Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 1991-05-16 Regularr 1 u REGUIAR MEE'TING PLANNING AND ZONING CCMMISSION MAY 16, 1991 7:00 P.M. A REGUIAR MEE'TING OF THE FRTENDSVIU:>D PLANNING AND ZONING CCMMISSION WAS HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 16, 1991, AT 7: 00 P .M. IN TI-lE CITY HALL COU NCIL CHAMBERS • THE FOLLC:WING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: BAKER -CHAIRMAN KONCABA RODGERS WASSON THCMPSON -CITY ENGINEER HENRY -DEVELOPMENT CCX)RDINA'IORBRINKMAN -SECRE'TARY WITH A QUORUM PRESENT, McHUGH, FINGER, AND COLBURN ABSENT, CHAIRMAN BAKER CALLED THE MEEl'ING TO ORDER 'IO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: MR. ALLEN ADDRESSED THE COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF PROPERTY OWNERS AIDNG CEDARWOOD, MANY OF WHICH WERE IN THE AUDIENCE. ACCORDING TO THE DEED RESTRICTIONS, THE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE 'IO PROVIDE A 4 FOOT SIDEWALK Th'O FEE'T INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE. THE HCMEX:JtJNER I S WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE AND ALSO Hc::MEOONER LIABILITY. HE STATED THAT ALL SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE CITY WERE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. CHAIRMAN BAKER INFORMED THE HOMECWNERS PRESENT THAT A SIDEWALK WAS TYPICALLY LOCATED ON CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. BAKER ALSO STATED THE COMMISSION'S PURPOSE IN R0;:)UIRING SIDEWALKS WAS TO PROVIDE A SAFE WALKWAY FOR THE CHILDREN WHO LIVED IN THE APARTMENTS. ALLEN STATED THAT MR. PERRY HAD AGREED TO REM)VE THE RESTRICTION PROVIDING THERE WAS AN AGREElvtENT OF 2/3RD'S OF THE HOMEXJNNERS. AFTER Sa.IB DISCUSSION, THE CXM-1ISSIONERS AGREED THAT A SIDEWALK WAS Nar NECESSARY. CHAIRMAN BAKER SAID THAT THE CITY DOES Nar I<Nom:NGLY ALI.J:JiJ PEOPLE TO BREAK DEED RESTRICTIONS; THEREFORE, THE FIRST THING 'IO BE DONE WAS FOR THE HOMEX::WNER'S 'IO MEE'T WITH MR. PERRY AND HAVE THE ITEM REMOVED FROM THE DEED RESTRICTION. 1.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE FINAL PIAT OF BOCARATON SECTION I -MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING. THIS ITEM WAS NaI' READY AND WAS PASSED OVER BY THE CCMMISSION. 2.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE FINAL PIAT OF BOCARATON SECTION II -MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING. THIS ITEM WAS NOT READY AND WAS PASSED OVER BY THE CCMMISSION. 3.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE REXX)MMENI)ATION REGARDING THE SITE PLANFOR MIKE'S DEl'AIL SHOP TO BE �TED ON FM 518 (CURRENTLY LOCATEDAT FM 2351 AND MEWDY LANE) • MIKE ADDRESSED THE COMMISSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN FORHIS DE'TAIL SHOP. HE STATED THAT HE WAS NaI' SURE OF THE LOCATIONOF THE BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY AND ASKED FOR GUIDELINES. HESTATED THAT THE DRIVE.WAY ¾OULD BE CONCRETE AND THE SITE ¾OULDACCOM-X)DATE 8 TO 10 PARKING SPACES WHICH IS :r-DRE THAN REQUIRED.ASKED ABOUT DRAINAGE, ENGINEER THOMPSON ADVISED MIKE THAT THE f l I lJ P&Z May 16, 1991 Page 2 STATE ¾QUID ALI.av SHEET FI/JiJ OF 150' 'l'CMARD THE HIGHWAY AND THAT HE SHOULD CONTACT THE HIGHWAY DEPARIMENT. MIKE ALSO STATED THAT IT WOULD BE TO HIS ADVANTAGE TO MAKE THE LOCATION AS A'ITRACI'IVE AS POSSIBLE AND THAT THERE ¾QUID BE I.ANDSCAPING WITHIN THE GUIDELINES SET BY THE CITY. MIKE SAID THAT THE STATE REQUIRED A GREASE TRAP SHOUID HE DO MORE THAN TEN CARS PER DAY. HE STATED THA'f HE DID NCYl' ANTICIPATE THAT MANY, BUT IF REQUIRED TO INSTALL ONE, HE w:>ULD. MIKE STATED THAT HE NO l.ONGER CLEANED ENGINES OF AUJXM)BILES NOR DID HE CHANGE OIL FOR HIS CUSTCMERS. HE ANTICIPATED HAVING A SEPARATE ADDRESS FRCM YOGI, WHO OWNS THE SUBJECI' PROPERTY, AND v.DULD THEREFORE BE ABLE TO HAVE A SIGN. THE CXM-1ISSION REVIEWED THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN OF THE DETAIL SHOP AND APPROVED THE CONCEPT, HavEVER, THE COMMISSION ASKED THAT PARKING, DRAINAGE, AND LANDSCAPING BE SHOivN ON THE SITE PLAN AS WEIJ,. 4.PRE-APP FOR v.DODCREEK ESTATES -6. 94 ACRES OF LAND -11 Im'SLOCATED OFF OF GREENBRIAR -GARTRELL. MR. GARTRELL F..XPLAINED THAT THIS PROPERTY HAD BEEN REPLATI'ED A NUMBER OF TIMES. HE REVIEWED THE WATER AND SEWER l.OCATIONS AND THE DRAINAGE PROPOSED FOR THIS PROPERI'Y. 'l'HE COMMISSION REVIEWED THE PRE-APP AND AGREED WITH THE CONCEPT. 5.PRE-APP FOR LEISURE ESTATES - 5 ACRES OF LAND - 6 Im'S l.OCATED ATLEISURE LANE AND WINDING WAY -GARTRELL. GARI'RELL PRESENTED THE PRE-APP FOR LEISURE ESTATES, EXPLAINING THAT THE DEVELOPER WAS TRYING TO GET 6 Im'S ON THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO MAKE IT A PROFITABLE VENTURE. HE INFORMED THE COMMISSION THAT ONE OF THE Im'S HAD A FRONTAGE OF 119.48 FEET AND THE DEVELOPER WAS REQUESTING A WAIVER OF THE 120 FOOT REQUIREMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENI'LY ZONED FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THE RI'C REFUSED TO ASK t""'OR A ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE IN THE BELIEF THAT THE MARKEI' VALUE WOUI.D BE STRONGER AS IT IS PRESENTLY ZONED. CHAIRMAN BAKER COMMENTED THAT HE ¾OULD NOT BE IN FAVOR OF WAIVING THE 120 1 FOOT MINIMUM Im' REQUIREMENT. ENGINEER THOMPSON STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUS'IMENT WOULD BE ABLE TO ACCEPT LESS THAN A 120 FOOT REQUIREMENT EITHER. ·MR. GARI'RELL ASKED IF THE Im' LINES COULD BE ANGLED IN ORDER TO ACCCMPLISH A 120 FOOT ROAD FRONTAGE, TO WHICH THE COMMISSION VOICED THEIR DISAPPROVAL. MR. GARTRELL WAS INFORMED BY THE COMMISSION THAT THE l.OTS MUST BE 120 FOO!' WIDE AND ADVISED HIM THAT IF NOCESSARY, THE PLAT SHOULD BE CHANGED TO REFLECl' FIVE LOTS INSTEAD OF SIX. 6.INFORMAL DISCUSSION REGARDING TRACI' LOCATED ON FRIENDSvitX)D LINKRD. WITH EXISTING BUILDING (Red Ball Building) -MR. SUAREZ DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR HENRY EXPLAINED MR. SUAREZ' BUSINESS AS BEING AN INSTRUMEN'I' TESTING CCMPANY. THERE WILL NOT BE ANY MANUFAC'rURING ON THE PROPER'rY NOR WII.J, THERE BE MOCH TRAFFIC. SHE EXPLAINED THA'f PREDOMINATELY ca,\PUTER EQUIPMENT WILL BE HOUSED IN r 1 l P&Z May 16, 1991 Page 3 THE BUiillING TCGETFlliR WITH OFFICE FURNITURE. SHE STATED THAT THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED NC (NEIGHBORHOOD Ca1MERCIAL DISTRICT) • THERE NO CATEGORY OR CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS TYPE OF BUSINESS IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE; THEREFORE, A CONSIDERATION NEEDED TO BE MADE. HENRY POINTED OUT THERE WAS A MISCELU\NOOUS BUSINESS SERVICES PERMITTED IN THE NC ZONE. THE CO�SSION REVIEWED THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND AGREED THAT THE BUSINESS �UUID FIT INTO 739 MISCELIANEOUS BUSINESS SERVICES CATEC'-ORY WHICH WOUill BE PERMITTED IN A NC ZONE. 7.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE PRELIMINARYIMPROVEMENT PLANS OF KATIE'S PARK ADDITION #1 LOCATED AT WINDINGWAY AND OAK -4 rms -GARI'RELL MR. GARI'RELL EXPLAINED THE PROPOSED DR AINAGE PLAN. ENGINEER THOMPSON RFX:XM-1ENDED THAT MR. GARI'RELL SHCW THE INCREASE IN RUN OFF RATE AND WHAT IMPACT THAT MIGH'r HAVE ON THE CREEK RATHER THAN PLAN FOR A DETENSION POND. THOMPSON INDICATED THAT IN Sa-IB INSTANCES, WHEN A PROPERTY IS RIGHT ON THE CREEK, THERE ARE NO SYSTEMS TO BE IMPACTED. ENGINEER THC»1PSON ALSO INDICATED TI-IA'r A PRELIMINARY APPROVAL IS NOT REALLY REQUIRED ON THIS PROPERTY AND THAT MR. GARI'RELL COUID GO DIRECTLY TO FINAL. 8.a:MPREHENSIVE PLAN (M.W.) Ca.1MISSIONER WASSON ASKED IF ANYONE KNEW THE STATUS OF THE PARKS BOARD'S PORTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CCM1ISSIONER KONCABA STATED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD IT HAD BEEN FINALIZED AND WAS TO BE PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING CCM1ISSION. WASSON SAID THAT SHE w::>UID LIKE TO HAVE THE PARKS BOARD ca.1MENTS AND SAID THAT SHE viDUill LIKE TO WAIT. KONCABA SAID THAT HE WOUill VERIFY THEIR COMPLETION OF THEIR PORI'ION OF THE Ca.1PREHENSIVE PLAN. CITY ENGINEER THOMPSON ADDRESSED THE COMMISSION REGARDING THE IMPACT FEE STUDY AND THE CALCUIATION OF FEES FOR PROPERI'IES NOT ZONED RESIDENTIAL. HE EXPLAINED THAT IT WAS NOT EQUITABLE FOR A DEVEI.DPER IN Sa-IB INSTANCES AND CITED Sa-IB EXAMPLES. THOMPSON PRESENTED HIS PROPOSAL IN WHICH HE HAD USED FORMUI.AS BASED ON ACTUAL GALLONS PER DAY RATHER THAN ACREAGE. AFTER DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED, THE COMMISSION AGREED TO RECONVENE THE CIP ADVISORY CCMMITTEE TO CONSIDER REVISING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT o��- ------__ ===:: S�RETARY