HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 1994-03-17 RegularREQIT.AR MEErING
PLANNING AND ZONING CCM-1ISSION MARCH 17, 1994
A REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIENDSID)D PLANNING AND ZONING CCM'1ISSION WAS
HELD ON THURSDAY, MARCH 17, 1994, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL
CHAMBERS. THE FOLI&ING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT:
HOOVER - CITY PLANNERBAKER -CHAIRMAN
FINGER HENRY -DEVELOP.Mn1J' COORDINA'IDR
DICKSON
WASSON McHUGH
CRESS
BRINKMAN -SOCRETARY
STOKF..S - INI'ERN
WITH A QUORUM PRESENT, JORDAN ABSENT, CHAIRMAN BAKER CALLED THE MEITTING
'ID ORDER TO CONSIDER THE FOLI&ING:
1.CONSIDERA.'-r!ON AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE FINAL PLAT OF
WESTSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL.
THIS ITEM IS STILL AT THE HARRIS COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT AND WAS
THEREFORE PASSED OVER.
2. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE FINAL PLAT OF
FCODMAKER (JACK IN THE BOX).
THE C0."\1MISSION REVIT!WED THE PLAT AND CCT-1MISSIONER FINGER MADE A
IDI'ION THAT THE FINAL PLAT BE APPROVED" WI'lH AN ADDED NCYI'E THAT THE
CITY REQUIRES ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTY.
SOCOND: DICKSONvoru FOR: UNANIMOUS
OPPOSED: NONE MCYI'ION CARRIED
3. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE REX:X::MMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR JACK IN THE BOX.
CCMMISSIONER FINGER MA.DE A IDI'ION TO REXXM1END TO CITY COUNCIL
THAT THE SITE PLAN OF JACK IN THE BOX BE APPROVED.
SOCOND: WASSON
VCYI'E FOR: UNANIMOUS
OPPOSED: NONE MCYI'ION CARRIED
4.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE R.EXXM-1ENDATION REGARDING THE FOLI.avING
REJ;JUESTS:
A.ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST OF SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL (SFR) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FOR
PROPERTY �ATED AT 109 WEST SPREADING OAKS, I.01' 1 OlJI' OF THE
SOTJI'HWEST 300 FEET OF BLOCK 12.
CTM-1ISSIONER WASSON STATED THAT THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY HAD
PLAl\lNED 'ID REMOVE THE FIRST STORY PORI'ION OF THE PERRY HCME
--.....
f
P&Z 3/17/94 Page 2
AND WILL Rl!."'CONSTROCT IT AT A LATER 'l'IME. THIS PORrION IS
PRIMARILY PORCH AREA. THE 'fl\U STORIED PORTION, WHICH IS THE
ORIGINAL HCME, WILL BE RENOVATED. CCM-1ISSIONER CRESS POSED
THE QUFSTION ABOUI' SP�IFIC USES AND IF THEY WOUID REQUIRE A
PUBLIC HEARING UNDER THE PUD SPOCIFICATION. PLANNER HOOVER
AFFIRMED THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WOUID BE REX)UIRED.
CCMMISSIONER McHUGH MADE A MCY.l'ION THAT THE ZONE
CLASSIFICATION CHANGE REX)UF..ST BE REXXMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL
FOR THEIR APPROVAL.
SOCOND: CRESS
VOI'E FOR: UNANINMOUS
OPPOSED: NONE MOTION CARRIED
B.ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE REX)UFST OF MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DY.7ELJ,ING DISTRICT - IJ:JiJ DENSITY (MFF-L) 'ID GARDEN
HCME RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (MFR-GHD) 1'""()R PROPERTY I.CX::.ATED M
F.M. 2351, TRACT B -7.721 ACRE TRACT OUI' OF A 9.697 ACRE
TRACT.
cn1MISSIONER CRF.SS STATED THAT HE DID NOT LIKE 45' lCII'S NOR DID HE
LIKE LONG CUI.r-DE-SACS. CCM1ISSIONER McHUGH REMINDED THE
CXM1ISSION THAT THIS WAS A ZONING ISSUE AND NOT A PLATTING ISSUE.
CHAIRMAN BAKER CTM-1ENTED THAT THE CURREm' DENSITY ALLavED ON THE
PROPERTY WAS 6 UNITS PER ACRE AND IF CHANGED TO GARDEN HCMES mrrD
REMAIN 6 UNITS PER ACRE. HE ALSO REVIEWED THE PUBLIC HEARING
SAYING THAT THE CITIZENS PREFERRED THE LAND TO REMAIN PASTURE
LAND; HOWEVER, DESIRED THE CWNERSHIP OF GARDEN HCMES TO RENTAL
PROPERTY (APARTMENTS) • HE FURTHER STATED THAT MISSION ESTATES AND
CARMEL VILLAGE, WHILE RATHER SMALL IN cx::MPARTSON TO THE arHER rms
IN FRIENDS¾WD, WERE ANYTHING BUI' A SLUM DISTRICT. THE CITIZENS
WHO RESIDE IN THAT CCMMUNITY LIKED IT. THERE WAS ALSO A CCM>1ENT
THAT Sa.1E POOPLE PREFERRED THE SECURITY OF A SMALL ENCLOSED
SUBDIVISION AS OPPOSED 'IO THE OPEN ENDED SUBDIVISION WHICH AT.JlX,lED
THRU TRAFFIC.
CCM,1ISSIONER WASSON MADE A MOTION TO RECCM-1END THA'l' CITY COUNCIL,
APPROVE THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE REX)UFST.
SECOND: McHUGH
VOI'E FOR: WASSON, McHUGH, FINGER, DICKSON AND BAKER
OPPOSED: CRESS r.rn'ION CARRIED.
5.PRE-APP • 962 ACRF...S TO BE SUBDIVIDED INTO ThU LCII'S -312
M:>RNINGSIDE.
CHAIRMAN BAKER STATED THAT THIS PROPERTY JS ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
AND IF SUBDIVIDED WOUID STILL MEET THE REX)UIRED 100' X 100' IN
ORDER THAT IT REr-1AIN ZONED FOR LIGHT INDUSTRY. THE CCM1ISSTON
AGREED WITH THE CO!\'CEPT.
6. CONSIDERATION AND PO...SSIBLE REC<MvlENDATION REGARDING THE PROPO..SED
AMENDMEm' TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE 84-15 PROVIDING EXCEPTION FOR
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS WHICH MAY BE CONSTRUCTED OR ERECTED WITHIN A
REAR YARD IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS BY SUBSTITlJI'ING SUB-PARAGRAPH A
f l
l
P&Z 3/17/94
Page 3
OF PARAGRAPH 3 OF SUBSECT'ION O OF SECTION 7 WITH A NEW SUB
PARAGRAPH A.
C(lv1MISSIONER McHUGH MADE A MOTION 'l'O RECXM-1END THE AMENDMENT 'ID
CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR APPROVAL.
SOCOND: WASSON
DISCUSSION FOLI1JNED:
PLANNER HOOVER lTh"VIEWED THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE STATING THAT HE HAD SPOKEN WITH SEVERAL BUIIDF.RS IN THIS
REGARD. THEIR ONLY PROBLEM WAS THE 10 FOOI' HEIGHT RESTRICTION AND
HOOVER PROPOSED A CHANGE THAT THE TEN FOOI' RESTRICTION BE LIMITED TO EAVE HEIGHT ONLY AND THE REQUIRF1'-1ENT FOR A SET BACK OF ONE
ADDITIONAL FOOT FOR EACH FOOT IN HEIGHT IN EXCESS OF TEN FEET FOR
BUIIDINGS WHICH EXCEEDED THE TEN FEET AT THE EAVES. THE
CCM-1ISSION AGREED WITH THE CONCEPI'.
cn1MISSIONER McHUGH AMENDED HER MOTION TO REFLECT THE 10'
RESTRICTION BE AT EAVE HEIGHT, WITH THE ADDITIONAL l' SETBACK.
SOCOND: DICKSON
VOTE FOR: UNANIMOUS
OPPOSED: NONE MOTION CARRIED
7.DISCUSSION REGARDING THE cn,1PREHENSIVE PLAN.
HOOVER CCM,1ENTED TBAT THE ca-1PREHENSIVE PLAN HAD BEEN QUESTIONED
RY MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. THOSE QUESTIONS HAD BEEN ANSWl<.,"'RED
AND 'l'HE CCMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOULD APPEAR ON THE COUNCIL'S MARCH
21ST AGENDA.
8.Ca.1MUNICA'rIONS FRa,11':
A.S'l'AFF
B.ca.1MISSIONERS
THERE HAS BE.'EN A. Lffi' OF ADVERSE PUBLICI'I'Y REGARDING THE PDD
l!Jv1E:NDMl1'-JT. CCf111iISSIONER DICKSON STATED '!'HAT THERE HAD BEEN
l\'L1''EROUS CCMMENTS REGARDING A IfJil INCCME HOUSING DISTRICT, WHICH SEEMED TO ORIGINATE FROM A LACK OF UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE.
9.MINUI'FS FOR APPROVAL -MARCH 3, 1994 APPROVED AS AMENDED.
&�-I -SECRET/