The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutP&Z Minutes 1994-10-06 RegularI ! I J REGULAR MEETING PLANNING AND ZONING ca.t,1ISSION OC'IOBER 6, 1994 A RE�.R MEE'TING OF THE FRIENDSWCX)D PLANNING AND ZONING CCM-1ISSION WAS HEID ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1994, AT 7: 00 P .M. IN THE CITY HAIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLCMING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: CRESS WA..SSON DICKSON FINGER WHITTENBURG KNEUPPER -CITY ENGINEER BRINKMAN -SECRETARY DICKEY -LIAISON WITH A QUORUM PRESENT McHUGH AND BAI<ER ABSENT CCM-1ISSIONER CRESS, ACTING CHAIRMAN, OPENED THE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE PUBLIC CQ\1MENI', EITHER ORAL OR WRITTEN, REGARDING THE FOLLONING REQUEST: A ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MELODY AND F.M. 2351, Im 21, HOIDALE AND COFFMAN SUBDIVISION FRCM SFR (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ™ELLING DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT). AL LENTZ OF LENTZ ENGINEERING ADDRESSED THE ca-1MISSION AND CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED USE FOR THE BACK PARI' OF THE PROPERTY IS AN INTERIOR DECORATING CCMPANY WITH A RESIDENCE LOCATED ON THE SECOND FLOOR. THE HC11E WILL RESEMBLE A SWISS CHALET. COUNCIIMEMBER STUARI' STATED THAT IN THE 1960 'S WESTBURY SQUARE WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH THE SAME CONCEPT AND WITH GREAT SUCCESS. COUNCII.MEMBER I.CME ASKED IF THE DIVIDED PROPERTY t-K)ULI) HAVE SEPARATE CWNERSHIP, TO WHICH THE REPLY WAS AFFIRMATIVE. QUESTIONS AROSE REGARDING THE PRCCEDURE IN WHICH Ha-1EX:WNERS WERE NCYI'IFIED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PROCEDURE WAS REVIl!."'WED. MR. BILL LANGDOC OF 106 ROYAL COURT, STATED THAT HE HAD NOT BEEN NCYI'IFIED ALTHOUGH HIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN 200' OF THE SlJBJEx::'r PROPERTY. CITY SECRETARY McKENZIE STATED THAT THE INFORMATION CCMES FRa-1 THE TAXING AUTHOR1TY AND THAT 14 LETTERS HAD BEEN SENT OUT BY HER OFFICE. ANOI'HER CITIZEN QUESTIONED THE SIG N WHICH HAD BEEN LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY. THE SIGN HAD BEEN ON THE PROPERTY FOR A '.IOTAL OF 'lWO WEEKS WHICH EXCEEDS THE 10 DAY LIMITATION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. SEVERAL CITIZENS SPOKE IN FAVOR OF THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST, ACKNC.WLEDGING THA'r A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING mum BE REQUIRED WITH THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. WITH NO FURI'HER CCM-1ENT, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. 1.COMMUNICATIONS FRCM THE PUBLIC THERE WAS NOT CCM1ENT FRa-1 THE PUBLIC AND THE FOLiffiING ITEMS WERE CONSIDERED. 2.PRE-APP FOR MAQIK)LIA ESTATES LOCATED ON GREENBRIAR, ACROSS FRa-1 BUCKINGHAM. l l J P&Z 10/6/94 Page 2 JACK BEARD OF AMTEX PROPERI'IES rs THE PROJECT MANAGER REPRESENTING LARRY WILKINSON, CWNER. MR. BF.ARD EXPLAINED THAT A PRELIMINARY PLAT HAD BEEN APPROVED IN 1986; HONEVER, THE NEW CONCEPT HAD A SHORTER ROAD AND LARGER rms.rm 10 HAS AN EXISTING HCME AND THE rm HAS BEEN POSITIONED SO THAT THE HCME WILL MEET PROPERTY SET BACK REQUIREMEHI'S. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE TEARING r:xJNN AN EXISTING BARN AND REPLACING WITH A 'lWO CAR GARAGE FOR THE HCME avNER AS PARI' OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. DISCUSSION FOLLCWED REGARDING THE STREET NAME AND THE THOROUGHFARE REQUIREMENTS OF GREENBRIAR. BEARD STATED THAT THE NAME MAGNOLIA ESTATES WAS SELECTED BECAUSE THERE ARE SEVERAL BIG MAGNOLIAS ON THE PROPERTY. THERE WILL ALSO BE A LARGE MAGNOLIA TREE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CUL-DE-SAC. A TREE SURVEY WAS PREPARED AND EVERY TREE PO..SSIBLE WIIJ.. BE SAVED. UTILITY EASEMENTS WERE DISCUSSED AS WERE PRIVATE GATES. THE CITY WILL NOT AI.MM A PUBLIC STREET 'ID BE GATED AND PRIVATE STREETS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL rmELLING DISTRICT. 3.PRE-APP FOR CHARLESTON ESTATES L<X'.ATED ON F.M. 518. AL LENTZ OF LENTZ ENGINEERING STATED THAT THE PRELIMINARY PLAT HAD BEEN APPROVED APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH PRIOR; HCX�R DUE TO A RIGHT OF WAY PROBLEM, THE PLAT HAD TO BE REVISED. THE CCM,USSION REVIEWED THE PLAT AND AGREED WITH THE CONCE.PI'. 4.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE FINAL PLAT OFEAGLE LAKES SECTION 5. MITCH MI'ICHELL ADDRESSED THE ro-1MISSION REGARDING A PROBLEM THAT HAD BEEN ENCOUNTERED REGARDING HIS TITLE REPORT WHICH HAD SLCWED r:xJNN THE PRCCESS. PRESENTLY HE DID NOT CMN THE PROPERTY AND WAS TO CI.OSE ON THE PROPERTY WITHIN 30 DAYS. THE TITLE REPORT INDICATED THE PRESENT a-.1NERS AND LIEN HOWERS WHICH DID NOT MA'ICH THE FINAL PLAT. MITCHELL WAS ASKING THAT THE FINAL PLAT BE APPROVED CONTINGENT UPON HIS PRESENTING CITY STAFF WITH A TITLE REPORT MA'ICHING THE PLAT, AND THIS BEFORE THE PLAT WAS FILED. HE STATED THAT NEW POLICIES REQUIRED AIJ_, IMPROVEMENI'S TO BE IN AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE CITY'S RECORDING OF THE PLAT. CCM-1.ISSIONER CRESS STATED THAT THE cetfflSSION DID NOT ISSUE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL. CRESS STATED ALSO THAT HE DID NOT APPROVE OF THE SUBDIVISION BECAUSE IT WAS A DE.AD END STREET SUBDIVISION. MITCHELL STATED THAT BY THE TIME HE CI.OSED ON THE PROPERTY THE PLAT APPROVAL PRCCESS WOULD BE VOIDED AND HE WOULD HAVE TO BEGIN THE PROCESS AGAIN. DETENTION ISSUES WERE DISCUSSED AND ENGINEER KNEUPPER STATED THAT AIJ.. CONCERNS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY AND LANDSCAPING ISSUES WERE ALSO DISCUSSED AS WAS THE ISSUE OF THE TITLE DISCREPANCY. CCMM.ISSIONER WASSON MADE A MOTION THAT THE FINAL PLAT BE APPROVED CONTINGENT UPON THE CITY STAFF RF.cEIVING AND APPROVING A TITLE POLICY PRIOR TO THE RECORDING OF SAID PLAT. SECOND: FINGER VOTE FOR: WASSON, FINGER, DICKSON, WHITI'ENBt.m.G OPPOSED: CRESS MOTION CARRIED I I J j P&Z 10/6/94 Page 3 5. PRE-APP SITE PLAN FOR FRIENDS¾OOD PHYSICIANS AND CHIROPRACTICCLINIC.DR. JESSE COATES ADDRESSED THE CCM-1.ISSION REGARDING THE PROPOSEDDEVELOPMENT. THE LOCATION OF THE DRIVEWAY WAS DISCUSSED AS THEPROPERTY WAS AIJ..cME:D '!WO DRIVES IN THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION. THEPLACEMENT OF THE DRIVE WAS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ORDER OFDEVELOPMENT. IT WAS RECOM1ENDED THAT THE DRIVE BE PLACED BE"IWEEN'DR. COATES PROPERTY AND THAT ADJACENT TO HIS IN ORDER THAT BOl'HCOUID SHARE THE DRIVE AND IN THE COST OF DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION.DEI'ENTION REQUIREMENTS AND PARKING WAS DISCUSSED AS WAS THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY HAD ENTERED INTO A VERBAL AGREEMENT WITH THE H�RS IN LAURELFIEf.D THAT THEY WOULD REQUIRE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SUBDIVISION FENCELINE. IN SlffiARY, THE DRIVE WOULD BE MOVED SO THAT IT CAN BE SHARED 20 ' AND 20' , THE FRONT PARKING AREA WOUID BE MOVED TO THE REAR AND REPLACED BY MORE LANDSCAPING. LANDSCAPING WOULD BE REQUIRED ON THE SIDE NEXT TO THE ADJACENT HCME, PERHAPS A HEDGE. 6.DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ON F .M. 518 (DR.FAIRLEIGH'S OFFICE).PAUL SPILLER, REPRESENTING DR. FAIRLEIGH, PRESENTED THE PROPOSEDPLAN. THERE WILL BE CONTROLLED ACCESS AND A PRIVACY WAIL AROUNDTHE PROPERI'Y. THE CCM'1ISSION REVIEWED THE CONCEPT AND STATED TI-J.ATIF THE SPOCIFIC USE PERMIT WERE GRANTED, THERE COULD BE NOVARIATION FRCM THE APPROVED PLAN. THE CCT1MISSION ADVISED MR.SPILLER TO CONTACT' CITY STAFF FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION SHOULD DR.FAIRLEIGH WISH TO PRcx:F'....ED. 7 • CCMMUNICATIONS FR.a1: A.STAFFTHERE WAS NO CCMv1ENT FRCM THE STAFFB.CCMMISSIONERSCCM-1.ISSIONER CRESS REQUESTED THAT THE MINIMUM Im SIZE FORCCMMERCIAL DISTRICTS BE PLACED ON THE NEXT AGENDA FOR CONSIDERATION. THE CCT1MISSION ALSO REQUESTED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING NCYI'IFICATION POLICY BE REVIEWED.8.MINUTES FOR APPROVAL -9/1/94; 9/15/94 -APPROVED AS READ9/8/94 -APPROVED AS CORRECTED. ��