HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 1994-12-19 Specialr----------·•--·--------·--· - -------
'
I
(
SPF.CIAL MEETING
PIANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 19, 1994
A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE FRIENDSWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WAS
HEf...J) ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1994, AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE CITY HAIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLCWING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT:
BAKER -CHAIRMAN
CRESS
KNEUPPER -CITY ENGINEER
HOOVER -CITY PLANNER
DICKSON HENRY -DEVEI.OPMENT COORDINATOR
FINGER
WHITI'ENBURG
McHUGH
BRINKMAN -SECRETARY
DICKEY -LIAISON
OLSON -CITY A'ITORNEY
WASSON
WITH A QUORUM PRESENT AND NONE ABSENT, THE FOT.J.,CWING ITEMS WERE
CONSIDERED:
1.DISCUSSION WITH CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY A'I'l'ORNEY TO REVIEW
PRCCEDURES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CCMMISSION.
2.
JOHN OLSON STATED THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WAS THAT
ENTITY WHICH WAS CHARGED WITH THE ENFORCEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. MAYOR
NEWMAN STATED THERE HAD BEEN NUMEROUS CONCERNS FRCM CITIZENS
REGARDING THE MANNER IN WHICH PEOPLE WERE ADDRESSED BY
C(M,USSIONERS AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS. THERE WAS DISCUSSION
REX"'�ING THE DESIRE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SEE PRELIMINARY PLAT
PRIOR TO THEIR FINAL APPROVAL. THIS WIU., BE DONE AS PER COUNCIL'S
DIRECTION. OTHER ISSUES ADDRESSED WERE THOSE REGARDING FENCING,
ENTRY /WAY OVERLAY, AND THE CCMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CITY PLANNER
HOOVER C':iAVE AN APPROXIMATE TIME SCHEDULE AND EXPIAINED WHAT viOULD
BE REQUIRED OF BOTH ENTITIES. IT WAS THE GENERAL CONSENSUS THAT
THERE SHOULD BE MORE CCMMUNICATION AND/OR WORI<SHOPS WITH CITY
COUNCIL TO "IRON OUT" DETAILS. MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
CCMMISSION AI.SO STATED THAT THEY HAD A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF
THEIR OBLIGATIONS AND WERE v�RI<ING TO RESOLVE SCME MAJOR ISSUES
WHICH WILL IMPACT THE CITY, SUCH AS ENTRYWAY /OVERLAYS. CHAIRMAN
BAI<ER STATED THAT THE CCM-1ISSION HAD GOALS FOR THE CITY THAT
STRE'ICHED 20 TO 30 YEARS IN THE FUTURE. BOI'H CITY COUNCIL AND THE
PLANNING AND ZONING CCMMISSION AG REED THAT QUARI'ERLY .MEETINGS
WOULD BE ADVISABLE. WITH NO FURTHER CCM-1ENT, THE MEETING WAS
AL\JOURNED TO THE CONFERENCE Rcx:11 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLCWtNG ITEM:
CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE FINAL PLAT OF
BUCKINGHAM ESTATES.
CITY ENGINEER KNEUPPER STATED THAT ALL CRITERIA HAD BEEN MET WITH
THIS PROJECT. HAVING SATISFIED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY,
COMMISSIONER FINGER MADE A MOTION THAT THE FINAL PLAT OF
BUCKINGHAM ESTATES BE APPROVED.
SECOND: McHUGH
VOTE FOR: UNANIMOUS
\
l
i j
P&Z
DECEMBER 19, 1994 Page 2
OPPOSED: NONE Mal'ION CARRIED
THE MEE1rING � /7�0· #/ld � L. B - RETARY
···: ·:.:.-_·· -�··:·-:.� -_:,: ------------··----· • · · ·· o·
'"''::'---·-:--:-"f·. '":,;:"j::_·'.•;·"F,_:_�""h..X :-:-" _;_ ··-·-•,.· ·--� • ,,-•. <•
• · •• ··::, '):c. .•:-,:--:-::::--_---; .7-,
.,_
TABLE 1: INPUT S TO CITY FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
T_PRE-APPLICATION DATA
1.PRESENT CONDITlONS
A.GeneraloCharacteristics of landand Conditions of site
'.,o Topographic data
<."•, j·•
B.Lo ca.ti on of Tract ( sketcaj_
C.Utilities (existing)
D.Other Data
o Covenants on landoCommunity facilitiesoBusinesses
2.PROPOSED TRACT
A.Lots
o Lot dimensionsonumbersoprice ranges
II CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
1.PRESENT CONDITIONS
A.GeneraloGround elevationsoCoursesoMarshesoWooded areasoLarge treesoExisting improvements(if required)o Subsurface conditionsoProfiles/c ross sections
B.Location of Tract (man)
C.Utilities (existing)
o LocationsoEasementsoSpatial relationshipsosizesoTypes of sewersoWater mainsoGas linesoHydrantsoTelephone/electric
2.PROPOSED TRACT
A.Lots
o Dimensions.o Block numbersoSetback lines
B.Streets
o NamesoRight-of-waysoSurfacing
o ElevationsoWalksoCurbsoCulvertsoRadiioGutters
poles
-
I a Ditches I Public Areas C .Public Areas
o General descriptive data jo Parks
o PlaygroundsoSchool areasoChurch sitesoCommunity centers
D.Business Areas (if anplicable)fD. Other Areas
o Uses nther than publicor si11gle-family .
(includes business)
III FINAL APPROVAL
1.PRESENT CONDITIONS
A/ GeneraloMonumentsoTract BoundariesoCertification by licensedsurveyor or engineerb Profiles/c ross sections
··\
2.PROPOSED TRACT
C.Public Areas
Statement(s) of dedication from owners
.-.�.
':�
E.Utilities (Pl anned)
,
F.Covenants (Proposed)
DATA TRANSMITTAL BY:
1 and 2 -Sketch & written data plus verbal description in presentation
;.,...·_ .:. -·· -=-·..:.-: .. : .. .
-2--
E.Utilities (planned)
o Loc ationsoEa$.einentsa-Spatial Relationships
o SizesoTypes of sewersoWater mainsoGas linesoHydrantsoTelephone/electric poles
F.Protective Covenants
o Draft fo r lot deeds
G.Boundary Lines
3.OTHER DATA
A.Ad jacent Land Data
o UsesoZoningoSubdivision(s) Description
B.Zoning in Tract
C.Title and Certificate
D.Photos of Tract
DATA TRANSMITTAL BY:
1A & lC; 2A thru E; 2G 3B
Plat on scale j111 =: 100' or greater
lB -Area Map
2F; 3C -Documents
D - 8 x 10 glossies
wii......:.......-��=--·, -· ..
F.Covenants
o Documentation for recordingby City
3.OTHER DATA
A.Names of Adjacent UnplattedLand Owners
B.Certific�tion by City:
o Improvements installedor � Bond made for improvements ·'; not yet accomplished
DATA TRANSMITTAL BY:
Plat 1 11 = 100 1
on tracing cloth in ink with 1A added
All other data on documents