HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 1995-02-06 Regularr
I I
j
REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 2, 1995
A REGULAR MEEI'ING OF THE FRIENDSWCX)D PLANNING AND ZONING CCM-1ISSION WAS
HEID ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1995, AT 7: 00 P .M. IN THE CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLI.ONING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT:
BAKER HENRY -DEVEI.OPMENT COORDINA'IDR
BRINKMAN -SECRETARY CRESS
DICKSON
FINGER
WHITTENBURG
McHUGH
WASSON
HOOVER -CITY PLANNER
WITH A QUORUM PRESENT, AND NONE ABSENT, CHAIRMAN BAKER CALLED THE
MF...ETING 'ID ORDER ASKING FOR CCMMUNICATIONS FRCM THE PUBLIC. HAVING
NONE, THE CCM'1ISSION GAVE CONSIDERATION 'ID THE FOLI.ONING:
1.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE RECCMMENDATION REGARDING THE ZONE
CLASSIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST OF SFR (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENI'IAL
DWEI.J.,ING DISTRICT) 'ID PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) FOR 402 E.
EDGEWCOD, 0.3857 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF rm 21 OF THE HOIDALE
AND COFFMAN SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE PERRY AND
AUSTIN LEAGUE, ABSTRACT 2, GALVES'IDN COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING 'ID
THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 215, PAGE 394 OF THE
COUNTY CLERK'S RECORDS OF GALVES'IDN COUNTY, TEXAS.
CCM-1ISSIONER FINGER MADE A MOTION THAT THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST BE
APPROVED.
SECOND: DICKSON
VOTE FOR: UNANIMOUS
OPPOSED NONE: MOTION CARRIED.
2.PRE-APP SITE PLAN FOR ZAPPE MED -DR. BRCWN.
3.
CCMMISSIONER WASSON REQUESTED A NOI'E STATING THAT FUTURE ACCESS
MIGHT BE REQUIRED 'ID THE F.AST. COMMISSIONER CRESS STATED THAT HE
LIKED THE LANDSCAPING AND FEL'r IT WAS ADEQUATE. CITY PLANNER
HOOVER CClv1MENTED THAT DR. BRCWN WOUID DEVELOP THE FIRST PHASE AND
THAT THE SECOND PHASE WOUID BE CONSTRUCTED A'r A LATER DATE.
HOOVER THEN ASKED FOR A POLL OF THE COMMISSION. THE CCM-1ISSION
GAVE UNANIMOUS APPROVAL 'ID 'l'HE PRE-APP SITE PLAN.
PRE-APP SITE PLAN FOR BLOCKBUSTER VIDED.
JJ.\MES THOMPSON OF LENTZ ENGINEERING PRESENTED THE PRE-APP SITE
PLAN. 'l'HE COMMISSION QUESTIONED THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AS
WELL AS THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY WERE PLACED ON THE SITE PLAN.
CHAIRMAN BAKER STATED THAT HE WAS OPPOSED 'ID THE PARKING SPACES
BACKING INTO AN ACCESS EASEMENT. BAKER FURTHER STATED THERE WAS
Nor ENOUGH LANDSCAPING. THE BUILDING SIZE WAS ALSO DISCUSSED.
l
!I
t
P&Z 2/2/95 Page 2
4.
CHARLES ANDERS, REPRESENTING THE CWNER, STATED THAT BLCCKBUSTER
NORMAIJ.,Y CONSTRUCTS A 7,000 'ID 8,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING. THE
PROPOSED BUILDING HAS BEEN SCALED I:)CMN 'ID 6,500 'ID CCM-IBNSURATE
WITH THE SITE. THE OVERALL CONSENSUS, HOOEVER, IS THAT THE
PRESENTED SITE PLAN IS NOT ACCEPI'ABLE. THE Ca-1MISSION ADVISED
THCMPSON 'ID REVIEW THE PLAN AND TRY 'ID CCT-1E UP WITH -A MORE
ACCEPI'ABLE PLAN.
CCMMUNICATIONS FRCT-1:
A.STAFF
1.KWIK LUBE
CITY PLANNER HOOVER STATED THAT THE GvNER OF THE I<WIK
LUBE WAS REQUESTING A REVISION 'ID HIS SITE PLAN WHICH
WOUID CAIL FOR A LARGER APPROACH. THIS OOUID ENABLE THE
TRAFFIC 'ID FI.J:JiJ EASIER. THE CCM,llSSION STATED THEY
OOUID NOT BE OPPOSED IF THE CWNER WOUID AGRF.E 'ID MORE
LANDSCAPING.
2.JAMAIL ESTATES
HOOVER STATED THAT THE CWNER OF THIS PROPERTY WOUID LIKE
'ID SUBDIVIDE, BUILDING A HOUSE ON ONE Im' WITH AN OPI'ION
'ID SELL TIIB OTHER HALF. CCM-1ISSIONER CRESS STATED THIS
i-.'DUID BE A DEAD END SUBDIVISION WHICH WOUID REQUIRE WELL
AND SEP'rIC SYSTEMS. DISCUSSION FOLLavED REGARDING THE
COUNTY REQUIREMENTS FOR A SEPI'IC SYSTEM. A MAJORITY OF
THE COMMISSION AGREED THAT IF THE SUBDIVISION .ME"!' ALL
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY, THEY OOUID NOT BE
OPPOSED. Ca-1MISSIONER CRESS STATED HIS OPPOSITION
BECAUSE HE FELT IT WOUID VIOLATE THE ORDINANCE.
3.LAWS
THIS PROPERTY IS PART OF A THREE Im' SUBDIVISION CALLED
REESE ESTATES. IN THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION, THERE WAS A
PLAT NOTE THAT STATED TIIBRE WOUID BE NO ACCESS FRCM
SUNSET. Ha-IBVER, TIIB LAWS , WHO a-R-1 THE CORNER PROPERTY,
SAID THEY WOUID LIKE 'ID CONSTRUCT A GARAGE 'ID THE REAR
OF THE PROPERTY. IF THEY DID SO, THEY WOUID LIKE 'ID
HAVE A DRIVE OFF OF SUNSE'T. THE COMMISSION STATEI;:> THAT
TIIBY COUID GO THROUGH THE REPLAT PROCEDURE WHICH WOULD
REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING, OR OBTAIN 100% APPROVAL FRCM
ALL Ha-1ECWNERS. AS THERE WERE ONLY THREE, THIS
PROCEDURE APPEARED 'ID BE THE MOST EQUITABLE. IF
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL WAS GIVEN, THE Ca1MISSION STATED THEY
HAD NO OBJECTION.
PLANNER HOOVER ADVISED THE COMMISSION THAT THE FUNERAL
Ha.IB BUILDING PLANS WERE BROUGHT IN. HE ALSO ADVISED
THE CCM-1.ISSION THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR DOCTOR
FARLEIGH'S PUD WAS REDPENED AT CITY COUNCIL.
B.Ca1MISSIONERS1.SUBDIVISION & STREET NAME POLICY· - FINGER
TIIBRE HAS BEEN SO MUCH CONFUSION REGARDING SUBDIVISION
AND STREET NAME POLICY. IT APPEARS TI·IAT ONE PERSON IN
r
[ I
I I
P&Z 2/2/95 Page 3
THE POLICE DEPAR'IMENT HAD GIVEN APPROVAL TO A NAME WHILE
THE POLICE CHIEF WAS IN DISAGREEMENT TO THAT NAME.
STAFF SHOULD GET A LETI'ER FROM THE POLICE DEPAR'IMENT AND
FIRE DEPAR'IMENT TO FORMULATE A POLICY.
2 • SIDEWAIJ< POLICY -FINGER
COUNCIL LIAISON DICKEY DID NOT HAVE A RES PONSE FROM CITY
COUNCIL REGARDING SIDEWAIJ< POLICY. SIIB WILL OBTAIN SCME
CLEAR DIRECTION TO BE REIAYED TO THE COMMISSION AT THE
NEXT MEETING.
5.ELECT' CHAIRMAN & VICE CHAIRMAN -THIS ITEM WILL BE PASSED OVER
UNTIL THERE IS Sa-IB CONFIRMATION RF-iGARDING THE REAPPOIN'IMENTS OF
C™
a2
I
�
{!;l_= ...