HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 2002-05-16 RegularI
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
May 16, 2002
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, May 16, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Niels Aalund
TomBurke.
Bob Bertrand
Zekie McVeigh
Tom Samson
Mike Dominguez-City Planner
Diana Steelquist -CD Coordinator
Loren Smith-City Attorney
With a quorum present, Clark and Frankovich absent, Chairman Burke called the meeting
to order to consider the following:
Call to order:
Public Hearing:
1.To receive public input, either oral or written, regarding the following:
A.Requesting the final plat of Rancho Viejo Replat of Lot 11, 7.8564 acres
being all of Lot 11, Rancho Viejo, Vol. 15, Page 92, Galveston County
Map Records, City of Friendswood, Galveston County, Texas
Janis Lowe, agent, addressed the Commission giving a brief history of the replat
request. It was first presented on 2-7-02 and was not approved because of a tie
vote. The agent and applicant believe all the subdivision requirements have been
met.
Mr. James Manley, 302 E. Viejo, addressed the Commission as the applicant. He
stated that his two closest neighbors were not in opposition to the replat. Also that
he had attended a Home Owners Association meeting held after February 7, 2002
during which a statement was made that the Home Owners should exert political
pressure on the Planning & Zoning Commission in order to have the replat
denied. He concluded his remarks by stating that the HOA was not relevant.to the
approval of the replat, that City Staff had recommended approval and should
approval be denied he would take the issue to another venue.
Chai1man Burke noted some inconsistencies with the building set backs on the
plat and the deed restrictions for the subdivision. Ms. Lowed later showed the
building lines were in keeping with the original filed plat.
- 1 -
05/16/02 P&Z
Mr. Less Butler, a resident of Rancho Viejo since 1980 stated he had not
opposition the r eplat and thought having nice homes fronting the street would be
more attractive than the cmTent tract and would not affect the appearance of the
subdivision.
Diane White, 106 E. Viejo, a 21 year resident was against the replat citing
increased traffic.
Eddie Stanaland, 402 Rancho Circle, lives across the street from lot 11. He likes
the privacy he currently enjoys and does not want additional homes facing his lot.
Was told before he purchased his home one year ago that further subdividing of
the lots were not allowed.
Bill Leverage, 204 E. Viejo, a 20 year resident was against the replat stating
concerns for increased h·affic and drainage problems from the increase in density.
Bob DeLuca, 203 W. Viejo, stated he had helped 01iginally develop the
subdivision. The developers had been told by engineers that Lot 11 could not be
further subdivided because of drainage problems. He stated in 1979 a hurricane
had completely flooded the area. Also that a replat would lower real estate values
because of increased drainage issues. He also stated that following the last
request to replat, the HOA documents had been amended to prevent a replat. An
approval of the replat would void the deed restrictions. He also presented a
petition from Rancho Viejo lot owners and some other near by lot owners in
opposition to the replat.
Ed Perkowski, 404 Rancho Circle, lives next to Lot 11. He was also told by his
real estate agent that no replat was allowed in the subdivision. He is concerned
that any new houses built on a subdivided Lot 11 will shed water onto his lot
causing erosion which will ruin property.
Molly Manely, 302 E. Viejo, spoke in favor of the replat. Prospective home
buyers have not wanted the larger lot. She stated the proposed drainage plans for
the new home sites had been reviewed by GCCDD without any problems noted.
She asse1ted prope1ty values would increase with the development of estate
homes on the lots. She questioned the amount of traffic two new home sites
would generate versus the many lots which have soccer and baseball fields
currently attracting large numbers of cars to the neighborhood.
Sally Stapleton, 512 Williamsburg Circle, stated she owned the last lot in the
subdivision. She believes the larger lots are desirable for people who want
animals. She was against the replat.
2.Close Public Hea1ing
With no fu1ther comment, the public hearing was closed.
-2 -
05/16/02 P&Z
I 1
l l
3.Communications from the public.
None.
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the final plat of Rancho Viejo Rep lat
of Lot 11.
Motion:
Second:
Vote for:
Bertrand
Lot 11.
Samson
Unanimous
to approve the final plat of Rancho Viejo Replat of
Motion Carried
At the request of the Commissioner Mc Veigh, the City Attorney restated his
opinion regarding the City's obligations with regards to the amended HOA deed
restrictions on the replat application. He stated the City's job is to determine if the
ordinances and regulations of the City have been met. There are other venues for
the enforcement of the HOA deed restrictions nor should Planning & Zoning or
Staff investigate the HOA documentation to determine if violations have
occurred. It is up to each Home Owriers Association to enforce its deed
restrictions.
Commissioner Mc Veigh stated it was not the city's intent to enforce deed
restrictions. They are here to make sure that building which does occur is
according to the City Codes. She would vote to approve replat.
Commissioner Bertrand was not unmindful of the two sides of the issue.
However, he took an oath to uphold the city ordinances and laws. He stated he
was bound to act as is required by law and would vote in favor. Issues regarding
the deed restrictions for replat or building set backs should be reviewed in another
venue.
Commissioner Aalund thanked the City Attorney for researching the issues and
offering an opinion. It is a difficult decision, however, he voted for the replat last
time and with opinion from City Attorney and staff, he has not had a change in
opinion.
Commissioner Samson asked the applicant how the property faired during
Allison. Mr. Manely stated that the flooding did not effect the proposed building
sites. He does not know what happened in 1979 since he was not in Friendswood.
Mr. Perkowski added that he saw the water rising and that any additional houses
would cause flooding.
Chairman Burke quoted the requirement of a replat from the Subdivi_sion
Ordinance. He believed a legal protest had been filed with the first public hearing
held on February 7, 2002 and there for the action would require a¾ majority vote
- 3 -
05/16/02 P &Z
r
of the Commission to approve. Mr. Manely st ated that Texas Local Government
Code did not require a majority of all the Commission members, rather only those
members present for the vote. Chaiiman Burke also expressed concem with the
conflicts between the deed restrictions and the plat. He also noted that Staff had
recommended approval.
Commissioner Aalund called for a vote. Following a unanimous affomative vote,
Chai1man Burke commented that the set backs should be reviewed and the note
on the drainage maintenance should be updated.
5.Discussion regarding the Conceptual Plan of Highlander Estates Subdivision
located at the NW comer ofBria1meadow and Greenbriar.
Mr. Buddy Steel addressed the Commission as the applicant. The area is
cun-ently two 2.5 acre tracts which he would like to combine and subdivide into
six lots and two reserves. Mr. Steel noted that the Drainage District had
previously rejected 5 other plans to subdivide this area. However, on May , 2002
the District did approve the preliminary plat of the subdivision.
Chairman Burke expressed some concern regarding the maintenance of
recreation/detention area. He suggested a Home Owners Association be created
with each lot having specific requi rements written in to their deeds in case
ownersh ip ever changed out of family hands. Mr. Steel confamed that deed
restrictions would be prepared with the plat with and HOA to take of
maintenance. As succession plan was also mentioned by the applicant. With
regards to drainage concerns, Mr. Carl Horecky, of the GCCDD, stated that the
preliminary plat had meet District requirements.
The consensus of the Commission regarding sidewal ks is that they would
determine the need at the preliminary plat stage. However, the developer would
be interested in covering and installing culverts in the ditches along Briarmeadow
and installing a side walk. Mr. Steel would also like inf01mation regarding the
width of the sewer easement along Greenbriar.
At this time the order of the agenda was changed in order to table item 7.
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the final plat of Lighthouse Addition,
Section 2.
Motion:
Second:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Vote for:
Be1trand -
Samson
to approve final plat with staff comments
Bertrand -to table item
Samson
Unanimous Motion Carried
- 4 -
05/16/02 P&Z
f
6.
Ms. Janis Lowe, agent, presented a letter from the owner asking that the final
approval be tabled until the final plat had been formally approved by the
Galveston County Consolidated Drainage Distiict. The plat would have been on
the May 14 GCCDD agenda except for a clerical error.
Consideration and possible action regarding the commercial site plan of Friends
Crossing town homes located off Live Oak at FM 2351.
Motion:
Second:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Vote for:
Samson
Bertrand
to approve
Samson -to approve with the condition that a turn a round of
durable pavement be provided for the first unit off FM 2351.
Aalund
Unanimous Motion Carried
Mr. Carl Horecky, land owner, and Mr. Carl Hancock, developer, addressed the
Commission. Chairman Burke expressed concern with the entrance and exits out
of the units onto Live Oak. The first unit in particular has an entrance located
close to FM 2351. A suggestion was made that some type of tum a round be
provided so cars would not have to back out onto Live Oak.
8.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the amending plat of Wedgewood Village , Section
One, Lots 6, 7, 8 and a portion of Reserve "E".
Motion:
Second:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Vote for:
Bertrand -
Aalund
to approve
Bertrand -to approve the amending plat with standard note
regarding sidewalk requirements to remain on plat but not to
require any sidewalks during current construction.
Aalµnd
Unanimous Motion Carried
Ron Ritter, lot owner, asked to address the Commission regarding any sidewalk
requirements. He noted that this is an existing subdivision which did not have
sidewalks in the area of the amended plat. Commissioner McVeigh asse1ted that
no sidewalks should be required and the plat notes modified. Commissioner
Be1trand postulated that at a later date re-development may occur in the area and
sidewalks would then be required. Such as in areas of Bellaire.
- 5 -
05/16/02 P &Z
Chairman Burke noted that the side walk issue was easier to address on
commercial plats but did not see a cunent need for sidewalks in front of the two
amended lots.
9.Adjournment.
With not fmther comment the meeting was adjourned at 9:07 P .M.
'!)i�� :Yiana Steelquist
Development Coordinator
-6 -
05/16/02 P&Z