HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 2004-03-18 Regular'
[ I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
March 18, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
March 18, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill-7:06 p.m.
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland-7: 11 p.m.
Diana Steelquist-City Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Y eretsky resigned; Commissioner Brekke and
Commissioner Burke absent, Chairman Bertrand called the meeting to order to discuss the
following:
Call to Order:
Regular Meeting:
1.Communications from the Commission.
Chairman Bertrand stated that Commissioner Burke would present as an agenda item at
the next meeting the HOA letter he has drafted.
Chairman Bertrand also stated that Mayor Brizendine is proceeding with finding a
replacement for Steve Yeretsky.
2.. Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
Tabled Items:
3.Consideration and possible action regarding Industrialized Housing.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Ho.Hand-to remove from table for discussion.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
Chairman Be1trand stated that the Staff has presented a draft ordinance in regards to
Industrized Housing, which could be presented to City Council for a possible workshop.
Commissioner Holland announced that after reviewing the proposal, he would like to
remove Industrized Housing from the table and remove from the agenda. He felt that in
past meetings it did not seem of interest to the Commission to formalize this item. He had
asked S_taff how many applicants had requested a permit for an industrialized home and
been told only one. Chairman Bertrand asked Commissioner Holland if this was his
formal motion. Commission Holland stated that after discussion amongst the Commission
Page 1 of 5
3/18/04 P&Z
he would like to make his statement of taking industrialized housing off the table and off
the agenda his formal motion.
Commission Gibson asked Staff is the timing was such, that if someone came in for a
permit would the Commission have time to act on it. Staff stated that if someone came in
and asked for a permit for an industrialized home in a single-family residential area, the
city must issue that permit. The purpose of the proposed ordinance was to establish a
control over the standards of an industrialized home by keeping it compatible to the
neighboring structures. Staff also stated that HOA documents could also regulate an
industrialized home. Commissioner Holland stated that his experience with the HOA's
and deed restrictions would not allow industrialized homes. Staff stated that a permit
would be issued, but it would be up to the HOA to regulate the actual allowance of the
structure to take place. Chairman Bertrand stated that not all areas of Friendswood are
protected by HOA's.
Chairman Bertrand stated that he would like to recommend the proposed ordinance to City
Council, but wants the Commissioners to understand that this topic could take several
months to finalize. He feels like sending it to City Council would allow them to review
the drafted ordinance and make comments.
Commissioner Gibson stated that he also felt that the proposed ordinance should go
forward to City Council.
Commissioner Brakebill stated that he has a concern with the comment in the drafted
ordina nce regarding taxable value. He feels like that term will not be able to be defined at
the time a permit is being considered. Staff stated that the value of the prope1ty and the
value of the home should define the taxable value. Commissioner Brakebill stated that he
would like to see the definition added.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-to move forward to City Council with a recommendation to
workshop.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding recommended changes to Cluster Home
Development Ordinance -Density Issues.
No action taken, remained on the table.
5.Consideration and possible action regarding a recommendation to adopt an updated
official zoning map.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-to remove from table for discussion
Brakebill
Unanimous
Page 2 of 5
3/18/04 P&Z
Motion Carried
I 1
l
Chanman Be1irand stated that CEDC is currently working on obtaining prope1ty on FM
528, in HruTis County. The CEDC would like to add this tract of land to the official
zoning map; however it is unce1tain when that property will officially be obtained.
The Commission discussed moving for ward with the recommendation of approval of the
new zoning map and if the CEDC is able to obtain the metes and bounds description to the
property on FM 528, in Harris County in time for the zoning map approval by City
Council, Planning & Zoning would like to have this property included. This prope1ty is to
be included on the zoning map; however, the City of Friendswood is not purchasing the
prope1ty.
The Commission believes the official map should be updated and adopted every 18
months when possible in conjunction with a land use change request. The Commission
believes combining the public hearing processes for both the map adoption and zone
change is a more efficient use of the process
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Regular Items:
Gibson-recommend to City Council for approval with the possible
inclusion of the FM 528, Harris County prope1ty that CEDC is currently
working on.
Holland
Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Discussion and possible action regru·ding sidewalk plat note requirement.
Motion:
Second:
Holland-to approve with staff sugge stions
Gibson
Commissioner Holland and Commissioner Gibson as a 2004 goal item prepared a sidewalk
statement that is to be required on all plats. Staff made suggested modifications to the
statement. After discussion the final statement regarding sidewalks was determined.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-that the sidewalk statement on plats will read:
Sidewalks ru·e required along all curb and gutter streets. The Developer,
prior to the City's one-yeru· inspection of infrastructure, must install
sidewalks along reserves. When sidewalks are required they shall be a
width of not less than four feet and comply with Federal, State, and Local
requu-ements.
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regru·ding Preliminary Plat of Friendswood Cove
Subdivision located along Bay Area Blvd.
Page 3 of 5
3/18/04 P&Z
. I
Motion:
Second:
Holland-to approve with staff comments.
Brakebill
Sel Thint, the engineer over the subdivision and representative of Friendswood Cove
Subdivision, addressed the Commission.
Commissioner Gibson asked about the length of the cul-de-sac and if the Staff comments
had been addressed. Mr. Thint stated that Staff did not want two entries onto Bay Area
Blvd. so therefore it required the cul-de-sac to exceed the minimum 600 feet.
Commissioner Holland stated that the property is a difficult one to develop and he felt that
a good job had been done to design the subdivision.
Commissioner Bertrand was concerned about Block 1, Lot 9 of the subdivision. He felt
that someone would try and make a drive from the back of the lot onto Bay Area Blvd.
Mr. Thint stated that a curb cut clmently exist there; however, between Bay Area Blvd.
and the lot there is a reserve that would be in place. This reserve will have a landscaping
buffer and sidewalks in it. This would make it difficult for someone to pour a drive off of
Bay Area Blvd. because they would not be allowed to cross the reserve with a driveway.
Staff stated that filling in the curb cut, since it is in the rights-of-way, would possibly be
the city's responsibility; however, Staff will research to verify.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-to approve with staff comments and to include the new sidewalk
statement.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
8.Discussion and possible action regarding Permitted Use Table (PUT) parking
requirements for Real Estate (Miniwarehouse Storage) Use# 531 of the PUT.
Staff recommended a change to the PUT, which would change parking requirements for
use #531 to "TBD" (to be determined). Staff stated that this parking group requirement is
not always feasible for some developments. Chairman Be1trand stated that he thought the
parking table itself should only be a guideline and not a requirement. Commissioner
Gibson stated that he felt staff could use their educated judgment with regards to the
parking table, but liked the idea to change the parking requirements to Staffs
recommendation.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-for use #531 the parking requirement to be changed to TBD (to be
determined)
Holland
The Commissioner's also discussed to take the parking group out of the PUT of the zoning
ordinance and placing it within the Design Criteria Manual. A workshop with Council
was requested to accomplish this.
Page 4 of 5
3/18/04 P&Z
[ ;
I l
l
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
9.Staff Repo1i
Gibson-Staff will consider removing the parking group from the Pe1mitted
Use Table (PUT) and placing it in the Design Criteria Manual.
Holland
Unanimous Motion Carried
Staff presented a report for the month of March of all Development Review Committee
(DRC) meetings held.
10.Adjournment
With no fmiher comment the meeting was adjourned at 8:43 p.m.
� !3fe.Llan.l ChiSkelton
Development Coordinator
Page 5 of 5
3/18/04 P&Z