HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 2004-11-04 Regularl
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Fri endswood Planning and Zoning Commission
November 4, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, November 4, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Mike Hodge-Director of CD and PW
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Burke resigned, Chairman Holland called the
meeting to order to discuss the following:
Call to order:
Regular Meeting:
1.Communications from the public.
Ron Hindt, Pastor of the Calvary Chapel Church located at 3700 FM 528,
addressed the Commission. Mr. Hindt encouraged the Commission to vote in
favor of the sign ordinance to allow electronic signs in Friendswood.
2.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the 10-21-04 regular meeting minutes.
B.Approval of the 10-21-04 special meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve consent agenda
Brakebill
Commissioner Bertrand requested Item "B" of the consent agenda to be removed.
Item "A" of the consent agenda was then voted upon.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
It was then realized that Item "A" was the item Commissioner Bertrand wanted to
discuss.
Item "B" was then voted upon for approval
Page 1 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Unanimous Motion Carried
Bertrand-to reverse approval of Item "A" and discuss.
Weesner
Commissioner Bertrand pointed out on Item 3, page 2 of the regular meeting
minu tes, his request for legal interpretation and the answer he received from the
City Attorney was not captmed in the minutes. He requested Staff review the
tapes from the 10-21-04 regular meeting and capture those comments and
responses.
Comm issioner Weesner stated on Item 4, page 2 the last sentence should read:
After fmther discussion, some of the Commissioners indicated a need for
new information from City Council on this item before deciding to change
the last recommendation.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Regular Meeting:
Bertrand-to table Item "A" in order for Staff to review the tapes for
clarity.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for a
Retail Shell Building located between Blockbuster and Schlotzsky's on FM 528.
Motion:
Second:
Be1trand-to approve the Site Plan
Gibson
Bob Weaver, architect of the project and representative of the owner, addressed
the Commission. Mr. Weaver stated the proposed shell building had preliminary
drainage approval from the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District.
Mr. Weaver also stated the property would have an underground detention
facility, which has also been approved by TX Dot.
Commissioner Bertrand showed concern with the adjacent parking of Blockbuster
stating he felt there could be a possible safety issue with the traffic pattern.
Amend
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to get final approval from the Galveston County
Consolidated Drainage District per Staffs recommendation.
Bertrand
Unanimous
Page 2 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
Motion Carried
4.Discussion and possible action regarding Amending Zoning Ordinance-Cluster
Homes.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to discuss
Klusend01f
Staff reviewed the changes made to the Cluster Home ordinance to date. Staff
stated the inf01mation to make the changes to the Cluster Home ordinance came
from workshops with Staff and the Commission. During the meeting, the
Commission and Staff reviewed the final proposed draft. Items of discussion
regarding changes to the ordinance involved lot coverage, density, setbacks, and
the definition of open space and green space.
The Commission felt a workshop with City Council to finish the revisions to the
Cluster Home ordinance, such as determining definitions and revising the Matrix,
was appropriate.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Discussion and possible action regarding possible amendments to the Sign
Ordinance.
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to approve
Brakebill
After discussion among Staff and the Commission, some changes were made to
the proposed sign ordinance. Changes included the length of time an electronic
sign may have its copy changed. The Commission also recommen ded that
manual and automatic changeable copy signs be further combined within the
ordinance. Commissioner Be1trand stated he was pleased with the proposed
ordinance but felt it is too restrictive with regards to changeable copy signs. The
Commission requested a workshop to discuss the proposed changes to the sign
ordinance with City Council.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve with changes
Be1trand
Unanimous
6.Communication from the Commission
Motion Carried
Commissioner Gibson commended Mr. Burke for the years he devoted to serving. . on the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Page 3 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
Commissioner Bertrand stated he was saddened to see Mr. Burke resign and he
will sorely miss Mr. Burke's council and logic. Commissioner Bertrand wished
Mr. Burke well.
Commissioner Klusendorf read an email he wrote to Staff indicating concern that
Planning and Zoning and City Council are not seeing eye-to-eye on issues. He
referenced the recent votes for the zone changes of prope1ty at the entrance of the
Forest of Friendswood Subdivision and Friendswood Lakes Subdivision. With
both of these items, the Planning and Zoning Commission gave a negative
recommendation to City Council. However, City Council then voted in favor of
the zone change.
Commissioner Brakebill stated he attended the last City Council meeting. He
believes that City Council has clear ideas for the city and if Planning and Zoning
were aware of those ideas then possibly different decisions would have made by
Planning and Zoning.
Commissioner Weesner addressed Commissioner Klusendorfs comments by
stating historically City Councils overturn Planning and Zoning decisions, here in
Friendswood and in other cities. She also requested that the reading file of the
agenda items still be placed at the library as well as providing the large format
drawings to the Commission.
Chairman Holland thanked the Community Appearance Board and Community
Economic Development Committee for being at the meeting. He also thanked
Mr. Burke for his time on the .Planning and Zoning Commission. He also asked
Staff if the Planning and Zoning Mission statement could be presented to City
Council.
7.Repo1ts
A.Council Liaison
No representative was available to give a report.
B.Staff
1.Presentation regarding Vision 2020.
Staff did not give a presentation regarding Vision 2020, but announced that a
presentation would take place at the next meeting.
Staff repo1ted on City Council's actions regarding the mini warehouse
recommendation. The Council approved the addition of miniwarehouses as a
separate line to the Permitted Use Table; howe ver, the new line mirrors the 531
Real Estate line with the exception of not allowing rniniwarehouses in the Office
Park District. The Council saw the need to not allow them in this district. The
Page 4 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
I
Planner apologized for the miscommunication at the last meeting with regards to
this issue. The goal of the last discussion was to provide Staff with the rationale
for P&Z's recommendation to City Council.
Staff provided some follow-up inf01mation on fire issues with setbacks.
Feedback has been received from both the Fire Marshall and the Building
Official. Cunent city set back requirements and building codes address the 5-foot
setback concern identified in the newspaper article provided by Commissioner
Weesner.
Staff provided a verbal report on prope1ty tax data obtained from the
Administrative Services Office. The info1mation included the cost of providing
services to a single-family lot versus the average tax revenue generated per single
family lot. The shortfall requii'es additional revenues generated by sales taxes,
and to some extent franchise fees, permits, fines and other service fees.
Lastly, staff clarified information on parking lots sent out in an email. Paid
parking lots are permitted under our current Permitted Use Table; however, this
use did not apply to the recent commercial site plan which was for a new church
parking lot.
8.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
��� J j' MLb) Che1:i Skelton /
Development Coordinator
Page 5 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z