Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 1972-09-11 Regular( ( i f" ! ( l 'f ( ( I Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission 109 East Eillowiclc Friendswood, Texas Gentlemen, September 11, 1972 Because I cannot meet with you for. the entire meeting tonight, I take this method to comment on the proposed plat for Sunmeadow 2, A closer look at the proposed Sunmeadow 2 subdivision leads me to question whether we could,at this time, in good conscience approve the plat as it has been submitted, From the .information that ie given on the plans, the following violations of our subdivision or�inance 23-A are shown, 1, Side set-back line on corner lots is 10' instead of the 25' required in Section III, Subdivision E, Paragraph 3. 2, Several 19' utility easements are shown, in violation of Section III, Subdivision C, Paragraph 1, which requires 12' easements, which is still too narrow. 3.If this is a final plat, it violates Section V, Subdivision3, Paragraph 1, Sub-paragraph f, which requires that thepurpose of sites which are reserved shall be shown, l�. Also, there is no indication of side and back-yard set-backrequirements on the plat, If these are not shown on the plat, how is the builder to know about them? In addition, the plat does not show roadway width, pavement type or quality, water, or sewer lines, etc., ad infinitum -all data which is called for in Ordinance 23-A, So far as I am concerned, Ordinance 23-A should be enforced until repealed by the City Council, Also, several questions are raised, Where does the pipeline go? Does it dead-end? Go under Lot 7? Also, I understand that an earlier submitted plat showed 15' side set-back on corner lots. Since I am a new member, there may be some information that I am missing that would explain the omissions listed above, but at the present time I am of the opinion that the Develop should be directed to read and to adhere to our subdivision ordinance before we approve his proposal. Sir{J_� Leah North