HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 1972-02-03 Special. \ }\ I• . '
/ / 1) '·'1·1t :1
I, ·1 l
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF f RIENDSWOOD
109 Willowick Avenue FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS 77546
482 -3323
February 3, 1972
Mayor Stuart and City Council
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
Nazarene Church Request for Specific Use Permit
As a result of a public hearing held on January 27, 1972, the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission has reached the unanimous
conclusion that the Specific Use Permit for the Nazarene Church should
be approved.
We therefore recommend that the City Council take the necessary
action to change the Zoning Ordinance to permit this Specific Use.
LVH/bh
FRIENDSWOOD PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
, .-" ;I
i , • ' I I/ ·1 I I .: i ..
/ . (' ,· / I ,' i ·1, /'J tf f ;7 �--··'
,· , ) . . . (. ( ' . ,
,; 1··/J-'...I(, c ·l ''/·.. .. I .I
111'
1
lJ
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE FRIENDSWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
February 3, 1972
The subject meeting was called at the request of Mr. Hausman and Mr. Palmer re the proposed subdivision of Reserve D. Annalea/Kingspark Section B into three lots.
The Commission has made the following findings regarding the request to approve the said subdivision:
l.The submitted house and lot plats show a 25 foot setback in frontand less than 25 feet in back, which is contrary to the Ordinance 132R-1 District regulations. The Ordinance does allow the Commissionto waive the 25 foot front setback to as little as 20 feet on lotsless than 105 feet deep.
2.The Commission was not in favor of granting a waiver because:
a.Lots bordering on the back of Reserve D are also shallow,making the distance between back doors of houses unduly closeand privacy jeopardized.
b.It would appear that this open area by its very designation"Reserve D 11 was intended by the developers as a park or openarea, not for building. This would be more desirable thanthree more houses closing up one of the last available openareas in this subdivision.
3.The plats as presented are barely acceptable size; if furtherconsideration is to be given to this proposed subdivision, a properlyattested survey and plat will have to be submitted.
4.If the developers wish to pursue the present platted subdivision, theywill have to seek a variance from the Board of Adjustment.
5.This finding was arrived by unanimous vote.,I j
Attendees: Frank Wall Frank Green Rodger Koppa Lloyd Van Horn
LVH/bh
---y,-:✓/-v IL J_ loyEI \fan Hor-n; Secretary, Planning Commission