HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 2022-03-10 RegularCITY OF FRIENDSWOOD
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
THURSDAY, MARCH 10, 2022 - 7:00 PM
Minutes
MINUTES OF A FRIENDSWOOD REGULAR MEETING HELD AT 910 S. FRIENDSWOOD
DRIVE, FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS, FRIENDSWOOD CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD
COUNTIES OF GALVESTON/HARRIS
MARCH 10, 2022
1.CALL TO ORDER
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIENDSWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION THAT WAS HELD ON THURSDAY, MARCH 10, 2022, AT 07:01 PM 910 S.
FRIENDSWOOD DRIVE, FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS
CHAIRMAN JOSEPH MATRANGA
VICE-CHAIRMAN RICHARD SASSON
COMMISSIONER CATHERINE KOERNER
COMMISSIONER RICHARD CLARK
COMMISSIONER MARCUS PERRY
COMMISSIONER TRAVIS MANN
COUNCIL LIAISON TRISH HANKS
CITY ATTORNEY KAREN HORNER
DIRECTOR OF CDD/PLANNER AUBREY HARBIN
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR BECKY BENNETT
COMMISSIONER TOM HINCKLEY WAS ABSENT FROM THE MEETING.
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons
(To comply with provisions of the Open Meetings Act, the Commission may not deliberate on subjects
discussed under this agenda item. However, the Commission may direct such subjects be placed on a
later regular Commission agenda for discussion and/or possible action)
No comments.
3.Consent Agenda
These items are considered routine or ministerial in nature and will be enacted with one motion. There will
be no separate discussion of items unless a commissioner so requests in which case the item would be
removed from the consent agenda and considered separately.
**Commissioner Richard Clark moved to approve Consent Agenda. Seconded by Commissioner
Marcus Perry. The motion was approved unanimously.
A.Consider approving the minutes for the Planning and Zoning Regular Meeting held
Thursday, February 24, 2022.
B.Consider approving the Replat of Lot 10 Friendswood Gardens.
C.Consider approving the Final Plat of Joyful Park.
D.Consider approving the Final Plat of the Albritton.
4.Action Items
According to the Planning and Zoning Rules of Procedure (R2021-18), all action of the Commission shall
be made by an affirmative vote of four (4) or more members of the Commission present at such
Commission meetings.
A.SITE PLAN: RED BALL OXYGEN AT 14200 BEAMER ROAD
Consider approving the site plan for Red Ball Oxygen to be located at 14200 Beamer
Road.
**Commissioner Marcus Perry moved to approve the site plan for Red Ball Oxygen to be located at
14200 Beamer Road. Seconded by Commissioner Travis Mann. Motion later amended by Perry to
include waiving the 4-foot sidewalk installation along Beamer Rd. Seconded by Mann. The motion
was approved unanimously.
Harbin stated the proposed facility is an industrial gas and welding supplier to be located on
Beamer Road. She said the developer extended a public water line more than 2,300 feet to reach
the site and the public infrastructure had been accepted by City Council in January 2022. Harbin
added the developer is asking to waive the sidewalk installation along Beamer Rd and explained
Beamer Road is outside the city limits.
Koerner commented the facility would be a perfect fit in the industrial panhandle area of the city.
Sasson asked if the site would be a terminal only or if they would be manufacturing any gases. Alex
Kennedy/CEO of Red Ball Oxygen said the site would not manufacture gases.
Matranaga asked how many employees they were expecting. Kennedy said the initial staff would
consist of 30-35 employees but the business is growing and they hope to increase the number of
shifts and employees. Matranga asked if the Fire Marshal had reviewed the plans, to which Harbin
answered yes. Matranga also asked about blast protection in the building. Kennedy said the
construction includes a fire wall, a deluge area, and sprinkler systems, all compliant with OSHA
standards.
B.ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING GARDEN HOME DISTRICT (GHD)
i Conduct a public hearing regarding proposed amendments to Appendix C, Zoning
Ordinance, "Section 2. Establishment of Districts" and "Section 6. Non-Conforming Uses,
Structures and Lots," "Section 7. Schedule of District Regulations," "Section 8.
Supplementary District Regulations," and "Section 20. Definitions" to remove the Multi-
Family Residential (MFR) reference from the Garden Home District (GHD) zoning district
and establish architectural and site related requirements for garden home developments.
Bennett introduced the proposed amendments to the Garden Home District to include removing all
references to multi-family use and adding design requirements such as utilizing one side zero lot
line for the home. She said the intent of a garden home is to decrease the amount of maintenance
for the yard and home. Bennett explained the current ordinance states the structures should be
attached but that is not required in a garden home community.
ii Consider making a recommendation regarding amendments to Appendix C, Zoning
Ordinance, "Section 2. Establishment of Districts" and "Section 6. Non-Conforming Uses,
Structures and Lots," "Section 7. Schedule of District Regulations," "Section 8.
Supplementary District Regulations," and "Section 20. Definitions" to remove the Multi-
Family Residential (MFR) reference from the Garden Home District (GHD) zoning district
and establish architectural and site related requirements for garden home developments.
**Commissioner Catherine Koerner moved to approve a recommendation regarding amendments to
Appendix C, Zoning Ordinance, "Section 2. Establishment of Districts" and "Section 6. Non-
Conforming Uses, Structures and Lots," "Section 7. Schedule of District Regulations," "Section 8.
Supplementary District Regulations," and "Section 20. Definitions" to remove the Multi-Family
Residential (MFR) reference from the Garden Home District (GHD) zoning district and establish
architectural and site related requirements for garden home developments. Seconded by
Commissioner Richard Clark. The motion was later amended by Koerner to recommend the
proposed redline changes, "Option 2." The motion was seconded by Clark. The motion was
approved unanimously.
Bennett said that since the last presentation of the garden home changes, there had been
discussion that 5-foot separation between buildings is too small. The "Option 2" proposal is to
increase the required building separation to 10-feet, creating slightly more space between the
homes. She explained the other proposed change was to remove specific requirements from the
ordinance so the requirements would then default to the adopted building and fire codes instead of
being regulated by the zoning ordinance.
Koerner said the subcommittee discussed increasing the separation to 10-feet but was not
necessarily married to 10-feet and open to other distances. Mann said defaulting to the building
codes makes sense.
C.SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE VARIANCE REQUEST
i Conduct a public hearing regarding a variance request to reduce the required minimum
block length from 300-feet to 260-feet at Friendswood Parkway and 244-feet at the
proposed Adrianna Crossing, being a variance to Appendix B, Subdivision Ordinance,
Section VI.K.2.a.
Harbin said the developer is requesting two block length variances in the proposed Sterling Creek
Section 7 subdivision. Harbin said the original subdivision layout the developer submitted had
multiple infractions, so staff worked with the developer to minimize the requested deviations. She
said when Friendswood Parkway was installed, the street stub-outs were installed but at less than the
required 300-feet width, so the first variance is for a block that is already constructed.
ii Consider approving a variance request to reduce the required minimum block length from
300-feet to 260-feet at Friendswood Parkway and 244-feet at the proposed Adrianna
Crossing, being a variance to Appendix B, Subdivision Ordinance, Section VI.K.2.a.
**Commissioner Marcus Perry moved to approve a variance request to reduce the required minimum block
length from 300-feet to 260-feet at Friendswood Parkway and 244-feet at the proposed Adrianna Crossing,
being a variance to Appendix B, Subdivision Ordinance, Section VI.K.2.a.. Seconded by Commissioner
Richard Clark. The motion was approved unanimously.
Adam Hill/developer said when Friendswood Parkway was under design, his team requested the street stub-
outs be installed as part of the contract for them donating land and funds for the boulevard construction. Hill
said if the block width was not adequate, the issue should have been raised before construction. He
explained that moving the streets now would be a substantial expense and include relocating drainage
infrastructure.
Mr. Chau Vu / 8 Dominion Ct spoke against the variance, citing speeding issues on Friendswood Parkway
plus congestion and traffic at the existing Sterling Creek Section 6 gates. He said the gates are too close to
the parkway to allow adequate room for vehicles. Mr. Vu also mentioned the parkway is more than one-foot
higher than The Dominion subdivision and he fears more development will create flooding.
Commissioner Perry said he understands the streets are built and asked if there was another design that
would work with the city codes. Hill said his engineer created another subdivision layout that would not
require variances but it makes four "runt lots" that would not be deep enough to build a home with a backyard
pool.
Clark asked staff if there was any precedent for a block width variance. Harbin said she was not aware of any
variances for the same situation. Mann asked if there was a creative solution to remove the variance needed
at the back of the subdivision. Chairman Matranga said he and Vice Chairman Sasson had joined the staff
when they met with the developer to discuss options. Matranga explained the option that met code was not
the most natural design. Mann asked the staff the purpose of the 300-foot block length. Harbin responded
that the city originally required block lengths to be 400-feet wide. She said staff were researching the
reasoning for the change as well as other cities' requirements and could not find a pattern. Harbin continued
that road design requirements are normally due to maneuverability for school buses and fire trucks, plus
traffic safety. Matranga said his research found long block lengths lead to speeding issues and short block
lengths, within city blocks not subdivisions, can increase traffic accidents.
Sasson said the third option that meets the code on the interior of the subdivision would still require a
variance for the block where the streets are already built. Sasson asked staff about Mr.Vu's comments
regarding the gates creating a back up onto the parkway. Harbin said the Design Criteria Manual requires
gated entrances to be set back at least 40-feet. She said staff would review the design during an
infrastructure plan review but would also look into the existing Section 6 gates.
D.PRELIMINARY PLAT - STERLING CREEK SECTION 7
Consider approving the Partial Preliminary Plat of Sterling Creek Section 7, a private
subdivision, consisting of 27.1092 acres of land out of a called 194.21 acre tract of land
known as Tract A and being recorded in Clerk's File No. 2010059686, being out of and a
part of Lots 1-3, 13-16, and 19-20 of the David Fahey Subdivision as recorded in Volume
118, Page 417 and also being out of and a part of Lot 4 of the Burgess Subdivision as
recorded in Volume 119, Page 14, both subdivisions being situated in the Geo Patterson
Survey, Abstract Number 645 and the Mary Fabrueau Survey, Abstract Number 69,
Friendswood, Galveston County, Texas.
**Commissioner Travis Mann moved to approve the Partial Preliminary Plat of Sterling Creek
Section 7. Seconded by Commissioner Richard Clark. The motion was approved unanimously.
Harbin said this subdivision would be the final section of Sterling Creek. She said the developer will
need to provide a landscape buffer and 6-foot barrier along Friendswood Parkway since the site
falls within the Community Overlay District. She said the pending items on the Compliance Memo
can be addressed during the final plat review.
5.Consideration and possible action regarding future Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting dates
A.Consider setting the next Planning and Zoning Commission regular meetings for (i)
Thursday, March 24, 2022 and (ii) Thursday, April 14, 2022.
6.Communications
A.Receive liaison updates, commercial and residential project updates, and City Council
actions and ordinance updates.
Matranga said he gave the annual Planning and Zoning Commission report to City Council.
Matranga said he attended an online Land Use seminar that was very informative and reminded the
commission that a previous commissioner repeatedly said zone changes go with the land, not the
developer. He said he felt that was good advice.
Councilwoman Hanks reported that Chairman Matranga did a great job presenting the 2021 report
and the report showed how much work the commission accomplished in 2021. Hanks announced
the first reading of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinance changes were approved at the
city council's meeting. She said the council also received an update from the Gulf Coast Protection
District regarding the Gulf Coast Barrier Project.
Harbin said the February DRC report was provided in the back up material.
7.ADJOURNMENT
This meeting was adjourned at 08:09 PM.