HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 2013-10-17 Regular PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
.
REGULAR MEETING
1. The regular meeting was called to order at 7:01pm with the following people in attendance:
Chairman Mark McLean
Commissioner Jim Gibson Commissioner Arthur Triplette
Commissioner Chris Brown Commissioner David O’Farrell
Commissioner Jim Nye Steve Weathered, City Attorney
Aubrey Harbin, Planner Nick Haby, PIO/Planning Manager
Becky Bennett, Dev. Coordinator Morad Kabiri, Director of Comm. Dev.
Absent: Tibbits
2. Communication from the public/committee liaisons
(To comply with provisions of the Open Meetings Act, the Commission may not deliberate
on subjects discussed under this agenda item. However, the Commission may direct such
subjects be placed on a later regular Commission agenda for discussion and/or possible
action.)
None
3. Consent Agenda
A. Approval of the minutes for the meeting held:
1) October 7, 2013
Motion: Nye
Second: Gibson
Vote: 6/0 unanimous
4. Consideration and possible action regarding a request for a zone classification change on
135.778 acres from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Community Shopping
Center (CSC) and Single Family Residential (SFR) at 3801 FM 528 (Tract 1: 123.2
acres from PUD to SFR; Tract 2: 3.197 acres from PUD to CSC; Tract 3: 9.4 acres
MINUTES OF A
REGULAR MEETING
HELD THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2013
AT 7 PM
CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
910 S. FRIENDSWOOD DRIVE
FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS
October 17, 2013 P&Z Meeting
from PUD to CSC)
Motion: Gibson
Second: McLean
Vote: 1/5 O’Farrell - Aye
Harbin presented economic scenarios including 1) current estimated property tax value,
2) taxes with the adoption of the proposed zone change and 3) property tax on full
commercial development.
Jeff Anderson of Beazer Homes also provided economic scenarios provided by a third
party. He stated the CEDC was being unrealistic in holding out for full commercial
development due to many difficulties surrounding the lot. He mentioned the
infrastructure alone would cost about $2 million, Blackhawk Blvd would need to be built
through, a lift station will be required plus detention & mitigation and mostly, the amount
of land located in the floodway/flood zone which cannot be utilized for homes or
businesses.
Nye stated Beazer Homes does not build houses in the $500,000 price range. Anderson
announced this development will bring a new product line from Beazer consisting of
higher priced homes. Harbin cited the break-even point for the City would require a home
value of $321,355.
O’Farrell inquired about “phantom buyers.” George Jones, a commercial real estate
broker for the bank, said he has had a contract with Beazer for about a year. He explained
it is difficult to market the property due to the lack of infrastructure and the amount of
land in the floodway. He stated residential development would be needed to entice
commercial developers into the area; Beazer is willing to front the expense of
infrastructure while the commercial developers are not. Brown wanted to know if the
pending contract could be hindering other potential buyers and Jones stated he is still
marketing the property.
O’Farrell asked Jones his professional opinion on whether or not it is likely a commercial
developer would purchase the entire property and Jones opined a commercial developer
would most likely build apartments. Triplette asked Jones to address CEDC’s comment
that many developers are interested in the property. Jones stated he has not had any offers
on the entire area, only smaller sections. Gibson asked Anderson why split the land into
SFR and CSC to which Anderson answered the most viable option for Beazer Homes to
make a profit is via the current proposal.
McLean stated he would like to see a conceptual plan and does not think million dollar
homeowners will want commercial development in their backyards. He asked Jones if
Beazer is the only interested party in the property. Jones stated the economy has declined
over the past few years and has affected real estate sales. McLean wanted to know why
the current contract is taking so long to which Anderson stated the bank and Beazer have
been negotiating and are currently on their 4th addendum. Jones stated he understands
CEDC would prefer all commercial but no one wants to purchase the entire 135+ acres.
Beazer Homes has used the proposed configuration several times in several areas and
shown it to be a successful model.
October 17, 2013 P&Z Meeting
Janis Lowe, local realtor, reiterated the “Whitcomb property” has always been a
problematic tract of land. She advised the City and the Commission to consider what the
current market will bear and realize a full commercial development is highly unlikely.
She also mentioned the need for infrastructure. She believes the home value is a good fit
for the City, stated the school districts have the capacity for the neighborhood, TXDOT
embraces the proposal and the nature way along the creek would be a nice addition to
Friendswood.
O’Farrell explained the absorption rate of that tract of land, should it be full commercial,
in a best case (yet non-realistic) scenario could be developed in close to 10 years. He
stated the “phantom buyers” are causing people to inflate their hopes and expectation
regarding what is realistic for the tract. He urged the Commission to look at the numbers
and not pay attention to the dream. He voiced his concern of a non-profit purchasing the
land and taking it off the tax rolls completely. He believes the longer the City holds out
on allowing development, the more time a non-profit has to gather the money needed to
purchase the land in its entirety.
Gibson asked Karen Capps of the CEDC for her opinion. Capps stated SFR would not be
the most beneficial option for the City. She said the pending contract is scaring off other
potential developers. She did concede the absorption rate of full commercial would be
longer than that of a split with SFR. McLean also voiced the desire for full/more
commercial use of the area.
5. Consideration and possible action regarding a commercial site plan for Corder’s
Convenience Store at 1401 S. Friendswood Dr.
Motion: Triplette
Second: Nye
Vote: 6/0 unanimous
Approved with comments.
Harbin stated the applicant requests to pay into the Sidewalk Fund, they changed the
canopy design, matched the colors to the building and removed the fence per the
Commission’s previous requests.
Nye mentioned page A2 color “amber” should be corrected to “umber.”
6. Consideration and possible action regarding proposed amendments to Appendix C –
Zoning Ordinance Section 7.P. Permitted Use Table to change NAICS Use #6244 Child
Day Care Services to NAICS Use #6244 Child Day Care Services (Child Care Center)
and to add NAICS Use #6244 Child Day Care Services (Registered and Licensed
Child Care Homes)
Motion: O’Farrell
Second: Nye
Vote: 6/0 unanimous
October 17, 2013 P&Z Meeting
Approved with comments to not allow registered or licensed daycares in any multi-
family zoning districts (MFR-L, MFR-M, MFR-H) or the mobile home district
(MHR) and change minor verbiage.
Harbin recapped the Joint Work Session on September 9th to change the Permitted Use
Table to allow in home day cares. She stated the NAICS code does not differentiate
between commercial and residential day cares hence the two changes to Appendix C. The
allowance of day cares in MFR was researched and there is a square footage calculation the
state enforces; therefore the City need not regulate as well. The Fire Marshal’s Office will
be doing life safety inspections, as well.
7. Consideration and possible action regarding proposed amendments to Appendix C –
Zoning Ordinance Section 20. Definitions regarding changes to definition of G. Child
Care Center and P. Home Occupation and adding definitions of Registered Child
Care Home and Licensed Child Care Home
Definitions were added using the Texas Administrative Code state licensing website
section 746. In home Day Cares will be required to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy
(zoning compliance) with the City.
8. Consideration and possible action regarding future Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting dates.
Move regular meeting from November 7th to coincide with City Council meeting on
November 4th after the Joint Public Hearing.
9. Communications from the Commission
None
10. Reports
A. Council Liaison
Steve Rockey commented on the good debate regarding the “Whitcomb property”
and praised David O’Farrell for his briefing on absorption rates.
Rockey mentioned the Furniture Boutique was now open and is a nice addition to
Friendswood. He also reminded the Commission and attendees of early voting beginning
October 21st for the Bond Election.
B. Staff - none
11. The regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission adjourned at 8:42pm.
These minutes respectfully submitted by:
Becky Bennett
Becky Bennett
Development Coordinator