Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 2008-02-18 Specialf l J PLANNING & ZONING COMM ISSION MINUTES OF A SPECIAL SESSION & JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2008 6:00PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY HALL 910 S. FRIENDSWOOD DRIVE FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS 1.The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm. The following people were in attendance: Commissioner Michael Brown Vice Chairwoman Sherry Weesner Commissioner David O'Farrell Development Coordinator Aubrey Harbin Commissioner Hassan Moghaddam Commissioner Mark McLean City Planner Mona Miller City Attorney Bobby Gervais Mayor David Smith changed the order of the agenda with permission from City Council and Pla1ming and Zoning Commissioners. 2.Discussion with City Council and CEDC chair and vice chair regarding updates/status report on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan The mayor explained what has been done so far in the process of updating the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. He explained that the document is almost ready for the Planning and Zoning Commission to make a recommendation to City Council; the items pending are a list of subdivisions and Single Family Estate lots from the mayor. He continued by explaining that the next steps are to place the item on P&Z agenda and CEDC agenda; then, set up a meeting with City Council, CEDC and Planning and Zoning for final approval. Next, facilitate public input by hosting a town hall meeting or something similar, possibly in April. Then hold required public hearings. This portion of the meeting was closed at 6:55pm. The public hearing was called to order at 7:05pm. 1.Receive conm1ents from the public, both oral and written, regarding: a)Amending Appendix C (Downtown District) of the Zoning Ordinance regarding sidewalks/ al temati ves. No one spoke for or against the item. b)Amending Appendix B of the Subdivision Ordinance, Section V, Required Improvements, regarding a sidewalk fund. No one spoke for or against the item. The public hearing was left open until a later date. 2.Discussion with City Council regarding amendments to the Sign Ordinance for Non conforming/obsolete signs McLean explained that the final draft of the proposed changes to the ordinance was a collaborative effort of P&Z, staff and legal counsel. He explained that the intent of the ordinance is to bring all signs into compliance and that the revised obsolete sign ordinance references the Local Government Code Chapter 216. Owners would be encouraged to keep signs in good repair and can repair legal non-conforming signs, as long as the repairs do not decrease compliance. There were some concerns with requiring property owners to bring signs up to code when the use changes, but it was determined that this portion of the ordinance is giving them a year to replace the sign if it is an owner; 2 years for leased properties. Requiring signs to be brought into compliance with the ordinance would help with revitalization. There was a question about what would be required of strip centers with multiple tenants, and it was decided that the ordinance should clarify this instance. There are signs within the city limits of which the city has no permit records. It was suggested that notices should be sent to property owners explaining that the revised ordinance was adopted and instruct them to obtain a permit or lawful non-conforming certificate from the building department. No fee would be required and the documentation would be required within 90 days. There was some discussion about requiring signs to be brought into compliance if they were damaged more than 60 percent. It was decided that the ordinance needs to clarify that 60 percent is the percentage of the cost of erecting the sign. The meeting was adjourned at 7:46pm. These minutes respectfully submitted by:2