HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 2004-08-02 Regular[
[
Minutes of a Special Meeting/Joint Workshop Session
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 2, 2004
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Monday,
August 2, 2004 at 4:30 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Tom Burke
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
John Olsen-City Attorney
Mike Hodge-Director of CD and PW
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton -Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Mayor Brizendine called the meeting to order to consider the following.
Joint Workshop Session
Call to order:
1.Discussion with City Council regarding:
A.Governance discussion with Planning & Zoning regarding Zoning Principals
(environmental Scan-Using West Ranch as an example) (40 min.)
Staff presented an environmental scan using the West Ranch project as an example.
There are essentially four items in the Governance Process:
1.Subject Overview (Environmental Scan)
2.Public comment
3.Development of draft ordinance or policy
4.Adoption ( or revision) of ordinance or policy
The Environmental Scan ( or Rezoning Report) includes a review of sub-categories such
as Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Major Thoroughfare Plan, Master Drainage Plan, etc.,
which the development must address in order to be presented to Planning & Zoning and
City Council. The report from Staff will document whether the proposed development
meets or exceeds and each plan. Adding this step to the governance process would allow
the public more information regarding the proposed development and provide the
decision-makers with a more comprehensive impact assessment tool.
Overall, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission felt the Governance
Process using an Environmental Scan/Rezoning Report was a w01thwhile idea and the
more infonnation the public was provided with about a project, the better. The
Commissioners present also voiced the opinion that Staffs rep01t be communicated prior
to the public hearing and not be presented at the public hearing.
Page 1 of2
8/2/04 P& Z
B.Discussion with Planning & Zoning regarding proposed changes to the
Entryway Overlay District (EOD) and the Downtown Overlay District (DOD)
Ordinances (20 Min).
Staff gave a presentation outlining the changes being proposed to the EOD/DOD
ordinances. The proposed changes will clarify the EOD/DOD and make the two more
consistent with each other. Some discussion between Staff, Planning and Zoning and
City Council took place, especially with regards to the where the EOD/DOD intersect.
2.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 6:48 p.m.
Page 2 of 2
8/2/04 P& Z
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August S, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, August S, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelt on-Developm ent Coordinator
Tom Burke-7:09 p.m.
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sheny Weesner-7:18 p.m.
With a quorum present, Commissioner Gibson absent, Chair man Be1trand called the
meeting to order to discuss the following:
Call to order:
Regular M�eting:
1.Communic ations from the Commission.
Chairman Bertrand spoke about the workshop with Ci ty Council held August 2,
2004. He asked that the Planning and Zoning Commissioner's receive a copy of
the hand out on Main Street provided to City Council.
2.. Communications from the public.
No one from the public spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the 6-3-04 regular meeting minutes.
B.Approval of the 6-7-04 spe cial meeting minutes.
C.Approval of the 7-15-04 regular meeting'minutes.
D.Approval of the 7-19-04 joint public hearing minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-to approve the consent agenda.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding Zone Classification change from
Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Office Park District (OPD) for prope1ty
Page 1 of 3
8/5/04 P & Z
located at 1505 and 1507 Winding Way, 1.63 acres at Parkwood Crossing
Subdivision.
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-approve the zone change.
Holland
Dr. Ron Baden addressed the Planning and Zoning Commission explaining that last
year he :rezoned this prope1ty to NC not knowing exactly what he wanted to
develop on it. Since that time, a company has contacted him and is interested in
opening an office on one of the parcels of lai:id. He now would like to rezone the
prope1ty to OPD to allow that business to have the opportunity to open in
Friendswood.
-Chairman Be1trand stated that at the public hearing no one spoke for or against the
re-zoning classification change.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Burke arrived at this time.
5.Consideration and possible action regarding Zone Classification change for
prope1ty located along FM 518 and Bay Area Boulevard.
A.From Single Family Residential (SFR) to Community Shopping Center
(CSC), 74 acres being Tracts 3 & 7, and Multi-Family Residential -Garden
Home District (MFR-GHD) 240.19 acres being Tracts 2, 4 & 6 and Single
Family Residential (SFR) 404.5 acres being Tracts 1 & 5, known as the West
Property along FM 518.
B.From Multi-Family Residential-Garden Home District (MFR-GHD), 240.19
acres, Tracts 2, 4 & 6, and Single Family Residential (SFR) 404.5 acres Tract
1 & 5 to Planned Unit Development-Cluster Homes (PUD-Cluster Homes),
known as the West property along FM 518.
C.From Single Family (SFR) 47.3 acres, Tract 8, located off Bay Area
Boulevard to Planned Unit Development-Cluster Homes (PUD-Cluster
Homes).
No action on this item was taken.
6.Staff Report
Staff repo1ted on the Development Review Committee meetings that were held for
the month of July. Staff also repmted that a joint workshop was held with City
Council on August 2, 2004 to discuss Main Street and the governance procedure
with an environmental scan prepared by Staff. In addition, a Tree Committee
Page 2 of 3
8/5/04 P & Z
!
meeting was held to finalize issues with the draft ordinance before going to the
City Attorney for review. Staff stated that a workshop on Cluster Homes and the
governance process would be scheduled soon.
Commissioner Weesner arrived at this time.
7.Adjournment
With no fmther comments the regular meeting was adjourned at 7:24 p.m.
Page 3 of 3
8/5/04 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
ofthe
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 19, 2004
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held on
Thursday, August 19, 2004 at 5:30 pm at the Friendswood City Hall second floor
conference room, located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The
following Planning & Zoning Commissioners were present:
Bob Bertrand
Tom Burke
Jim Gibson
Sherry Weesner
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
Mike Hodge -Director of CD/PW
With a quorum present, Commissioners Brakebill, Holland and Klusendorf absent,
Chaitman Bertrand, called the special meeting to order.
Call to order:
Special Meeting:
1.Discussion regarding Cluster Homes.
The Commissioners discussed how the current Cluster Home ordinance should be
revised. It was determined that a definition of "open space" and a definition of
"green space" should be established. Ftuther, input from the City Attorney was
requested on the issue of defining open space with regards to a golf course being
used as open space.
2.Discussion regarding the Comprehensive Plan.
No action was taken on this item.
3.Adjournment
With no fu1ther comment the meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
(!!fvv� �
Che'ri Skelto
Dev�lopment Cbordinator
l Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 19, 2004 A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday, August 19, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:Bob Bertrand David Brakebill Tom Burke Jim Gibson Shen-y Weesner Loren Smith-City Attorney Diana Steelquiest-Planner Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator With a quorum present, Commissioner Holland and Commissioner Klusendorf absent, Chairman Bertrand called the meeting to order to discuss the following: Call to order:
Regular Meeting: 1.Communications from the Commission.Commissioner Gibson stated that he attended the City Council meeting and the rezoning request for property along FM 2351 at Woodland Trails had the firstreading with Council; the vote was 6 to 1 in favor of the re-zoning. Several otherordinances were passed such as the Entryway Overlay District/DowntownOverlay District (EOD/DOD) changes and the final reading of the Whitcombproperty, which received a vote of 7 to 0. Commissioner Gibson also stated heattended the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District (GCCDD)meeting. He reported that an increase in flow rate has been established to ClearCreek since debris was cleared from the creek.Commissioner Burke wanted to point out from the June 17, 2004 minutes, that thediscussion had summarized only one of the two points he was trying to make.The one point he wanted to make that did not get captured in those minutes waswith regards to -the subdivision Hunters Creek and lack of access from thesubdivision and HEB. Commissioner Burke stated he was trying to makeeveryone aware that whenever possible the interconnectivity between residentialand commercial should be considered.Chairman Bertrand asked Staff to investigate the protocol and determine if it ispossible to hear communications from the liaisons present at the meetings.2.Communications from the public.Page 1 of 6 8/19/04 P & Z
No one spoke from the public at this tiII?-e, 3.Consent Agenda:A.Approval of the 6-17-04 regular meeting minutes.B.Approval of the 6-24-04 special meeting minutes.C.Approval of the 6-29-04 special meeting minutes.D.Approval of the 7-1-04 regular meeting minutes.E.Approval of the 8-2-04 special meeting minutes.F.Approval of the 8-5-04 regular meeting minutes.Motion: Second: Brakebill-to approve consent agenda. Gibson Commissioner Weesner requested that item "D" of the consent agenda be removed for discussion. Commissioner Burke requested item "E" of the consent agenda be removed for discussion. Amended Motion: Second: Second: Voted For: Chairman Be1trand-to remove Item "D" and Item "E" of the consent agenda for discussion. Weesner-Item "D" Burke-Item "E" Unanimous Motion CarriedItems "A", "B", "C", and "F" remained on the consent agenda for vote. Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried Item "D" Commissioner ·weesner commented on Item 3, fifth paragraph, second sentence of the July 1, 2004 minutes. This sentence should read: Amended Motion: Second: Voted For: The immediately adjacent tracts to the No1th, South and East are residential. Brakebill-to approve Item "D" with changes. Weesner Unanimous Motion Carried Item "E" Commissioner Burke commented on Item IA, second parag raph, first sentence of the August 2, 2004 minutes. This sentence should read: Overall, the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission felt the Governance Process using an Environmental Scan/Rezoning Rep01t was worthwhile and the more information the public was provided with about a project, the better. The Page 2 of 6 8/19/04 P & Z
[
Commis sioners present also voiced the opinion that Staffs report
be communicated prior to the public hearing and not be presented
at the public hearing.
Item lB last sentence should read:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Some discussion between Staff, Planning and Zoning and City
Council took place, especially with regards to where the
EOD/DOD intersect. The following discussion was concerning the
effect that the existing, as well as the proposed changes to those
ordinances would have on existing developments and legal non
conforming developments. That further consideration would be
given as the downtown area plan took form.
Brakebill-to approve Item "E" with changes.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding Zone Classification change for
property located along FM 518 and Bay Area Boulevard called the West Ranch
development.
A.From Single Family Residential (SFR) to Community Shopping Center
(CSC), 74 acres being Tracts 3 & 7, and Multi-Family Residential -Garden
Home District (MFR-GHD) 240.19 acres being Tracts 2, 4 & 6 and Single
Family Residential (SFR) 404.5 acres being Tracts 1 & 5, known as the West
Property along FM 518.
B.From Multi-Family Residential-Garden Home District (MFR-GHD), 240.19
acres, Tracts 2, 4 & 6, and Single Family Residential (SFR) 404.5 acres Tract
1 & 5 to Planned Unit Development-Cluster Homes (POD-Cluster Homes),
known as the West pro perty along FM 518.
C.From Single Family (SFR) 47.3 acres, Tract 8, located off Bay Area
Boulevard to Planned Unit Development-Cluster Homes (PU:D-Cluster
Homes).
Chaitman Be1trand gave an ove1view of the history of the development. He also
explained that the public hearing for the project was held last month. Chairman
Bertrand stated at the public hearing comments were made about prohibiting
commercial prope1ty along the EOD and DOD. For the record Chairman
Bertrand stated that the EOD and DOD does permit commercial property. In
addition, Commissioner Brakebill recused himself from any discussion or vote on
this proposed development.
Page 3 of 6
8/19/04 P & Z
I
The Commission recommended approval of all three requests. In making the
recommendation, the Commission clarified that the Cluster Home project would
be limited to 1,500 home sites as pmt of the PUD ordinance.
The· Commission believes that the Master Plan of the West Ranch is well
designed and is civically responsible. By developing as Cluster Homes and
providing Open Space along our natural creek areas, the development meets the
goals of the Open Space Task Force and the Pm·ks Master Plan. This
development will provide public access to our creeks, which have for the most
part only been accessible through private lots. Cluster Homes may also provide
places for those who work in our city, affordable home sites to also live here.
Changing demographics also indicate that smaller lots m·e desirable for seniors
and empty nesters. This development as designed creates a walkable community
with access to parks, schools and shopping along the trail system.
By providing 74 acres of commercial in the development, the Master Plan is also
helping the Community reach the Vision 2020 goal of 80 percent residential and
20 commercial.
Density was discussed but was not an issue so long as the PUD ordinance
specifically limits the development to 1500 lots. All of the Commissioners agreed
that the density proposed was well below what could develop if left as Single
Family Residential.
Drainage was also discussed. However, the Commission knows that the design
review and criteria for the detention will be fully addressed during the platting
process. Also when platting, some of the Commissioners expressed that they
would like to discourage any street connections with the Rancho Viejo
subdivision. However, these and other platting issues will have to be fully
discussed at the time of the plat review.
At this time, the Commission is reviewing proposed changes to the Cluster Home
Ordinance. The Commission is aware of the Agent's requests for increased lot
coverage and set back reductions, which are not currently available with the
current ordinance.
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Lakes of
Falcon Ridge Section Two.
Motion:
Second:
Burke-to approve Preliminary Plat with Staff comments
Brakebill
Saib Saour with Benchmark Engineering addressed the Commission. Mr. Saour
stated that he represented Brighton Homes who recently bought the prope1ty out
of bankruptcy to develop. Mr. Saour explained that this was the second section of
the original subdivision and will contain 79 lots. This subdivision will also have
Page 4 of 6
8/19/04 P & Z
an interconnee:tion to Parkview Drive. Mr. Saour also stated that the plan had
received preliminary drainage district approval. Mr. Saour addressed each item of
the Staff comments and will comply with each of Staffs comments.
Chairman Bertrand stated that he would like to have the applicant provide an
access to the detention pond for safety issues. Mr. Saour stated that he could
provide that access. Commissioner Burke stated that a verbiage statement appears
on the first page of the Preliminary Plat does not meet the requirements for the
City of Friendswood. This note should be removed.
Mr. Saour thanked City Staff and especially the Development Coordinator, Cheri
Skelton for all the assistance that was provided with this project.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
6. Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of the
Laurence Cline Subdivision.
Discussion took place regarding this property but no motion was made.
7.Discussion regarding Conceptual Plan for Mary's Creek Development located off
N01th Friendswood Dr.
Tony Banfield Jr. addressed the Commission. Mr. Banfield explained that last year
his company purchased this IO-acre tract to develop. The majority of the prope1ty
is zoned Community Shopping Center (CSC) with part of it being zoned Single
Family Residential (SFR). Mr. Banfield explained that the current zone does not
work for his devel opment. He will be requesting a Planned Unit Development
(PUD)/Specific Use Permit (SUP) for his project. He also explained that his
development is mainly structured to the "empty nesters" and should not have any
impact ·on the school system. Mr. Banfield stated that the townhomes would be for
sale and would consist of a square footage between 1800 and 2200 in size. This
would result in a density of approximately 4.7 units per acre. In addition, the Home
Owner's Association (HOA) will be responsible for the maintenance of the utilities
and streets.
Commissioner Burke asked Mr. Banfield if the project was going to be phased and
where the outfall of the detention pond would be. Mr. Banfield stated that it would
probably be phased; however, there is already interest in the office park so that
construction could begin at the same time as the residential section. With regards
to the outfall, it is constructed to go to Mary's Creek. In addition, the target date for
construction to begin is November of 2004. Commissioner Burke stated that the
Fire Marshall's Office should look at the design of the project.
Page 5 of 6
8/19/04 P & Z
Chairman Bertrand stated that the plans did not seem to show where a dumpster
location was proposed. He also stated the Entryway Overlay District (EOD) will
require the dumpster to be screened.
Mr. Banfield thanked the Commission and stated that within the next ten days he
will be applying for a zone change for the project.
8.Discussion and possible action regarding the Planning and Zoning Mission
Statement.
A draft mission statement was prepared by Commissioner Brakebill and
Commissioner Holland and presented to the Commission. After reviewing the
draft, some verbiage was changed. Staff will prepare a final draft with changes to
the mission statement for the Commission's approval.
9.Status report from the Commissioners regarding 2004 goals.
The Commission reviewed and updated their 2004 goals. One item that was
requested by the Commission was that Staff provide the minutes from the
Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District (GCCDD) meetings, if possible.
10.Staff Report
Staff reported that a joint public hearing is scheduled for September 13, 2004. The
public hearing is concerning two re-zoning requests and an amendment of the
Zoning Ordinance regarding Miniwarehouse use. Staff also reported that the
property on Woodland Trail had the first reading with City Council. In addition,
Staff stated that sign ordinance draft would hopefully be ready by September for
the Commission to review. Staff also explained the Galveston County Appraisal
District numbers for the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is being reviewed
manually to ensure accuracy.
11.Adjournment
With no fmther comment the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
l. �/<.< - · <Umv
� � C�i Skel�
Development Coordinator
Page 6 of 6
8/19/04 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
ofthe
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 2, 2004
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held on
Thursday, September 2, 2004 at 5:30 pm at the Friendswood City Hall second floor
conference room, located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The
following Planning & Zoning Commissioners were present:
Bob Bertrand
Tom Burke
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland-6:20 p.m.
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioners Brakebill absent, Chairman Bertrand, called the
special meeting to order.
Call to order:
Special Meeting:
1.Discussion regarding Cluster Homes.
The Commission determined a definition of "open space" and "green space" wasstill needed. The Commission asked Staff to research other cities as well as
Federal and State definitions of "open space", "green space" and landscape buffer.
The City Attorney stated that the platting process would govern "open space"
requirements. The Commission also discussed the possibilities of a land trust or
perpetuity ownership by the City of Friendswood for open space.
Staff presented the Commission with a concept of Cluster Homes to use in creating
the draft ordinance. The Commissioners had mixed feeling about some of the
concepts Staff presented (i.e. sidewalks on one side of a collector street, overall
density, and lot sizes) but Staff was given the approval to create a draft of the
ordinance with Commissioners' comments. After listening to Staffs proposed
concept, Commissioner Burke stated that if it was accepted then theFe was no
reason for the Multi-Family Residential-Garden Home District (MFR-GHD) to
remain as a zone. He suggested that it be removed from the Zoning Ordinance to
be replaced with Cluster Homes. Chairman Bertrand asked Staff to package their
proposal with the removal of MFR-GHD. The Commission determined one more
workshop was needed for the Cluster Homes discussion.
2.Discussion regarding the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 1 of 2
9/2/04 P & Z
Staff presented a graph of land uses with information obtained through the
Galveston County Ap praisal District. The analysis of land uses came from the tax
roles. This graph indicated that Friendswood currently has approximately 44
percent residential, 6 percent commercial, 27 percent undeveloped and 23 percent
was considered exempt or in the road right-of-way. The next step in the land use
analysis will be to compare city zoning districts with land use.
3.Adjournment
With no fu1ther comment the meeting was adjourned at 6:48 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 2 of2
9/2/04 P & Z
t
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 2, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, September 2, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Tom Burke
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Bertrand called the meeting to order to discuss the
following:
Call to order:
Regular Meeting:
1.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Klusendorf commended the Commission on moving forward with
a positive recommendation on the West Ranch re-zoning request.
Commissioner Burke stated he attended a Galveston County Consolidated
Drainage District Meeting (GCCDD), however due to losing his voice he will
report on the meeting at the next Planning and Zoning meeting.
All Commissioners requested a hard copy of any drawings in lieu of electronic
copy.
2.Communications from the public.
No one from the public spoke at this time.
3. Discussion and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of the Laurence
Cline Subdivision.
Chairman Bertrand explained that since no motion was made at the previous
·Planning and Zoning meeting this item was required to be placed back on the
agenda.
Page 1 of 5
9/2/04 P & Z
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-to approve
Burke
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the 8-19-04 special meeting minutes.
B.Approval of the 8-19-04 regular meeting minutes.
C.Approval of the Final Plat of the Laurence Cline Subdivision.
Motion:
Second:
Holland-to approve consent agenda
Brakebill
Chairman Bertrand asked that Item "B" of the consent agenda be removed for
discussion.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to remove Item "B" of the consent agenda
Holland
A vote for approval was then taken on Items "A" and "C" of the consent agenda.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Chairman Bertrand stated that it was his intention to have his comment regarding
the Entryway Overlay District .and Downtown Overlay District (EOD/DOD) on
the record concerning the West Ranch project. This comment should have been
placed in the first paragraph of the Item # 4. That paragraph should read:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Chairman Bertrand gave an overview of the history of the
development. He also explained that the public hearing for the
project was held last month. Chairman Bertrand stated at the
public hearing comments were made about prohibiting commercial
prope1ty along the EOD and DOD. For the record, Chairman
Be1trand stated that the EOD and DOD does permit commercial
property. In addition, Commissioner Brakebill recused himself
from any discussion or vote on this proposed development.
Burke-to approve with changes.
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Discussion and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for
Primrose School located at 1409 S. Friendswood Dr.
Motion: Holland-to approve Commercial Site Plan
Page 2 of 5
9/2/04 P & Z
Second: Brakebill
Patty Lozano, with PDG Architects representative for the developer, addressed
the Commission. Ms. Lozano explained that the franchise would like to develop a
childcare facility in Friendswood. This facility would have access off of Winding
Way and FM 518. In addition, the Site Plan has received preliminary approval
from the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District (GCCDD).
Commissioner Klusendorf asked when the construction for the project was
scheduled to begin. Ms. Lozano stated that construction would begin as soon as a
building permit is issued from the city.
Commissioner Burke noted that with reference to the Site Plan a lot of existing
trees were going to be removed. He asked why that was the case. Ms. Lozano
stated that due to excavation and GCCDD requirements the trees must be
removed. Commissioner Burke noted that one tree along Winding Way is
proposed to be removed, however, it does not seem to be in the way of excavating
for the detention pond. After review of the Site Plan, Ms. Lozano stated that the
note for removal of the tree would be taken off the Site Plan. Commissioner
Burke also pointed out a note on the Site Plan with regards to a fence. After
review of the note Ms. Lozano stated she was not sure if the fence was needed for
the development of the project. Commissioner Burke stated if the fence is not
needed then the note should be removed. Ms. Lozano stated she would find out if
the fence is needed before she submits additional plans to the City of
Friendswood for a building permit.
Chairman Bertrand stated his concern for safety with the proposed driveway
along FM 518. Staff stated that the driveway was actually designed by TxDot.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-to approve with changes to saving a tree along Winding
Way and to look at the note on the site plan regarding a fence to
determine if it should be removed or installed by developer.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for Sun
Meadow Plaza located at the comer of Sun Meadow Boulevard and FM 528.
Motion:
Second:
Bolland-to approve Commercial Site Plan
Burke
Bruce Fehr with Fehr, Grossman, Cox, representative for the developer, addressed
the Commission. Mr. Fehr explained the site is a commercial retail site with two
points of access, one off of Sun Meadow Drive the other off of FM 528. Randy
Liska with JKC and Associates explained that a master drainage plan had been
Page 3 of 5
9/2/04 P & Z
approved by the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District (GCCDD) and
the detention pond would be maintained by the property owner/owner's. He also
explained that, from a safety standpoint, entering and exiting the property from
Sun Meadow Drive would be safer than FM 528. Mr. Fehr pointed out that the
median must be reduced along Sun Meadow Drive for emergency access, but the
irrigation line that has been installed by the Boca Raton Home Owner's
Association (HOA) would be repaired to working condition. A maintenance
agreement of the irrigation line will be worked out between the developer and the
HOA.
Commissioner Burke wanted to know why a common access drive had not been
provide to the adjacent prope1ty. After discussion between Commissioner Burke
and Staff it was determined a common access drive would be required if it did not
interfere with elevations of the property. Staff also stated that it would see if a
common access drive was required on the Plat. Commissioner Burke also pointed
out that the adjacent property fence (Boca Raton Section One) was sagging and
could use some improvements. Commissioner Burke would like the developer to
provide assistance with fence repairs. Mr. Fehr stated he would need to verify
with the developer that providing assistance with fence repair was not a problem.
He stated that he felt the developer would not have a problem with that request.
Chai.Iman Bertrand suggested to Mr. Fehr that instead of using crape my1tles
within all the islands use some tree like a Live Oak. Chairman Be1trand stated
that is was only a suggestion and not a requirement for the project.
Amended
Motion: Holland-to create common access drive to adjacent property and if
feasible, help in the repair of some of the sagging section of the fence that abuts
the commercial prope1ty.
Second: Burke
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Planning and Zoning Mission
Statement.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve Mission Statement
Holland
After discussion some changes were made to the drafted Mission Statement. The
Commission decided that the Mission Statement would be as follows:
"To promote the highest quality of life and to maintain the
community's heritage for the current and future residents of the
City of Friendswood through sound planning and zoning, including
the sensitive, effective and professional administration of the
Comprehensive Plan, enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance,
Page 4 of 5
9/2/04 P & Z
!I Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Subdivision Ordinance and other development regulations."
Gibson-to approve with changes
Holland
Unanimous Motion Carried
Chairman Bertrand asked that the adopted Mission Statement of Planning and
Zoning be communicated to the Mayor and City Council.
8.Staff Report
Staff announced to the Commission that a public hearing would be held
September 13, 2004. Also, one more workshop will be needed on Cluster Homes.
Staff provided the Commission a list of Development Review Committee (DRC)
meetings and invited the Commissioner's to attend. Staff also provided the
minutes from the last Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District
(GCCDD) meeting.
Commissioner Burke requested a copy of the agenda from the Developer's Forum
that Staff held on August 24, 2004 be forwarded to the Commi ssion. Staff stated
a Developer's Forum would be held every 6 months.
9.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 8:28 p.m.
tku
Development Coordinator
Page 5 of 5
9/2/04 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 13, 2004
A special meeting of the Friendswood Plan ning and Zoning Commission was held Monday,
September 13, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand-7:05 p.m.
Tom Burke
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Mike Hodge-Director of CD and PW
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of Community Development
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Holland absent, Chairman Be1trand called the meeting to
order to consider the following.
Call to order:
Docketed Joint Public Heari ng:
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
Chaiiman Be1trand had a request to change the order of the agenda items.
A.Zone Classification change 1.445 acre tract of land being a portion of umestricted
Reserve "B" along Friendswood Lakes Boulevard, Friends wood Lakes Subdivision,
Section 1, Galveston County, Texas, from: Single-Family Residential (SFR), to:
Office Park District (OPD). (1623 Friendswood Lakes Boulevard).
Steve Gardner and Scott Hunter, with Huitt-Zollar, representatives for the developer
Mitch Mitchell addressed the Commission and City Council. Mr. Gardner stated that it is
the developer's intent to develop a two-story professional office on the prope1ty. The
prope1ty had always been designated by the developer to be for commercial use and had
been constructed within a master plan when the development of Friendswood Lakes
Subdivision began. Cunently, the developer would like to rezone this portion of Reserve
"B" and rezone his remaining property within that subdivision at a later date.
No one spoke in favor of the re-zoning.
The following spoke against the re-zoning.
Richard Gierczic, 1621 Garden Lakes Dr., stated that he will live near the development
and does not want the re-zoning request to go through. He stated that if an office
Page 1 of 3
9/13/04 P & Z
building were allowed, it would hinder his view of the lake. He also stated that he moved
there for the piece and quit of the su rroundings and if the re-zoning goes forth that will
take away the quietness of the subdivision.
Glen Grayban, 1628 Mossy Stone Dr., stated the area is hospitable and beautiful to
families. He is concerned those attributes that rezoning the property to commercial will
take away from that.
John Ribarits, 1°605 Cascade Falls, stated he enjoys the lake and open space of the
subdivision and the quality of life the open space gives. He also stated that a commercial
development would take away from that.
Raymond Sawicki, 1604 Stoney Lakes Dr., stated that the thing that attracted him to the
Friendswood Lake Subdivision was the beauty of the subdivision. The builder had
shown him a master plan of the subdivision that did not indicate that was ever to be any
commercial. He also stated the backyard of his home will face this development if this
property is allowed to be re-zoned. This development will take away from the beauty of
the subdivision.
Kathleen Sawicki, 1604 Stoney Lakes Dr., stated that she agreed with her husband but
her main concern is the view from the backyard. She explained the office building would
look out of place among the residential homes.
Charles Chrzanowski, 1809 Sandy Lakes Dr., stated the prope1ty was not always planned
to be commercial or the developer, when developing the subdivision would have zoned it
commercial then. He also agrees with all of the other people before him and feels an
office building will take away from the beauty of the subdivision.
Pam Hoy, 1602 Stoney Lake Dr., stated that her concern was dealt more with safety
issues. She explained that a lot of young children live in the subdivision. The backyards
of these children's homes can be viewed from the proposed commercial site. The
proposed office building will have different people coming and going all day. She feels
that Friendswood Lakes Subdivision is a neighborhood for families and not businesses.
Steve Hernandez, 1931 Skip Rock Dr., explained he is a future homeowner and if he had
known this re-zoning was going to happen then he would not have bought in the
subdivision. He stated he feels the subdivision is a place for kids and the green space
should be kept.
Mitch Mitchell, the developer, addressed the Commission and City Council in favor of
the request. Mr. Mitchell stated he is very pleased with how Friendswood Lakes
Subdivision turned out. He also explained all the literature that has been distributed with
regards to Friendswood Lakes has always indicated this prope1ty woul d be developed as
commercial prope1ty. He feels the commercial prope1ty will be an asset to the
community and will not put a burden on the school district.
Page2 of3
9/13/04 P & Z
B.Zone Classification change for 45.8541 acres, tract 2, out of the Joh n Dickinson
Survey, properiy located at the 3900 Block of W. Bay Area Boulevard, Harris
County, Texas, from: Single Family Residential (SFR), to: Multi-family Residential
Garden Homes (MFR-Garden Homes)
C.Zone Classification change for 45.8541 acres, tract 2, out of John Dickinson Survey,
prope1ty located at the 3900 Block of W. Bay Area Boulevard, HaiTis County, Texas,
from: Multi-Family Residential-Ga rden Hom es (MFR-Garden Homes), to: Planned
Unit Development-Cluster Homes (PUD-Cluster Homes).
Dick Duffy, 8584 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas addressed the Commi ssion and City
Council. Mr. Duffy stated he is the developer of the property and over the past
couple of years he has spoken to Staff and Planning and Zoning with regai·ds to the
development of this property. Mr. Duffy is proposing 94 units on the property with
16 to 17 acres of the property being developed and the remaining 28 acres being open
space to be owned and maintained by the Home Owner's Association (HOA).
Councilman Goza asked if the zoning were to stay, as it is, how many homes could be
built on the site. Mr. Duffy stated he could build about 124 units. He also stated the
value of the homes would range in price from $175, 000 to $230,000 and would focus
on empty nesters. The homes would also be free standing homes with spacing
between each un it. Mayor Brizendine stated that he and council like projects where
overall density is reduced and green space is made available.
D.Amending Zoning Ordinance-Rev isions to the Permitted Use Table by adding Use
#53113 Lessors of mini-warehouses and self-storage units.
No one spoke either for or against the proposed amendment.
2.Adjournment
With no further comment, the Chairman closed the Joint Public Hea ring at 7:58 P.M.
<Mtb -<� St_() 2�/an e1 ·1:-.Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
9/13/04 P & Z
I
Min utes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 16, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, September 16, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Tom Burke
Jim Gibson
Roy K.lusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quornm present, Commissioner Holland absent, Chairman Be1trand called the
meeting to order to discuss the following:
Call to order:
Regular Meeting:
1.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Gibson stated that he attended the Galveston County Consolidated
Drainage District (GCCDD) meeting and the Sun Meadow Plaza project passed
for Final approval. He also stated that GCCDD was in agreement on attending a
workshop with Planning and Zoning with regards to regional detention.
Chairman Bertrand requested Staff to follow up with the GCCDD about the
workshop.
2.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the 9-2-04 special meeting minutes.
B.Approval of the 9-2-04 regular meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve the consent agenda
Gibson
Commissioner Weesner requested Item "A" be removed for discussion.
Item "B" of the consent agenda was then voted upon.
Page 1 of 6
9/16/04 P & Z
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Unanimous
Weesner-remove Item "A" for discussion
Burke
Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner stated Item 2, page 2, second sentence should be:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
The analysis of land uses came from the tax roles.
Brakebill-to approve with changes to Item "A" of the consent
agenda.
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding Zone Classification change for
property located along the 3900 Block of West Bay Area Boulevard.
A.From Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential-Garden
Home District (MFR-GHD), Tract 2, 45.8541 Acre tract, John Dickinson
survey abstract 15, Harris County, TX.
B.From Multi-Family Residential-Garden Home District (MFR-GHD), to
Planned Unit Development-Cluster Home (PUD-Cluster Home), Tract 2,
45.8541 Acre tract, John Dickinson survey abstract 15, Harris County, TX
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve zone classification change
Weesner
Chairman Bertrand stated that this item was presented at the Joint Public Hearing
with City Council on September 13, 2004. He also stated no one spoke for or
against this project.
Dick Duffy, 8584 Katy Freeway, was present to address any questions the
Commission had regarding this project.
Commissioner Burke asked if the lines at what appears to be the entrance of the
subdivision indicate the subdivision would be a gated community with private
streets. Mr. Duffy responded that the lines do represent a gated community, but if
the Commission voted not to have the gates, he would still proceed with his
project. Commissioner Burke pointed out to the Commission that Mr. Duffy is
asking for a zone change to a Planned Unit Development/Cluster Home
(PUD/Cluster Home) and a master Site Plan is required for this request, therefore
the concept of a gated community versus a non-gated community must be voted
on with the zone change request. Mr. Duffy requested the Commission consider
the gates in their decision. Commission Burke also asked Mr. Duffy if a gated
Page 2 of 6
9/16/04 P & Z
community existed, would there be public access to a hike and bike trail along the
creek. Mr. Duffy stated that hike and bike trails were not part of the plan for this
development. Commissioner Weesner stated that the open space that this tract of
land offers would be suitable to the city and appealing to the public.
Commissioner Brakebill stated that future drawings should have better
infmmation and should have items on the drawing labeled accordingly.
Commissioner Burke asked Staff how it would be possible to let the public enjoy
a hike and bike trail on private property.
Motion:
Second:
Burke-that the PUD/Cluster Home incorporate a minimum hike
and bike trail through the development with public access.
Klusendorf
Chaiiman Bertrand stated the motion made by Commissioner Burke should be
discussed with the City Attorney to ensure the requirement can be placed on
private property. The Commissioners agreed that the public access through the
project should be allowed.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to table item for City Attorney's clarification of legal
issues regarding property access.
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Zone Classification change for
property located at 1623 Friendswood Lakes Boulevard.
A.Zone Classification change 1.445 acre tract of land being a portion of
umestricted Reserve "B" along Friendswood Lakes Boulevard,
Friendswood Lakes Subdivision, Section 1, Galveston County, Texas,
from: Single-Family Residential (SFR), to: Office Park District (OPD).
(1623 Friendswood Lakes Bouleva rd).
Chai1man Bertrand gave a brief history of the re-zoning request and
Commissioner Gibson reviewed the comments and concerns presented by citizens
present at the public hearing. Items of concern were: allowable view into back
yards and the safety issue it will create for families with small children. Also, not
being able to view the entire pond due to visual obstruction, commercial prope1ty
within the subdivision will take away from the beauty of the subdivision, and the
builders stated that the prope1ty was only for residential use.
Motion:
Second:
Burke-to open for discussion
Brakebill
Page 3 of 6
9/16/04 P & Z
Chairman Bertrand asked each Commissioner to voice their views on this
proposed zone change. It was felt by most Commissioners the land the developer
is requesting to be re-zoned is infringing on the subdivision, there is not property
tax gain for the city, and one Commissioner stated he felt the un restrictive
reserve, which the developer is trying to rezone, should have been done at the
time the subdivision was being developed. The Commissioners also expressed an
interest in seeing the Master Commercial Plan for the area. The Commission also
pointed out there is no other commercial development in the area to support a
change in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which indicates the property as
Single Family Residential. In addition, it was recognized that Frien dswood Lakes
Boulevard would one day be Brittany Bay Boulevard but is cutTently not open to
through traffic.
Voted For: Be1trand
Voted Against: Brakebill, Burke, Gibson, Klusendorf, Weesner
Motion Failed
6.Consideration and possible action regarding amending Zoning Ordinance
Revisions to the Permitted Use Table by adding Use #53113 Lessors of mini
warehouses and self-storage units.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve the amendment to the Permitted Use Table
Weesner
After discussion the Commission felt Use #53113 should be restricted with a
Specific Use Pe1mit in the following zoning districts: Community Shopping
Center (CSC), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Local Neighborhood
Commercial (LNC), Business Park (BP) and Planned Unit Development (PUD).
Miniwarehouses and self-storage units should be permitted in: Light Industrial
(LI), and Industrial (I) districts. The issue of concern was pe1mitting
miniwarehouse and self-storage units in Office Park District (OPD) and Original
Business District (OBD), which with this recommendation they will not be
allowed.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Burke-remove "S" from the Pe1mitted Use table for Office Park
District and Original Business District and allow miniwarehouses
with a Specific Use Permit in Business Park District (BP).
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding tree requirements on the Commercial
Site Plan of the Primrose School located at 1410 FM 518.
Motion: Gibson-to approve request of applicant to replace required Cedar
Tree with a Live Red Oak.
Page 4 of 6
9/16/04 P & Z
Second: Brakebill
Commissioner Burke stated that on the Site Plan originally approved by the
Commission there appeared to be approximately a half a dozen trees on this
property that could be saved during construction versus being removed because of
excavation of the detention pond. He also stated he believed the Galveston
County Consolidated Drainage District had stated at one time trees within the
detention pond were allowable.
8.Discussion and possible action regarding the meeting rotation schedule of
Commissioners.
Chairman Bertrand commended Commissioner Holland and Staff on the rotation
scheduled presented to the Commissioners. Commissioner Weesner stated that
the schedule did not reflect someone attending City Council meetings. Staff
stated the rotation schedule would be revised to include City Council meetings
then would be redistributed. Chairman Be1trand requested a motion for him to
send a letter out to all the other committees and boards with the revised schedule.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Burke-to approve rotation schedule with changes and having the
Chairman send out a letter to the different committees and boards.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
9.Status report from the Commissioners regarding 2004 goals.
The Commission reviewed their 2004 goals. Commissioner Holland presented
through Staff a liaison rotation schedule of other committees and boards. This
completed another goal item. Chai1man Be1trand stated he felt to finish the
Comprehensive Land Use Study additional workshops should be scheduled to
complete this goal before the end of the year. After discussion amongst the
Commission it was decided a Saturday workshop would be better for all
Commissioners to attend.
10.Repmts
A.Staff
Staff reported attending a conference in San Jose, California for mixed-use
development.
B.Liaisons
City Council liaison reported the second reading with City Council for the zone
classification change for the Forest of Friendswood passed on September 13,
Page 5 of 6
9/16/04 P & Z
2004. In addition, the Council liaison stated he would not be able to attend the
American Planning Association Conference as originally thought.
11.Adjournment
With no fmther comment the meeting was adjourned at 8:57 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 6 of 6
9/16/04 P & Z
l i
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
October 7, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, October 7, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910
S.Friendswood Driv e, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Be1trand
David Brakebill
Tom Burke
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chainnan Bertrand called the meeting to order to discuss the
following:
Call to order:
Regular Meeting:
1.Consideration and possible action regarding the selection of chairman and vice
chairman.
Chairman Be1trand stated he was leaving as chairman but is pleased and honored
to have been chai1man. He also stated that, as chairman, he had wished to have
completed some goals such as the Tree Preservation Ordinance, Sign Ordinance,
and he had wished to work on a-Sound Ordinance. He is pleased, however, to
have been pait of the Whitcomb prope1ty and the West prope1ty and is excited
about the changes they bring to Friendswood. He thanked members of Planning
and Zoning, Staff, and City Council. He was especially thankful to former
Mayor, Harold Whitaker, Mayor Brizendine, and most imp01tantly his wife.
Commissioner Gibson nominated Commissi <?ner Holland for Chaiiman, seconded
by Commissioner Weesner. Commissioner Burke nominated Commissioner
Gibson for Chairman, seconded by Commissioner Brakebill. Commissioner
Gibson declined the nomination.
Voted For Commissioner Holland as Chairman-Bertrand, Brakebill, Gibson,
Holland, Klusendorf, and W_eesner.
Voted For Commissioner Gibson as Chahman-Burke
Commissioner Holland-Chairman
Page 1 of 7
10/7/04 P & Z
Chairman Holland nominated Commissioner Gibson as Vice-Chairman, seconded
by Commissioner Klusendorf. Commissioner Burke nominated Commissioner
Brakebill, seconded by Commissioner Weesner. Commissioner Brakebill
declined the nomination.
Voted for Commissioner Gibson for Vice-Chairman-Bertrand, Brakebill, Burke,
Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Weesner.
Commission Gibson-Vice-Chahman
2.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Bertrand stated he attended a meeting with all committees. Some
important issues discussed were the city strategy, defining and understanding
80/20 concept, quicker ordinance development, and positive Commission images.
He also stated Mayor Brizendine brought up issues such as better efforts of
communication, be hard on issues and soft on people, and the city's vision 2020.
Commissioner Bertrand reminded the Commission of a dinner to be held on
October 19 th for all committees. He also stated that the Planning and Zoning
Commission should consider a booth during the 4 th of July, so that the citizens can
get better acquainted with the Commission.
Commissioner Burke explained he and Copunissioner Bertrand has been working
on the Tree Preservation Ordinance for the last four years. He stated he felt since
Commissioner Bertrand has a lot of knowledge and information regarding all the
years dedicated to this, he should continue to work with the sub-committee to get
this ordinance in place. Commissioner Burke also stated he would like to have
the electronic agenda process made an agenda item for discussion at a future
meeting. In addition, Commissioner Burke added that he had attended the
Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District (GCCDD) meeting. He
explained that before he attended the meeting, he had written a letter to the
GCCDD regarding tree preservation and construction of hike and bike trails.
Commissioner Burke reported that it seems the GCCDD does not intend to do
anything with regards to these issues. The GCCDD feels that these items are
ordinance issues and they do not govern by ordinances.
Commissioner Gibson thanked Commissioner Bertrand and Commissioner Burke
for their leadership and congratulated Chairman Holland on his new position. He
also stated that he was disturbed about the agenda being totally electronic and
explained it was not always convenient to come to City Hall to go over the
reading file.
Commissioner Klusendorf thanked Commissioner Be1trand and Commissioner
Burke. He also expressed desire to have paper copies of drawings.
Page 2 of 7
10/7/04 P & Z
I :
l
Commissioner Brakebill thanked Commissioner Be1trand and Commissioner
Burke and congratulated Chaiiman Holland.
Commissioner Weesner thanked Commissioner Bertrand and Commissioner
Burke and congratulated Chairman Holland. She also agreed with other
Commissioners that access to paper drawings should be discussed. She explained
that getting to City Hall is not always possible and if a reading file is necessary,
then consideration should be given to it being at a location such as the City
Library that stays open later than City Hall. In addition, Commissioner Weesner
asked Staff to prepare a short lecture on how the city gets tax revenue and how it
collects. She also asked Staff to work on gathering information for such items as
Texas Coastland rules and how they apply to the City of Friendswood; the city's
80/20 vision with regards tax revenue, and real information on how land is
designated. Commissioner Weesner wanted to make the Commission aware of
newspaper aiticles she had read with regards to items that will eventually be
before the Commission. One was with regards to Cluster Home developments
and fire spreading easily if homes are allowed to be built six feet apart. The other
is with regards to the Tree Preservation Ordinance and requiring a variety of trees
to be planted since disease spreads easily when several trees of the same species
ai·e planted.
Chairman Holland thanked everyone for his new position. He also thanked
Commissioner Bertrand and Burke for their motivation and hard work. He also
stated that if possible he would like to have Commissioner Be1trand continue on
the Tree Preservation Committee.
3.Communications from the public.
Ed Sherill, #5 Windsong addressed the Commission. Mr. Sherill expressed his
concerns regai·ding a roadway or emergency exit that could be constructed
between Windsong Subdivision and Sun Meadow Sub division. Mr. Sherill stated
he does not want the interconnectivity between the two subdivisions. He also
stated that if his request does not go through and the roadway is put it place then
curb and gutter street should be required to be constructed through the entire
subdivision by the developer.
4.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the 9-13-04 public heai-ing meeting minutes.
B.Approval of the 9-16-04 regulai· meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Be1trand-to approve
Brakebill
Commissioner Weesner asked for each item of the consent agenda to be taken off
for discussion.
Page 3 of 7
10/7/04 P & Z
Commissioner Weesner stated that Item "B" of the consent agenda, page 4, item 6
motion refers to her by her first name and should be by her last name.
Commissioner Burke also stated within Item "B" of the consent agenda, page 1,
Item 1, the second sentence should read:
He also stated that GCCDD was in agreement on attending a workshop
with Planning and Zoning with regards to regional detention.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve Item "B" with changes
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner stated that Item "A" of the consent agenda, page 1, iteml,
third sentence should read:
The property had always been designated by the developer to be for commercial
use and had been constructed within a master plan when the development of
Friendswood Lakes Subdivision began.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Tabled Items:
Weesner-to approve Item "A" with changes
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding Zone Classification change for
prope1ty located along the 3900 Block of West Bay Area Boulevard.
A.From Single Family Residential (SFR) to Multifamily Residential-Garden
Home District (MFR-GHD), Tract 2, 45.8541 acre tract, John Dickinson
Survey Abstract 15, Harris County, TX.
B.From Multi-Family Residential-Garden Home District (MFR-GHD), to
Planned Unit Development-Cluster Home (PUD-Cluster Home), Tract 2,
45.8541 acre tract, John Dickinson Survey Abstract 15, Harris County,
TX.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Be1trand-to take item off table.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
This item was tabled at the last meeting in order to ask the City Attorney if a hike
and bike trail can be required of the developer in order for approval. The City
Page 4 of?
10/7/04 P & Z
I I
Attorney stated that the construction of the hike and bike trail or access to the
property couldn't be made a requirement for approval. Some Commissioners still
expressed that it would be beneficial to tie-in the hike/bike trail system along
Clear Creek proposed by the adjacent development in the West Ranch.
Dick Duffy, 8584 Katy Freeway, addressed the Commission regarding his project.
Mr. Duffy presented a new Site Plan clearly identifying the privacy gates to the
development, fencing, landscape buffer and the emergency access will be
installed. The Commission also expressed the need for access to the detention
pond for safety reasons. Mr. Duffy stated that enough access would be provided
for safety vehicles.
The Commission believes that, due to the amount of area located in wetlands and
or the flood way, the proposed land plan using a cluster home design is logical
and efficient.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Regular Meeting:
Gibson-to approve zone classification change
Weesner
Unanimous
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for
Calvary Chapel Church located at 1409 S. Friendswood Dr.
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to approve
Gibson
Commissioner Be1trand asked Staff if it was the intent with the request if
approved to bring the front of the property into compliance with the Entryway
Overlay District (EOD) requirements including the sign? Staff stated the new
portion that the prope1ty would be in compliance with the crnTent ordinance
requirements; the existing building is not being changed so no changes have been
requested. Commissioner Bertrand stated that he felt the plan was one plan and
not two and he would like to see the whole property come into compliance.
Commissioner Burke asked if permission by the pipeline has given for the paving
within their easement. Jim Weaver, Demar Engineering, representative for
Calvary Chapel Church addressed the Commission. Mr. Weaver stated that the
pipeline had given permission and he explained that not all of the pipeline
easement would be paving. Commissioner Bmke asked if Mr. Weaver understood
that the paving would be the only thing being given approval, and not the
proposed futme building shown on the plans. Mr. Weaver stated he understood
that from Staff. Commissioner Burke continued to say that the site, by virtue of
the EOD, has non-conforming issues, such as setbacks and landscaping buffers,
and must be brought up to conformance for approval. Staff stated that the
property is two separate tracts and the new p01tion is being brought up to
Page 5 of 7
10/7/04 P & Z
compliance with the EOD. The existing tract was not required to come into
compliance; however, new landscaping along the front of the existing tract was
provided by Staff's request. Mr. Weaver stated that Staff requested the
landscaping be extended along the existing property. Staff stated that when the
building was to be built then the property must be platted and come into
compliance. Commissioner Weesner stated that the existing property is cunently
legal non-conforming. She asked Staff if there are additional non-conforming
issues other than the sign and the landscaping buffer. Staff stated possibly a rear
landscaping buffer and landscaping buffer along Blackhawk. Some
Commissioners felt that the prope1ty should be considered as one and not two
pieces of property and should be brought up to EOD requirements.
Commissioner Bertrand stated that he would like for the City Attorney to
provided clarification on this prope1ty whether it should be considered one piece
of prope1ty or two. Commissioner Bertrand also felt a legal interpretation is
needed to determine at what threshold a prope1ty owner is required to bring their
property up to confmmance when it is a legal non-conforming use.
Amended
Motion: Gibson-to table item for legal advice
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Be1trand, Brakebill, Burke, Gibson, Holland, and Weesner
Voted Against: Klusendorf Motion to Table Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the amending of Commercial Site
Plan for Friendswood Retail Center located at corner of FM 528 and FM 518.
Prior to the meeting, the applicant requested for this item to be removed from the
agenda.
8.Discussion regarding Conceptual Plan for commercial property reserves located
on FM 528 at Friendswood Lakes Subdivision.
Mitch Mitchell, Altair Development, addressed the Commission._ Mr. Mitchell
presented visuals of the proposed project and gave a history of his intentions for
the development which dated back to the late 1990's. He stated that he did not yet
have any tenants lined up for the property. Mr. Mitchell's intention is to rezone
the prope1ty from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Community Shopping
Center (CSC). He also asked the Commissioners for their input on the proposed
project. The Commissioners seemed very receptive to the development, but asked
Mr. Mitchell to take into consideration making the project pedestrian friendly by
adding walk ways for those who live within the Friendswood Lakes Subdivision.
Commissioner Burke stated he felt that Mr. Mitchell should rezone the property to
a Planned Unit Development (PUD) since it has not been determined what type of
tenants will occupy the property. Mr. Mitchell stated that he and his business
prutner felt the CSC zone was the proper zone at this time.
Page 6 of 7
10/7/04 P & Z
9.Rep01ts
A.Staff
Staff repo1ted on the city spon sored rezoning land swap that took place between
the City of Friendswood and League City. Staff stated that it was time to move
forward with the rezoning of 50 to 60 acres of prope1ty acquired from that
transaction. Staff also explained that cost had been the reason for the delay. The
zoning being considered is from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Community
Shopping Center (CSC) and Business Park (BP).
Staff stated that the paperless agenda does need to be an upcoming agenda item
for discussion. Staff also announced a workshop on Cluster Homes will be on
October 21, 2004. This workshop may also include the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan and the Sign Ordinance.
Staff stated a training CD could be purchased for the Commission. At the retreat
held on October 7, 2004, Vision 2020 was discussed as a guiding document for
the city.
B. Liaisons
No one spoke at this time.
10.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
ordinator
Page 7 of7
10/7/04 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
October 21, 2004
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held on
Thursday, October 21, 2004 at 5:30 pm at the Friendswood City Hall second floor
conference room, located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The
following Planning & Zoning Commissioners were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of C.D.
Diana Steelquist-Planner
With a quorum present, Commissioners Brakebill and Commission Burke absent,
Chairman Holland called the special meeting to order.
Call to order:
Special Meeting:
1.Discussion regarding Cluster Homes.
At the directive of the Commission, Staff presented a revised version of the Cluster
Home Ordinance, which integrated the Staff recommendations. In addition, the
Commission and Staff discussed the definitions of open space and green space.
The consensus was that green space is a component of open space. It was
recom mended that a definition of open space be included in the Zoning Ordinance
at some point in the future. The revised ordinance should also include an item to
address setbacks for a cluster home development. It was also suggested that those
setbacks be included in the regulation matrix.
During discussions on defining open space, Commissioner Weesner restated her
opinion that a golf course should not be considered as open space.
The consensus of the Commission was that this item was ready to be discussed
with possible action at a regular meeting.
2.Discussion regarding the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff presented a map with a data sheet indicating the breakdown for the
percentages of commercial and non-commercial property as zoned in Friendswood.
The next step will be to analyze the relationship of the zoned areas with available
vacant land.
Page 1 of 2
10/21/04 P & Z
. 3. Adjowrunent
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m .
Page 2 of2
10/21/04 P & Z
[ I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
October 21, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, October 21, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910
S.Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Burke absent, Chairman Holland called the
meeting to order to discuss the following:
Call to order:
Regular Meeting:
1.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
2.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the 10-7-04 regular meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve consent agenda
Klusendorf
Commissioner Bertrand asked that Item "A" of the consent agenda be removed
for discussion. He stated item 6, page 6, the last sentence should read:
Commissioner Be1trand also felt a legal interp�·etation is needed to
dete1mine at what threshold a property owner is required to bring their
prope1iy up to conformance when it is a legal non-conforming use.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve with changes.
Klusendorf
Unanimous
Page 1 of 4
10/21/04 P & Z
Motion Carried
Tabled Items:
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for
Calvary Chapel Church located at 1409 S. Friendswood Dr.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to remove from table for discussion.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
The City Attorney stated that this property is to be considered two tracts of land.
The property the church currently is on and is not making improvement to cannot
be required to be brought into compliance. Additional discussion took place
between the Commission, Staff and the City Attorney with regards to religious
uses, when an owner is required to bring a property into compliance, and
restrictions on parking lots. Commissioner Bertrand asked the City Attorney at
what threshold a property owner is required to bring their property up to
compliance when it is a legal non-conforming use and if it is based on financial
threshold or a percent of change to the property. The City Attorney responded
that it depends on the grandfathering provisions of the zoning ordinance. The
grandfathering provisions of the zoning ordinance categorize the types of
prope1ties and/or structures into three categories and it depends on which category
the property falls into. The first is non-conforming uses of land only or land with
minor strnctures only. The second is non-conforming uses of strnctures, not
involving the land. The third is non:.conforming uses in combination of structures
and land. The most common non-conf01ming use is the combination of structure
and land uses. Specifically, ifthere is a removal, repair or change to the structure,
which involves 50 percent or more of the replacement cost, the requirement to
bring the non-conforming structure into compliance, applies. Typically, that is the
rule that applies; however, it is not the rule for every piece of property because the
gl'andfathering provision is applied in more specific terms.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Regular Meeting:
Gibson-to approve
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Discussion and possible action regarding amending Zoning Ordinance Revisions
to the Permitted Use Table by adding Use #53113 Lessors of miniwarehouse and
self-storage units.
Staff reviewed the history of the recommended changes that the Commission had
made with regards to the mini warehouse use. Staff stated City Council would like
for the Commission to take another look at the recommendation and consider the
properties it would affect. Commissioner Bertrand stated that this is an excellent
test case for the governance process and could provide an opportunity for the
Page 2 of 4
10/21/04 P & Z
Commission and the City Council to work together in order to insure the
Commission is working in the same direction as City Council. After further
discussion, some of the Commissioners indicated a need a need for new
information from City Council on this item before deciding to change the last
recommendation.
5.Communication from the Commission
Commissioner Gibson thanked the city for sending the Commissioners to the
American Planning Association Conference.
Commissioner Klusendorf stated he learned a lot at the conference and he thanked
the city for sending the Commission.
Commissioner Be1irand thanked the city for sending the Commission to the AP A
Conference. He was, however, disappointed that at the conference luncheon
Friendswood was not among the cities recognized for projects . they had
completed. He asked that Friendswood take advantage of the AP A awards
program and apply for recognition of various projects we complete next year.
Commissioner Weesner stated that at the last Planning and Zoning meeting, many
Commissioners had requested an electronic agenda item discussion. She feels
that it still needs to be placed on the agenda as a discussion regarding paper
drawings. She also stated there is a lot going on and the discussion regarding
taxing should happen post haste. She also stated that she felt the City Council
was not getting adequate information about what was said at the P&Z meetings.
She was also concerned that the Commission memos do not state why the
Commission was making the decisions they are making.
Chairman Holland stated he attended the Galveston County Consolidated
Drainage District (GCCDD) meeting and was very impressed how the meeting
was conducted. He also stated he attended a Development Review Commit tee
meeting as an observer and felt Staff did a good job with supplying information to
the proposed developer and making that person feel comf011able at the meeting.
In addition, Chairman Holland commented that he was ready for the challenge
and excited about being the Planning and Zoning chair. He would like, however,
for the Commission to align its vision with City Council. He also thanked City
Council for the dinner given in honor of the volunteers for the City . of
Friendswood.
6.Reports
A.Council Liaison
Council Liaison David Smith reported the dinner was a lot of fun and it was a
pleasure to give thanks to all the volunteers of the City of Friendswood. He also
Page 3 of 4
10/21/04 P & Z
stated that he was glad to have the oppmtunity to improve the governance process
between different committees.
B.Staff
Staff reported that the electronic agenda process, currently being used by the
Commission is in line with City Council directives. As recommended at the last
regular meeting, an additional reading file is now available at the reference desk
of the Friendswood Library, which has extended hours. Staff announced that
Commissioners will be invited at varies times, to attend as an observer, the
Development Review Committee meetings. In addition, the Commission is
always invited to City Hall to speak with Staff at any time. Staff stated the
Mission Statement adopted by Commission was not the same as the purpose and
duties description of the Commission provided in the Boards, Commissions and
Committees Handbook. The mission statement is not inappropriate so long as it
does not conflict with the purposes and duties. Commissioner Bertrand asked if
City Council could adopt the Mission Statement for Planning and Zoning. Staff
also reported on information requested by Commissioner Weesner regard ing the
TCEQ and the EPA; however, Staff had not yet researched the Texas Coastal
Management Agency for information requested.
7.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 8: 17 p.m.
Page 4 of 4
10/21/04 P & Z
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Fri endswood Planning and Zoning Commission
November 4, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, November 4, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Mike Hodge-Director of CD and PW
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Burke resigned, Chairman Holland called the
meeting to order to discuss the following:
Call to order:
Regular Meeting:
1.Communications from the public.
Ron Hindt, Pastor of the Calvary Chapel Church located at 3700 FM 528,
addressed the Commission. Mr. Hindt encouraged the Commission to vote in
favor of the sign ordinance to allow electronic signs in Friendswood.
2.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the 10-21-04 regular meeting minutes.
B.Approval of the 10-21-04 special meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve consent agenda
Brakebill
Commissioner Bertrand requested Item "B" of the consent agenda to be removed.
Item "A" of the consent agenda was then voted upon.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
It was then realized that Item "A" was the item Commissioner Bertrand wanted to
discuss.
Item "B" was then voted upon for approval
Page 1 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Unanimous Motion Carried
Bertrand-to reverse approval of Item "A" and discuss.
Weesner
Commissioner Bertrand pointed out on Item 3, page 2 of the regular meeting
minu tes, his request for legal interpretation and the answer he received from the
City Attorney was not captmed in the minutes. He requested Staff review the
tapes from the 10-21-04 regular meeting and capture those comments and
responses.
Comm issioner Weesner stated on Item 4, page 2 the last sentence should read:
After fmther discussion, some of the Commissioners indicated a need for
new information from City Council on this item before deciding to change
the last recommendation.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Regular Meeting:
Bertrand-to table Item "A" in order for Staff to review the tapes for
clarity.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for a
Retail Shell Building located between Blockbuster and Schlotzsky's on FM 528.
Motion:
Second:
Be1trand-to approve the Site Plan
Gibson
Bob Weaver, architect of the project and representative of the owner, addressed
the Commission. Mr. Weaver stated the proposed shell building had preliminary
drainage approval from the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District.
Mr. Weaver also stated the property would have an underground detention
facility, which has also been approved by TX Dot.
Commissioner Bertrand showed concern with the adjacent parking of Blockbuster
stating he felt there could be a possible safety issue with the traffic pattern.
Amend
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to get final approval from the Galveston County
Consolidated Drainage District per Staffs recommendation.
Bertrand
Unanimous
Page 2 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
Motion Carried
4.Discussion and possible action regarding Amending Zoning Ordinance-Cluster
Homes.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to discuss
Klusend01f
Staff reviewed the changes made to the Cluster Home ordinance to date. Staff
stated the inf01mation to make the changes to the Cluster Home ordinance came
from workshops with Staff and the Commission. During the meeting, the
Commission and Staff reviewed the final proposed draft. Items of discussion
regarding changes to the ordinance involved lot coverage, density, setbacks, and
the definition of open space and green space.
The Commission felt a workshop with City Council to finish the revisions to the
Cluster Home ordinance, such as determining definitions and revising the Matrix,
was appropriate.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Discussion and possible action regarding possible amendments to the Sign
Ordinance.
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to approve
Brakebill
After discussion among Staff and the Commission, some changes were made to
the proposed sign ordinance. Changes included the length of time an electronic
sign may have its copy changed. The Commission also recommen ded that
manual and automatic changeable copy signs be further combined within the
ordinance. Commissioner Be1trand stated he was pleased with the proposed
ordinance but felt it is too restrictive with regards to changeable copy signs. The
Commission requested a workshop to discuss the proposed changes to the sign
ordinance with City Council.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve with changes
Be1trand
Unanimous
6.Communication from the Commission
Motion Carried
Commissioner Gibson commended Mr. Burke for the years he devoted to serving. . on the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Page 3 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
Commissioner Bertrand stated he was saddened to see Mr. Burke resign and he
will sorely miss Mr. Burke's council and logic. Commissioner Bertrand wished
Mr. Burke well.
Commissioner Klusendorf read an email he wrote to Staff indicating concern that
Planning and Zoning and City Council are not seeing eye-to-eye on issues. He
referenced the recent votes for the zone changes of prope1ty at the entrance of the
Forest of Friendswood Subdivision and Friendswood Lakes Subdivision. With
both of these items, the Planning and Zoning Commission gave a negative
recommendation to City Council. However, City Council then voted in favor of
the zone change.
Commissioner Brakebill stated he attended the last City Council meeting. He
believes that City Council has clear ideas for the city and if Planning and Zoning
were aware of those ideas then possibly different decisions would have made by
Planning and Zoning.
Commissioner Weesner addressed Commissioner Klusendorfs comments by
stating historically City Councils overturn Planning and Zoning decisions, here in
Friendswood and in other cities. She also requested that the reading file of the
agenda items still be placed at the library as well as providing the large format
drawings to the Commission.
Chairman Holland thanked the Community Appearance Board and Community
Economic Development Committee for being at the meeting. He also thanked
Mr. Burke for his time on the .Planning and Zoning Commission. He also asked
Staff if the Planning and Zoning Mission statement could be presented to City
Council.
7.Repo1ts
A.Council Liaison
No representative was available to give a report.
B.Staff
1.Presentation regarding Vision 2020.
Staff did not give a presentation regarding Vision 2020, but announced that a
presentation would take place at the next meeting.
Staff repo1ted on City Council's actions regarding the mini warehouse
recommendation. The Council approved the addition of miniwarehouses as a
separate line to the Permitted Use Table; howe ver, the new line mirrors the 531
Real Estate line with the exception of not allowing rniniwarehouses in the Office
Park District. The Council saw the need to not allow them in this district. The
Page 4 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
I
Planner apologized for the miscommunication at the last meeting with regards to
this issue. The goal of the last discussion was to provide Staff with the rationale
for P&Z's recommendation to City Council.
Staff provided some follow-up inf01mation on fire issues with setbacks.
Feedback has been received from both the Fire Marshall and the Building
Official. Cunent city set back requirements and building codes address the 5-foot
setback concern identified in the newspaper article provided by Commissioner
Weesner.
Staff provided a verbal report on prope1ty tax data obtained from the
Administrative Services Office. The info1mation included the cost of providing
services to a single-family lot versus the average tax revenue generated per single
family lot. The shortfall requii'es additional revenues generated by sales taxes,
and to some extent franchise fees, permits, fines and other service fees.
Lastly, staff clarified information on parking lots sent out in an email. Paid
parking lots are permitted under our current Permitted Use Table; however, this
use did not apply to the recent commercial site plan which was for a new church
parking lot.
8.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
��� J j' MLb) Che1:i Skelton /
Development Coordinator
Page 5 of 5
11/4/04 P & Z
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting .
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
November 18, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, November 18, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill-6:30 p.m.
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Sherry Weesner-6:15 p.m.
Loren Smith-City Attomey-7:00 p.m.
Ron Cox-City Manager
David Smith-Council Liaison
Mike Hodge-Director of CD and PW
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquis t-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
Commissioner Burke resigned; Commissioner Bertrand and Commissioner Klusendorf
absent, Chai1man Holland called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. to begin the
discussion. A quorum was reached at the arrival of Commissioner Brakebill at 6:30 p.m.
6:00 PM-WORK SESSION
A.Regarding Vision 2020
Staff gave a presentation rega_rding the history of Vision 2020 and where the
concept of Vision 2020 is today. Staff pointed out Vision 2020 has 15 goals of
which the top 6 goals are considered as major goals. The focus of this presentation,
was with regards to the City tax base within Vision 2020. Within the presentation
the West Ranch property was used as a comparison to show undeveloped,
developed, zoned and not zoned commercial prope1ty. This comparison was used
to show where the City stands today in meeting Vision 2020's top goal of
Economic Development.
Staff was not able to complete the presentation due to a lack of time. Additional
research was also requested by the Commission. Chairman Holland asked Staff to
finish the presentation at another time.
B.Comprehensive Land Plan
No discussion was held on this item.
7:00 PM-REGULAR SESSION
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public.
Page 1 of 4
11/18/04 P & Z
No one spoke from the public at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
. a. Approval of the 11-4-04 regular meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Tabled Items:
Brakebill-to approve consent agenda
Gibson
Unanimous
4.Approval of the 10-21-04 regular meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Regular Items:
Weesner-to remove from table
Brakebill
Unanimous
Weesner-to approve minutes
Brakebill
Unanimous
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
5.Conceptual Plan discussion for proposed development on 15.3672 acres located
at the comer of FM 518 and Leisure Lane.
Charles Anders, 1408 S. Friendswood Drive, addressed the Commission. Mr.
Anders stated that he has owned the property for about 12 or 13 years and has
worked very hard to try and develop the prope1iy. He has had various companies
express interest in the property and has come before Planning and Zoning with
those prospects but has never been able to make it work for one reason or another.
Mr. Anders would like to build townhomes at the rear of the property with
commercial remaining on the frontage of FM 518. Approximately 7 of the 15
acres would have 50 townhomes constructed on it. He stated that he would zone
the entire frontage on FM 518 to Community Shopping Center (CSC). In
addition, Mr. Anders has included in his proposed plan a shared detention area
between the townhomes and the commercial prope1iy. The detention pond would
be used to separate the two developments. Mr. Anders stated he understood that it
is not the best timing for this project with the city working to hit the 80/20 goal.
He also stated he understood that he would be taking away from the commercial
prope11y, but he feels that he must do something with the prope11y. Currently,
townhomes are selling well in the area, and Mr. Anders feels they would work
best for this prope11y. Mr. Anders stated that the price of the townhomes is
approximately $160,000 per unit.
Page 2 of 4
11/18/04 P & Z
Chairman Holland stated that one of the goals in Vision 2020 is to improve the
tax base. Fifty townhomes at $160,000 would be improving the tax base, as
opposed to vacant land. Chaiiman Holland also asked if the entrance into the
townhomes would be through the Starbucks parking lot. Mr. Anders stated he
would like to use that entrance off of FM 528 for an ingress/egress to the
property.
Commissioner Brakebill suggested to Mr. Anders that, before he goes to City
Council or Staff he should have documents to back up his claim of how, in the
past, he has tried to develop this property. Mr. Anders then verbally listed
potential companies that were once interested in the_ property.
Ending discussion amongst the Planning and Zoning Commission, Vice
Chairman Gibson stated that he would like to see this property with the frontage
along FM 518 as C:ommunity Shopping. Center or some other type of retail
business, and the back section Office Park District. Vice-Chairman Gibson then
stated he did not like the duplex (townhome) concept there, as it is not consistent
with the City's Vision, as he understands it:
No other Commissioners had any additional comment s.
6.Status report regarding the Commissions 2004 goals.
Staff reviewe(l the outstanding commissioners goals. The remaining goals for
2004 are the Comp rehensive Land Use Plan, Tree Preservation Ordinance, and
Planning and Zoning's involvement in Main Street. Staff stated that Main Street
has started conducting meetings again and requested the Chairman to appoint a
Commissioner to attend. Chairman Holland requested Vice-Chairman Gibson
attend the Main Street meetings. Staff also announced that a retreat is being
organized in the near future in order for Planning and Zoning to set new goals for
2005. Chairman Holland requested the retreat not be held until a new
Commissioner is appointed to fill Tom Burke's vacancy.
7.Communications from the Commission
Commissioner Brakebill announced that he had attended the last City Council
meeting. He stated that new positions were appointed but a new appointment for
a Planning and Zoning Commissioner was not. He asked if Planning and Zoning
fell under a different appointment category and when a new person would be
appointed.
Commissioner Weesner announced that she attended the Galveston County
Consolidated Drainage District meeting in which their budgets were discussed.
She also requested a copy of the presentation presented by Staff in the work
session.
Page 3 of 4
11/18/04 P & Z
Chairman Holland stated that he had attended a Community Economic
Development Committee meeting, as well as a Galveston County Consolidated
Drainage District meeting. Chairman Holland also stated that he was looking
f01ward to getting a collective group during the 2005 retreat in order to create
good and reasonable goals for the Commission.
8.Reports
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison, David Smith, addressed Commissioner Brakebill's concern with
regards to appointing a Planning and Zoning Commissioner. He stated that
Planning and Zoning does fall under a different category than other committees.
He also assured Commissioner Brakebill a new person will be appointed as a
Planning and Zoning Commissioner soon.
b.Staff
Staff briefly listed a few discussion items the Commission had requested
information on; but stated the Staff report would be emailed to all Commis sioners
so they may read the rep01t.
9.Adjournment
With no fmiher comment the meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
?' /) {JL()J; Ch1ri Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
11/18/04 P & Z
I Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
December 2, 2004
\
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
December 2, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sheffy Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissi oner Burke resigned; Chairman Holland called the meeting to
order to discuss the following:
7:00 PM-REGULAR SESSION
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public.
No one from the public spoke at thfo time.
3.Consent Agenda:
A.Approval of the 11-18-04 regular meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve
Brakebill
Chairman Holland stated that on the third page, in the second paragraph, a last sentence
should be added as follows:
Mr. Anders then verbally supplied, to the Commission, the information of past
attempts to rezone the property.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-approve with changes
Brakebill
Unanimous
Page 1 of 3
12/2/04 P & Z
Motion Carried
\
4.Con sideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for RSSA
located at 1410 Winding Way.
Motion:
Second:
Be1trand-approve with Staff comments
Gibson
Richard Peterson and Carolyn Sherman, owners of Riley Sherman Shipping &
Associates (RSSA), 307 South Friendswood Drive, addressed.the Commission.
Commissioner Weesner asked if all comments from Staff had been addressed, with the
-exception of the comments on the Staff memo. Staff stated that there were no
outstanding issues except minor labeling issues on the Utility Plan, which were indicated
on the memo to the Commission for recommendation of approval with conditions.
Voted For: Unanimous
5.Discussion regarding status of Comprehensive Plan review.
Motion Carried
Staff reviewed with the Commission the sections of the Comprehe�sive Plan that have
been discussed with revisions to this point. Staff stated that the current Comprehensive
Plan is not in electronic format and currently the Comprehensive Plan is being conve1ted
into an electronic format in order to track any cha nges made.
6.Discussion regarding possible retreat topics.
Staff expressed to the Commission that the retreat is coming soon and the Commissioners
should start considering what goals they might want to set for next year. Chairman
Holl and stated that he had a list of potential goals and would forward them to Staff.
Commissioner Weesner stated she felt that the tax situation should be discussed at the
retreat or in the very near future. Commissioner Be1trand explained that, in his
experience, that the retreats have the aspect of self-examination. This helps to identify
for the group what their sense of performance was and how it can be imp roved. This
would take into consideration the external perceptions and desires of other groups. This
reflection would help to better understand where the Commission is with regards to City
Council. Commissioner Bertrand feels that there should be a portion of the retreat set
aside for that purpose of self-examination. He also explained he would like to see more
focus put forth on the goal itself instead of just focusing on completing it.
7.Communication from the Commission
Commissioner Bertrand stated the draft for the Tree Preservation Ordinance has been
completed. He also stated that it was his request (and not Staff's) to move the meeting
date.
Commissioner Brakebill asked if Staff could send the Sign Ordinance and Cluster Home
Ordinance via email to the Commission.
Page 2 of3
12/2/04 P & Z
1
[
\
Commissioner Weesner announced she attended the last Galveston County Consolidated
Drainage District meeting. Commissioner Weesner stated that she believed the rezoning
report was not supposed to reflect a Staff recommendation but was to· indicate if the
property met or did not meet the city's requirements.
Chairman Holland stated he would commu nicate the retreat topics he had come up with
to Staff via email. He also stated he attended the Community Economic Development
Committee meeting and they have already established their 2005-2006 goals. Chairman
Holland announced Mr. Burke, former Planning and Zoning Commissioner, thanked the
Commission for the plaque that was provided for his years of dedication to the city.
8.Reports
A.Council Liaison
No one spoke at this time.
B.Staff
Staff stated that recent conversati ons had taken place amongst Planning and Zoning
Commissioners, City Manager and the Mayor indicating ce1tain communication needs
and issues. From those conversations, the Staff has come up with an act1on plan to
address those issues. Staff also reminded the Commission of a Joint Public Hearing and
Workshop with City Council that would take place on December 6, 2004.
9.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 8:06 p.m.
C6,,,.; 111.b, 2ChriSkeltG_. ·
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
12/2/04 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
December 6, 2004
A special meeting of the Friendswood City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission,
was held on Monday, December 6, 2004 at 8:30 a.m. at the Friendswood City Hall Council
Chambers, 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following Planning & Zoning
Commissioners were present:
Bob Be1trand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Ron Cox-City Manager
Mike Hodge-Director of CD & PW
Dan Johnson -Deputy Director CD
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton -Development Coordinator
8:30 A.M.-WORK SESSION
1.Discussion with City Council regarding:
A.Cluster Homes
Staff gave a presentation to the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission
outlining proposed changes to the Cluster Home Ordinance. Some of the proposed
changes included setbacks, lot size requirement s, allowing reduced rights-of-ways, and
defining "open space" and "green space". City Council had comments regarding the
definition of "open space" and "green space". After the presentation, it was the
consensus of the City Council that Staff may move forward with a Joint Public Hearing
on the proposed revisions.
B.Amendments to the Sign Ordinance
Staff gave a presentation to the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission
regarding amendments to the Sign Ordinance. After the presentation, discussion took
place regarding electronic signs. City Council asked that Planning and Zoning revisit
recommendations regarding electronic signs such as the amount of time that a message
can change, allowing the sign to have more than one color, and allowing the electronic
sign to flash and scroll. In addition, it was requested by City Council to Staff that the
section of the Sign Ordinance regarding garage sale signs be reviewed for possible
changes.
2.Adjournment
'With no fwther comment the meeting was adjourned at 10:59 a.m.
�,A,l',I) l< &e..L /2J7c 2�rl ·Lskelton
Development Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
12/6/04 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
December 6, 2004
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Monday, December 6, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910
S.Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Ron Cox-City Manager
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Burke resigned; Chairman Holland called the
meeting to order to consider the following.
7:00 PM-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
Call to order:
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Request for a Specific Use Permit-Limousine Service, for property located
at 626 S. Friendswood Drive (FM 518), Stones Throw Shopping Center, Lot
14, Block 3, Friendswood Subdivision, Galveston County, Texas.
Ed Stuart, 2001 Pine Dr, developer of the prope1ty, addressed the Commission I and City Council. Mr. Stuaii stated he wanted to bring an upscale business to
the City of Friendswood and he felt this establishment did that for the city. He
explained that allowing this rezoning to go forwai:d would be good for
Friendswood.
Chairman Holland allowed anyone from the public to speak in favor of the
zone change.
Mike Rebesher, 2202 San Joaquin Pai·kway, spoke in favor of Mr. Stuaii's
request for rezoning.
Jaime Cortez, owner of the Limousine Service, gave the history of his
business indicating he would like to have his business in Friendswood for not
just a couple of yeai·s but for many years to come.
Page 1 of 3
12/6/04 P & Z
Chairman Holland then allowed anyone from the public to speak in opposit ion
to speak.
No one spoke in opposition.
B.Zone Classification change for. 2.1556 acres located at 2000 West
Parkwood (FM 528), Reserve "B" of Windsong Subdivision, from Single
Family Residential (SFR) Specific Use Permit-Church (SUP-Church) to:
Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
Michael LeBlanc, 11414 Sagecherry Houston Texas, owner of the property,
addressed the Commission and City Council. Mr. LeBlanc stated he would
like to change the zone of his tract to Neighborhood Commercial. He is
making this request in order to market the tract to a business that would be
allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial district. The cunent Church tenant
has outgrown the existing building. With a zone change, Mr. LeBlanc could
landscape and create additional parking. He did not propose that any re
development have a driveway off FM 528. Although a church would still be
permitted under the Neighborhood Commercial zoning, Mr. LeBlanc stated he
would like to be able to market the tract for a different use that could be leased
at more than $0.70 square foot.
Chai1man Holland then allowed anyone from the public in favor of the zone
change to speak.
No one spok e in favor.
Chaitman Holland then allowed anyone from the public in opposition of the
zone change to speak.
Ryan Dennard, 39 Windsong, stated he is pro-development and is not opposed
to the property going commercial. He realizes if the property goes
comm ercial, the ingress/egress of Windsong will be affected. If the property
were i:ezoned,· it would create traffic issues, and would impact the character of
the subdivision. Therefore, he is not in favor of the zone change.
·Ed Sherrill #5 Windsong, president of the Home Owner's Association for
Windsong, agreed with the previous comments. He also added the offset of
the traffic signal light at Desota already causes a traffic hazard and the uses
allowed in Neighborhood Commercial are not compatible with the character
of the subdivision.
James Carter, #1 Windsong, stated he lives next door to the property and his
prope11y would not retain its value if the prope11y were rezoned. Also, he is
concerned about drainage, garbage from a comm·ercial establishment and the
increase in traffic.
Page 2 of 3
12/6/04 P & Z
l Victoria Heiman, #31 Windsong, is concerned with the safety of her children
riding their bikes to school if the prope1ty were to be rezoned commercial.
Mary Kole, 1700 W. Parkwood Lane, asked that the Commission consider the
variety of uses Neighborhood Commercial would allow next to the school.
Debbie Dickens, #40 Windsong, stated the residential prope1ties will be de
valued if the property is· rezoned commercial. She also stated that the
subdivision is quiet and a commercial establishment will take away from that
quietness.
2.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
c�AJ� ·JI�
..... :Ii Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
12/6/04 P & Z
f Minutes of a Regular Meeting
ofthe
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
December 16, 2004
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
December 16, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
David Smith-Council Liaison
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director CD
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
Regular Meeting:
1.Call to order
2.Administer the Oath of Office for the appointment of new Commissioner.
Oaths of Office were administered to Mark Van Riper.
3.Communications from the public.
No one from the public spoke at this time.
4.Consent Agenda:
Motion:
Second:
A.Approval of the 12-2-04 special meeting minutes.
B.Approval of the 12-2-04 regular meeting minutes.
C.Approval of the 12-6-04 joint public hearing minutes.
D.Approval of the Final Plat of the Lakes of Falcon Ridge, Section Two.
Brakebill-to approve consent agenda.
Gibson
Commissioner Gibson stated that item "A" of the consent agenda should be removed due
to the date of the meeting being incorrect. It should have read" 12-6-04 Special meeting
minutes".
Amended
Motion: Brakebill-approve consent agenda with removal ofltem "A"
Page 1 of 6
12/16/04 P & Z
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding request for a Specific Use Permit
Limousine Service, for property located at 626 S. Friendswood Drive (FM 518), Stones
Throw Shopping Center, Lot 14, Block 3, Friendswood Subdivision, Galveston County,
Texas.
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve
Gibson
Commissioner Weesner requested from the City Attorney clarification regarding Specific
Use Permits (SUP). Commissioner Weesner expressed concerns with the number of
limousines allowed on the property in lieu of the number of spaces in the strip center.
Staff stated the Commission could limit the. number of limousines and parking spaces
within the SUP if they choose. Commissioner Bertrand stated the he was concerned that
the Commission was trying to govern the business. He also stated that many SUP's do
not have limits on them and he was concerned that it would look like the Commission
was picking on this particular business; however, he did understand the need for limits.
Amended
Motion: Weesner-Limit the number of Limousines to two on the property at any
point and time.
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Voted Against: Bertrand, Brakebill Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action re garding Zone Classification change for 2.1556
acres located at 2000 West Parkwood (FM 528), Reserve "B" of Windsong Subdivision,
from Single Family Residential (SFR) Specific Use Permit-Church (SUP-Church) to:
Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve
Bertrand
Commissioner Bertrand stated that a number of people came forward at the public
hearing and some of the concerns mentioned such as the road, seemed outside the scope
of the zone change request. In addition, Neighborhood Commercial (NC) is as low
impact as possible to a neighborhood. He stated he was in favor of the zone change.
Commissioner Van Riper stated he was also in favor of the zone change considering the
property location is a viable location for commercial development.
Commissioner Gibson asked Staff if there were anything in the Design Criteria Manual
for the road (Windsong) to be widened if the zone change were granted. Staff stated that
there was nothing in the Design Criteria Manual for that and it would be something that
Page 2 of 6
12/16/04 P & Z
[
I l
l
would be looked at during the Site Plan process. Commissioner Holland asked if a curb
and gutter street with sidewalks would then be required. Staff stated that cunently
sidewalks are being required on open ditch commercial projects but did not feel that curb
and gutter would be required.
Commissioner Klusendorf state he was against the re-zoning due to the traffic/safety
concerns he had.
Commissioner Weesner read a statement of the reasons she was against the rezoning.
The statement indicated of the following:
1.Traffic to and from this property would enter and exit off of Windsong.
2.The traffic ingress/egress from Windsong onto FM 528 is already difficult due
to the traffic light to the east and the school to the west.
3.The types of businesses allowed in Neighborhood Commercial (NC) are not
appropriate in a residential neighborhood using a residential street for access.
4.Nejghborhood Commercial (NC) limits the office use to only 60 percent of the
structure.
5.The homeowners would experience a loss in property value.
6.Concerns for safety, increase in noise, light pollution, and traffic issues.
Commissioner Weesner did however give a suggest that the property owner create a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) with limited possible uses and a Site Plan to minimize
the impact of the commercial business on the neighborhood and other citizens of the city.
Voted For: Bertrand, Brakebill, Gibson, Holland, Van Riper
Voted Against: Klusendorf, Weesner Motion Carried
7.Conceptual Plan discussion regarding Largo Friendswood Subdivision located
adjacent to Friendswood Lakes along FM 528.
John Garner with Municipal Engineering and engineer for the project addressed the
Commission. Mr. Garner stated that this is a Boyfsil tract next to Friendswood Lakes
Subdivision, which he and the developer have had several meetings about developing.
Mr. Garner stated that the prope1ty would remain in Mr. Bofysil's name. Chai rman
Holland asked if the "Commercial Reserve" indicated on the Conceptual Plan would be
platted at the same time as the part indicated as Single Family Residential. Mr. Banas,
developer of the property, stated that the "Commercial Reserve" would be developed at
the same time as the residential. Chairma n Holland then asked for comments from the
Commission. Commission Weesner expressed concern with regards to the pipeline and
the distance from the single-family lots. After further review of the Conceptual Plan with
regards to the pipeline easement width, it was determined the Conceptual Plan indicated
the wrong easement width. Commissioner Be1trand stated that there are a number of
ponds shown on the Conceptual Plan. He asked Mr. Gamer if the ponds were wet and if
so then the developer should coordinate with Staff to provide a safety access to the pond.
Commissioner Be1trand asked if Mr. Garner would contact the Fire Marshall's office to
Page 3 of 6
12/16/04 P & Z
determine the city's needs if access to the ponds were needed. Commissioner Gibson
agreed with Commissioner Bertrand with regards to access to the ponds. Commissioner
Gibson also requested that the developer reconsider single family residential along
Friendswood Lakes Boulevard (future Brittany Bay) to allow for commercial.
8.Consideration and possible action regarding the revision of the Master Drainage section
of the Comprehensive Plan.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve
Bertrand
Staff stated that this plan has been reviewed with consideration of Tropical Storm
Allison. Staff also stated the main purpose of this plan is taking the study conducted by
Claunch and Miller in 1993, and. incorporating it in the city's current Comprehensive
Plan. Our cutTent Comprehensive Plan took 20 of the 200 worse flooding areas within
the City of Friendswood and showed a summary of those areas. The goal with the
revision to this section of the Comprehensive Plan is to show which twelve areas have
been addressed and what areas are left to be addressed.
Some of the Commi ssioners felt very strongly that an ongoing list of areas should be
created. It was felt that the 8 currently remaining items should not be specified within the
Comprehensive Plan. It was suggested the verbiage should be created so as to indicate an
ongoing list exists of problem drainage areas. This will allow the areas with drainage
problems to be added to the list as needed without revising the Master Drainage Section
of the Comprehensive Plan every time. Commissioner Be11rand, asked in addition to a list
being kept of problem drainage areas, that a yearly report should go to City Council that
prioritizes that list of drainage problem areas, and what steps have been taken to mitigate
for those d1;ainage problems. Commissioner Bertrand stated he understood that the
Comprehensive Plan is not revised but every so many years, in this case 10 years. He felt
that singling out the 8 remaining drainage areas on the list developed by the consultant is
unfair to the people in the areas who are cmTently experiencing drainage problems. Not
recognizing all areas that have flooding because they are not on the city's list is offensive.
Voted For: Brakebill, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper
Voted Against: Be11rand, Weesner Motion Carried
9.Discussion and possible action regarding amendments to the Sign Ordinance.
Motion:
Second:
Amended
Motion:
Brakebill-to approve
Gibson
Weesner-to remove item
The Amended Motion died for lack of a second.
Page 4 of 6
12/16/04 P & Z
l
Commissioner Weesner stated she had expected a memo from City Council indicating
what changes they wanted to the proposed revision of the Sign Ordinance. Staff
explained a memo would not come from City Council. Instead Staff listed five items that
City Council requested Planning and Zoning reconsider. Those items are as follows:
1.To not require notarization of sign pe1mit request.
2.To not require a fee and permit for garage sale signs.
3.Consider lowering the time a sign is allowed to change from 45 seconds.
4.Reconsider not allowing a sign to blink , flash, scroll or be animated.5.Reconsider not allowing a sign to have multiple colors.
Concerns from several Commissioners were with regards to the amount of time a sign
changes and the ability of scrolling, flashing, or blinking of a sign. After discussion of
each of the above listed items, the following changes were made to the recommendation
to City Council.
1.Sign permits request will not be required to be notarized.
2.A fee will not be assessed or a permit required to have a garage sale sign.
3.No change-remained 45 seconds for allowing text change.
4.No change-signs are still not allowed to blink, flash, scroll or be animated.
5.Colors may only change every 45 seconds with the text change.
Voted For: Brak ebill, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Voted Against: Bertrand Motion Carried
10.Communications from the Commission
Chairman Holland welcomed Mark Van Riper as a new Planning and Zoning
Commissioner.
Commissioner Bertrand stated there was an error in the minutes that were approved
earlier in the meeting. The 12-2-04 regular meeting minutes when he was discussing the
retreat goals and self-examination, Commissioner Bertrand explained the last sentence
should be read:
"He also explained he would like to see more focus put forth on the quality of the
goal rather than the quantity of the goal."
Commissioner Gibson stated he attended the Main Street Committee meeting. He
explained that there were two critical issues for this project. The first is drainage issues
and the second is what governmental funding is available for the project. Commissioner
Gibson stated that zoning issues must be addressed, but will be at a later date.
Commissioner K.lusendorf stated he attended the December City Council meeting.
During the meeting the second reading for the West Ranch was on the agenda, but was
table. Commissioner Klusendorf also stated the owner of the Shell Station at the corner of
Page 5 of 6
12/16/04 P & Z
FM 518 and FM 23 51 addressed the City Council. The owner of the Shell Station had
stated that he felt he was mislead by Staff. He appealed to the City Council for assistance
in order to renovate and add onto his property.
Commissioner Weesner requested that either at the retreat or a future meeting the
Permitted Use Table be discussed.
Chairman Holland then wished the Commissioners a Happy New Year.
11.Repo1is
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith stood at the podium to address the Commission. He wished the
Commission a happy holiday and welcomed Commissioner Van Riper. He also stated as
a new liaison he has a greater appreciation for what the Planning and Zoning Commission
does. He thanked the Commission for the Mayor and City Council for the volunteer time
that each of the Commissioners give the city.
b.Staff
Staff reported in the near future the Commission would review a three prui-training
module on pre parin g a Comprehensive Plan. Each module is 1 ½ hours long. In addition
Staff stated the retreat would be scheduled for the Commission after the City Council
retreat. Staff also reminded the Commission of a Joint Public Hearing and Workshop
taking place on January 3, 2005. The workshop would be over Si gns and the Joint Public
Hearing would be over Cluster Homes, Sign Ordinance, and a rezoning request.
12.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 9:27 p.m.
Page 6 of 6
12/16/04 P & Z
[Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
January 6, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910
S.Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Jim Gibson
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
David Smith-Council Liaison
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director CD
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland, Commissioner Brakebill, and Commissioner
Bertrand absent, Vice-Chairman Gibson called the meeting to order to discuss the
following:
7:00 PM-PUBLIC HEARING
1.Call to order
2.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding
A.Re-plat of Friendswood Community Church Re-plat No. 1, located at 2821
West Parkwood.
Joseph Guillory, representative for Friendswood Community Church addressed the
Commission. Mr. Guillory stated that an additional reserve is being created in order
to have additional sign on the property.
No one spoke against the re-plat.
REGULAR SESSION
3.Communications from the public.
No one from the public spoke at this time.
4.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 12-6-04 special meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the Re-plat of Friendswood Community Church Re-plat
No. 1, located at 2821 West Parkwood.
Page 1 of2
1-6-05 P & Z
c.Approval of the Final Plat of Pecan Plaza located at the comer of FM
2351 and Pecan Street.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve the consent agenda
Klusendorf
Unanimous
5.Communications from the Commission
Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner reported that there was no meeting held for the
Community Appe arance Board in the month of December.
Commissioner Klusendorf stated that the City Council had the first reading for the
Zone Change on Windsong and FM 528. He also stated that the first reading for
the Zone Ch ange was approved. Commissioner Klusendorf expressed his
concerns with regards to the single entrance for a commercial property through a
residential property. He continued by stating that he did not support this
rezoning. Co mmissioner Klusendorf spoke of concerns with regards to the Shell
Station on the corner of FM 2351 and FM 518. He feels that the city is not giving
the owner's request enough consideration based on the increase of commercial
business that could result, and Staff should do what they can to help the owner
with his request.
6.Reports
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith wished the Commissioners a Happy New Year.
b.Staff
Staff reported a workshop had been held regarding the Sign Ordinance on
Monday, January 3, 2005. City Council came to a consensus with regards to
. proposed changes to the Sign Ordinance. Staff stated with regards to the Shell
Station owner, a meeting with him has been scheduled to discuss his property.
Staff also announced the City Council is planning a retreat to be held on January
24, 2005, and the Planning and Zoning retreat will take place after that date.
7.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 7: 11 p.m.
(fl ll! ,i Alu !Lltm.JCh rj. Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 2 of2
1-6-05 P & Z
[
.
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
January 17, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Monday, January 17, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910
S.Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
John Olsen-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Bertrand abs ent, Chairman Holland called the
meeting to order to consider the following.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Zone Classification change for 9.842 acres, frontage on FM 528 and
Friendswood Lakes Subdivision, Section One, Galveston County, Texas;
From: Single Family Residential (SFR) to: Community Shopping Center
(CSC) .
B.Zone Classification change for 3.549 acres, frontage on FM 528 and on
Friendswood Lakes Boulevard, being Friendswood Lakes Subdivision,
Section One, Reserve "A", Galveston County, Texas; From: Single Family
Residential (SFR) to: Community Shopping Center (CSC).
C.Zone Classification change for 2.784 acres, frontage on FM 528 and on
Friendswood Lakes Boulevard, Friendswood Lakes Subdivision, Section One,
being a portion of Reserve "B", Galveston County, Texas; From: Single
Family Residential (SFR) to Community Shopping Center (CSC).
Mitch Mitchell, developer of the prope1ty, address ed the Commission and
City Council. Mr. Mitchell gave a list of reasons why the zone change should
be granted. Some of the reasons included such things as:
1.The location of the properties to be rezoned is in line with a main
future thoroughfare as such is one of the city's future commercial
corridors.
Page 1 of 4
1-17-05 P & Z
2.The commercial businesses that will be going in will benefit the City
of Friendswood tax base as well as school district, without adding
students.
3.Rezoning of the property will send a clear message to potential
businesses that Friendswood wants new business.
4.The property has always been designated as commercial since the
1990's when a master plan was brought forth and approved by the City
of Friendswood.
The following spoke against the zone change.
Richard Gierczic, 1621 Garden Lakes Drive. He read a letter he had written to
the Commission and City Council. Mr. Gierczic stated he did not want to have a
10-foot to 12-foot fence blocking his view. He also expressed concern that he had
been lied to by the developer.
Heath Taylor, 1915 Rolling Stone, stated that Mr. Mitchell does not answer
questions or allow the homeowners to speak at Home Owners Association (HOA)
meetings. He also stated he was going to do what he could to stop this rezoning.
Leslie Roque, 1916 Sandy Lakes Drive. Mrs. Roque stated the HOA has not had
the opportunity to be involved in the development within their subdivision. She
asked that the HOA be allowed to be involved.
Larry Buswa, 1900 Sandy Lakes Drive. Mr. Buswa stated he is not really in
opposition of the zone change; however, the comment of a 10 to 12 foot high
fence being installed around the property concerned him.
Gary Birsinger, 1606 Cascade Falls. Mr. Bursinger stated he felt the majority of
the homeowners in Friendswood Lakes were opposed to this zone change. He
also stated he felt office buildings took away from the feel of the subdivision. In
addition, he asked that in striving for the 80/20 goal of the city, that consideration
be given to the citizens of Friendswood when allowing developments.
R.Boveadur, 1918 Pampas Trail Drive. Mr. Boveadur stated that not all the
sections of Friendswood Lakes have been developed as promised. He asked that
the Commission and City Council consider holding off the rezoning request until
more information is provided about the undeveloped sections.
Edwin Fong, 1608 Cascade Falls. Mr. Fong stated he would like to know what
type of commercial prope1ty is allowed in that requested zone. He also stated that
what was promised and what has actually happened with the development of the
subdivision has not taken place.
Page 2 of 4
1-17-05 P & Z
Greg Balson, 1922 Skip Rock. Mr. .Balson stated he is concerned that there is
already to many empty storefronts in Friendswood. He is concerned the same
thing will be true if commercial is allowed to take place on these tracts.
Tom Merkle, 1811 Sandy Lakes. He stated the original vision was that the other
sections were going to be developed first, before commercial. He would like to
know why that has not happened.
Theresa Huning, 2000 Sandy Lakes Drive. She stated how Friendswood is a
quaint town. She stated she is not particularly concerned with the rezoning
request. Her concern is more of what is allowed when a building is built, such as
what type of material is used, and the height it will be allowed to be.
Robin Welch, 1601 Stoney Lakes. Mrs. Welch feels Friendswood Lakes is a nice
neighborhood, btit since moving here feels it has been degraded with the
installation of power poles, and the development that hasn't taken place like
promised.
Thomas Easterly, 1705 Sandy Lakes Drive. Mr. Easterly expressed concern in
regards to what commercial establishments are allowed in the zone requested. He
also expressed concern over the development that has not been completed in the
subdivision. In addition, he asked what benefit was gained from changing the
zone from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Community Shopping Center
(CSC).
D.Requesting amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, Planned Unit Development
Cluster Homes.
Staff gave a brief overview of what a Planned Unit Development-Cluster
Home is. Staff explained the Cluster Home development involves reduced
requirements such as street rights-of-ways when prope1ty is given up for
"open space".
No one spoke for or against the item.
E.Requesting amendment to the Sign Ordinance-Appendix A.
Staff rep01ted the revisions to the Sign Ordinance had been made in conjunction
with the input of the Commission. The goal was to simplify the ordinance as well
as to address specific issues such as electronic changeable copy signs. Staff also
presented a revised version of Changeable Copy Signs. The revised version
addressed a question asked by City Council regarding what revisions must be
inade to the si gn ordinance to bring the City's sign in Stevenson Park up to
conformance.
The following spoke in favor of:
Page 3 of 4
1-17-05 P & Z
Ron Hindt, with Calvary Ch apel Church on FM 528, addressed the Commission
and City Council. Mr. Hindt thanked the Staff for the time and hard work put into
updating the sign ordinance. He also asked the Commission and City Council to
move quickly on the changes proposed. He stated that it would be nice if there
were closure on these proposed revisions.
No one spoke against the item.
2.Adjournment
With no fmiher comment the meeting was adjourned at 8: 17 p.m. c�A· J}@pu h�. -· . -· · ri Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
1-17-0SP&Z
f I
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
January 20, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
January 20, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand David Smith-Council Liaison
Loren Smith-City Attorney David Brakebill-7:07 p.m.
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director CD
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Roy Klusendorf Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
7:00 PM-REGULAR MEETING
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 12-16-04 regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 1-6-05 regular meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the Final Plat of Oak Creek Forest Subdivision located at the end
of Crawford Street.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve consent agenda
Gibson
Item "C" remained on the consent agenda for approval.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner asked Item "A" be removed from the consent agenda for
discussion. Commission Klusendorf asked Item "B" be removed from the consent
agenda for discussion.
Page 1 of 6
1/20/05 P & Z
Commissioner Weesner stated on the 12-16-05 regular meeting minutes, on page 3, item
6, the list ofreasons she stated, number 4 of that list should read:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
4.Neighborhood Commercial limits the amount of office use to only 60
percent of the structures.
Weesner-to approve with changes
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Klusendorf stated on the 1-6-05 regular meeting minutes, on page 2, item
5 the last sentence should read:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
"He feels that the city is not g1vmg the owner's request enough
consideration based on the increase of commercial business that could
result, and Staff should do what they can to help the owner with his
request."
Bertrand-to approve with changes
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding Zone Change request for property located at
Friendswood Lakes Subdivision.
A.Zone Classification change for 9.842 acres, :frontage on FM 528 and Friendswood
Lakes Subdivision, Section One, Galveston County, Texas; From: Single Family
Residential (SFR) to: Community Shopping Center (CSC).
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-approve zone change request
Bertrand
Commissioner Weesner read a statement into the record. This state ment would be for
all three tracts requested for rezoning. Her statement included the following:
That the exis ting zoning provides a framework for decision-making for
citizens, developers, city staff, and the Commission and City Council
members. This information is used to make property purchases and
development decisions. As representatives of citizens, it is the duty of the
Commission to only make zoning changes when there are compelling or
overwhelming benefits to the citizens and there is no or minimal harm to
citizens who own adjacent property. Two, that there are no guarantees for
rezoning and no one who represents the City or its citizens should imply
property will be rezoned. without first consulting the citizens. The
property was zoned SFR when purchased. Development to date had been
Page 2 of 6
1/20/05 P & Z
residential. The developer's comments implied that City government
assured him rezoning would take place. Thirdly, Friendswood Lakes
Blvd. is not cunently a major thoroughfare, even though it may be in the
future. · Home buyers should have been made aware should have been
made aware of the road •·s end status by naming it Brittany Bay Blvd. and
notice placed on the dead end of the future connection. This street is also
not part of the Entryway Overlay so the minimal architectural protections
are not available to the residents. Fourth, the Comprehensive Plan does
not support additional land being rezoned from residential to commercial.
Even by revising the Plan to support Vision 2020, the necessary
commercial acreage is already available. Finally, commercially zoned
property is not always a benefit to the citizens. A significant portion of
the 1900 acres cunently zoned for commercial use is under utilized or
vacant. There is already plenty of commercial property available for
development. Therefore she would be voting against the rezoning.
Commissioner Klusendorf commented the developer had not brought forth the site
plan for the two-story building adjacent to the property. He would like to see the
plans for the project going forth. Staff stated the Site Plan is cunently being reviewed
by the city. Staff is compiling a list of comments for the developer to address so the
development is in line with the Zoning Ordinance and Design Criteria Manual. Once
the developer has addressed all Staff comments the Site Plan will then be formally
presented to the Commission. Chai rman Holland stated that the property fronts FM
528 and he considers that a major thoroughfare. He feels when a property fronts a
major thoroughfare it is best utilized as commercial.
Voted For: Bertrand, Brakebill, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper
Voted Against: Weesner Motion Carried
B.Zone Classification change for 3.549 acres, frontage on FM 528 and on Friendswood
Lakes Boulevard, being Friendswood Lakes Subdivision, Section One, Reserve "A",
Galveston County, Texas; From: Single Family Residential (SFR) to: Community
Shopping Center (CSC).
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-approve zone change request
Bertrand
Voted For: Bertrand, Brakebill, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper
Voted Against: Weesner Motion Carried
C.Zone Classification change for 2. 784 acres, frontage on FM 528 and on Friendswood
Lakes Boulevard, Friendswood Lakes Subdivision, Section One, being a portion of
Reserve "B", Galveston County, Texas; From: Single Family Residential (SFR) to
Community Shopping Center (CSC).
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-approve zone change request
Bertrand
Page 3 of 6
1/20/05 P & Z
Voted For: Be1irand, Brakebill, Gibson, Holland, K.lusendorf, Van Riper
Voted Against: Weesner Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding amendment to the Sign Ordinance-Appendix
A.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve
Gibson
Unanimou s Motion Carried
Staff explained to the Commission the second document provided at the public hearing
was given for information purposes only. The document was a response to a question by
City Council on what it would take to bring the city's changeable copy sign into
compliance with the proposed changes to the sign ordinance.
Commissioner Weesner feels the sign ordinance recommended on December 16, 2004,
should be approved and recommended to City Council. She stated that Staffs
recommended changes to bring the city park sign into compliance are not nec essary and
even with the proposed ordinance, the city park sign would not meet requirements. She
explained her concern about safety had not changed and allowing scrolling or flashing
signs does not improve the city in any way. She believes signs that do that are a
distraction and danger to drivers. Commissioner K.lusendorf expressed concern about
some language in the sign ordinance. He is concern with the language under the
changeable copy section of the Sign Ordinance. Staff stated that language was in the
original si gn ordinance. Commissioner Bertrand expressed he felt the sign ordinance the
way the recommendation is currently with regards to electron ic signage is too restrictive.
The other con cern he stated was allowing electronic signage to be placed every 50 feet;
however he understands that limiting the signage would leave people out that would want
electronic si gnage and would not be fair.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to use the December 16, 2004, recommendation not allowing a
changeable copy si gn to change more than at 45-second intervals.
K.lusendorf
Voted For: Brakebill, Holland, K.lusendorf, Weesner
Voted Against:Be1irand, Gibson, Van Riper Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possibl e action regarding amendment to the Zoning Ordinance,
Planned Unit Development-Cluster Homes.
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve amendments
Bertrand
Page 4 of 6
1/20/05 P & Z
!
l
Discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Planned Unit Development-Cluster
Home ordinance centered on detention facilities. Commissioner Weesner stated since
detention ponds were a requirement when developing, she did not feel it should allowed
to be counted in the total percentage of open space. Chairman Holland stated that some
detention facilities were used for recreational purposes such as soccer fields. The
Commission asked Mr. Hodge for a rough estimate as a percent of the acreage used for
detention in a typical neighborhood. Mr. Hodge responded that it sometimes could run as
high as 15-20 percent. The Commission decided that more discussion regarding the
definitions of Open Space and Green Space, particularly with the inclusion of detention
ponds in these definitions, needed to be held. However, these definitions can be
discussed at a later date, because they are not part of the proposed ordinance.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Friendswood Oaks
Section Two.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertand-to approve Preliminary Plat with conditions
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
8.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan of Pecan Plaza
located at the comer of FM 2351 and Pecan.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve Commercial Site Plan
Bertrand.
Commissioner Brakebill expressed concern that the same building had been built around
town so many times that next time the developer comes forth with a plan he would like to
see a different architectural design. Commissioner Van Riper agreed. He also expressed
concern regarding the mature trees and how the city allowed them to be removed from
the site.
Voted For: Unanimous
9.Communications from the Commission
Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand state he was pleased to report the Tree Preservation Ordinance
meeting was held and a draft of the ordinance was reviewed at the meeting. It was
determined another meeting will be held to implement the changes. At that time he hopes
the committee will be handing out the draft of the ordinance. Commissioner Bertrand
also commended the people on the Tree Preservation Ordinance committee because it had
been a long process. He also repo1ted due to illness he did not attend the city council
meetings in January. Commissioner Gibson stated he attended the Main Street meeting
and there are particular zoning issues that need to be addressed. He stated that topic is
something that could be added as a retreat item. Commissioner K.lusendorf repo1ted he
Page 5 of 6
1/20/05 P & Z
attended the Galveston County Drainage District (GCCDD) meeting. At that meeting the
Walgreen's at the comer of FM 2351 and FM 518 and Friendswood Lakes Office
Building was discussed. The GCCDD also discussed the reduction of detention ponds
and looking for possible ways to use more surface runoff. Commissioner Klusendorf also
reported that he attended the City Council meetings where 15 goals for the city were
adopted. Commissioner Brakebill stated he also attended a GCCDD meeting. At that
meeting the discussion took place with regards excavating 250,000 cubic yards of soil
from Imperial Estates. Best case this project would have lowered the 100-year flood.
Commissioner Brakebill believes this project will not happen, but he found it interesting.
There were also adoptions of several ordinances. Chairman Holland requested that the
Commission start thinking about goals for the upcoming retreat.
10.Reports
a.Council Liaison
No report was given at this time.
b.Staff
Staff reported City Council adopted 15 goals set fo1th from Vision 2020. Staff also
!'{!ported a revised Design Criteria Manual has been adopted. Staff also reminded the
Commission about the upcoming retreat planned for February 15, 2005. Commissioner
Brakebill stated he would not be able to attend the retreat due to prior commitments.
Staff announced a workshop with City Council will be held on February 7, 2005, and
there will possibly be a Joint Public Hearing on February 21, 2005. In addition, Staff
commended all the efforts made on the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Staff feels that the
draft of the Tree Preservation Ordinance is a good draft and is proud to be moving
forward with it.
11.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 7:58 p.m.
u
Development Coordinator
Page 6 of 6
1/20/05 P & Z
I Minutes of a Special/Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
February 3, 2005
A special/regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was
held Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at
910 S. Friendswo od Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Smith-Council Liaison
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Sherry Weesner
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director CD
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
6:00 PM-WORKSESSION
1.Call to Order
2.Discussion regarding the definitions of open space and green space.
No work session took place due to a lack of quorum.
7:00 PM-REGULAR MEETING
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland, Commissioner Klusendorf, and
Commissioner Van Riper absent, Vice -Chairman Gibson called the meeting to order to
discuss the following:
3.Communications from the public.
The Commission was presented with a letter from a citizen regarding
development within the Sun Meadow Subdivision.
4.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 1-17-05 special meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve consent agenda.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the revision of the Parks section of
the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 1 of 4
2-3-05 P & Z
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve
Bertrand
Staff presented the Parks section of the Comprehensive Plan to the Commission.
Staff explained that this portion of the plan had been updated with CUITent
statistical data such as population, and income. The plan has also been revised
with regards to the number of Neighborhood Parks. The previous plan had
indicated 8 to 10 Neighb orhood Parks. The current park plan now calls for the
creation of 3 new sub-regional parks. Staff also informed the Commission an
inventory of park features still must be updated. Commissioner Weesner stated
that she felt there is not enough information provided to discuss this or approve
this item at this time. Commissioner Brakebill agreed and stated he had not had a
chance to review what he was given. Commissioner Bertrand stated he noticed
when parks were counted in Friendswood, the count also included school sites.
He feels school sites should not be included in the calculation of area parks.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to table item
Weesner
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
6.Discussion and possible action regarding the definitions of open space and green
space. (30 minutes)
Vice-Chairman Gibson stated he felt that since no quorum was present to have a
work session over this item it should be tabled.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to table item
Weesner
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
7.Discussion and possible action regarding amendments to the Entryway Overlay
District to include Friendswood Lakes Boulevard (i.e. Brittany Bay Boulevard),
Blackhawk, and Whispering Pines (a.k.a. Friendswood Link Road).
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to discuss item
Brakebill
Staff explained to the Commission that Friendswood Lakes Boulevard,
Blackhawk, and Whispering Pines are currently prut of the Major Thoroughfru·e
Plan. Staff would like to gather input from the Commission in order to move
forwru·d to City Council requesting these roadways be added to the Entryway
Overlay District Ordinance.
Commissioner Weesner stated the Commission should be proactive in creating
Entryway Overlay Districts (EOD). The reason for the EOD and their restrictions
Page 2 of 4
2-3-05 P & Z
l
is to provide a pleasing entrance into the city. She feels that there is a need to
look at the Major Thoroughfare Plan and proceed with identifying the streets that
are going to be those entrances. Then place those streets identified as city
entrances into the EOD. She understands that the streets may not be finished yet;
however, we know that they will probably exist. She also feels by placing these
streets into the EOD it creates stability, obvio usness to what is intended to
happen, and is a proactive approach by creating the kind of visual entrances
desired into the city. Commissioner Brak ebill feels the concept is good and
should be discussed. Commissioner Bertrand stated that when EOD was created
the purpose at that time was to provide a sense of appeara nce/look for people
coming into the city. A sense of arrival is also another purpose. Many meetings
took place at that time with significant input from the public. Commissioner
Bertrand expressed he fully supports the EOD; however, is very disappointed with
how the EOD has turned out. He explained that is not because the businesses
coming in have not meet the requirements but because non-conforming lots
within the city limits are not being encouraged to come up to conformance. In
addition, areas outside the city limits that are not required to follow the rules of
the EOD. He expressed he is very interested in the Friendswood Link
(Whispering Pines) road. Commissioner Bertrand strongly recommends there be a
concerted effort by City Council and members of the community to get people
involved and create a plan on how the community wants that area to look. That
look can then be used as an example on how to make established areas in the
community look better. New people coming in will then follow the rules of the
EOD. The areas already established can also try and get help such as grants to
bring their non:conforming portion into EOD requirements. Commissioner
Bertrand also stated he was concerned with Blackhawk being part of the EOD.
Staff stated that Blackhawk to Beamer and Bay Area Boulevard to Blackhawk
would be the only area of Blackhawk designated as part of the EOD.
Commissioner Bertrand stated he is not going to be very excited about the EOD
until the non-conforming lots can be addressed. Staff received a consensus from
the Commission to move forward to City Council with a memo requesting
amendments to the EOD.
8.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Bertrand reported that since the last Planning and Zoning meeting,
a Tree Preservation meeting has taken place. At that meeting it became apparent
there is still work to be done on the draft ordinance before it can be released for
review by other committees. He added the Committee is applying themselves and
he feels late March or early April a draft ordinance might be available to
workshop.
Commissioner Brakebill stated the Community Economic Development
Committee did not meet on its regular meeting date, but will have a meeting this
month.
Page 3 of 4
2-3-05 P & Z
Commissioner Weesner stated the Community Appearance Board meeting was
changed from its normal location, she was not informed of this change, and
therefore she did not attend the meeting.
Vice-Chairman Gibson reminded everyone of the Planning and Zoning retreat on
February 15, 2005.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison David Smith had nothing to report at this time.
b.Staff
Staff announced to the Commission a Joint Public Hearing for Mary's Creek
Village is set for February 21, 2005. The Planning and Zoning retreat is
scheduled for February 15, 2005, from 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Staff also reported
on the recommendations to City Council. The recommendations dealt with
Cluster Homes, Friendswood Lakes zone change request, and the amendments to
the Sign Ordinance. Staff advised the Commission an additional recommendation
from Staff was made with regards to the Sign Ordinance and chang eable copy
signs. The recommendation made by Staff was to place a zero time limit for
changeable copy signs.
Vice-Chairman Gibson stated there is a strong consensus amongst the Planning
and Zoning Commission for a 45 second time delay with regards to the
changeable copy signs.
Commissioner Be1trand also requested the Staff director of Parks r�view and
gives his written approval on the Parks section of the Comprehensive Plan.
10.Adjournment.
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m.
(!�Vt,' JluLl,'rlA i Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
2-3-05 P & Z
l
Minutes of a Special Meeting
ofthe
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
February 15, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Tuesday,
February 15, 2005, at 2:00 p.m. in the Chamber of Commerce Conference Room located at
1100 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Special Guest: Joe Gonzalez
Jerry Ericsson-Mayor Pro-Tern
David Smith-Council Liaison
Mike Hodge-Director of CD and PW
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Brakebill absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to
order to consider the following.
Call to order:
1.Planning retreat facilitated by the Management Connection.
Mayor Pro-Tern Ericsson began by thanking the Commissioners for their time they
dedicate to the city. Mayor Pro-Tern Ericsson made some significant statements about the
city's policy and expectations of how the Planning and Zoning Commission could carry
out the policy. Council Liaison Smith reiterated Mayor Pro-Tern Ericsson's comments
and elaborated on the Commission's role. Facilitator Joe Gonzalez discussed with the
Commission ways of taking a more pro-active approach in their roles as Commissioners.
After discussion, Mr. Gonzalez asked the Commission to establish their 2005 goals. The
Commission felt it was impmiant to complete the remaining est ablished goals set in
2004. Those goals were:
1.Updated and adopt the Comprehensive Plan.
2.Complete and adopt the Tree !>reservation Ordinance.
3.Engage Planning and Zoning in EOD/DOD/Main Street Steering Committee.
2.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
�&� .�LhmCh�iSkelton
Development Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
2-15-05 P & Z
[. Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
February 17, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
February 17, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
7:00 PM-REGULAR MEETING
1.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
2.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 1-20-05 regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 2-3-05 regular meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the Final Plat of South Friendswood Plaza located behind HEB
grocery on FM 528.
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-approve consent agenda
Weesner
Removing Items "A" and "B" from the consent agenda the Commission voted on Item
"C".
Voted For:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Unanimous Motion Carried
Weesner-remove Items "A" and "B" from the consent agenda and change
with amendments.
Bertrand
Page 1 of 6
2-17-05 P & Z
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner sta ted on Item "A", page 3, item 4, the second sentence should
read:
Thirdly, Friendswood Lakes Blvd. is not currently a major thoroughfare, even
though it may be in the future.
Still on page three same item, the eighth sentence down, Commissioner Weesner stated
that sentence should read:
A significant portion of the 1900 acres cutTently zoned for commercial use is
under utilized or vacant.
Commissioner Weesner stated on page 5, item 6, after the sentence from Chairman
Holland regarding soccer fields a sentence should be added stating:
The Commission asked Mr. Hodge for a rough estimate as a percent of the
acreage used for detention in a typical neighborhood. Mr. Hodge responded that
it sometimes could run as high as 15-20 percent.
Commissioner Bertrand stated that on Item "A", page 6, the fifth sentence should read:
Best case, this project would have lowered the 100-year flood.
Item "A" with amended changes was then voted upon.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Item "B" the 2-3-05 regular meeting minutes were then discussed.
Commissioner Weesner st ated that on page 3, item 7, the third sentence should read:
She understands that the streets may not be finished yet; however, we know that
they probably will exist.
Commissioner Brakebill stated that on the same page and item number the fifth sentence
should read:
Commissioner Brakebill feels the concept is good and should be discussed.
Commissioner Bertrand stated that on the same page and item number the thirteenth
sentence should read:
Commissioner Bertrand strongly recommends there be a concerted effort by City
Council and members of the community to get people involved and create a plan
on how the community wants that area to look.
Page 2 of 6
2-17-05 P & Z
l
Item "B" with the amended changes was then voted upon.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Tabled Items:
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the revision of the Parks section of the
Comprehensive Plan. (30 minutes)
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-remove from the table for discussion.
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
Commis sioner Weesner stated she felt this item should be removed from further
discussion.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-remove item from further consideration on the agenda.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Discussion and possible action regarding the definitions of open space and green space.
(15 minutes)
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to remove from the table
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand asked that his comments be placed into record. Commissioner
Bertrand stated:
Golf courses can be considered appropriate recreational uses in open
spaces. In the past Planning and Zoning is on record of saying that golf
courses can be used as open space ..
Commissioner Bertrand also listed a few items he felt were important when discussing
open space and green space. They were:
1.The definitions for open space and green space should be part of the City's
ordinance and not just in resolution form or in the Design Criteria Manual.
2.Allowing open space to become green space, but green space not b�coming
open space. Any changes to that concept would require at least two-thirds
vote among Planning and Zoning and City Council. In addition, this should
only be con sidered if the land is in excess of 110 percent of allotted park
space.
Page 3 of 6
2-17-05 P & Z
3.Green space must be permitted to allow man to do such things that are
protective of it. So man-made aspect in support of preservation or
conservation are to be permitted in Green space.
Commissioner Brakebill felt revisiting the golf course issue was needed particularly
regarding the Cluster-Home Ordinance and allowing the golf course to be considered as
part of the open space requirements.
Commissioner Weesner stated she did not think a golf course was a great idea for open
space; however, she is not fundamentally opposed to it in the appropriate circumstances.
She does feel that the Planning and Zoning's position should be just because it is not
listed doesn't mean it is not green space. In the definitions, the explanation should list
the types of things that are considered green space or open space. Commissioner
Weesner also expressed a concern regarding detention ponds; they should not be
considered as prut of the open space calculation because detention ponds are required
already. She felt that the citizens of the city do not get the value of the concessions given
for green space when detention is to be included as part of the open space/green space
calculations. Commissioner Weesner stated she would like it if a detention pond is listed
as green space then it must be required to serve another purpose also. Commissioner
Brakebill is also concerned with using detention ponds to meet the open space
requi rements when considering the Cluster Home Ordinance. Commissioner Gibson
stated he felt detention is open space but whether or not is qualifies for Cluster Home
open space should be handled in the Cluster Home Ordinance verses the definitions.
Commissioner Weesner stated she did not feel it could be handled that way because the
cluster home ordinance had just been forwru·ded to City Council and Planning and Zoning
had ag reed to put the green space/open space definitions in the ordinance.
Motion: Be1trand-to approve the City of Friendswood's definition of open space
and green space and make the definitions become part of the zoning
ordinance.
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Bertrand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper
Voted Against:Brakebill, Weesner Motion Carried
Regular Items:
5.Consideration and possible action regru·ding an extension of the approval for the
Commercial Site Plan of Shear Pleasure.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve extension request
Gibson
Daniel Gage, 906 West Gayhill Drive addressed the Commission. Mr. Gage is requesting
an extension on a previously approved Site Plan. He explained to the Commission
personal circumstances had delayed the project to this point. His builder had brought it to
Page 4 of 6
2-17-0SP&Z
[ I
I
his attention the one-year constrnction period was about to expire and he should request
and extension.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for Friendswood
Office Building located at 1623 Friendswood Lakes Boulevard.
Chairman Holland announced the applicant had requested this item to be removed from
tonight's agenda.
7.Communications from the Commission.
Chairman Holland announced the liaison rotation schedule is available on the city's ftp
site. He also announced the three goals for 2005 that were established at the retreat. In
addition, he thanked the Staff and Council Liaison for the retreat. Commissioner
Brakebill was not able to attend the Community Economic Development Committee
(CEDC) meetings liaison so Chairman Holland reported on the meeting. Chairman
Holland reported that the CEDC would be electing a new Chairman shortly.
Commissioner Gibson stated the Main Street Committee is reviewing the city's zoning
and what possible changes need to be made in order to develop Main Street. He stated
Staff is putting together a proposal for the committees review.
Commissioner Bertrand reported the Tree Preservation Committee is making progress.
He also stated he felt the retreat was beneficial but feels strongly about City Council
supplying Planning and Zoning with a resolution listing the goals of the Comprehensive
Plan. He suggested that Planning and Zoning wait for those goals until the
Comprehensive Plan is worked on.
Commissioner Weesner stated she felt a great deal was accomplished at the retreat. She
commented the minutes were excellent and the details capturing the meeting are what she
has been looking for. Commissioner Weesner asked Staff to send a copy to the
Commission of what City Council has done regarding the 15 goals of Vision 2020. She
also stated she would be sending Staff a list of specific questions that have not been
answered for her as of yet.
8.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
No report was given at this time.
b.Staff
Page 5 of 6
2-17-05 P & Z
Staff thanked the Commission for attending the retreat. Staff announced the Joint Public
Hearing scheduled for 2-21-05 has been rescheduled for 3-7-05. Also, Chairman Holland
is presenting his annual report to City Council on 2-21-05. Staff requested the all the
Planning and Zoning Commissioners sign up on group builder in order to receive agendas
from other Committees and Boards.
9.Adjournment.
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 7:53 p.m.
\W ,,, Jhjk,,
Ch ·i Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 6 of 6
2-17-05 P & Z
I i
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
March 3, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, March 3, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Gibson absent, Chairman Holland called the
meeting to order to discuss the following:
7:00 PM-REGULAR MEETING
1.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
2.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 2-15-05 special meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 2-17-05 regular meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-approve consent agenda
Brakebill
Amended
Motion: Bertrand-remove Items "A" and "B" from the consent agenda for
discussion
Second: Brakebill
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Regarding the 2-15-05 minutes, Commissioner Bertrand felt that it was
unnecessary to mention the comments by Mayor Pro-Tern Jeny Ericsson about
the organizational chart of the city. Rather, he would like the following on
record:
Page 1 of 4
3/3/05 P & Z
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
"Councilman Ericcson made some significant statements about the
city's policy and expectations of how the Planning and Zoning
Commission could cany out the policy."
Be1trand-approve Item "A" with discussion comments
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand stated, Item "B" page 4, the third paragraph first sentence
should read:
"Commissioner Weesner stated she did not think a golf course was
a great idea for open space; however, she is not fundamentally
opposed to it in the appropriate circumstances."
Com missioner Weesner stated on the same paragraph, fifth sentence should read:
"She felt that the citizens of the city do not get the value of the
concessions given for green space when detention is to be included
as part of the open space/green space calculations."
Commissioner Weesner stated that the same paragraph, last sentence should read:
Amended
"Commissioner Weesner stated she did not feel it could be handled
that way because the cluster home ordinance had just been
fo1warded to City Council and Planning and Zoning had agreed to
put the green space/open space definition in the ordinance."
Motion: Weesner-approve with changes
Second: · Brakebill
Voted For: Bertand, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Voted Against:Brakebill Motion Carried
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for
Friendswood Office Building located at 1623 Friendswood Lakes Boulevard.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-approve with Staff comments.
Brakebill
Bruce Walck with Powers Bmwn Architects, representative for the developer,
presented the Site Plan to the Commission.
Commissioner Weesner expressed a concern that no trees were identified within
the landscape buffer along the rod iron fence on the Site Plan. Mr. Walck stated
Page 2 of 4
3/3/05 P & Z
the developer felt the project was more marketable if the trees were not
obstructing the view of the lake. Commissioner Klusendorf stated he felt there
should not be a drive off of Garden Lakes Drive. Mr. Walck stated the driveway
was designed as a second entrance mainly for emergency vehicles access.
Commissioner Weesner suggested making the driveway on Friendswood Lakes
Boulevard larger than currently proposed. Commissioner Klusendorf stated he
would feel better if the drive on Friendswood Lakes Boulevard was expanded.
Commissioner Bertrand asked if the developer would consider another location
for the dumpster. Chairman Holland stated that landscaping should be provided
within the buffer and the dumpster location should be relocation. He stated that
he could not support the project if those issues were not addressed.
Wayne Fowlkes, 515 Eleanor, addressed the Commission. Mr. Fowl kes, who is
employed by the developer, stated that the issues addressed by the Commission
could be resolved. Mr. Fowkles verified with the Commission the issues of
concern are:
1.Driveway on Friendswood Lakes Boulevard needs to be
widened.
2.Dumpster must be relocated.
3.There must be a landscape buffer and trees must be provided
within it.
After discussion the Commission felt it was necessary to table the item. This
would allow the developer to address the concerns of the Commission and
resubmit revised drawings.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Be1trand-to table item.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
4.Discussion regarding Conceptual Plan of a portion of the West Ranch
development located on FM 518.
Jeff Anderson with Friendswood Development addressed the Commission. Mr.
Anderson brought forth a Conceptual Plan for the West Ranch. He is requesting
feedback from the Commission regarding this project. Mr. Anderson explained
the Conceptual Plan only shows the development of the no1th patt of the West
Prope1ty currently. The south po1tion will be developed at a later date. Mr.
Anderson stated that the overall development density was approximately 1.62 on
the no1th side of FM 518.
Commissioner Weesner asked if the Entryway Overlay requirements are being
met. Mr. Anderson stated they are being met, but a variance will be requested for
the cul-de-sac lengths. Commissioner Weesner asked if sidewalks are being
provided on FM 518. Mr. Anderson stated at this time there was no intention to
Page 3 of 4
3/3/05 P & Z
place sidewalks on FM 518. Commissioner Weesner thought sidewalks were
required on FM 518 per the Zoning Ordinance. Staff stated sidewalk
requirements for FM 518 were being investigated. Commissioner Klusendorf
asked if this development would connect to Rancho Viejo. Mr. Anderson stated
there was no reason this development would need to connect to Rancho Viejo.
Commissioner Bertrand expressed concerns with emergency outlets in case of
flooding. He is concerned the larger proposed homes are isolated.
After discussion, the consensus from the Commission indicated the project should
move forward through the development process.
5.Communications from the Commission.
a.Rep01t from the TPO Sub-committee
Commissioner Bertrand stated that action would take place on the Tree
Preservation Ordinance if the work by the City Attorney has been completed.
b.Rep01t from the Comprehensive Plan Sub-committee
Commissioner Weesner stated the sub-committee would be meeting on March 4,
2005, to discuss a plan.
6.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
No rep01t was given at this time.
b.Staff
Staff reported working on sh01t-term measmes to allow development in Main
Street that would still be in line with the Main Street goals. A Joint Public
Hearing will be schedule for sometime in April with Planning and Zoning, City
Council, and the Main Street Committee. Some items of discussion to consider
are sidewalk requirements, building height requirements for non-residential
structmes, set backs, parking lot locations, and revising the Permitted Use Table
(PUT) for the Original Business District (OBD).
7.Adjournment.
,�:It��
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
3/3/05 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
March 7, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Plan ning and Zoning Commission was held Monday,
March 7, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill-7:08 p.m.
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
John Olson-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairm an Holland called the meeting to order to consider the following.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Zone Classification change for 9.8718 acre, located at 511 North Friendswood Drive,
out of Lot 5, Hoidale and Coffman Subdivision Galveston County, Texas, from:
Community Shopping Center/Single Family Residential to: Planned Unit
Development with/Specific Use Permit for Townhomes/Office.
Brett Banfield, 901 Woodcrest, owner of TGB Properties and developer of the property,
addressed the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. Mr. Banfield presented
his proposed development concept with a brief overview of the project and reasons he felt
the rezoning should take place. He also stated that private market research had been
conducted and it was determined from that research that a mixed-use development would
be the best use for this property. He explained the project would be low-density
residential ·catering to "empty nesters" and would be a positive for the city budget.
Fred Kreh, 209 Dawn stated he had no objections to the rezoning; however, he is
concerned about having adequate fire protection. Mr. Kirk feels it is important firewalls
be required between the units in order to prohibit fire from spreading.
No one spoke against the request
2.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 7: 12 p.m.
c�_A d •• dJRLtc& Ch err-Skelto�
Development Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
3/7/05 P & Z
[
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
March 17, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, March 17, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910
S.Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Loren Smith-City Attorney Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of C.D.
Rhonda Baker-C.D. Division Secretary
With a quorum present, Commissioner Gibson and Commissioner Van Riper absent,
Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
7:00 PM-REGULAR MEETING
1.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
2.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 3-3-05 regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 3-7-05 special meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the Final Plat of Friendswood Square located at the corner
of FM 518 and FM 2351.
Motion:
Second:
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve
Brakebill
Weesner-to remove Item "A" from the consent agenda for
discussion.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
The Commission then voted on the approval of Items "B" and "C" of the consent
agenda.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Item "A" was then discussed. Commissioner Weesner then stated that Item 3 of
the March 3, 2005 meeting the first sentence of the second paragraph should read:
Page 1 of 4
3-17-05P&Z
"Commissioner Weesner expressed a concern that no trees were identified within the landscape buffer along the rod iron fence on the Site Plan." Commissioner Weesner also revised, under the same item the next to last paragraph, listed items of concern, number 3 should read: " 3. There must be a landscape buffer and trees must be provided within it." Commissioner Brakebill stated on the same item it is indicated the Amended Motion was unanimous, when if fact he was in opposition. Amended Motion: Second: Voted For: TABLED ITEMS: Weesner-to approve Item "A" of the consent agenda with changes. Bertrand Unanimous Motion Carried 3.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan forFriendswood Office Building located at 1623 Friendswood Lakes Boulevard.Motion: Second: Voted For: Be1trand-to remove item from table for discussion Brakebill Unanimous Motion Carried Chairman Holland stated a motion to approve remained from the last meeting. Cary Els, Powers Brown Architecture, represented Altair Development. Mr. Els explained changes to the Site Plan had been made per the request made at the previous meeting. Chairman Holland asked if there was an oversight as the landscape buffer was not contiguous. Cary Els stated it was an oversight and would be corrected. Commissioner Klusendorf stated that since the exit onto Garden Lakes Drive must remain for emergency access purposes, he would like an "Emergency Exit Only" sign be placed at that exit of the property. · Commissioner Be1trand reminded the Commission that signs on private property are not enforceable. Commissioner Bertrand then stated he commended the developer for relocating the dumpster; however, he felt the new location would was not far enough from the residential. He suggested the developer make arrangements with the trash company for pickup between 6 and 7 in the morning, in order not to disturb the residents in the neighboring subdivision. Amended Page 2 of 4 3-17-05 P & Z
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
REGULAR ITEMS:
Bertrand-approve with Staff comments, making landscaping
conti guous, and adding an exit only sign to the property.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the zone change request for property
located at 511 N. Friendswood Drive from Single Family
Residential/Community Shopping Center to Planned Unit Development with a
Specific Use Permit for Townhomes/Office Use.
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to approve
Bertrand
Commissioner Bertrand stated that at the public hearing there were no objections
to this project and he also felt it was a well thought out development. Since that
time he has discovered that this property is part of the acreage considered in the
commercial need for the city. He also explained that some commercial
development is going in with the residential; however, he did not feel in this
instance it was viable to convert the residential to commercial. He wanted to
point out to the Commission that this development takes away from that
percentage the city is hoping to achieve in commercial. Commissioner Weesner
then added with all the commercial land there is, that the developers should be
encouraged ·to figure out the what the market demand is. She also stated that she
feels .what the city is looking for is for commercial space to be rented and
prosperous for the city.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for
Walgreen's located at the comer of FM 2351 and FM 518.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve with Staff comments
Klusendorf
Commissioner Bertrand stated that Site Plan looked well don.e and commended
Walgreen's for their outdoor lighting and consideration of the "Dark Skies"
concept.
A representative for Walgreen's addressed the Commission, and was available to
answer questions from the Commission.
The Commission expressed concerns that the landscaping buffer did not continue
across the rear of Walgreen's. Staff stated the landscape buffer was not required
between commercial. The City Attorney stated that the ordinance reads the length
Page 3 of 4
3-17-05 P & Z
of the prope1ty, which the intent was to mean the frontage of the prope1ty. Staff
then stated the Commission could review the landscape buffer requirements at a
future meeting. Commissioner K.lusendorf then stated that Staff should take action
to get the sidewalks installed along FM 2351.
Voted For: Unanimous
6.Communications from the Commission.
a.Report from the Tree Preservation Sub-Committee.
Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand stated next schedule meeting is March 23, 2005.
b.Repmt from the Comprehensive Plan Sub-Committee.
Commissioner Weesner stated the sub-committee meet and came up with 3
different directions to proceed with reviewing/updating the Comprehensive Plan
with the pros and cons for each. She also stated that at the retreat she understood
that City Council would be providing a resolution indicating the direction
Planning and Zoning should take with regards to the amount of various types of
commercial needed within the City.
7.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
No report was given at this time.
b.Staff
Staff provided the 2005 goals for Planning and Zoning Commission as discussed
at their retreat.
8.Adjournment.
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
G•lb/611,.d,.AI ., v ,e/ q/4 X ,eli(JYV hei\LSkelton
Development Coo'rdinator
Page 4 of 4
3-17-05 P &Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
April 4, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commi ssion was held Monday,
April 4, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill
Bob· Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sheny Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Planner
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to consider the following.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.A request for a zone classification change for 45.8921 acres, Lots 1-29, Block 1, Lots
1-24, Block 2, and Reserves A-G, property located at FM 518, Hunter's Creek
Estates Subdivision, Galveston County, Texas, from: Single Family Residential
(SFR) to: Planned Unit Development (PUD).
Chairman Holland asked if there was anyone who wished to speak for or against the
project.
Mr. Thomas Lay, stated he had come prepared to speak against the request, but after
to speaking to Kent Ballard, Mr. Lay did not have any objections.
Mr. Dan Schroeder, 18 Mary's Creek Lane, stated he was opposed to the request. He
had concerns about the safety of his family should an apartment development be built
behind his property.
Chaiiman Holland asked staff to clarify the subject of the Public Hearing. The
Planner addressed the Council and Commission stating that the request before them
was in regard to an existing subdivision, Hunter's Creek Estates, located behind the
HEB off FM 518. The request is to rezone in order to allow for a private street gated
subdivision.
B.A request for a Specific Use Pe1mit (SUP)-Private Street, Gated Community, for
45.8921 acres, Lots 1-29, Block 1, Lots 1-24, Block 2, and Reserves A-G, property
located at FM 518, Hunter's Creek Estates Subdivision, Galveston County, Texas.
Page 1 of2
4/04/05 P & Z
No one spoke for or against the request
2.Adjournment
With no f;miher comment the meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m.L»�� Diana Steelquist
Planner
Page 2 of2
4/04/05 P & Z
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
April 7, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, April 7, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland, Commissioner Brakebill and Commissioner
Klusendorf absent, Vice-Chairman Gibson called the meeting to order to discuss the
following:
REGULAR SESSION
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the zone change request for property
located on FM 518 at Hunters Creek Estates.
A.Zone classification change for 45.8921 acres at Hunter's Creek Estates
Subdivision on FM 518 from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Planned
Unit Development (PUD).
B.Zone classification change for a Specific Use Permit (SUP)-Private
Street, Gated Community for 45.8921 acres located on FM 518 for
Hunter's Creek Estates Subdivision.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-approve items "A" and "B"
Weesner
Commissioner Bertrand expressed that he would like to see the SUP amended so
that the streetlights within the subdivision are maintained by the Home Owners
Association (HOA). The Commission felt this clarity within the Specific Use
Permit would eliminate confusion in the future as to the responsible party should
the lighting fixtures need repair or maintenance. The Commission also verified
that a new plat would be required and that the maintenance of the streets would be·
the responsibility of the HOA.
Page 1 of 3
4-7-05 P & Z
Amended
Motion: Bertrand-add to the SUP that the HOA will maintain the street
lights.
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for Best
Storage located at 3200 FM 528.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Be11and-approve with Staff comments
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of West Ranch
Restricted Reserve "A" located off FM 518.
Prior to meeting, the applicant asked items to be removed from the agenda.
6.Discussion and possible action regarding height restrictions in Community
Shopping Center (CSC) District.
The Commission discussed the height restriction in the Community Shopping
Center District. Commissioner Bertrand explained to the other Commissioners
the history behind the height restrictions pmt of the ordinance. The
Commissioners then decided a workshop with City Council to discuss the height
restriction was needed.
7.Communications from the Commission.
a.Report from the Tree Preservation Sub-Committee.
Commissioner Bertrand repm1ed a meeting is scheduled for 4-20-05 and at that
time the committee hopes to review the documents prepared by the City Attorney.
b.Repm1 from the Comprehensive Plan Sub-Committee.
The Commission reviewed the scenm-ios presented by the sub-committee and
determined the moderate overhaul would be the best solution in completing the
Comprehensive Plan. Vice-Chai1man Gibson asked the sub-committee when the
Comprehensive Plan would be completed. It was stated a projected
accomplishment date is April or May of 2006.
8.Repo11s.
a.Council Liaison
Page 2 of 3
4-7-05 P & Z
The Liaison was not present.
b.Staff
Staff rep011ed a Joint Workshop with City Council, Main Street and Planning &
Zoning would be held on April 18, 2005 to consider the interim zoning of the
Main Street are a.
9.Adjournment.
With no fur ther comment the meeting was adjourned at 7:43 p.m.
Page 3 of 3
4-7-05 P & Z
l
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
April 18, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Monday, April 18, 2005 at 4:30p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director CD
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
4:30 PM-WORKSESSION
1.Call to order.
2.Discussion regarding Interim Zoning Measures for the Main Street Area.
Staff presented a PowerPoint presentation of the proposed changes to the Zoning
Ordinance which would facilitate interim development in the Main Street area.
Proposed changes included a revision to the Original Business District with regards to
the types of uses allowed within the district as well as the lot size and set backs. An
expansion of the Downtown Overlay District was also proposed. The revised DOD
would require 8 foot sidewalks and 24 foot minimum front facades for commercial
buildings.
The Council expressed concern for currently non-confmming lots. They would like
to see the revisions proposed try assist those businesses to allow new or expanded
development.
3.Adjournment
/4
[
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
April 21, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, April 21, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sheny Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
David Smith-Council Liaison
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of C.D.
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the
following:
7:00 PM-PUBLIC HEARING
1.Call to order
2.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding:
A.Re-plat Rancho Viejo Lot 11-2, located on Rancho Circle in Viejo Subdivision.
Janis Lowe, 401 Forest Pine Court, representative of the owner, addressed the
Commission. Mrs. Lowe explained the owners had purch ased this prope1iy to build
a home; however, in order to build their home the drainage ditch running through
the middle of the property had to be relocated. To relocate the drainage ditch the
original plat had to be updated causing a re-plat to be required.
No one spoke in for or against the item.
REGULAR SESSION
3.Communications from the public.
Harold Benson, 305 N. Shadowbend, addressed the Commission. Mr. Benson
requested the Commission consider changing the requirement percentage of retail
and office required in a Community Shopping Center (CSC) district. He asked
the Commission to consider it as an item on an upcoming agenda.
4.Consent Agenda:
Page 1 of 6
4-21-05 P & Z
a.Approval of the 4-4-05 special meeting min utes.
b.Approval of the 4-7-05 regular meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the Re-plat of Rancho Viejo Lot 11-2.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve
Brakebill
Commissioner Weesner requested Items "B" and "C" be removed from the
consent agenda for discussion.
A vote for Item "A" of the consent agenda was then taken
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Motion: Weesner-Remove Item "B" and "C" from the consent agenda for
discussion.
Second: K.lusendorf
Voted For: Brakebill, Holland, K.lusendorf, Weesner
Voted Against:Be1trand, Gibson, Van Riper Motion Carried
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-Approve item "B"
K.lusendorf
Commissioner Weesner stated the last meeting the CSC height restriction was
discussed. Commissioner Weesner asked for clarification that a Planned Unit
Development is a stand-alone zone, which could allow a hotel to go in a PUD
without height restrictions. The City Attorney clarified a PUD was a stand-alone
zone.
There were no changes to the minutes made.
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Unanimous
Weesner-Approve item "C"
Brakebill
Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner stated that placing an item on the consent agenda implies
that the item has about an 80 percent or more approval. Placing an item on the
consent agenda after a public hearing, if the item was controversial, implies to the
public that their input is not going to be heard or is not imp01tant. Chaiiman
Holland then stated that the person that has an item on the consent agenda would
pay the price.
Voted For: Unanimous
Page 2 of 6
4-21-05 P & Z
Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of the Enclave
at West Ranch Section One located off FM 518.
Commissioner Brakebill recussed himself from the vote.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Recussed:
Bertrand-Approve with Staff comments
Gibson
Be1iand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Brakebill Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Creekside at
West Ranch, Section One located off FM 518.
Commissioner Brakebill recussed himself from the vote.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Recussed:
Bertrand-Approve with Staff comments
Gibson
Bertrand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Brakebill Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of West Ranch
Restricted Reserves "A" & "B" located off FM 518.
Commissioner Brakebill recussed himself from the vote.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Recussed:
Be1irand-Approve with Staff comments
Gibson
Bertrand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Brakebill Motion Carried
8.Discussion and possible action regarding the Main Street Interim Zoning.
Staff gave a presentation of the Main Street Development Interim Measures.
Staff discussed the conceptual plan, the implementation plan and the components
of these measures. In addition, Tony Banfield spoke about the desire to get this
project moving. He expressed the interim zoning is cmTently what is needed to
take care of any issues that could arise in the short term.
Council Liaison Smith stated the interim measures are what City Council is
lo oking to get from Planning and Zoning. Liaison Smith also stated that the issue
is the timing associated with being able to influence what will happen with
downtown. Also, so that there needs to be more control over developments
developing under the cw-rent zoning. Liaison Smith stated that the interim zoning
would help with other issues that may arise later on in the downto-wn
development.
Page 3 of 6
4-21-05 P & Z
Commissioner Weesner expressed concern that the Main Street Interim Measures is moving to fast and that a PUD should be created so the properties were not nonconfmming. Commissioner Be1trand stated he appreciated all the hard work that had been done by the Main Street Steering Committee. Commissioner Bertrand did continue to say that he had concerns with the Interim Measures that had been written. Commissioner Bertrand then listed a few items of concern some are setbacks, screening, signage and parking. Commissioner Bertrand agreed that interim measures are needed and he encourages them; however, he feels there should be more clarity. Commissioner Gibson stated he would like to workshop with Main Street on this item, if possible before the public hearing. After more discussion it was determined a workshop with Main Street could be setup after the pubic hearing, for a date to be determined. 9.Discussion and possible action regarding the implementation of the plan of theComprehensive Plan.Commissioner Weesner provided an overview of the schedule developed by the Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee for completion of the Friendswood Comprehensive Plan. Part one of the plan includes an introduction, the current situation, and the land the same time; the Staff will complete a draft of the Cunent Situation. Each group will bring questions or concerns to the P &Z Commission. The Drafts of each section will be complete and given to the Commission on May 16th, The Commission will have a workshop/round table discussion on May 19th and June 16th to work through these chapters, staff will make all required changes to both documents and both will be ready for approval by the Commission on August 14th
311d the Introduction and Current Situation will be forwarded to City Council. During this time period Commission members will be explaining the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan to the Boar·ds and Committees and will be expressing the desire of the P&Z Commission to obtain input from them. Staff will have an outline of the Land Plan/Vision completed by August 21st and issue it to the P&Z Commission, all stake holders (this includes Council, all City Boards, Committees, and Commissions) and will ask for input/comment from each either in writing or at a series of workshops scheduled for this purpose. Written invitations to the workshops from the Chairman of the P&Z will be sent to each member of the City Boards, Committees, and Commissions and to Council Members. All the comments brought forth in these meetings will be recorded and a copy of the comments from the meeting and those provided in writing will be provided to the P&Z Commission members. The Staff will Page 4 of 6 4-21-05 P & Z
l
complete the draft and the draft will be reviewed and revised by the P &Z
Commission at a series of workshop/round table discussions with a goal of
Approval at the November 17'h meeting. The Land Plan/Vision will be forwarded
to City Council.
Completion of Part One of the Comprehensive Plan means that the substance of
the comprehensive plan is complete. If progress is more rapid all the dates move
forward and if progress is less rapid all the dates move backward.
In 2006, we will continue with Part two of the comprehensive plan, which fills out
the detai ls. These sections will be managed in the same manner as the Land
Plan/Vision section with brainstorming and comment by stakeholders affected by
the particular section during the draft writing stage followed by revision and
rewrites. The goal is for P&Z to aprrove all of the detailed chapters of the
Comprehensive Plan by May 18th an forward them to City Council.
At that time P&Z will have completed a rewrite of the existing Comprehensive
Plan and will start work on a Main Street Sector Plan following the same
procedures. The goal for completion is August 3 rd of 2006. The P&Z
Commission may decide to work on additional sector plans at that time.
10.Communications from the Commission.
a.Report from the Tree Preservation Sub-Committee.
Commissioner Be1irand announced the Tree Preservation Sub-Committee
approved the document. He also stated a recommendation will be made that the
existing qualified tree list be removed from the Zoning Ordinance and the Design
Criteria Manual.
11.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith apologized for not being at the last couple of Planning and
Zoning meetings. Liaison Smith stated he would pick up on the regular schedule
from now on. He also thanked the Planning and Zoning Commission for what
they have accomplished so far. Liaison Smith stated that City Council had a
workshop on items that could improve the communication with the public. Also,
there are going to be a Home Owners Association (HOA) Board quaiierly
meetings to keep the HOA's informed and provide an information exchange.
Liaison. Smith also s·tated he feels the purpose or intent of the consent agenda is if
it is on the consent agenda than it is allowed to be approved, unless there is
something that needs to be discussed.
Page 5 of 6
4-21-05 P & Z
b.Staff
Staff reported the first reading for Hunters Creek Planned Unit
Development/Specific Use Permit would have its first reading on May 2, 2005.
Staff also stated on May 5, 2005, there would be a Joint Public Hearing with City
Council held. May 16, 2005 will be a canvas of the election, and June 6, 2005,
will be another Joint Public Hearing with City Council with four items on it.
12.Adjournment.
With no fwiher action the meeting was adjourned at 9:23 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 6 of 6
4-21-05 P & Z
[
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
May·2, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Monday, May 2, 2005 at 4:00 p.m. Friendswood Public Library Room, located at 416 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
4:00 PM-WORKSESSION
1.Call to order.
Mike Hodge-Director of CD and PW
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director CD
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
Mayor Brizendine called the meeting to order.
2.Discussion regarding amendments to the Tree Preservation Ordinance.
Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposed amendments to the Tree
Preservation Ordinance. Staff also stated recommendations made by the Tree
Preservation Sub-committee. These recommendations involved a new qualified
tree list being placed in the Design Criteria Manual and the old qualified tree list
being removed from the Zoning Ordinance.
3.Adjournment
With no fu1ther comments the meeting was adjourned at 4:30 p.m.
Development Cooroinator
l
Minutes of a Special/Regular Meeting
ofthe
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
May 5, 2005
A special/regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was
held Thursday, May 5, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910
S.Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Dave Smith-Council Liaison
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of C.D.
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quomm present, Commissioner Brakebill absent, Chairman Holland called the
meeting to order to consider the following.
JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.Call to Order
2.Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Friendswood, Appendix C,
Section 5, 7, 7.5, and 8 to implement interim zoning measures for Main Street
Development.
Staff and the Main Street Task Force Chairman, Bill Finger, gave a presentation
to City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the Main
Street Development. The presentation consisted of the history, the present day,
and the future plans of downtown. The Chaitman then asked the public to speak
regarding the proposed measures.
The following is a synopsis of people who spoke against the interim measures
Carol Shrophire, 415 Morningside. She felt this should be brought before all the
citizens of Friendswood. She also expressed concern that she would be forced to
move due to the changes proposed.
Vince Maleche, 709 Windsor Drive. He stated Friendswood has changed and the
city is zoning people into the ground.
Ed Stuart, 2001 Pine Drive. Mr. Stuait stated that he felt the interim measures
discriminated against property owners and developers who want to build a one
story building. Mr. Stuart referenced commercial properties· such as the new
Sonic, the Shell station, and McDonalds. He also feels that the physical
Page 1 of 5
5/5/05 P & Z
characteristics of Friendswood should be preserved. In addition, Mr. Stuart,
stated that false fronts during hunicane season could be dangerous. Mr. Stuart
also mentioned he was concerned about detention availability.
Orland Carelock, 910 Riverside Court. He felt the city's priorities were wrong.
He stated that Friendswood is a quite place Interim measures would allow for
more alcoholic establishments in the City. He also believes there would be no
control over the Downtown Overlay District (DOD), nor does he think there is
now. He stated that Friendswood was founded on religious freedom and religious
values. The interim measures would allow more wet areas in Friendswood, and
he is against it.
Bill Holbert, 507 Windsor Drive. Mr. Holbert stated in the time he has been in
Friend swood he has never outwardly spoken out against anything, but now he is.
He feels this is poorly thought out. He explained that he moved his family to
Friendswood because it had a small town charm and feel. He additionally stated
he is ready to place time and money to fight against this idea.
Don Beeth, 5303 Whittier Oaks, addressed the City Council and Planning and
Zoning Commission. Mr. Beeth expressed his belief that this idea does not have
the suppmt needed to move forward. He stated that pedestrians did not walk in
July and he wanted to know the city's stand regarding imminent domain.
The following is a synopsis of people who spoke in favor on the interim
measures.
Bill Finger, 2805 Bun Oak Drive. Mr. Finger stated he is the Chairman of the
Mainstreet Steering Committee, but was speaking as a private citizen. He stated
he thinks interim measures are a good idea; however, there were several items that
he felts needed to be addressed. He recommend that a Joint Workshop between
Mainstreet and the Commission be held, to discuss these and other issues.
Mark McLean, 1212 Verdun Lane, owner of Lary's Florist. Mr. McLean stated
he would like something to be done to mainstreet. He feels mainstreet needs to be
improved and should be pedestrian friendly. In addition he stated, the interim
measures allow businesses the flexibility to improve.
With no futther comments the public hearing was then closed.
REGULAR SESSION
3.Communications from the public.
No one from the public spoke at this time.
4.Consent Agenda:
Page 2 of 5
5/5/05 P & Z
,
[ I
a.Approval of the 3-17-05 regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 4-18-05 special meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the 4-21-05 regular meeting minutes.
d.Approval of the Final Plat of Friendswood Oaks, Section Two.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of the West
Ranch Estates Section One located on FM 518.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve with Staff comments.
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Discussion and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for
Morningside Office Park located at 312 Morningside.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to approve
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the amendment· to the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Friendswood, Appendix C, Section 5, 7, 7.5, and 8 to
implement interim zoning measures for Main Street Development.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve
Weesner
The Commission had a brief discussion on this item, deciding a workshop should
be held between the Main Street Committee and the Commission.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to table
Gibson
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
8.Discussion and possible action regard_ing the limitations of office uses in the
Community Shopping Center (CSC) District.
Staff provided information to the Commission regarding the limitations of office
use in the Community Shopping Center (CSC) district. Harold Benson, 305 N.
Shadowbend addressed the Commission with his specific issues· that the
limitations placed on his development. Commissioner Bertrand asked Mr.
Page 3 of 5
5/5/05 P & Z
Benson what other types of zoning could work for his development and that
would accomplish the same thing. Commissioner Bertrand then sugge sted Mr.
Benson consider a Planned Unit Development (PUD), listing out the possible uses
he would like to see be allowed in his development. Commissioner Bert rand then
suggested Mr. Benson work with Staff to determine the best needs for his
development.
9.Discussion and possible action regarding a new Tree Preservation Ordinance.
Motion:
Second:
Be1trand-to approve
Van Riper
Commissioner Bertrand stated he was pleased to be able to pass this item on to
Planning and Zoning and City Council. He stated he understands Planning and
Zoning and City Council could change the proposed ordinance; however, he
cautioned that the ordinance had strong support from the Tree Preservation
Committee members and changing the ordinance could cause that suppmt to go
away. Chairman Holland agreed that a lot of negotiating did take place.
Commissioner Be1trand then added there were items of consideration to tie with
the motion.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to remove the qualified tree list from the zoning
ordinance, to remove the current quaiified tree list in the DesignCriteria Manual to be replaced with the qualified tree list
recommended by the TPO Committee. To accept the
recommendation from the TPOC with regards to the inconsistency
of penalties making the penalty $2000.00 a day for non
compliance with the ordinance. Also, to review the zoning
ordinance for consistency of language.
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion Carried
10.Communications from the Commission .
a.Repo1t on the Comprehensive Plan.
Chaiiman Holland gave no repmt at this time.
Chairman Holland asked Staff to add Mr. Benson's issue to the to do list for
Planning and Zoning and refer to fr as the Benson Solution. He then recapped
.items that were asked of Staff or members of the Commission in previous months.
Those were items such as Staff's presentation at the retreat. Chairman Holland
also asked that items be placed on the FTP site for easier access by the
Commission. He would like to have a "to do list" and an "opportunity list".
Page 4 of 5
5/5/05 P & Z
Commissioner Klusendorf asked that the items from the public be listed for the
workshop with Mainstreet.
Commissioner Be1trand expressed he was distressed over an article that was
published in the Friendswood Journal regarding development in the City.
Commissioner Be1trand stated that the lengthy response from the editor is the
issue was inappropriate. Commissioner Be1trand stated he tries his best to help
enforce zoning ordinances and to help make them better. He also stated he was
even more distressed with the paper's reference to Mainstreet as a "Disneyland
recreational of a downtown that Friendswood never had and never wanted".
Commissioner Bertrand stated that he thought if the paper was for profit, it should
encourage business development. This would stand to reason, when businesses
come in and compete for customers and when businesses are competing for
customers; those businesses buy newspaper advertisements.
11.Reports
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith stated that the Commission has certain responsibilities in a
leadership positions that are held; to gather as much information as possible in
order to make the best possible decisions for the city. He has watched the
Planning and Zoning Commission struggle through those decisions that have been
made and he encouraged the Commission to continue to do the great job that has
be being done.
b.Staff
Staff reported a regional American Planning Association (AP A) Conference will
be held in June and asked if any of the Commissioners had an interest in
attending. If so, please contact Staff. Staff also repmted that an "on going task
list" had already been added to the FTP site. Commissioner Bertrand asked if a
domain name could be used instead of the number used to access it. In addition,
Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist stated she was very proud to have worked on the
Tree Preservation Ordinance Committee and thanked the Commission for
supporting the proposed ordinance.
12.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 9:36 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 5 of 5
5/5/05 P & Z
[
I
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
May 19, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held on Thursday,
May 19, 2005, at 5 :30 pm at the Friendsw ood City Hall second floor conference room, located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following Planning & Zoning
Commissioners were present:
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sheny Weesner
Special Guests:
Bill Finger
Alton Todd
Tony Banfield
Ron Cox-City Manager
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of C.D.
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
'With a quorum present, Commissioners Bertrand, Brakebill and Van Riper absent, Chairman
Holland called the special meeting to orde r.
Worksession
1.Call to order
2.Discussion with Main Street Committee regarding Interim Zoning measures for
Downtown redevelopment (45 minutes)
, Mr. Bill Finger, Chairman of the Main Street committee, gave some . background
information regarding the planning that has taken place over the last 5 plus years to create
a Main Street Implementation Plan. He outlined the various aspects of the Conceptual
Plan, and the boundaries of the Main Street area. He also discussed the various meetings
with City Council, P &Z and stakeholders that had taken place in the past. The
Implement ation Plan had two preliminary steps that need to be taken to move forward:
the creation of the 'entity' and revising the zoning regulations. The latter is what P&Z
needs to address. Mr. Finger wanted to make it clear what the Main Street concept is, so
that P&Z can move forward with their deliberations on the proposed zoning ·changes.
The concept is one of mixed-use, pedestrian friendly environments with parking in the
rear, green space, public buildings and ai·eas where people can congregate. The initial
module, which was targeted for redevelopment, is around the post office, library and
public safety building.
05/19/05 P&Z
Page 1 of 3
Mr. Finger further stated his belief that the interim-zoning proposal does not address all
the needs of redevelopment in the downtown area. Besides the Original Business District,
changes need to be made to the other zoning districts that are within the Downtown area.
Chairman Holland questioned the validity of the Main Street project. He expressed
concern with outdated infmmation from market studies and surveys. He was also
concerned that other mixed-use projects, such as the Whitcomb property, would draw
business away from downtown. Both the Main Street Chairman and the Economic
Development Coordinator voiced opinions that the Main Street project was viable and
would have a public focus rather than the destination place focus planned for the
Whitcomb project. Tony Banfield pointed out that the demographics of Friendswood
would cause redevelopment in the downtown area. He advocated having zoning in place,
which would guide developers to create a downtown as envisioned by the Main Street
Implementation Plan.
Mr. Finger stated the major challenge would be the transition from the current zoning
requirements to those needed to achieve the goals of the Implementation Plan.
Commissioner Weesner pointed out that although the proposal was called interim
measures, they were actually pe1manent changes to the Zoning Ordinance. \Vhat ever
was put in place would be a permanent change. Staff agreed that the approach was to
incorporate small changes that could be built upon over time as other aspects of the Main
Street vision were or were not put into place. Without some changes, development will
continue to occur as it does now. Further, currently non-conforming sites will have no
relief. However, it was also pointed out by the Chairman that the proposed changes
would not fix all the non-confirming issues for developments in downtown. Staff
acknowledged that was the case but also stated the changes could help in some areas.
The Commission, Staff and Mainstreet members agreed that more discussion was needed.
The future focus needs to be on zoning. A review of the proposed changes needs to be
made on a point-by-point basis. If some changes are too drastic, such as minimum height
requirements or eight-foot sidewalks, they should not be included in this staiting place.
A meeting was scheduled for June 14 th at 6:00 p.m. till 8:00 p.m.
3.Discussion regarding Comprehensive Plan (45 minutes)
The Chairman presented a draft introduction to the Comprehensive Plan. He asked each
Commissioner to review the introduction and forward any changes to staff. Staff will
integrate all the comments into the document and return it for discussion to the
Commission at the next session. Commissioner Weesner will add a statement addressing
balanced development within the city in her comments.
The Staff also presented a Friendswood Fact sheet, which listed statistical data and
infmmation on the city. The Commission requested some additional info1mation be
05/19/05 P&Z
Page 2 of 3
included on the fact sheet. They will also forward any comments on the fact sheet to
Staff before the next meeting.
The Commission will continue to meet on a monthly basis at 5:30 p.m. before the second
regular meeting to discuss the Com prehensive plan.
4.Adjournment.
With no further comment the special meeting.was adjourned at 6: 55 p.m.
LLJlq,,,J�
Diana Steelquist
Planner
05/19/05 P&Z
Page 3 of 3
I Minutes of a Regular Meeting
ofthe
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
May 19, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friends wood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
May 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
David Smith-Council Liaison
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of C.D.
Diana Stee lquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Deve lopment Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Bertrand, Commissioner Brakebill, and Commissioner
Van Riper absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
REGULAR SESSION
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from t�e public at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 5-2-05 special meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 5-5-05 special/regular meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the request for an extension of the Final Plat for Colonial Oaks
Subdivision approved Juhe 3, 2004.
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to approve
Gibson
Commissioner Weesner asked Item "B" of the consent agenda be removed for discussion.
Item "A" and "C" of the consent agenda were then voted on:
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner stated during the public hearing Bill Finger spoke in favor of the
interim measures but as a citizen. She felt-the minutes should reflect that. Commissioner
Klusendorf also asked since the citizens comments are paraph ra sed he would like for
Staff to use different language other than, "The following people spoke in favor. .. ".
Staff agreed to use, "The following is a synopsis of people who spoke in favor ... "
Page 1 of 4
5-19-05 P & Z
Amend
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
TABLED ITEMS:
Weesner-approve with changes
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Friendswood, Appendix C, Section 5, 7, 7.5, and 8 to implement interim
zoning measures for Main Street Development.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to remove from table for discussion
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
Staff stated a workshop prior to the meeting took place. The Commission decided to
have Staff continuing working with Planning and Zoning on the interim measures in
order to bring it forward for fmther consideration. The Commission felt additional
workshops are needed between Planning and Zoning, the Main Street Committee and
Staff. The Commission is not making a negative recommendation to City Council but
rather a request for more time to study the proposed changes.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to recommend to City Council additional time to review the
proposed ordinance Main Street Interim zone changes with Staff and Main
Street Steering Committee.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
REGULAR MEETING:
5.Discussion and possible action regarding sidewalks in the West Ranch Development.
Jeff Anderson with Friendswood Development ad dressed the Commission. Mr.
Anderson asked the Commission for a variance f�om placing sidewalks on FM 518. Mr.
Anderson stated that there was not enough right-of-way for sidewalks. Chairman
Holland stated that based on the Plat there appeared to be enough right-of-way for
sidewalks and if there wasn't, the right-of-way could be increased. Discussion then took
place 1;egarding the sidewalk system within the proposed subdivision. Mr. Anderson
stated that it is Friendswood Development's intention to have some six-foot sidewalks in
area, but only on one side of the street; however, in front of homes the standard 4-foot
sidewalk will be place.
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the revised Preliminary Plat of Stonecreek
at West Ranch (formally knovm as Enclave at West Ranch).
Motion: \Veesner-to approve with sidewalks along FM518.
Page 2 of 4
5-19-05 P & Z
l
l
l I
Second: Klusendorf
John Hammond with Friendswood Development addressed the Commission. Mr.
Hammond stated he would construct sidewalks along FMS 18, but he felt an alternate
sidewalk system should be allowed within the subdivision for a more pedestrian friendly
area.
The Commission decided to address the sidewalk requirements on FMS 18 and the
sidewalks inside the subdivision separately.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-change plat to include sidewalks on FMS 18.
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
Weesner-to approve plat with previous sidewalk note and collector streets
will have sidewalks on both sides of the street.
Klusendorf
Mr. Hammond stated that he would like to provide a better exhibit to show the
Commission the benefits of having the sidewalks bigger and being on one side of the
street.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to table discussion for an exhibit presentation to be provided.
Holland
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Discussion and possible action regarding the Master Plan Ordinance.
Staff gave a history of the proposed Master Plan Ordinance to date. Staff stated Master
Plans would be required for phased or sectioned developments.
Commissioner Weesner expressed various concerns, such as:
1.Developer not owning prope1ty.
2.Development not going as planned.
Chairman Holland stated he was not opposed to the Master Plan Ordinance; however, he
feels some issues need to be worked out. Council Liaison Smith stated that if a Master
Plan Ordinance was in place homeowners might have made different decisions.
Chai1man Holland asked if detention was going to be part of the Master Plan Ordinance.
Janis Lowe, 401 Pine Court addressed the Commission on this item. Ms. Lowe explained
the history behind the Master Plan Ordinance.
Page 3 of 4
5-19-0SP&Z
Commis sioner Weesner stated she believes the Master Plan Ordinance is a good idea, but
feels there needs to be more rese�·ch on the item. Chai1man Holland stated this item
should be on the next meeting agenda for more discussion.
8.Communica tions from the Commission.
Commissioner Weesner stated she provided the Commission and Staff with news art icles
regarding a golf course/green space issues in Clear Lake, low impact
development/stmmwater runoff, and a report from a commission in Washington State
which she believed was a good example of the type of repo1i she would like to see used
with the Commission.
Chairman Holland stated he distributed a letter from Governor Perry to the Commission.
This letter referenced zone changes in small cities. Chairman Holland also stated he
spoke to the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District about redoing the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
a.Report on the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Weesner spoke to the Library regarding the Comprehensive Plan. She
explained they were excited to be part of the process. She stated a copy of the Land Use
Plan should be provided to the Library by July 15th in order for them to discuss at their
July 19th meeting.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith commented on the work the Commission is doing. He stated he
was surprised at how much the Commission is doing behind the senses and everything
seems to be going well.
b.Staff
Staff reported attending an Urban Land Institute Lunch Conference for revitalization of
downtown.
10.Adjourn ment.
'With no fmiher action the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
✓ /jJJA -Je Id, frD\ Cher , Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
5-19-05 P & Z
I I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
June 2, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
June 2, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive,
Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Be1irand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Weesner absent, Chai1man Holland called the meeting to
order to discuss the following:
REGULAR SESSION
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public.
Don Seyfert, 2304 Old Road, addressed the Commission. Mr. Seyfert, read a statement
he had prepared to the Commission regarding the proposed Master Plan Ordinance. The
statement outlined several of Mr. Seyfe1i's concerns regarding the wording used in the
draft ordinance, creating a binding document between the developer and the city, and the
exchange of information between the city and the developer which seemed to exclude the
public. Mr. Seyfe1i also gave suggestions regarding the proposed Master Plan Ordinance.
Those suggestions where to show the identity of any properties shown on the plan that
aren't currently owned in fee by either the owner of the property being developed or the
developer, and to show the identity of any properties adjacent to or within 1,500 feet of
the outer perimeter of the development that may in any way be impacted by the
development.
The Commission thanked Mr. Seyfert for bringing these issues to the table.
3.Consent Agenda:
No consent agenda at this time.
The tabled item was moved to item #5.
4.Discussion and possible action regarding sidewalks in the West Ranch Development.
John Hammond of Friendswood Development gave a presentation regarding the sidewalk
and trail system designed and constructed for the \\Test Ranch Development.
Commissioner Be1trand commended Mr. Hammond on his presentation of the
sidewalk/trail plan. He then asked of the sidewalk and trail system would tie together and
if the sidewalks would meander. Mr. Hammond stated that the sidewalk system and trail
system would all tie together and they would meander through the subdivision that is why
the additional landscape buffer is in place.
Commissioner Klusendorf asked if there would be sidewalks conshucted along both sides
of FM518. Mr. Hammond stated it has been established that sidewalks would be place
on both sides of FM518 and would not be placed in the ditch. Commissioner Klusendorf
then asked who would be responsible for constructing the "sidewalks by HOA"? Mr.
Hammond stated the developer would be required to install those sidewalks.
Motion: Gibson-to approve the sidewalk plan.
Second: Klusendorf
Voted For: Bertrand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper
Commissioner Brakebill recused
Voted F,or: Unanimous Motion Carried
TABLED ITEM
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the revised Preliminary Plat of Stonecreek
at West Ranch (formally known as Enclave at West Ranchf
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-remove from table for discussion
Klusendorf
Needing no discussion due to item #4 being finalized; The May 19, 2005, meeting motion
was called.
Motion from previous meeting: Weesner-to approve with sidewalks on FM518
Second Klusendorf
Voted For: Be1trand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper
Commissioner Brakebill recused
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
REGULAR SESSION
6.Discussion and possible action regarding the Master Plan Ordinance.
Staff gave a summary of the proposed Master Plan Ordinance. Commissioner Be1trand
then stated he would like to give some history regarding this item. He stated the Master
Plan Ordinance was before the Commission once before and at that time Staff had put
together a matrix showing the differences between a PUD, SUP and a Master Plan.
! Commissioner Bertrand discussed different senerios that could arise if a Master Plan was
in place. Commissioner Gibson stated he shared Commissioner Bertrand's concerns and
that he would like to see the matrix that Staff had prepared in the past if it is available.
Commissioner Klusendorf state he was concerned due to the fact that this Master Plan
Ordinance places new responsibilities on the Commission and other entities.
Commissioner Brakebill then expressed his concerns when he discussed the language
used in the proposed ordinance and which areas that need to be better defined. Staff then
stated if the matrix was available it would be provided to the Commissioner as well as
Staff will redefine some of the terms in the proposed ordinance.
7.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Bertrand acknowledged Madonna Crain, Community Appearance Board
liaison and stated he understood she was moving. He thanked her for her time she has
put in to the City and offered her good luck.
Chairman Holland stated he attended the CEDC and the Galveston County Consolidated
Drainage District (GCCDD) meeting. He stated that at the learned at the GCCDD
meeting that the West Property did not have Drainage Plan approval.
8.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
No report was given at this time.
b.Staff
Staff rep01ied that a Joint Public Hearing would take place on June 20th for the Tree
Preservation Ordinance. In addition, there is a meeting on June 16 th for the
Comprehensive Plan discussion. Staff also stated that the June 14 th meeting regarding
Mainstreet Interim Measures would need to be rescheduled due to scheduling conflicts of
Commissioner Gibson and Bill Finger, Chairman of the Mainstreet Steering Committee.
9.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
June 6, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Monday, June 6, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Mike Hodge-Director of C.D. and P.W.
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of C.D.
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland absent, Commissioner Be1trand called the
meeting to order to consider the following.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.A request for a zone classification change for 0.3788 acres, 206 E.
Shadowbend more or less, being part of Lot Twelve (12) in Block Two (2) of
Friendswood, also know as Tract 5 of Collins-Friendswood, an unrecorded
subdivision in Galveston County, TX; From: Multi-Family Residential
Medium (MFR-M) to: Multi-Family Residential-Low (MFR-L).
Michael Pina, 11811 Gulf Point Drive addressed the City Council and
Commission. Mr. Pina stated he wants to rezone the prope1ty in order to
build a two-unit townhome.
No one spoke in favor of the zone change request.
The following is a synopsis of the public input against the against the zone
change request.
Bill Trump, 209 E. Shadowbend lives across the street from the property and
stated he chose his homesite because he wanted to live in town on a beautiful
lot. Be does not want to see a duplex built on the lot across the street from
him and his family.
Rae Powell, 201 E. Shadowbend agreed with Mr. Trump regarding the
rezoning request.
Page 1 of 5
6/6/05 P & Z
William Whipkey, 207 Shady Nook stated he does not want the property to
change but if it does, it should be changed to Single Family Residential.
Daryl Sasser, 210 E. Magnolia, bought his property to create a better area for
his family to live, this rezoning to will diminish property values and he is
against the rezoning request.
B.A request for a zone cl assification change for 2.147 acres, 1501 Winding
Way, situated in the Sarah McKissick League, Abstract No. 151, being out of
and a part of Lot 4, Block 8, Antoinette Voss Subdivision, Galveston,
County, TX; From: Single Family Residential (SFR) to: Office Park District
(OPD).
Richm·d Peterson, 5307 Whittier Oaks addressed the City Council and
Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Peterson stated he has been a resident
of Friendswood for 37 years and his partner has been a resident of
Friendswood for 9 years. He and his partner have a vested interest in the
property because they also own the property across the street at 1401
·winding Way. He explained he started his busi ness 5 years ago, which is
logistics operation. His company works with shipping through the Pmt of
Houston, and the business primarily is conducted by using the computer and
telephone. He also stated that there are no deliveries to the office except for
office suppl ies and customers do not even come to the office. Mr. Peterson
then began to discuss the zoning of Friendswood and restrictions placed on
properties. He explained that Office Park District (OPD) is a zone used by
the City as a buffer to Single Family Residential (SFR). If rezoning did
occur, the City's requirements would not allow a four-story glass building to
be constructed on the property. He stated 6 out of the 10 properties within
200 feet of the property are already zoned for commercial use.
The following is a synopsis of those who spoke in favor of the zone change
request.
Pamula Beeth, 5303 Whittier Oaks spoke about the integrity of Mr. Peterson.
She stated the Pilgrim's Point Subdivision could not have a better neighbor.
The following is a synopsis of the people who spoke against the zone change
request.
Steve Baughman, 202 Cha rleston stated the only thing about the property that
makes it close to being commercial is that the property driveway is on
Winding Way. He announced that if Mr. Peterson wanted to live there and
constructed a driveway · on Charleston he would put it in himself. Mr.
Baughman also listed the loss of quietness to the neighborhood and that the
property encroaches into the subdivision as other reasons he was against the
zone change.
Page 2 of 5
6/6/05 P & Z
f : Don Glasgow, 109 Charleston stated the prope1ty owner has engaged in
mistrust with the residents of the subdivision and the home is pait of the
subdivision. He also stated he did not see any support for the rezoning.
Ca1Tie Hunnicutt, 1804 San Jose stated when people buy prope1ty they buy on
the basis of what they see at that time. This rezoning should be denied.
Sean Tracey, 402 Charleston stated this rezoning is a train wreck waiting to
happen because eventually Mr. Peterson will get rid of the property. In
addition the subdivision has only one way in and one way out and that is onto
Winding Way. He also stated that prope1ty values of Charleston would
diminish.
Rebecca Yeater, 206 Chai·leston thanked Staff for having the meeting with
the homeowners of the subdivision. She stated she is a homeowner and a
developer. Her concern from a citizen's standpoint is the prope1ty values
decreasing. From a developer's standpoint she understands an owner would
want to get the maximum developable square footage of prope1ty usage when
developing. She does not want to see the maximum developable squai·e
footage allowed for this property consumed. If rezoning is granted than
others will want to do the same to residential properties. In addition she
stated the rezo_ning process from residential to commercial is too easy.
Stephen Newcomb, 406 Charleston stated there ai·e safety concerns. The
rezoning will create an impact on 34 homes, Mr. Peterson was misleading
and the rezoning would not stop anyone in the future from tearing down the
home and building something else on the property. He also stated the
rezoning does not suppo1t Vision 2020 and does not meet the city's goals.
Richard Melancon, 403 Charleston stated prope1ty values will decrease,
devaluing the prope1ties and the city will lose revenue. He also stated that the
use of the property may change in the future and traffic could then be an issue
if it is not now. Chaifoston is a one street subdivision and they do not want
pai·king lots and loading docks in their subdivision.
John Morawski, 103 Chai·leston stated turning the prope1ty into commercial
devalues the surrounding prope1ties. Safety, traffic and entry onto Winding
Way are also concerns.
Alt Williams, 306 Chaifoston stated he questions the integrity of the owners.
In addition if the forefathers of the property had it as i·esidential, that is how it
should remain.
Joan Cooper, 210 Chaifoston identified what she called a clear dividing line
on Winding Way to Charleston. She would also like for the current zone of
Page 3 of 5
6/6/05 P & Z
the property to stay the same.
Loren Shriver, 108 Charleston stated he had the same concerns already
expressed by others. Then he stated he did not see what the city had to gain
by allowing this to be commercial. He feels rezoning 1501 Winding Way wiil
not support the Vision 2020 goals and the rezoning is unethical.
Janell Keith, 101 Charleston agreed with everything that had previously been
stated. She stated she had additional safety concerns because her child has
severe vision problems and other disabilities. Their property is the first lot in
the subdivision and more traffic on Winding Way is a concern. She also
stated that the area has become so commercialized that if she tried to sell she
would have problems.
Wade Keith, 101 Charleston stated the 1501 \Vinding Way property is
beautiful and he would hate for it to be rezoned. He understands ethics of
business and how a developer would want to utilize the property to the fullest.
He also stated Charleston is the heritage of Friendswood and people bonding
together is what makes up Friendswood.
Kathy Rogers, 207 Charleston stated the Home Owner Association is not
against development; however, this rezoning is different. She explained that
all the people who live in Pilgrim's Point subdivision have at least nine years
of dedication to the Pilgrims Point Subdivision by the residents there. She
stated there should be not compromise to this rezoning request.
Phyllis Peters, 105 Charleston stated that if Mr. Peterson's business goes bad
he is going to do whatever he needs to do to help his business survive. She is
against the rezoning.
Bill Peters, 105 Charleston reiterated what everyone else previously stated.
He is very concerned with what is going to become of the prope1ty in the
future if this rezoning is approved.
Bill Reeves, 201 Charleston agreed with everything that had been stated. In
addition he stated that this is one person's desire and not the desire of the
subdivision.
Russell Burkett, 309 Charleston stated he felt the arguments heard where
better than "not in my backyard" arguments. He also stated this is a one way
in, one way out subdivision and if this were to go through this would be
considered "spot zoning". He reiterated the concerns of h·affic and safety. In
addition he stated the petition that was before City Council and Planning and
Zoning were riot just from the residents in the subdivision but also from
businesses in the area. He asked the rezoning request be denied.
Page 4 of 5
6/6/05 P & Z
I C.A request for a zone classification change from 3 .1940 acres, situated in the
Sarah McK.issick League, Abstract No. 151, Reserve B, Park 518, Galveston,
County, TX; From: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to: Community
Shopping Center (CSC).
John Montgomery of New Quest Prope1ties addressed City Council and
Planning and Zoning. Mr. Montgomery stated that the request for rezoning to
Community Shopping Center (CSC) was to allow for an automotive repair
shop to be constructed on the prope1ty.
The following is a synopsis of those who spoke in favor of the zone change
request.
Lewis Have, Operating Officer for Christian Automotive stated Christian
Automotive prides itself in being very honest. There are 31 stores in
Houston, which are ovvner operated. Christian Automotive works with the
community and it feels Friendswood is a place it would like to be. In
addition, the building is constructed of stone and brick and there are no
openings to the back of the building, which will face the child daycare on the
adjacent property.
The following is a synopsis of those who spoke against the zone change
request.
Rebecca Yeater, 206 Charleston stated she would like to see photos of the
repair shop and that she did not feel FM 518 was a place for that type of
business.
2.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
Cleu�l ,Jk tlca. 1Ch ri Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 5 of 5
6/6/05 P & Z
[
[
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
June 16, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, June 16, 2005 at 5:30p.m. in the city hall second floor conference room
located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were
present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Sherry Weesner
David Smith-Council Liaison
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Brakebill, Klusendorf and Van Riper absent,
Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
Worksession
1.Call to order
2.Discussion regarding Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission and Staff review the "Introduction" and the "Where Are We
Now" portion of the proposed Comprehensive Plan. The Commission decided
some changes should be made to the "Introduction" and the fact sheet of the
"Where Are We Now". Staff will make the recommended changes and provide
the Final Draft to the Commission at the 7-21-05 Special Meeting. These
proposed portions of the Comprehensive Plan will also be on the agenda for
consideration of the 7-21-05 Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting.
3.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
6-16-05 P & Z
(
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
June 16, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
June 16, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Kevin Holland
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Gibson and Klusendorf absent, Chairman Holland called
the meeting to order to discuss the following:
REGULAR SESSION
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public.
Mr. Trump wanted to speak with regards to the rezoning of 206 E. Shadowbend.
Chairman Holland stated to Mr. Trump that was not possible at this time due to the fact
the item is on the agenda for consideration.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 5-19-05 special meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 5-19-05 regular meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the 6-2-05 regular meeting minutes.
d.Approval of the 6-6-05 special meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve consent agenda
Brakebill
Commissioner Weesner requested Items "A, B, & C" be removed for discussion.
The Commission then voted on Item "D" of the consent agenda.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner stated item 3 of the 5-19-05 special meeting minutes should be
corrected. The last sentence of the first paragraph should read:
"Commissioner Weesner will add a statement addressing balanced development
within the city in her comments."
Page 1 of 3
6-16-05 P & Z
Commissioner Weesner then stated item 8 of the 5-19-05 regular meeting minutes should
be corrected also. The first sentence of the first paragraph should read:
" Commissioner Weesner stated she provided the Commission and Staff with
news articles regarding a golf course/green space issues in Clear Lake, low impact
development /stormwater runoff, and a report from a Commission in Washington
State which she believed was a good example of the type of report she would like
to see used with the Commission."
Commissioner Weesner then added item 5 on the 6-2-05 regular meeting minutes gave
the impression she was in attendance of that meeting when she was not. She had made a
motion at a previous meeting that carried over into the 6-2-05 meeting. She stated she
felt the Motion should be as followed:
"Motion from previous meeting: Weesner-to approve with sidewalks on
FM518."
Commissioner Brakebill then stated on item 4 of the same meeting minutes he was
recused from the vote yet his name is mentioned in the "Vote For" and should be
removed.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve items with changes.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Uptown Place
located at the corner ofFM2351 and Woodland Trails.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve with Staff comments
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the zone change request for property
located at 206 E. Shadowbend from Multi-Family Residential-Medium (MFR-M) to
Multi-Family Residential-Low (MFR-L).
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve
Weesner
Commissioner Bertrand stated that the 6-6-05 special meeting minutes captured the
concerns of the public who spoke in opposition of this rezoning. He stated he recognized
those comments made but he also recognized as the current zoning the developer could
build at a higher density than what the zone they are requesting. Commissioner Brakebill
stated he felt it was important to realize this property has been vacant and zoned at MFR
M for 28 years. The Commission recognized that this request would decrease the density
allowed and would result in a development which would be closer in nature to the
surrounding Single Family residences.
Page 2 of 3
6-16-05 P & Z
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the zone change request for property
located at Reserve B of the Park 518 Subdivision located on FM518 near FM528 from
Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Shopping Center (CSC).
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve
Weesner
Commissioner Bertrand stated the 6-6-05 special meeting minutes captured comments
made at the public hearing. He then stated he hopes that Staff has made the applicant
aware of the Entryway Overlay requirements with regards to bay doors even though
zoning is being discussed and not the Site Plan.
Voted For: Unanimous
7.Communications from the Commission.
Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand repo_rted the Tree Preservation Ordinance Super-Sub Committee
met. The heritage tree draft document was presented at that meeting. He then stated a
workshop with City Council would be held at 4:30 p.m. on June 20, 2005.
Commissioner Weesner stated she would need to trade liaison meetings with someone for
the last of August.
8.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
No report was given at this time.
b.Staff
Staff reported there would be a workshop with City Council at 4:30 on June 20, 2005,
regarding the Tree Preservation Ordinance and a joint public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on the
same. In addition a workshop with the Main Street Steering Committee will be on June
22, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. and when that meeting ends the Comprehensive Plan will be
discussed for a half hour. Staff also announced a joint public hearing would be held on
July 25, 2005.
9.Adjourmnent.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 7:24 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
6-16-05 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
June 20, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Monday,
June 20, 2005 at 4:30 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand 7:00 p.m.
David Brakebill 7:00 p.m.
Jim Gibson 4:30 p.m.
Kevin Holland 5:30 p.m.
Roy Klusendorf 4:40 p.m.
Sherry Weesner 7:00 p.m.
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director CD
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
4:30 P.M. JOINT WORK SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL
A.Height Restrictions for Community Shopping Center (CSC) Original Business
District (OBD) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
The Planner outlined the issue by stating that in most commercial districts building
heights were allowed to go up if there was a corresponding increase in set backs.
The CSC, OBD and NC districts, however, did not allow any increase in height and
were restricted to up to 35 feet. The Planner presented a diagram, which indicated
what the set backs would be for a 40 foot building on a 300 x 300 ft. corner lot that
was adjacent to Single Family Residential districts. The resulting building envelope
would be 120 x 120 ft. The Council asked Commissioner Gibson what the concerns
were for allowing CSC, OBD or NC to exceed 35 ft. in height. Commissioner
Gibson could not recall specific concerns; just that the Commission wanted to
confirm that this height change was something the Council wanted the Commission
to pursue. The consensus from Council was for the Commission to pursue allowing
CSC, OBD and NC developments to exceed 35 feet in height, with proper set backs.
B.Amendments to the Tree Preservation Ordinance
The Planner gave a power point presentation of the proposed changes to the zoning
ordinance affecting tree preservation, tree survey requirements, and tree mitigation
requirements. Council expressed concern that the requirements might be a costly
hindrance to commercial development. Chairman Holland stated he thought the
ordinance, from a developer's viewpoint, was not onerous. Council also expressed
concern about the affects of the TPO on Main Street re-development plans. Judy
Kimball and Kevin Holland stated that they were aware that modifications might be
needed to address Main Street issues. It was also stated changes to the ordinance to
include a section for Heritage Trees is being worked on.
Page 1 of2
6/20/05 P & Z
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Regarding amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Friendswood
Appendix C Section 8 regarding Tree Preservation Tree Surveys and
Landscaping requirements.
Bob Bertrand, addressed City Council and Planning and Zoning as Chairman of the
Tree Preservation Ordinance Super Sub-Committee. He explained the effort has
taken a lot of time and he recommends the draft Tree Preservation Ordinance for
approval. The presentation given by Mr. Bertrand and Staff explained the elements
of the proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance and how the elements are applied.
No one spoke in favor of the zone change request.
The following is a synopsis of the public input against the zone change request.
Don Beethe, 5303 Whittier Oaks, addressed the Commission and City Council. Mr.
Beethe stated he felt the lack of tree ordinance is wonderful. The proposed ordinance
does not encourage development within the City of Friendswood. In addition, the
proposed ordinance does not have an appeal process. Mr. Beethe also stated there is
no one on Staff who is qualified to inspect the process and make sure it has been
adhered to. Lastly, Mr. Beeth stated there is not a need, nor support, to warrant a tree
ordinance.
Jim Hill, 2404 South Friendswood Drive, addressed the Commission and City
Council. Mr. Hill stated in 1946 when he moved here there were virtually no trees.
Since that time there have been trees planted everywhere. He feels this ordinance is
creating a reason for people not to develop in Friendswood.
2.Adjournment
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
{!,4uu -Jkfiw
e1 +-'ilSkelton
Development Coordinator
Page 2 of 2
6/20/05 P & Z
[
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
June 22, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission and the Main Street
Committee was held on Wednesday, June 22, 2005, at 6:00 pm at the Friendswood City Hall
second floor conference room, located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The
following members were present:
Planning & Zoning:
Kevin Holland
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Roy Klusendorf 6: l 5p.m.
David Brakebill 6: 15 p.m.
Bob Be1trand 6:45 p.m.
Main Street Committee:
Bill Finger
Alton Todd
Tony Banfield
Staff:
Ron Cox-City Manager
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Karen Capps-Economic Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Gibson absent, Chairman Holland called the special
meeting to order at 6: 15 p.m. Approximately 14 additional interested citizens were present for
the meeting.
Worksession
1.Discussion regarding interim zoning measures for the Main Street area.
Staff presented two documents that had been requested by the Chairman at the last
meeting. The first was a matrix of the proposed changes to the Downtown Overlay
District (DOD) and the Original Business District (OBD). Changes to the Single Family
Residential district-were not included in the matrix as no changes were proposed for this
district. The second was a comparison of non-conforming issues for two properties within
the DOD and how these non-conforming issues would be affected by the proposed
changes.
The Chairman began the discussion by asking that each page of the proposed changes to
the Zoning Ordinance be reviewed and discussed fully. Discussion on the changes to the
Permitted Use Table would be held at the end of meeting.
Discussion began with a review of the proposed changes to the regulation matrix
regarding the Original Business District (OBD). Bill Finger stated that the proposed
changes to the OBD and DOD should apply to all commercial zoning districts within the
Main Street area. In particular, set back requirements should be the same for each zoning
district. Mr. Tony Banfield reconunended there be a minimum and a maximum front set
06/22/05 P&Z
Page 1 of 3
back requirement. The Chairman suggested more of a 'build to' line than set backs.
Widths of 15 to 25 feet were discussed. The issue focused on the sidewalk requirements
and how they would affect any building set back requirements. Also as to what width of
sidewalk would be required and if the sidewalk could be placed at the back of curb. Staff
will contact TxDot to determine what sidewalk requirements could be placed off of FM
518.Also how could trees be planted within sidewalk areas. Mr Banfield cited examples
from Thomasville, GA where 4x4 tree wells were used along Main Street. He asked that
his photos be sent to the conunittee and Conunission members.
Chairman Holland would like to see the Friends Church site exempted from any Main
Street requirements, particularly side walks. Mr. Banfield suggested that a tlu·eshold on
the percentage of change proposed for redevelopment be established before DOD or
Main Street requirements would kick in. More discussion on non-confirming lots will be
needed.
There was additional discussion regarding where along FM 518 sidewalk requirements
should extend. Bill Finger suggested the area from FM 2351 to Castlewood should
include all the proposed OBD and DOD requirements. From Castlewood to Cowards
Creek the DOD area would simply expand, but retain all the current ordinance
requirements. Bob Bertrand suggested that tlu·ee overlay districts be applied to the Main
Street area.
A discussion on minimum and maximum height requirements was also held. It was
suggested and agreed upon that by not having a 24-foot minimum height requirement,
many existing buildings would not become non-conforming structures. However, the
limitation for new structures to be 35 feet or less in height would not promote vertical
mixed use. Mr. Banfield stated that it would be difficult to fit a 3-story building within
35 feet. There was concern however, that when next to SFR districts, no building should
exceed 35 feet in height. The matrix was revised to indicate that minimum rear yard set
backs in the OBD should be 15 feet when the rear yard abuts a SFR, Cluster or Garden
Home District.
As time began to run short, the Chairman reiterated the action items for the next meeting.
These included: 1) contacting TxDot for sidewalk information, 2) finding out where trees
could be planted along sidewalks or in right-of-ways, 3) reviewing other ordinances for
information on minimum and maximum height requirements.
2.Adjournment.
Several citizens asked if some questions could be answered. The biggest concern appeared
to be what the fate of the Friendswood Junior High would be if Main Street were re
developed. Their concern was that it would be redeveloped for apartment or commercial
use. Mr. Alton Todd stated he had worked with FISD and seen several long-range plans
for the District. He had never seen one in which the Junior High area was not utilized for
school or administration facilities. The concern for FISD is a lack of land to expand on.
He suggested that these questions should be directed to FISD. Mr. Cox also pointed out
that the proposed Main Street area did not include the area of the Junior High. Any
06/22/05 P&Z
Page 2 of 3
[ ! changes that the school district would want to make to that area would have to be initiated
by FISD.
Chairman Holland suggested the next meeting be held on July 13 from 6 to 8 p.m. He also
requested that some food be provided to the committee members. With no further
comment the special meeting was adjourned at 7: 55 p.m.
06/22/05 P&Z
Page 3 of 3
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
July 7, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, July 7, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Be1irand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sheny Weesner
David Smith-Council Liaison
John Olson-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of C.D.
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the
following:
REGULAR SESSION
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 6-16-05 special meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 6-16-05 regular meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the 6-20-05 special meeting minutes.
d.Approval of the 6-22-05 special meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve consent agenda
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for South
Friendswood Plaza located on FM 528 behind HEB Grocery.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-approve with Staff comments
Brakebill
Unanimous
Page 1 of 4
7/7/05 P & Z
Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the zone change request for property
located at 1501 Winding Way from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Office
Park District (OPD).
Commissioner Gibson recused himself from the agenda item discussion.
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve
Bertrand
Each Commissioner explained reasons why the rezoning should be denied. The
Commission felt the Single Family Residential use was an acceptable use for the
property. Comments for the denial of the rezoning included the aesthetic value
should not be touched, the residential property balances out the area and it appears
the break between commercial and residential on Winding Way is at the private
street entrance into the retirement center. One Commissioner stated he is against
the rezoning but believes in the future it may become commercial. For now he
felt the neighbors needed time to plan for that eventual change in use.
In addition to the comments made, Commissioner Brakebill pointed out his
concern with having Council members give direction to citizens on how one
should proceed with dealing with zone changes. Council Liaison Smith stated to
Commissioner Brakebill he understood his concern; however, the intent was to
provide an understanding of the rezoning process.
Commissioner Gibson recused
Voted For: None
Voted Against: Bertrand, Brakebill, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Motion Failed
6.Consideration and possible action regarding amending the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Friendswood Appendix C Section 8 regarding Tree Preservation,
Tree Surveys and Landscaping requirements.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve
Weesner
Commissioner Bertrand stated that Staff was working through some small items
regarding the Tree Preservation Ordinance and he felt this item should be tabled.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to table
Weesner
Unanimous
Page 2 of 4
7/7/05 P & Z
Motion to Table Carried
[
[
7.Discussion and possible action regarding height restrictions for Community
Shopping Center (CSC), Original Business District (OBD) and Neighborhood
Commercial (NC).
The Commission discussed this item and decided NC should still contain a height
restriction. The City Attorney was asked to provide a draft ordinance for the
Commission to review before making a recommendation to City Council. The
Commission also requested the City Attorney provide in the proposed ordinance
language stipulating that over a certain height (undetermined at this time, 50-feet
was given as an example) a Specific Use Permit (SUP) would be required. The
City Attorney stated he could provide a proposed ordinance at the next meeting.
8.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Brakebill stated he had attended the Main Street meeting.
Commissioner Gibson announced he would be on vacation in July. In addition
Commissioner Gibson stated he would like to see the Main Street Committee
consider limiting the zone changes to a 2 or 3 block area at this time and leave
FM 518 under the overlay districts. Commissioner Van Riper stated he attended
the Community Appearance Board meeting and he is pleased to know all the
dedication on that committee. Commissioner Bertrand announced the last week
of July he would be unavailable to attend any meetings. Commissioner Bertrand
commented to Staff, he would like to see financial information added to the
rezoning reports, such as value of prope1ty, etc. Chairman Holland stated he
attended the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District meeting and it was
very lengthy.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith expressed City Council and Mayor Brizidine's
appreciation for all the Planning and Zoning Commission does. He explained
City Council had a retreat earlier in the day and there were six core items that
came from the retreat that City Council will be working on, one of which would
be the Main Street project. Council Liaison Smith expressed to the Commission
that Main Street is a time sensitive issue due to the upcoming budget and it is
important to get Main Street into the budget for the next year.
b.Staff
Staff provided the Commission with last months Development Review
Committee (DRC) meeting report. Staff also reviewed the upcoming meeting
schedule with the Commission. The August 1, 2005, scheduled joint public
hearing was discussed since Commission Brakebill, Commissioner Van Riper,
and Chairman Holland will not be able to attend. All other Commissioner
Page 3 of 4
7/7/05 P & Z
acknowledged they could attend the joint public hearing; therefore quorum would
not be an issue on this date.
10.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.111. C1f�Jklk Che · Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
7/7/05 P & Z
I
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning ancl Zoning Commission
July 13, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission and the Main Street
Committee was held on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, at 6:00 pm at the Friendswood City Hall
second floor conference room, located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The
following members were present:
Planning & Zoning:
Kevin Holland
Mark Van Riper 6:08 p.m.
Sherry Weesner
Roy Klusendorf
Jim Gibson
Main Street Committee:
Bill Finger
Tony Banfield
Staff:
Ron Cox-City Manager
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Karen Capps -Economic Development Coordinator
Without a quorum present for the Main Street Committee, Chairman Holland called the special
meeting to order for the Planning & Zoning Commission only at 6:15 p.m. David Brakebill and
Bob Bertrand were absent.
1.Call to order.
Joint Work session between P&Z ancl Main Street Committee
2.Discussion regarding Zoning Measures for the Main Street Area.
(1 hour and 30 minutes)
No discussion was held on this issue due to a lack of quorum for the Main Street
Committee.
P&Z special session
3.Discussion regarding Comprehensive Plan (30 minutes)
Commissioner Wessner presented copies of her comments on the Friendswood Today
section. The section on school enrollment was reviewed and it was suggested that if no
number could be obtained which indicated how many students in the Clear Creek ISD
lived in Friendswood, the total number of students attending the schools serving
Friendswood should be added to the total number of students attending Friendswood ISD.
Information regarding the sewer treatment facilities was also revised.
The introduction, Friendswood Today and Friendswood 2005 fact sheet will be placed on
7/13/05 P&Z
Page 1 of2
the next regular meeting agenda for approval. These sections along with an outline of
the Vision of Friendswood will be forwarded to the various Boards and Commissions in
the City for comment.
4.Adjourn.
Prior to adjounm1ent, the Chairman asked staff to investigate a means to host public
meetings with various Boards and Commissions to discuss the Comprehensive Plan.
Quorum issues were of especial concern. With no further comment the meeting was
adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
j( ') 4
,. 400 .• Jl .ftµWJ <lli
Diana Steelquist
Planner
7/13/05 P&Z
Page 2 of 2
Minutes of a Special/Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
July 21, 2005
A special/regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was
held Thursday, July 21, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910
S.Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members ,vere present:
Bob Bertrand-7:00 pm
Jim Gibson-6:00 pm
Kevin Holland-6:20 pm
Roy Klusendorf-6:00 pm
Sherry Weesner-6:00 pm
David Smith-Council Liaison
John Olson-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Brakebill and Commissioner Van Riper absent,
Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
6:00 PM-SPECIAL MEETING-2nd Floor Conference Room
1.Call to order
2.Discussion regarding the Introduction and Friendswood Today section of the
Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission and Staff reviewed the Introduction and Friendswood Today
portion of the Comprehensive Plan. It was agreed with a few minor corrections to
grammar, the documents were ready to submit to the entire Commission for a vote.
3.Adjourmnent
With no fmiher action the meeting was adjourned at 6:43 p.m.
7:00 PM-PUBLIC HEARING-Council Chambers
1.Call to order
2.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding:
a.Final Re-plat of Lots 1 and 3 of Highlander Estates, located at the corner
of Briarmeadow Drive and Greenbriar Drive.
A citizen asked for clarification as to why the applicant was asking for the Re-plat.
No one spoke for or against this item.
Page 1 of 4
7/21/05 P & Z
REGULAR SESSION
3.Conummications from the public
No one spoke from the public at this time.
4.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 7-7-05 regular meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
TABLED ITEM
Weesner-to approve consent agenda
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding amending the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Friendswood Appendix C Section 8 regarding Tree Preservation,
Tree Surveys and Landscaping requirements.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to remove from table
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
City Attorney John Olson reviewed the changes of the proposed ordinance with
the Commission. The changes dealt with discretionary powers delegated to Staff
as well as grammatical corrections and cite references.
Commissioner Bertrand reported at the Tree Preservation Ordinance Super
Sub-committee (TPOSSC) meeting held the previous evening, the changes made
by the City Attorney were voted upon and accepted unanimously. Commissioner
Bertrand then read a statement which he asked be included in the official records.
The statement concerned his thoughts on the TPO process and specifically
addressed issues raised at the Joint Public Hearing. He was particularly
concerned with the manner in which the opposing comments were delivered.
Issues he recalled were enforcement of the TPO, over regulation of homeowners
and why the TPO was needed. Commissioner Bertrand recounted that the
TPOSSC in the development of the Ordinance had discussed these and other
issues thrnugh hours of debate. In his opinion, the resulting TPO addresses those
issues and is the most complete, detailed and thoughtful analysis and work
product in which he has ever participated as a city volunteer.
Chairman Holland agreed with Commissioner Bertrand's statements.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve (from previous meeting)
Weesner (from previous meeting)
Page 2 of 4
7/21/05 P & Z
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
REGULAR SESSION
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Re-plat of Lots 1 and Lot
3 of Highlander Estates located at the corner of Briarmeadow Drive and
Greenbriar Drive.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to approve
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Introduction and Friendswood
Today sections of the Comprehensive Plan.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve with changes from the special meeting
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
8.Discussion and possible action regarding height restrictions for Community
Shopping Center (CSC), Original Business District (OBD) and Neighborhood
Commercial (NC).
City Attorney John Olson reviewed with the Commission the proposed draft.
The Commission discussed allowing heights greater than 35 feet in CSC, OBD,
and NC. It was discussed that if an applicant is seeking a structure higher than 35
feet in any district, which is adjacent to a residential district, then the applicant
must submit the request as a Specific Use Permit.
The Commission advised Staff to move forward through the process with this
item.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to approve
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
9.Discussion and possible action regarding the Master Plan Ordinance.
The Commission discussed this item bringing up several questions that were
answered by the City Attorney. Commissioner Bertrand pointed out the
differences between a Planned Unit Development and a Master Plan concept.
Commissioner Bertrand also stated he felt strongly that the Master Plan
Ordinance is not going to solve future zoning issues. The Commission overall felt
more work was needed with the details of the proposal. Commissioner Weesner
requested that since there had been so many changes to the laws, she would like
Page 3 of 4
7/21/05 P & Z
the City Attorney to come and talk about those changes with the Commission at a
future meeting.
10.Communications from the Commission.
Chairman Holland stated he attended the Main Street and Galveston County
Consolidated Drainage District Meetings. Commissioner Bertrand stated there
should be only one more Tree Preservation Ordinance meeting. Commissioner
Weesner thanked Commissioner Gibson for offering to take her August liaison
meetings.
11.Reports .
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith request that Commissioner Bertrand provide Staff with a
copy of the statement he had read earlier in the meeting in order for that statement
to be provided to City Council.
b.Staff
The Planner, at the request of the Chairman, factors she believes are inhibiting
redevelopment in along main street. Such .things as lot coverage limitations,
setbacks, parking, and detention were included.
12.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 8:2l p.m.
:kJ?zJ
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
7/21/05 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 1, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Conunission was held
Monday, August 1, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director CD
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Zone Classification change for a tract of land containing 30,000 square feet,
Commercial Reserve B of the Final Plat of Friends Knoll, property located
at 306 West Edgewood, Galveston County, Texas, from Conununity
Shopping Center (CSC) to Planned Unit Development (PUD)/ Specific Use
Permit (SUP) -Mixed Use Commercial.
Harold Benson, 305 No1th Shadowbend, addressed the Commission and City
Council. Mr. Benson stated the purpose of his request is in order to allow a larger
percent of office use in his facility. The current zoning district he is in it will only
allow him to have up to 30 percent office use and a PUD/SUP will allow him to
have more than 30 percent.
No one spoke in favor or against the request
B.Zone Classification change for 21. 77 acres, located at FM 518 @ FM
2351, out of the Peny and Austin League, Galveston County, Texas, from
Multi-Family Residential-Low (MFR-L), Community Shopping Center
(CSC) and Specific Use Permit-Church (SUP-Church) to Planned Unit
Development (PUD) with Specific Use Permit (SUP) -Church and
Related Activities.
Charles Anderson, 704 Hackberry, stated he would allow his architect to explain
what will be taking place on the property.
Tom Lancaster, with Lancaster and Associates, addressed the Commission and
City Council. Mr. Lancaster stated the Church had purchased additional property
Page 1 of2
8/1/05 P & Z
in order to expand their facility to seat 900 people. He stated the building would
be constructed of stucco. He also stated the structures are away from property
lines.
Stephanie Delose, with Jones and Carter Engineering, addressed the Commission
and City Council. Ms. Delose stated the 100-foot ditch on the property is being
dedicated to the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District and that the
structure of the ditch helps the drainage of neighboring subdivisions.
No one spoke in favor or against the request.
Vice-Chairman Gibson aimounced that both items on the agenda would be on the
August 18, 2005, Planning and Zoning agenda.
2.Adjournment
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
�d.,,· ,f ��
Cl�
Development Coordinator
Page 2 of 2
8/1/05 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 15, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Monday, August 15, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Jim Gibson
David Brakebill
Kevin Hol_land 5: 15 p.m.
Bob Bertrand 5 :30 p.m.
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Mike Hodge -Director CDPW
JOINT WORK SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL
1.Discussion with City Council regarding the following:
a.Entryway Overlay District (EOD) Boundaries
The Mayor invited Vice-Chairman Gibson to provide some introductory comments
regarding the EOD issues. Commissioner Gibson stated that the Commission had made
the recommendation to extend EOD Boundaries in order to be proactive, also to provide
information to citizens as to where future entrances into the City would be located. Staff
presented a PowerPoint presentation which provided some additional background as well
as where the proposed extensions would be located. The areas to be included in the EOD
were Blackhawk, north of FM 2351 and south of FM 528, Whispering
Pines/Friendswood Link, and Brittany Bay Blvd.
Council was concerned about corner lots where the EOD might overlap either with the
Downtown Overlay District or other areas of the EOD. The consensus seemed to be that
should that situation occur on corner lots, only one side of the lot should be subject to the
EOD requirements. Council directed the Commission to resolve the corner lot issue
before moving forward with the extension of the EOD boundaries.
b.Community Shopping Center (CSC) to allow more office space
Staff made a presentation on the background of office space limits in CSC and also NC.
Staff also stated their issues with allowing more office space within CSC, which included
current enforcement of those limitations and the possible loss of tax revenue.
Councilmember LeCour requested additional market study information on the types of
retail business appropriate within the City. He would also like more information on the
differences in tax revenues generated by office uses and retail uses.
Staff provided some possible solutions to the office use limitations in CSC. These
included revisions to the Permitted Use Table to not allow any office uses, or allow office
Page 1 of2
8/15/05 P & Z
uses only with a Specific Use Permit, or leave the current ordinance in place with
limitations. The Mayor suggested that the limitations simply be removed as possible
solution. There was some consensus that CSC developments of less than 10,000 sq. ft.
not have any office use limitations, rather, the limitations should be reserved for larger,
more typical, integrated CSC developments of 2 or more acres. Commissioner Bertrand
suggested that the uses allowed adjacent to residential districts be more office type rather
than retail. Commissioner Gibson noted that there is a solution in place should a
landowner wish to exceed the allowable limits of office space: rezone to PUD/SUP
mixed use commercial. The Council asked the Commission to continue to review this
issue and bring back a clear recommendation.
c.Open Space/Green Space
Staff presented some background on where in the Zoning Ordinance Open Space or
Green Space are used. References are made in the PUD-Cluster Home Ordinance, under
the description of Mutli-family Residential districts and when reducing parking areas.
Although the definitions of Open Space and Green Space were discussed when adopting
the amended Cluster Home Ordinance, the definitions were not formally included in the
ordinance. The Commission also had concerns with including detention areas in the
definition. Commissioner Brakebill stated that before a detention area should be included
in Open Space, there needed to be some type of 'value added'. He reasoned that all
developments required detention areas. Council noted that most new developments used
detention areas as an amenity and the consensus was that they should be counted toward
Open Space. However, they did see a need to provide some incentives for developers to
create detention areas which did have value added properties such as fountains, trails etc.
In addition, Council clearly stated that golf courses should be included in the definition of
Open Space.
2.Adjournment
With no further comment, the meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
J,, 0 -., ,., )i) � Diana Steetq' � ee , ... / -
Pl
u1st '-< ,l'.<'.J
anner
�
Page 2 of 2
8/15/05 P & Z
I
I
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Planning and Zoning Commission
Comprehensive Plan Sub-Committee
August 16, 2005
A special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission Comprehensive Plan Sub
Committee and the Library Board was held on Tuesday, August 16, 2005, at 6:30 pm at
the Friendswood City Hall second floor conference room, located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following were present:
Planning & Zoning:
Kevin Holland
Mark Van Riper
Jim Gibson
Library Board:
Mark Lasch
Ruth Lay
Larry Seeling
1.Call to order.
Staff:
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Mary Perroni -Librarian
Mel Measeles -Council Liaison
Chairman Holland called the meeting to order.
2.Discussion regarding the Comprehensive Plan with members of the Friendswood
Library Board.
Chairman Holland thanked the members of the Library Board for volunteering to
meet with P&Z and discuss the revisions to the Comprehensive Plan. Larry Seeling
asked if there was adequate Right-of-way for the expansion of Whispering
Pines/Friendswood Link. Staff noted that there were no plans to acquire more Right
of-way. The Library Board was also concerned that there was sufficient Park Land
Space. Staff stated its understanding that the Parks Board was now looking to create
a few Sub-regional parks versus the several neighborhood parks in previous plans.
The understanding being that there are fewer areas available for parkland. Council
Liaison Measeles added that the West Ranch development included several areas for
Open Space and parklands.
The Board informed the Commission of its inclusion in the 2008 Capital
Improvements Plan for an expansion of the library. They did not see a need for any
other location of the library. In addition, they felt the Library should be included in
the Land Use Plan for the Main Street area. Long-range plans should include the
purchase of adjacent properties including the lot behind the library adjacent to the
Heritage Gardeners and the tract currently being utilized as a massage therapy facility
located on FM 518. These additional tracts could be used for added parking or
Page 1 of 2
8/16/05 P&Z
building expansions to meet the needs of population build out.
3.Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
I �
Page 2 of 2
8/16/05 P&Z
Minutes of a Special/Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 18, 2005
A special/regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, August 18, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. in the city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive,
Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Kevin Holland 7:00 p.m.
David Brakebill 7:00 p.m.
Jim Gibson
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Loren Smith-City Attorney 7:00 p.m.
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
6:00 PM-SPECIAL MEETING-2nd Floor Conference Room
1.Call to order
2.Discussion regarding the Comprehensive Plan.
3.Adjournment
Due to lack of quorum, no special meeting was held.
7:00 PM-REGULAR SESSION -City Council Chambers
1.Call to Order
With a quorum present, Commissioners Weesner and Bertrand absent, Chairman
Holland called the regular meeting to order to discuss the following:
2.Conununication from the Public
Harold Benson, 306 West Edgewood, addres_sed the Commission. Mr. Benson asked for
direction from the Commission regarding his zone change request and if he should
proceed with it since office limitations were being discussed at the next City Council
meeting. City Attorney, Loren Smith stated the Commission could vote on the
recommendation to City Council tonight and Mr. Benson can then request City Council
not to place it on the agenda.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 7-21-05 regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 8-1-05 special meeting minutes.
08/18/05 P&Z
Page I of 4
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to approve
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the zone change request for 306 West
Edgewood from Community Shopping Center (CSC) to Planned Unit Development
(PUD)/Specific Use Permit (SUP)-Mixed Use Commercial development.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Brakebill-to approve
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the zone change request for First United
Methodist Church property located at FM 518 and FM 2351, from Multi-Family
Residential-Low (MFR-L), Community Shopping Center (CSC) and Specific Use Permit
Church (SUP-Church) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Specific Use Permit
(SUP) -Church and Related Activities.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Brakebill-to approve
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
During discussions, Chairman Holland, asked for clarification on the height issues
associated with this project. Staff stated that a recommendation for PUD/SUP was made
to the Church to allow for a building height of greater than 35 feet. The current
ordinances do not allow structures in CSC districts to exceed that height. However,
buildings in PUD can, so long as additional set backs are in place. Staff noted that the
master site plan indicated proper set backs to allow the structure to be in excess of 35 feet
in height.
Staff also noted that although a preliminaty drainage plan had been submitted and
approved, the Church was working with the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage
District and City Engineering Staff to revise the plan. If the revisions are of significant
external impact to adjacent property owners, the Church will need to amend their site
plan through the public hearing process.
5.Discussion and possible action regarding the EOD boundaries (Blackhawk Boulevard,
Bay Area Boulevard, Brittany Bay Boulevard)
Commissioner Gibson stated he felt that at the workshop, City Council seemed in favor
of the request to add these to the Entiyway Overlay District (EOD). He recalled one City
Councilmember felt the address should dictate where open bays could be placed on
corner lots. Commissioner Gibson then stated he felt the EOD should include the above
listed streets. In addition where two intersections occur in an EOD, the address should
could dictate which direction bay openings could face.
08/18/05 P&Z
Page 2 of 4
The consensus was to have language added to the Entryway Overlay Ordinance which
would provide some relief for lots located on a corner where two EOD streets intersect.
This would include the corners of FM 528 and FM 518, FM 2351 and FM 518,
Friendswood Lakes and FM 528, Blackhawk at Bay Area Blvd., and Blackhawk at FM
2351 and FM 528. At these intersections, the Commission reconunends that only orie
side of a corner lot be subject to the EOD restrictions. In particular with regards to the
limitation of garage bays facing the EOD.
The Commission discussed the inclusion of Whispering Pines/Friendswood Link in the
EOD. However, to avoid conflict with the Downtown Overlay District and because it
was felt that opportunities for further development along this roadway were limited, it
was not recommended for inclusion in the EOD.
The Commission believes a proactive approach needs to be taken as major roadways
develop. The EOD requirements provide for a uniform development that enhances and
preserves the physical characteristics of the City as well as enjoyment of travel along the
enttyways of our City. Identifying these areas as being in the EOD also provides some
development expectations for the Community.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to modify EOD ordinance to include Blackhawk Boulevard, Bay
Area Boulevard, & Brittany Bay Boulevard with language regarding
corner lots.
Voted For:
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Discussion and possible action regarding the definitions of Open Space/Green Space.
The Commission noted that the inclusion of golf courses was discussed at the Joint
Workshop with City Council and that they should be included in any definition of Open
Space. Staff noted that Open Space and Green Space were also used within the Park
Dedication ordinance and the proposed definitions were consistent with how they were
used in both the Cluster Home Ordinance and Park Dedication Ordinance. Some
discussion was held regarding the use of detention areas as Open Space. It was noted that
the current and previous Cluster Home ordinances allowed detention areas to count
towards Open Space. Commissioner Brakebill asked that copies of the new Cluster
Home Ordinance be distributed for review.
The proposed definitions read:
Open Space: A restricted reserve located within a development with limited low
impact amenities. Amenities may be passive or active. For example: green space
both natural and landscaped, detention areas, trails, lakes, pavilions, benches,
outdoor cooking facilities, and active recreational facilities such as ball and soccer
fields, golf courses, playgrounds, and the like.
Green Space: Natural undeveloped areas such as prairies, farmland, barren land,
08/18/05 P&Z
Page 3 of 4
forests, wetlands, and lakes. Green space may also include landscaped perimeters
and green landscape reserves along thoroughfares.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to recommend to Council the adoption of the definitions
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Discussion and possible action regarding CSC to allow more Office Space.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-to remove limitations in Community Shopping Center to allow
more Office Space.
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion Carried
8.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Gibson stated he would be attending the following meetings this month:
Drainage District, City Council, and Community Economic Development Committee.
He also stated the Mayor congratulated Planning and Zoning on the hot issues they have
been working on.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
No report given at this time.
b.Staff
Staff reported the FTP site now requires a password and user id to logon. Staff also
requested the Commission think of how to improve workshop attendance. Staff then
announced upcoming meetings. On August 23, at 6:00 p.m. there is a meeting with Main
Street and August 24, a meeting with Community Economics Development Conunittee
(CEDC). September 1, 2005, is a regular Planning and Zoning meeting and on
September 12, a Joint Public Hearing will be held.
10.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
De�elopment Coordinator
08/18/05 P&Z
Page 4 of 4
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 24, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held on
Wednesday, August 24, 2005, at 6:00 pm at the Friendswood City Hall second floor
conference room, located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The
following members were present:
P&Z Commissioners:
Kevin Holland
David Brakebill
Roy Klusendorf
Sheny Weesner 6:05 p.m.
Mark Van Riper 6:10 p.m.
1.Call to order.
Staff:
Ron Cox -City Manager
Diana Steelquist -Planner
Karen Capps -Economic Development Coordinator
With a quorum of P&Z members present, Chairman Holland called the P&Z
meeting to order. Also in attendance from the Main Street Committee were Alton
Todd, Bill Finger, Carole Jones and Tony Banfield.
2.Discussion with members of the Main Street Committee regarding Zoning
Measures for the Main Street Area.
Mr. Finger began the discussion by calling to order the Main Street Committee.
He then addressed both groups. He recapped the intent of the Main Street
Committee: to encourage, enhance, re-develop and provide a sense of place in the
downtown area. The current situation includes a main street which has 5 different
zoning districts, small lot sizes, and many different uses allowed. The plan is to
include the whole area along FM 518 from FM 23 51 to Cowards Creek. It should
also incorporate residential use in commercial prope1iies. He added that
providing public spaces should encourage retail activity. To move forward with
the zoning changes, he stated that everyone needed to agree on these principles.
Kevin Holland added that the zoning should be consolidated into one district.
Sherry Weesner agreed and suggested that each property owner/stakeholder be
offered the option to participate in the rezoning rather than making it mandatory.
She also wanted td make sure that improvements to existing structures could be
made without having to tear down existing structures to meet new regulation
requirements. The consensus was to make the rezoning a voluntary process.
In addition, lot sizes should be a consideration. Mr. Finger asked staff to
determine how many lots were less than 7,000 sq. ft. in the downtown area. He
Page 1 of2
08/24/05 P&Z
also did not want to require on-site detention. With regional detention available,
the consensus was to say no on-site detention would be allowed. This would
encourage the total use of the lot.
Parking was also discussed. Shared parking needs to be encouraged. It was also
suggested that the City provide off-site parking, or that parking be allowed on side
streets. High-rise parking should also be available. A Master plan of the areas
owned by the City is needed. This will useful in determining where public
space/green space is available and allow lots to front on those areas. This might
mean some changes to the Subdivision Ordinance. It was also stressed that once
dedicated as Open Space, these areas could not be further developed.
A review of the Permitted Use Table will need to be done and the uses allowed in
the new district determined.
Street landscaping issues were also discussed including the replacement of traffic
signals. Solid poles were suggested instead of lights hung from swinging wires.
Staff will investigate with TxDot what is allowed. A side walk plan is also
needed.
Sheny Weesner suggested that the all of the proposed elements of the Main Street
plan be collected. Ways to incorporate each element into the Zoning Ordinance
could then be discussed. It was pointed out that the Tree Preservation
subcommittee used this method successfully.
3.Adjourn.
Before adjourning, possible regular meeting dates were discussed. The second and
fourth Tuesday of month were agreed upon. The next meeting will be held on
Tuesday, September 13, 2005 at 6:30 p.m.
With no further comment, the meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
-------1 . / / /' /-JJa,,l'Uv _--_)-t:.&::_/e,--:r 1; /
Diana Steelquist C .. / Planner
Page 2 of 2
08/24/05 P&Z
I
I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 1, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
September 1, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand-7:25 p.m.
David Brakebill
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Jim Gibson
Dan Johnson-Deputy Director of CD
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Kevin Holland Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
With a quorum present, Commissioner Weesner absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to
order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public
No one spoke from the public spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 7-13-05 special meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 8-15-05 specia'i meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the 8-16-05 special meeting minutes.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to approve
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Northfield Estates,
located on Melody Lane.
Motion:
Second:
· Brakebill-approve with Staff conunents
Van Riper
Jason Christian, with JKC & Associates, addressed the Commission. Mr. Clu·istian stated
that he would like the Commission to consider not requiring the stub-outs that the city Staff
requested.
Commissioner Klusendorf stated he felt the proposed subdivision would create a traffic
issue for Melody Lane and the schedule for widening Melody Lane should be evaluated
Page 1 of 2
9/1/05 P & Z
before this subdivision is approved. Conunissioner Gibson stated he felt requiring the stub
outs created a safety issue.
Amended
Motion: Gibson-to approve with all Staff's recommendations except #2 and #3.
Second: Brakebill
Voted For: Brakebill, Gibson, Holland, Van Riper
Voted Against:K.lusendorf
Abstained: Bertrand-did not attend for discussion. Motion Carried
5.Conununications from the Commission.
No communication from the Commission at this time.
6.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith announced that City Council has finished reviewing the budget.
b.Staff
Staff stated it has provided the Commission with the DRC list for the month of August. In
addition the FTP site will now be password coded and Staff has provided each
Conunissioner with their information in order to access the Site. Staff also stated if any of
the Co1mnissioners would like to attend the Texas AP A conference in October, then Staff
should be contacted by Friday.
7.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
a ,e_}fu0
Development Coordinator
Page 2 of 2
9/1/05 P & Z
[
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 12, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Conunission was held Monday,
September 12, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive,
Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill-?: 10 p.m.
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Bertrand absent, Chairman Holland called the Joint
Public Hearing to order to discuss the following:
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Zone Classification change for a tract of land containing 137.307 acres of land,
Clear Creek Farms, located in the Sarah McKissick Survey, property located at
3801 FM 528, Harris County, Texas, from Single-Family Residential (SFR) and
amending Planned Unit Development (PUD) -Mixed Use/amending Ma ster
Land Use Plan to Planned Unit Development (PUD) -Mixed Use.
Staff gave a brief history overview of the zone change request. Staff explained that since
approved in 2004, the FEMA map has changed which placed portions of the property in
the Floodway. The reasons for the Public Hearing are due to the land swap with Clear
Creek Independent School District (CCISD) and the percentage of changes to the master
land use plan of the Planned Unit Development (PUD).
Mr. Browne, developer of the property, addressed City Council and the Conunission.
Mr. Browne explained FEMA changed the floodplain map after the re-zoning was
approved. Mr. Browne stated since FEMA changed the floodway this forced the project
to change and allow for additional water. Mr. Browne continued by explaining the
biggest change to the project is the parkland, which was previously 27 acres and now is
41 acres. The other changes to the project included the increase in office space, retail
decreased, the amphitheater, hotel, and the restaurant moved to the retail commercial
area. Councilmember Ewing asked how much green space is lost to detention ponds.
Mr. Browne stated the wet ponds would be part of the aesthetics and the all trees will try
to be saved but the trees in the wet ponds may not be.
The following is a synopsis of the discussions in opposition of the zone change request:
Page 1 of 3
9/12/05 P & Z
Cindy Bohmmon, 2102 McKissick stated she opposed the zone change for the following
reasons:
1.Flooding is a concern because erosion is increased.
2.Loss of the green belt (trees).
3.Cuts down on screening and aesthetics of the neighborhood.
4.Concerned about marina, and wildlife will be displaced.
5.Loss of large growth trees and habitat for woodpeckers.
After giving the issues of concern, she then gave possible changes to consider for the
development to help homeowners, wildlife and the overall development.
Ted Leach, stated he was concerned with the creek itself. He likes the natural beauty of
it. Polluted runoff from parking lots and the marina is an issue. He feels this
development could be a negative impact to the creek.
Jolm Johnson, 703 Oak, stated he is all for the development and property rights; however,
he is concerned with the amphitheater. He feels there will be issues with noise pollution
because he likes the quietness of his property. He also feels a 100 boat marina will be a
problem because the creek turns are going to cause an accident if more boats are on it.
He asked if the marina would be public or private. He stated in addition he is concerned
with the greenbelt being destroyed.
Kathy Rodgers, 207 Charleston stated she is concerned with the amphitheatre because of
noise pollution.
No one spoke in favor of the zone change.
Mr. Browne then addressed the concerns of the citizens opposed of the zone change. He
stated that FEMA requires that no changes to the hydraulics of the creek can be made.
FEMA enforces those requirements. He also stated that no changes would be made to the
parkland but he thought that Friendswood wanted the amphitheater for community based
events. In addition, regarding the concern about noise pollution, Mr. Browne stated the
amphitheater would be positioned where noise would go toward the development.
B.Amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Friendswood, amending height
restrictions in Community Shopping Center (CSC), Original Business District
(OBD) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
Staff reviewed with the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission the current and
proposed zoning ordinance regarding height restrictions.
The following is a synopsis of people who spoke in favor:
Bill Finger, 2805 Burr Oak stated by allowing these zones to have a greater height will
encourage commercial development, which in turn will increase tax revenue. He also stated
that the city has in place protection for homeowners for this modification.
The following is a synopsis s of people who spoke against:
Page 2 of 3
9/12/05 P & Z
[ I
I
Penelope Burke, 613 Penny Lane stated she is opposed of changing the look of Friendswood
and that Friendswood has a fundamental look that other city's do not.
C.Amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Friendswood, adding definitions
of Open Space and Green Space.
Staff gave a brief history regarding this item. Staff stated that the current Cluster Home
ordinance does not have a clear definition of open space/green space within the ordinance.
Staff then reviewed with City Council and Planning and Zoning the proposed definitions.
No one spoke in favor or against.
D.Amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Friendswood, revisions to the
Entryway Overlay District to include additional roadways.
Staff explained the Entryway Overlay District is merely an overlay on top of the current
zoning and the proposed revisions would also provide relief to intersecting zones of corner
lots.
No one spoke in favor or against.
E.Amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Friendswood, eliminating office
space limitations in Community Shopping Center (CSC) and Neighborhood
Commercial (NC).
Staff reviewed with City Council and Planning and Zoning the current zoning requirements
for this item.
The following is a synopsis of people who spoke against the item.
Bill Finger, 2805 Burr Oak stated by allowing the office limitations to be removed it will
eliminate sales tax revenue for the city. He also stated that allowing this proposal eliminates
the need. for Office Park District (OPD), and it negatively impacts residential values.
2.Adjournment
With no further comments the Joint Public Hearing was adjourned at 8: 12 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
9/12/05 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 13, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was scheduled
for Tuesday, September 13, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. in the city hall located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas.
The meeting regarding a discussion with members of the Main Street Committee
regarding Zoning Measures for the Main Street Area was cancelled due to a lack of
quorum available. No meeting was held.
7) -.. 7 ,,,-;? / / /'' . . ... ,....-l. ·� /{J1l4_, �l,.u-�0 >/ --• o' l
Diana Steelquist
Planner
09/13/05 P&Z
Page 1 of 1
I
(
Minutes of a Special/Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 15, 2005
A special/regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, September 15, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. in the city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand-7:00 p.m.
David Brakebill-7:00 p.m.
Jim Gibson-6:30 p.m.
Loren Smith-City Attorney-7:00 p.m.
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
Roy Klusendorf-6:30 p.m.
Mark Van Riper-7:00 p.m.
Sherry Weesner-6:30 p.m.
6:30 PM-SPECIAL MEETING-2nd Floor Conference Room
1.Call to order
2.Discussion regarding the Comprehensive Plan.
3.Adjournment
Due to lack of quorum, the special meeting was not held.
7:00 PM-REGULAR SESSION -City Council Chambers
1.Call to order.
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland absent, Vice Chairman Gibson called the
meeting to order to discuss the following:
2.Communications from the public.
No one spoke from the public spoke at this time.
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Samson Estates
located on Coward Creek Drive.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Brakebill-approve with Staff comments
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Mary's Creek
Village located at 511 N. Friendswood Drive.
Motion: Bertrand-approve with Staff comments
Page 1 of 4
9/15/05 P & Z
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the zone change request for a tract of land
containing 137.307 acres located at 3801 FM 528, from Single Family Residential (SFR)
and amending Plam1ed Unit Development (PUD)-Mixed Use/amending Master Land Use
Plan to Plam1ed Unit Development (PUD)-Mixed Use.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Brakebill-approve
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion Carried
The Commission discussed the zone change request. It was noted that this amendment
incorporates a land swap between Clear Creek ISD (CCISD) and the Whitcomb
developers. The land swap will facilitate the development of a second school site for
CCISD behind their existing facility.
Although there was some concern regarding the decrease in overall retail square footage
in the Master plan, the Commission believes that the project is an important resource in
achieving the City's goal of improving the tax base.
The Commission also requested that the areas in the land swap be clearly identified on
the zoning map with the correct zoning designations.
6.Consideration and possible action regarding revisions to the zoning ordinance to include
additional roadways to the Entryway Overlay District (EOD).
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve
Van Riper
Commissioner Weesner stated she felt the Commission needed to see the draft ordinance
before they vote on it. Commissioner Bertrand stated he feels the current overlay system
is not being enforced well, and that it is inappropriate to go after an ordinance without
enough information.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-motion to table
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding amending the zoning ordinance for height
restriction in Conununity Shopping Center (CSC), Original Business District (OBD) and
Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve
Weesner
Page 2 of 4
9/15/05 P & Z
[
Voted For: Brakebill, Gibson, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Voted Against:Bertrand Motion Carried
8.Consideration and possible action regarding the revision to the zoning ordinance to
eliminate office space limitations in Community Shopping Center (CSC) and
Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
Motion: Brakebill-approve
Second: Klusendorf
Voted For: Brakebill, Gibson, Klusendorf, Van Riper
Voted Against:Bertrand, Weesner Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner stated she would like to see a draft ordinance in order to vote on
this item. She stated that eliminating the office limitations would in effect eliminate
retail districts in Friendswood. She also stated that it eliminates the need for the Office
Park District (OPD). In addition, her concern is that residents purchasing lots next to
CSC or NC districts which are currently used as office parks, may later be disturbed
when a retail business such as a fast food restaurant moves next door. Distinct zoning
districts for office uses and retail uses provide the community with assurances of the
types of uses allowed in each district. Commissioner Bertrand agreed and stated retail
sales provide a greater sales tax base. He also noted that allowing retail districts to
convert to more office uses seems contrary to the adopted goals of the City to increase the
tax base. Commissioner Klusendorf stated he felt the city could not be so restrictive, so
therefore he was in favor of the change. Commissioner Brakebill and Commissioner Van
Riper agreed; however, Commissioner Van Riper stated he to felt it is necessmy to see a
draft ordinance before voting on the item.
Amended
Motion: Weesner-to table until a draft ordinance is provided
Second: Van Riper
Voted For: Van Riper, Weesner
Voted Against:Bertrand, Brakebill, Gibson, Klusendorf Motion to Table Failed
Amended
Motion: Gibson -to add in the recommendation that by approving this Planning and
Zoning understands that if passed this could be countered.
Failed for lack of a second.
The majority of the Commission believes that the deletion of these restrictions will allow
the property owners and the market to determine the best uses of developments located.
within these commercial districts. Enforcement of these limitations will also no longer be
an issue. In addition, some comments were made that the current legislation was too
restrictive and that having limitations on the amount of office space allowed, was
discouraging to developers. The majority concurred that existing empty commercial
developments in our Community needed to be filled with tenants be they retail or
professional in nature.
Page 3 of 4
9/15/05 P & Z
9.Consideration and possible action regarding the zoning ordinance to include the
definitions of Open Space and Green Space.
Motion: Weesner-motion to table
Second: Klusendorf
Voted For: Bertrand, Brakebill, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Voted Against:Gibson Motion to Table Carried
10.Communications from the Commission.
No communication from the Commission at this time.
11.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
No report was provided from Council Liaison.
b.Staff
Staff stated meeting dates for Main Street zoning and the Comprehensive Plan should be
discussed at the next regular meeting. Commissioner Gibson stated if the Commission
plans to accomplish its goals then the creation of a sub-committee should also be
discussed in order to meet calendar objectives. Staff then announced a Tree Preservation
meeting will be held Wednesday, September 28, 2005 and a Joint Public Hearing is
scheduled for October 3, 2005.
12.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
9/15/05 P & Z
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
Octobe1· 6, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, October 6, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand-7:25 p.m.
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper-7:07 p.m.
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney-7:05 p.m.
David Smith-Council Liaison
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Bertrand and Brakebill absent, Chairman Holland
called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public
No one spoke from the public spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 8-18-05 special/regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 8-24-05 special meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the 9-1-05 regular meeting minutes.
d.Approval of the 9-12-05 special meeting minutes.
e.Approval of the 9-13-05 special meeting minutes
f.Approval of the 9-15-05 special/regular meeting minutes.
It was asked to remove Consent Agenda items "C" and "D" for discussion. The
remaining Consent Agenda was then voted on.
Motion: Gibson-to approve items a, b, e & f
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commission Klusendorf stated the last sentence under Item 4 of the 9-1-05
minutes should read: "Commissioner Klusendorf stated he felt the proposed
subdivision would create a traffic issue for Melody Lane and the schedule for
widening Melody Lane should be evaluated before this subdivision is approved."
Page 1 of 4
10-6-05 P & Z
Commissioner Weesner stated the comment from Bill Finger under Item E. on the
9-12-05 minutes should read: "He also stated that allowing this proposal eliminates
the need for Office Park District (OPD), and it negatively impacts residential values.
The sentence stating, "in addition, Mr. Finger did list several reasons why the
limitations should be lifted should be struck out."
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Tabled Items
Gibson-to approve with changes items "C" and "D"
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the zoning ordinance to include the
definitions of Open Space and Green Space.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to remove from table
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
The Conunission had much discussion regarding the inclusion of the words ' golf
courses' in the definition of Open Space. They recognize that citizens in the
Community perceive the playing greens of a golf course to be open space.
However, there are other secondary uses associated with a golf course which
should not be considered as open space. These associated uses might include a
clubhouse, parking lot, restaurant, pro-shop and facility storage buildings for
equipment and golf carts. The Conunission believes that not listing golf courses
as an example of open space will not preclude a proposal to include a golf course
in any application requesting a golf course be considered as such. The
Commission believes each individual application should be considered
independently and that the definitions provide only a few examples of what might
be considered as either open space or green space. These examples are not
intended to be exclusive. Each developer should use these as ideas of what Open
Space or Green Space could be.
Therefore, the definition of Open Space was further amended to clarify
that the examples listed in the definition of Open Space are just a few of the kinds
of things that could be counted as Open Space.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-accept definitions as is but remove "golf course" and add
" a few examples are"
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion Carried
Weesner-add "examples include but are not limited to"
Klusendorf
Page 2 of 4
10-6-05 P & Z
I
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
The definition should read: "Open Space: A restricted reserve located within a
development with limited low-impact amenities. Amenities may be passive or
active. A few examples include but are not limited to: green space both natural
and landscaped, detention areas, trails, lakes, pavilions, benches, outdoor cooking
facilities, and active recreational facilities such as ball and soccer fields,
playgrounds, and the like."
5.Consideration and possible action regarding revisions to the zoning ordinance to
include additional roadways in the Entryway Overlay District.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to remove item from table
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Gibson-to approve the recommendation to Council regarding the
revision of the Entryway Overlay District (EOD) to include areas
along future thoroughfares including Friendswood Lakes Blvd.
(a.k.a. Brittany Bay), Bay Area Blvd., and the planned extensions
of Blackhawk Blvd. north of FM 2351 and south of FM 528; and
to include limits on the garage bay door restrictions on corner lots.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
This recommendation specifically eliminates the garage bay door restrictions for
corner lots at two EOD intersections. The Commission does not believe that other
EOD requirements should be eliminated such as the screening of trash dumpsters,
mechanical equipment etc.
The Commission further discussed the need for Council to consider adding
similar language which would eliminate the bay door and other EOD restrictions
for corner lots where the Downtown Overlay District and Entryway Overlay
District intersect at the corners of FM 2351 and FM 518.
Regular Items
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Crawford
Business Park located at the corner of Winding Way and FM 528.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve with Staff comments
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding meeting elates and possible sub
committees for Main Street Zoning and Comprehensive Plan.
Page 3 of 4
10-6-05 P & Z
After discussion the Commission decided to appoint a sub-committee for the
Comprehensive Plan and for Main Street Zoning.
8.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Klusendorf commented on the "Brittany Bay Boulevard" and
asked for more information on when the alignment would be determined.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith stated he felt Planning and Zoning has the right idea for
how to handle the Comprehensive Plan and Main Street Zoning. He also stated
that there were Councilmembers who were concerned about the changes to
Community Shopping Center with regards to office space limitations; however, it
was approved by Council with the aspect of reviewing it later to place some
restrictions on it.
b.Staff
Staff reported on upcoming meeting dates and hearing dates.
10.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting was adjourned at 7:59 p.m.
\:.,IJ4R ,,,, J /..___,,,,u -KJ crn0
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
10-6-0SP&Z
I I . I
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
November 3, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Plam1ing and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, November 3, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Sherry Weesner
1.Call to order
David Smith-Council Liaison
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Rhonda Baker -CD Secretary
With a quorum present, Commissioners Brakebill, Van Riper and Klusendorf
absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:2.Communications from the public None.3.Consent Agenda:a.Approval of the Final Plat of Samson Estates located at 905 Cowards CreekDrive.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve the consent agenda
Be11rand
Unanimous Motion Carried 4.Consideration and possible action regarding revisions to the Commercial site plan of the
518-528 Retail Center, specifically the deck addition for Piccomolo's Ice Cream.
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to approve with staff comments and to have staff
comments added to the general notes of site plan.
Gibson
Commissioner Bertrand expressed his concern that the deck would be a safety
hazard for this development. His belief is that vehicles need a way to get out of
harms way by using the driveway to the rear of the development. He has no
problem with a deck in a different location. Commissioner Weesner questioned
what purpose the driveway to the rear of the development served. Commissioner
Gibson shared Commissioner Bertrand's safety concerns. Chairman Holland was
concerned that the bollards would not keep cars from driving onto the deck.
There was no one present to represent the site owner.
Page 1 of 4
11-03-05 P & Z
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland-to table the item and allow the developer to address the
Commission with information or an alternative plan.
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the approval of the Preliminary Plat of
Monte Bello Subdivision located off Shadowbend and Woodlawn.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve with staff comments.
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Staff clarified that comment #5 had been added in order that the developer
address a question regarding platting of additional adjacent acreage. It appears
from Appraisal District records that a portion of an adjacent track had been
included without including the entire tract. Tom Offenburger of 150 W.
Shadowbend, developer, addressed the Commission regarding the Staff
comments. Mr. Offenburger will need to have the surveyor research the deeds and
will comply with the Staffs request to clarify the platting issue. In response to
questions about the detention plan and GCCDD, Mr. Offenburger stated he is
working through the issues with the City and Drainage District. This is a curb and
gutter street development with sidewalks. Sidewalks will also be built along
Woodlawn and Shadowbend. The detention pond will be a dry pond and has
adequate volume. Commissioner Bertrand clarified that Lot 17 will only be
accessed from Woodlawn. Also, that the water well on Lot 16 could only be used
for irrigation use. Commissioner Weesner noted that if the additional property
needed to be included in the plat, it would be brought back before the
Commission for approval.
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the approval of the Preliminary Plat of
Tena Bella located on Bay Area Boulevard.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve with staff comments.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
Weesner -to approve the preliminary plat with sidewalks required
along Bay Area Blvd. with the condition that the this issue will be
looked at again at the time of final plat approval.
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
Mr. Dick Duffy addressed the Commission. Commissioner Bertrand asked if the updated
floodplain maps had been used to prepare the plat and locate the 100-year flood plain.
He also wanted to clarify that the streets would be used to drain the subdivision and that
homes would be built at least 12 inches above the floodplain elevation. Mr. Duffy
Page 2 of 4
11-03-05 P & Z
I
reported that the development was being designed based upon the updated flood plain
elevation information. The 100 year flood plain shown on the plat is based the existing
approved map. He confirmed that none of the lots will be located within the floodplain.
Commissioner Gibson asked about the density. Mr. Duffy noted that it was less than 2.7
units per acre and that the development was zoned PUD-Cluster Homes. Many of the
Commissioners expressed concern about the lack of sidewalks along Bay Area Blvd.
Mr. Duffy responded that there was no room to putt sidewalks on this side of Bay Area
Blvd. and they would not lead to anywhere. He has left a tree buffer along Bay Area
Blvd.; putting a sidewalk in this area would mean removing the existing trees.
Commissioner Weesner stated sidewalks are required per the Ordinance. She noted that
although no sidewalks exist in City right-of-ways, it may be done in the future.
Commissioner Bertrand suggested that the developer's portion be put in contingent upon
the City putting the sidewalks in front of the water treatment plant. He believes only
having a portion of the sidewalk in place creates more of safety hazard.
Staff noted that sidewalks are required along all curb and gutter streets. Commissioner
Bertrand also wants to get information from staff regarding any plans to put sidewalks in
front of public property off of Bay Area. The Commission discussed tabling the item,
however, Mr. Duffy asked that the item be voted upon. Commissioner Weesner stated
that the Commission should review the issue further and determine if the lack of
sidewalks constitutes a safety hazard and be prepared to readdress the requirement at the
time of final plat approval. Staff advised Mr. Duffy to prepare construction plans with
the sidewalks in place.
7.Discussion and possible action regarding the Downtown Overlay District (DOD) and
conflicts with the Entiyway Overlay District (EOD) at FM 2351 and FM 518.
Staff reported that the Council had asked that this issue be reviewed and that Staff was
meeting regularly to discuss the conflicts. However, input was needed from the
Commission as to what the best approach might be. Some of the issues and possible
solutions Staff were reviewing included:
1-Address the situation as it applies to gas stations and allow them to be exempt from
ce1tain development requirements;
2-Give special exemption authority to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for gas stations;
3-Redefine the EOD/DOD boundaries;
4-Revise the non-conforming section of the Zoning Ordinance;
5-Change the set back requirements.
Commissioner Bertrand suggested that design standards should apply based upon the use
proposed in the Overlay Districts. Other suggestions included creating a separate
Overlay District for corner lots. Commissioner Gibson recommended that the Zoning
Board of Adjustment be given authority to review requests for development in these
intersections based on their unique development requirements and that specific guidelines
for approval be provided to ZBOA. Commissioner Bertrand suggested soliciting some
feedback f rom the Chamber of Commerce or an ad hoc committee.
8.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Bertrand reported that he had some conflicts with attending upcoming
meetings but agreed to swap with Commissioner Weesner. Commissioner Gibson
reported he would be out of town for the Joint Public Hearing. Chairman Holland has
been attending the Drainage District meetings.
Page 3 of 4
11-03-05 P & Z
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison David Smith spoke to the Commission about the need to adhere
to parliamentary procedures. He complimented the Commission because he
believes for the most pa1t, they do regularly apply parliamentary rnles to their
meetings. He also commented on the discussion regarding the EOD/DOD. This
is not an easy issue but he was encouraged by the discussion and wants to keep
the discussions going.
b.Staff
Staff reported that one DRC had been held in October. A Joint Public Hearing
was scheduled for Monday. Cheri Skelton is out sick and would be out for the
next few weeks. Staff reported that Mike Hodge, Director of Community
Development and Public Works would be leaving the City. A special luncheon
was planned for November 10th . Commissioner Bertrand stated that Mr. Hodge
has done an excellent job, had been a good mentor and provided gracious help to
the Commission.
10.Adjournment.
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.111.
Diana Steelquist
Planner
Page 4 of 4
11-03-05 P & Z
I
[
l
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
November 7, 2005
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Monday, November
7, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive,
Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill
Bob Bertrand
Kevin Holland
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
John Olson-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Planner
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to consider the following.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Zone Classification change for a tract of land con taining 2.0195 acres, Block 1, Reserve A,
Schultz Center, located in the Sarah McKissick Survey, property located at 3500 FM 528, Harris
County Texas, from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with
Specific Use Permit (SUP)-Mini-Warehouses with Caretakers Quarters.
No one spoke for or against this request.
B.Specific Use Permit(SUP) -Mixed Use Commercial for property located at 107 Shadwell, Lot 1,
Block 1, Winding Hollow Subdivision, Galveston County, Texas, amending Specific Use Permit,
Ordinance No. 2000-38.
Nancy Wheeler, 405 Glen Leah Drive, addressed the Commission and Council. Ms. Wheeler and
her sister, Kelly Stevens, propose to purchase this development. They would like to open a
specialty day care for babies and toddlers. They would also like to use the pool house for a separate
business which would offer swim lessons, water aerobics and pool parties. Council questioned the
applicants if they were aware of the parking lot agreement associated with this development. The
prospective buyers are aware of the agreement. Council asked Staff to review the agreement and
find out if the pavement could be done as negotiated on the agreement. The City Manager
indicated that the agreement would need to be renegotiated with any new property owners.
Janice Lowe, 401 For est Pine Court, agent for BeaSym, LLP will follow-up with the owners to get
details on the parking agreement.
John Mezzle, 222 Shadwell, stated he was concerned with how the trash generated by the new
business would be picked up. The restaurant use had generated a lot of trash and no dumpster had
been used for service.
Page 1 of2
1 1/0 7/05 P & Z
2.Adjournment
With no further comments the Joint Public Hearing was closed at 7: 16 p.m.
/4
Page 2 of211/07/05 P & Z
[ Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning ancl Zoning Commission
November 17, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
November 17, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
1.Call to order
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Rhonda Baker -CD Secretary
Loren Smith -City Attorney
With a quorum present, Commissioner Van Riper absent, Chairman Holland called the
meeting to order.
2.Communications from the public
Leslie Roque, 1960 Sandy Lakes Drive, with Friendswood Lakes HOA conveyed that
they had approved the addition of Largo Friendswood to their HOA.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 10-06-05 Regular Minutes
b.Approval of the 11-7-05 Special meeting minutes.
Because copies of the minutes had not been included in the electronic agenda packet, no action
was taken on the Consent agenda.
Tabled Items:
4.Consideration and possible action regarding revisions to the Commercial site plan of the 518-528
Retail Center, specifically the deck addition for Piccomolo's Ice Cream.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to remove from the table
Klusenforf
Unanimous Motion Carried
Original
Motion: Weesner-to approve with staff comments and to have staff comments
added to the general notes of site plan.
Second: Gibson
Vote For: Gibson, Klusenclorf, Brakebill
Vote Against: Holland, Weesner, and Bertrand opposed
Page 1 of 6
11/17/05 P&Z
Motion Failed
Amended
Motion: Weesner -add to site plan a note stating no walk up window would be added at a
later date.
Second:
Vote For:
Vote against:
Brakebill
Gibson, Holland, Brakebill, Klusendorf, Weesner
Bertrand Motion Carried
Juan Martinez, representing the owner, addressed the Commission. No new plan was presented.
The proposal is for a wooden deck closing the rear access drive. According to Mr. Martinez,
there are other cross access agreements in place which serve this development. Staff noted this is
a one-way access going from the front to the rear of the property. Mr. Martinez stated that
concrete bollards would be placed in front of the closed driveway. Comm issioner Bertrand
commented that the placement of the bollards was even more of a safety issue because there was
less room for a car to maneuver when entering the parking lot. Commissioner Weesner asked if
two parking spaces could be removed for the deck. Staff indicated that that decision was up to
the property owner and his tenants. Parking would still meet the guidelines if two spaces were
removed. Staff clarified that no EOD requirements were being affected by the revised site plan.
Regular Items:
5.Consideration and possible action regarding Zone Classification change for a tract of land
containing 2.0195 acres, Block 1, Reserve A, Schultz Center, located in the Sarah McKissick
Survey, property located at 3500 FM 528, Harris County Texas, from Neighborhood Commercial
(NC) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Specific Use Permit (SUP)-Mini-Warehouses
with Caretakers Quarters.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve
Bertrand
Amended
Motion: Weesner-to table
Second: Bertrand
Voted For: Bertrand, Holland, Gibson, Klusendorf, Weesner
Vote Against: Brakebill Motion Carried
Although he had no problem with a caretaker on the property, Commissioner Bertrand
was concerned with the use of PUD/SUP for this development. He believes the PUD
should not be used because the underlying zone of NC does not allow residential use. He
believes the zoning should be PUD-mixed use. He was concerned with the mixing of a
residential use in this area. He felt there might be set back issues in combining the
residential use within the commercial development. Also, it would be a bad precedent.
He suggested that a PUD-mixed use 'light' zone be created. Staff noted that a PUD is a
distinct zoning district. Under the General PUD, each use requires a SUP. In zoning
districts, other than PUD, where an SUP is required, the underlying zoning district
requirements apply and the SUP requirements can only be more restrictive, not less
restrictive. For example, a church being built in a Single Family Residential district
would have the SFR set backs apply. Once the district in rezoned to PUD, the underlying
zone no longer applies. Commissioner Bertrand would like more information regarding
PUDs and their uses.
Page 2 of 6
11/17/05 P&Z
l
Commissioner Klusendorf was concerned about the location of the apartment and if any
hanging laundry would be visible. Staff noted that the site was still under construction
and a final had not been issued.
Commissioner Bertrand was concerned about there being limitations on the number of
residential units and the size of the caretaker's quarter. Staff suggested adding additional
language to limit the number and size of residential uses. Commissioner Weesner asked
that staff draft language with limits for the SUP and present it at the next regular meeting.
6.Consideration and possible action regarding Specific Use Permit(SUP) -Mixed Use Commercial
for property located at 107 Shadwell, Lot l, Block 1, Winding Hollow Subdivision, Galveston
County, Texas, amending Specific Use Permit, Ordinance No. 2000-38.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve
Be1trand
Unanimous Motion Carried
Be1trand-to approve with a letter sent to City Council recommending that
a written agreement be put into place with regards to the shared parking
and the hours of operation for the Childcare center and that they not
conflict with City Park activities and that the agreement be completed
prior to the approval by Council of the SUP amendment.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
Bertrand-to delete the generalized use categories: Arts, ente1tainment, and
recreation as well as Professional, technical services from the SUP
request.
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Ms. Nancy Wheeler, who will be purchasing the property, addressed the Commission.
Commissioner Be1trand stated his concerns with the parking issues related using City
parking. He wanted to verify that City parking use would not be limited by the
commercial use. Also that young children would be around when City facilities in the
area would be in heavy use. Ms. Wheeler addressed Commissioner Bertrand's comments
regarding hours of operation and parking. She stated the childcare facility would be for
children under two years of age. The facility will be open between 6:30 am to 6:30 pm.
Monday thru Friday. She did not anticipate their facility hours to conflict with park
activities. She also believes there will not be any parking or traffic issues related to the
business. Most parents drop off and pick up quickly.
Staff clarified that the existing parking agreement will need to be re-negotiated with the
new property owners.
Page 3 of 6
11/17/05 P&Z
Commissioner Gibson felt the requests for Art, entertainment, and recreation were too
undefined. Some things like under this category should not be allowed. He
recommended deleting this line item. The use requests need to be more specific under
both the Arts and Entertaimnent and Professional services. · After some discussion with
Ms. Wheeler, it was determined that the existing SUP allowed the type of mixed use
conunercial they may want to have in the future. For now, the existing structure will be
renovated to allow the childcare use. The pool house will be used for the swimming
lessons, water aerobics and pool parties.
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan of Sterling Plaza locatedoff Winding Way.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve with staff comments
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Randy Liska with n<.c and Adam Hill, addressed the Commission. Commissioner Weesner asked about the detention area and berms located around the property. Mr. Liska indicated that a portion of the detention was being provided in the parking lot and that the front of the property will be built up to have the property drain into the parking area and into the detention pond. Commissioner Bertrand asked what areas of common access are being contemplated. Mr. Liska stated that no common access was currently being contemplated although the common access note has been listed on the site plan per Staffs requirements.
8.Consideration and possible action regarding the Prelimina1y Plat of the Boone Subdivisionlocated offNarnia Way.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner -to approve with Staff comments
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Weesner -to approve the length of the cul-de-sac which is over 600 feet in
length.
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Mr. Paul Boone addressed the commission and stated his just wants to build one house.
Mr. Boone wanted to know if the pavement width issue had been resolved. Staff stated
that the question of whether 24 ft. or 26 ft. of pavement would be required should be
resolved with the Fire Marshal when the construction plans were reviewed.
9.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Largo Friendswood locatedoff FM 528 and adjacent to Friendswood Lakes.
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve
Weesner
Page 4 of 6
11/17/05 P&Z
l
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand -to table
Weesner
Unanimous
Mr. Don Barris, developer, asked that the item be tabled.
Motion Carried
10.Discussion and possible action regarding the proposed extension of the Entryway Overlay
District along Blackhawk Blvd. north of FM 2351 within an Industrial Zoning District.
Kirk Lippert, CEDC Chairman, addressed the Commission. CEDC understands that the
recommendation is before Council, but they would like for P&Z to reconsider including this
portion of Blackhawk as it is within an industrial zone.
Commissioner Weesner noted that the Council had already voted once on the recommendation.
Staff stated that the Commission could send a memo requesting an amendment at the second
reading. Staff reported attendance at the last Community Economic Development Committee
(CEDC) meeting in which this issue had been discussed. The issue Staff heard at the CEDC
meeting and from Dan Rucker, a property owner in the area, was that Industrial Zoning was not
consistent with EOD architectural and screening requirements. Another comment heard was that
the EOD was designed for entryways and that this road would not be a major entryway into the
city. Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist, recommended taking a pro-active approach and keeping the
EOD in this area.
Commissioner Bertrand was concerned that the entire length of Blackhawk Bouldevard was not
included in the EOD. He also recalled that the presentation from Dan Rucker for the
development of his property was not for industrial use. Before he could be in support of
extending the EOD along Blackhawk, he wanted more public input. He also has a problem with
the term Entryway used in connection with Blackhawk Boulevard. He does not consider
Blackhawk or the proposed extensions as entryways. He was also concerned about the restriction
of the garage bays within the EOD.
With action scheduled for Monday, November 21st , the consensus was for CEDC address City
Council directly on Monday as this might be the most effective way to amend the ordinance. The
Commission did agree that additional discussion regarding the EOD should be held in the future.
11.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Weesner stated she had attended City Council and had forwarded her notes.
Commissioner Brakebill reported attending the Main Street Zoning Committee and the Drainage
District meetings. Commissioner Bertrand reported that the Tree Preservation Super Sub
committee had held their final meeting and was recommending a Heritage Tree Ordinance and a
formula to calculate an amount for tree replacement/mitigation. Chairman Holland reported
attending a Drainage District workshop on the West property.
12.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
b.Staff
Page 5 of 6
11/17/05 P&Z
Staff Planner relayed thanks from Cheri Skelton for the plant. Ms. Skelton should be
returning to work in a couple of weeks. Staff reported that Mike Hodge was now Assistant
City Manager in Pearland. Additionally, Randy Mason would be leaving his position as
Building Official. For the present time, Kaz Hamidian will be the Acting Director of Public
works and Dan Johnson will be the Acting Director of Community Development. Staff
Planner thanked Commissioners Bertrand and Holland for their work on the TPOSSC.
13.Adjournment.
With no further comment, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Page 6 of 6
11/17/05 P&Z
I
Minutes of a Special/Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
December 1, 2005
A special/regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
December 1, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand-7:25 p.m.
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland and Commissioner Van Riper absent, Vice-Chairman Gibson
called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Dave Smith stated the Mayor would like to address Planning & Zoning. Mayor Brizendine addressed
the Commissioner to explain why the Entryway Overlay District (EOD) Ordinance at City Council was
tabled and to inform the Commission that the item would be coming back to Planning and Zoning for
reconsideration of additional issues, such as landscape and setback requirements.
b.Staff
Staff reported there would be a joint public hearing on Januaiy 9, 2006. Also, the City Attorney regarding
the item Mayor Brizendine spoke to the Commission about, has prepared a brief draft.
7:00 PM-PUBLIC HEARING
3.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding:
a.Pretts Lumber Company Platt Re-plat of Lots 4-1 and 4-2 located at 400 West Parkwood.
No one spoke for or against the item.
REGULAR SESSION
4.Communications from the public
Tom Offenburger addressed the Commissioner regarding a requirement for platting. Commissioner
Gibson stated he would need to be placed on the agenda to dialog with the Commission.
Leslie Roque addressed the Commission regarding Largo Friendswood. She stated the Home Owners
Association of Friendswood Lakes supports the development of this subdivision.
Page 1 of 4
12/1/05 P & Z
5.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 10-06-05 Regular Minutes.
b.Approval of the 11-7-05 Special meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the Final Plat of Crawford Business Park located at the corner of Winding Way
and FM 528.
Commissioner Weesner asked that item "A" be removed for correction.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-approve item "B" and "C"
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
Item "A" was then discussed.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
TABLED ITEM
Weesner-to approve with the correction
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Canied
6.Consideration and possible action regarding Zone Classification change for a tract of land
containing 2.0195 acres, Block 1, Reserve A, Schultz Center, located in the Sarah McKissick
Survey, property located at 3500 FM 528, Harris County Texas, from Neighborhood
Commercial (NC) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Specific Use Permit (SUP)-Mini
Warehouses with Caretakers Quarters.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-remove from the table
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
A motion to approve carried over from the last meeting:
Motion:
Second:
Amended
Motion:
Gibson-to approve
Bertrand
Weesner-amend the PUD to include language presented by Staff, being the
following:
1.The caretaker's residence shall be and remain incidental to the primary us of the
facility as a self-storage mini-wa rehouse.
2.The caretaker's quarters shall be limited to one (1) residential structure
containing not more than nine hundred (900) square feet.
3.Not more than three (3) persons shall be permitted to reside in the caretaker's
quarters at any one time.
4.The hanging of laundry outside the caretaker's quarters in a place visible from
any adjoining property is prohibited.
5.The caretaker's quarters shall have not more than two (2) cars, both of which
shall be in vvorking condition, parked on the property at any one time.
Page 2 of 4
12/1/05 P & Z
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Largo Friendswood
located off of FM 528 and adjacent to Friendswood Lakes Subdivision.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Amend
Bertrand-to remove from the table
Weesner
Unanimous
Bertrand-to approve with Staff comments
Brakebill
Motion: Klusendorf-to take note #11 off the plat.
Second: Bertrand
Voted For: Bertrand, Brakebill, Gibson, Klusendorf
Voted Against: Weesner
Amended
Motion: Brakebill-to remove the word commercial from plat.
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Brakebill, Weesner
Voted Against:Bertrand, Gibson, Klusendorf
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Motion Failed
Amended
Motion: Klusendorf-replace the current language regarding commercial with:
Second:
Voted For:
Umestricted Reserve "J" Planned for Conunercial Development. This would
also be the same language on Reserve "K".
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
REGULAR SESSION
8.Consideration and possible action regarding the Prets Lumber Company Platt Re-plat of Lots 4-1
and 4-2 located at 400 West Parkwood.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-approve with Staff comments
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
9.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan of Acadian Plaza located at
400 West Parkwood.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-approve with Staff comments
Weesner
Unanimous
Page 3 of 4
12/1/05 P & Z
Motion Carried
10.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Friendswood United Methodist
Church located along FM 2351 and FM 518.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-approve with Staff comments
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
11.Consideration and possible action regarding a modification to the plat note and requirement for
sidewalks along Reserve "E" for Friendswood Oaks Section Two.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-approve with Staff comments
Brakebill
Voted For: Unanimous
Dick Duffy addressed the Commission and discussed his proposal for providing a jogging trail on
Reserve "E" in lieu of a sidewalk. He explained that a walking/jogging trail is required by the City to
meet the Park requirements.
12.Discussion and possible action regarding the Friendswood Vision Section of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The Comprehensive Sub-committee received input from the other Commissioners regarding a draft
bullet-point version of Friendswood Tomorrow Vision of the Future section of the Comprehensive Plan.
13.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Bertrand spoke of a grant he understood the University of Houston could be receiving to
help Friendswood and Webster with the disposal of chemicals. He also spoke about liaison attendance
at CAB and that CAB would be giving away 10 different varieties of trees in January.
Commissioner Gibson will be out of town the next regular meeting date.
Commissioners Brakebill, Bertrand, and Van Riper attended the Main Street Zoning meeting.
14.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeti ng was adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
�' �·� c�r <J:e.lcJ Cheri Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
12/1/05 P & Z
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
December 15, 2005
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
December 15, 2005, at 7 :00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Sherry Weesner
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Bertrand, Commissioner Klusendorf, and Commissioner
Van Riper absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communicat ions from the public
No one from the public spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 11-03-05 Regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 11-17-05 Regular meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the Final Plat of Friendswood United Methodist Church located
on FM 518 and FM 23 51.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Brakebill-to approve consent agenda
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of Northfield Estates
Subdivision located on Melody Lane abutting the Forest of Friendswood Subdivision.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-approve with Staff comments
Brakebill
Commissioner Weesner stated that Final Plats should not be before Planning and Zoning
with comments. Final Plats should not have comments to address and should be placed
on the consent agenda.
Staff stated that the project missed the agenda deadline at the Galveston County
Consolidated Drainage District and that is why the Final Plat was placed on the agenda
with comments.
Page 1 of 4
12/15/05 P & Z
Randy Liska stated that he felt that the outstanding comments were addressed with a re
submitted set of plans at the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding sidewalks along Bay Area Boulevard in the
Friendswood Oaks Subdivision.
Staff gave a brief summary of why this item was placed on the agenda. Stating that Staff
had allowed a modification to the sidewalks in Friendswood Oaks and along Bay Area
Boulevard, but realized the modifications could only be approved by Planning and
Zoning.
Commissioner Weenser, Commissioner Gibson, and Chairman Holland stated that all the
sidewalks should be completed within the subdivision and along Bay Area Boulevard like
normally required.
Dick Duffy addressed the Commission. He stated that he has no problem with finishing
out the sidewalks but he has concerns. Those concerns are:
1.Concerned about skateboarding and the safety issue that the extension of the sidewalk
creates.
2.The ditch the sidewalk goes into stays full of water most of the time. It seems that to
place a sidewalk into a ditch that stays full of water is a waste of money if no one can
use it.
3.The distance from where the sidewalk stops currently and the distance to the property
line are approximately 350 feet. He would like to know why Autumn Creek
sidewalks were not completed to the property line when it was developed and how
should he address this to his potential homeowners when they need to go to the
shopping center on FM 528.
Mr. Duffy then stated if he was required to complete the sidewalks he would like to have
a 60-day extension to complete them without holding his project up. He stated he needed
the 60-day extension because:
1.It was the holidays and he could not get concrete until after the holidays were over.
2.Most of the people who do the concrete work go south for Clu·istmas and do not
return until after the holidays.
Commissioner Weesner stated that the extension request could not be granted by
Planning and Zoning because it was not in the Planning and Zoning Conunissions scope
of approvals. The City Attorney agreed with Commissioner Weesner stating that the
approval of the time extension request could not be made by Planning and Zoning, only
by Staff. Chairman Holland then stated that it is not the city's intent to slow down the
project, but to allow Mr. Duffy adequate time finish the sidewalks; however, this would
Page 2 of 4
12/15/05 P & Z
l
only be a recommendation. Commissioner Weesner then stated that Planning and Zoning
had no grounds to make this recommendation and the City Attorney also agreed.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weenser-to complete the sidewalks on Bay Area and complete the
sidewalks within the subdivision.
Brakebill
Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Discussion and possible action regarding the site plan requirements for gas stations and
auto repair facilities with the Entryway Overlay District (EOD) and Downtown Overlay
District (DOD).
Chairman Holland stated that there are other issues and properties to consider so that the
focus was not creating spot zoning. There are other properties that are affected in much
of the same way and should be considered.
Commissioner Brakebill agreed with Chairman Holland, stating that the entire issue
should be looked at instead of focusing just on one person.
Nick Alvery, 3698 Blackhawk, addressed the Commission. Mr. Alvery owns the Plaza at
the corner of Blackhawk and FM 528. He stated that there has been a hardship created
with his property due to the city's requirements. Mr. Alvery stated he must have a
minimum of three gas pumps on his property to sell gas with a franchise; however, he
cannot meet the requirements of the city code to finish the renovation to his prope1ty, to
include the gas pumps. It then creates a hardship for him to keep the gas station open,
because he cannot get a permit for the remaining improvements. Mr. Alvery stated that
just to get a sign permit, it took four years, and he finally got his permit thanks to Linda
Taylor. Mr. Alvery stated with the city requirements are not allowing him to improve the
property. He is also not able to get tenants for his plaza, therefore creating a hardship on
him. He then stated that if it wasn't for the other two stores he owns that he would need
to file bankruptcy. He does not understand why he is able to get permits in the other
cities where he owns gas stations, but he cannot get a permit in Friendswood, being he
has been here as long as he has. Mr. Alvery said that the property in Friendswood is
older than any others he owns. In addition, he explained that City Staff has been great in
helping him but he sees that Staff has not been given the authority to make any decisions
to help people, and they are scared to tell him what he needs to do to get approval,
because they have no authority to approve it. He asked the Commission for help with the
city code requirements in order to complete his renovations or give City Staff authority to
help him.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Chairman Holland-to table until other Commissioners are present.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
7.Discussion regarding purposes and intent of Planned Unit Developments (PUD).
Page 3 of 4
12/15/05 P & Z
Conm1issioner Weesner stated that this item should be placed on the next meeting agenda
in order for other Commissioners to attend the meeting.
8.Communications from the Commission
Commissioner Weesner stated she attended the City Council meeting and the CEDC
meeting. She stated that CEDC is not as far along as Planning and Zoning may have
thought to make any decisions on land use for the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Brakebill stated at the Main Street meetings there have been a number of
issues that have been worked tlu·ough. He stated the Staff was working on providing a
summary of the meetings to the Commissioners.
Commissioner Gibson stated the sub-committee was still working on the Vision Plan.
Chairman Holland stated he would like to discuss in January the bridge that is referred to
as "Devils Bridge" that connects Imperial Estates to FM 23 51. He stated he has a report
from TX Dot that the footing of the bridge are not bad as the city states and he feels the
bridge should be opened up for use. Staff stated that the City Engineer had stated that the
bridge should be closed. Chairman Holland then stated, but the city has a new City
Engineer who could look at it again. Commissioner Gibson stated that Chairman Holland
should speak with the Mayor or City Manager first.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison was not present at the meeting.
b.Staff
Staff stated a Joint Public Hearing will be held January 9, 2006, for a zone change
regarding property on Old Road. Staff also stated a new Zoning Manual was provided to
the Conunission which includes the Tree Ordinance. Chairman Holland asked if it
included Heritage Trees. Staff stated it did not and that Heritage Trees would not be part
of the Tree Ordinance but would be included in the City Code.
10.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m.
a�w:lJll:k Cherj Skelton
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
12/15/05 P & Z
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
February 2, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
February 2, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand-7:03 p.m.
David Brakebill-7:07 p.m.
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
David Smith-Council Liaison
John Olson-City Attorney
Dan Johnson-Acting Director of C.D.
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Van Riper absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to
order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
No one from the public or conunittee liaison spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Minutes of the 1-5-06 Regular meeting minutes.
b.Minutes of the 1-9-06 Special meeting minutes.
c.Minutes of the 1-19-06 Special/Regular meeting minutes.
d.Approval of the Final Plat of Mary's Creek Village.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve consent agenda
Klusendorf
Commissioner Weesner requested Item "A" and "B" be removed from the consent
agenda.
Item "C" and "D" were then voted on.
Voted For: Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Weesner
Commissioner Bertrand arrived.
Item "A" was then discussed.
Page 1 of 5
2/2/06 P & Z
Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner stated there is a typing error to be corrected in these minutes.
The error is a misspelled word. The word should be "candid" not "candied".
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve with word correction.
Gibson
Be1irand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Weesner Motion Carried
Item "B" was then discussed.
Commissioner Weesner stated that Commissioner Bertrand attended the joint workshop
with City Council, but did not attend the public hearing. The minutes do not reflect that
he left.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Tabled Items:
Weesner-to approve with correction
Klusendorf
Bertrand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Weesner Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for Christian
Brothers Automotive located on FM 518, being Restrictive Reserve "A" of the Final
Re-plat of Park 518, Reserve "B".
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to remove from table.
Bertrand
Bertrand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Weesner Motion Carried
. Commissioner Brakebill arrived.
Commissioner Weesner stated the sidewalk appears to be located in the landscape buffer
within the property line. Staff confirmed the sidewalk is located on the property of the
owner; the reason is due to the open ditches and safety hazards along FM 518.
Commissioner Weesner requested Staff to provide information, in the future, if anything
is different than normal required standards. She request the information be placed within
the Staffs recommendation. Commissioner Bertrand asked how the vehicles, left over
from the day's work, would be stored overnight.
Larry Ayers, Construction Project Manager and representative for Christian Brother
Automotive addressed the Commission. Mr. Ayers stated it is Christian Brothers
Automotive policy and common practice to store any vehicles left overnight on
automobile racks or underneath the racks.
Motion for approval from the January 19, 2006 meeting.
Page 2 of 5
2/2/06 P & Z
l
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Regular Items:
5.Discussion and possible action regarding fencing regulations.
The Commission, Staff, and the City Attorney discussed this item extensively. However,
the Commission continued to ask the same question, "What was the reasoning behind the
cunent fencing regulation?" Commissioner Gibson stated he felt the recommendation
should be rejected and people should go to the Zoning Board of Adjustments (ZBOA) for
a decision. He feels there is too much on Planning and Zoning now and there should not
be any more items added. Discussion continued with Staff providing additional insight to
the City Ordinance and the City Attorney providing information on laws and rulings that
have taken place. When discussion ended, Staff was directed to explore why the fencing
ordinance was create.
6.Discussion and possible action regarding temporary buildings.
Staff explained a typo may have taken place when writing the ordinance and felt this typo
could be corrected by renumbering the section on exception so that it applied to both
commercial and outdoor sales.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve the correction of the typing enor by numbering the
section.
Bertrand
Commissioner Weesner asked why portable buildings and structures are being approved
by Staff. Staff explained because they are portable building (temporary buildings) and
can be moved, and the building is not permanent to a site.
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Discussion and possible action regarding non-conforming uses and structures.
The Commission and Staff discussed gas stations in Friendswood as identified prope11ies
which have trouble with non-conformance issues or structures. Commissioner Bertrand
spoke adamantly about the concept to keep businesses existing and viable in Friendswood
until the business can get to the standards the city requires. He feels the City has
forgotten the way the properties look today and not as the City believes those businesses
should look. He also feels strongly the Planning and Zoning Commission should discuss
how to get all businesses going in the same direction as the City. The Conunission
provided Staff with suggests such as:
1.Allowing a non-conforming structure to be enhanced or improved while it is
still doing business.
2.Separate non-conforming uses from non-conforming structures.
Page 3 of 5
2/2/06 P & Z
Staff was asked by the Conm1ission to prepare draft ordinance language for their review.
8.Discussion and possible action regarding the Site Plan requirement for gas stations and
auto repair facilities within the Entryway Overlay District (EOD) and Downtown
Overlay District (DOD).
Staff explained the goal is to provide exceptions for gas stations only. Commissioner
Weesner explained as she understood the EOD/DOD is was established to provide
pleasing esthetics to properties. She explained she reviewed the EOD/DOD requirements
and made a draft version with some possible changes to consider. She stated her changes
were to such items as landscape buffers. Commissionei' Bertrand stated the entire reason
the majority of items are in the EOD/DOD is because Friendswood is considered a
special conununity. Commissioner Weesner requested the Commission be allowed
additional time to review the EOD/DOD. She requested the item be placed on the next
Planning and Zoning agenda. Commissioner Gibson felt a workshop should take place
before the next Planning and Zoning meeting.
9.Discussion and possible action regarding a modification to the sidewalk statement
adopted by Planning and Zoning on March 18, 2004.
Chairman Holland stated at the last Planning and Zoning meeting he was in disagreement
with the time frame associated with the construction of the sidewalks. However, since
that meeting he now feels it meets all the needs to get sidewalks installed in the city.
Conm1issioner Bertrand commended Cheri Skelton for her persuasive argument with
regards to the need for the revised statement. He explained he still feels some language
in the sidewalk statement should be revised, but understands Staff needs the help
enforcing the requirement. He also stated that Staff has requested the revision to the
sidewalk statement and the revision is strongly supported by Staff. Commissioner
Weesner requested a sidewalk statement also be considered for open ditches within
conunercial and residential zones.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to adopt the revised sidewalk statement provided by Staff.
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
10.Discussion and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Plan Vision and future
Land Use Plan.
Conunissioner Gibson stated the draft provided to the other Conunissioners is going to
move forward unless someone finds any reason it should not. Conunissioner Klusendorf
stated the vision the sub-conunittee created represents a comprehensive look at
Friendswood. Commissioner Weesner stated she and the other members of the sub
committee (Gibson & Klusendorf) did not all agree about every little thing in the
document, they did, however, agree on the overall document. She referred to the draft as
a compromised document, but also a consensus document. Conunissioner Gibson stated
the next step is to proceed with this document to the Community Economics
Page 4 of 5
2/2/06 P & Z
I I
Development Committee (CEDC). Commissioner Bertrand stated the draft document appears to be very thorough.
11.Communications from the Commission
City Attorney Jolm Olson spoke briefly to the Commission about the open meetings act.He explained that under "Conmrnnications from the Commission" it is not appropriate todiscuss political issues or opinions. He explained more and more the government isreviewing violations to the open meetings act.
Chairman Holland stated he attended the Galveston County Consolidated DrainageDistrict meeting (GCCDD), Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBOA). CommissionerWeesner stated that during the January 5, 2006, Planning and Zoning meeting Staff wasasked to provide information regarding attendance by conference call and to provide theslides from the financial plan for the city.
12.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith provided no report at this time.
b.Staff
Staff provided a Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting repo1t to the Commission for the month of January. Staff also stated the Heritage Tree Ordinance and the Tree Preservation Ordinance Super-Sub Committee (TPOSSCC) final report had been forward to City Council.
13.Adjournment.
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 9: 17 p.m.
(!J:ivu,. 1Jlillrn0 Cheri/Skelton Develbpment Coordinator
Page 5 of 5 2/2/06 P & Z
f
l
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
February 9, 2006
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday, February
09, 2006 at 6:30 p.m., in the second floor conference room of City Hall, located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill 6:45 p.m. Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Jim Gibson
Roy Klusendorf
Sheny Weesner
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland, Commissioner Be11rand, and Commissioner Van Riper
absent, Vice -Chairman Gibson called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order.
2.Discussion regarding possible rev1s10ns to the Entryway Overlay District (EOD) and
Downtown Overlay District (DOD).
Commissioner Weesner presented a draft document which was a consolidation of the EOD and
DOD. This overlay district called the City Appearance District included· existing language of
the EOD and DOD with some changes. It was noted by staff that the EOD and DOD districts
had undergone several revisions in the last few years, which essentially created identical
requirements in both. The differences were in the locations of the overlays. The Commission
discussed the intent of the overlay districts. The consensus was that they provide for the visual
improvement of the major thoroughfares within the city by requiring landscaping and screening
as well as architectural specifications. The Commission agreed that these requirements were
the focus and the underlying zones should address those issues regarding setbacks and
exceptions based on use. The requirement for a 30-foot front setback was removed to allow
the underlying zoning setbacks to take precedence. The 10-foot landscape buffer requirement
along right of ways was restated in the overlay district text, even though it is a standard
landscaping requirement in the Zoning Ordinance. The Commission felt some redundancy was
appropriate.
Commissioner Gibson did ask that the proposed thoroughfares be looked at separately. He was
concerned about the addition of the proposed extension of Blackhawk north of FM 2351 being
included in the overlay district.
3.Adjourn.
With no further comment the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
, � . ll ecl{;_�/_J_� . -T �Diana Steelquist
Page I of I
Planner
219106 P & Z
\
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
January 5, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Thursday, January 5, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at
910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
David Smith-Council Liaison
Loren Smith-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Brakebill, and Commissioner Van Riper absent,
Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communications from the public
No one from the public spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 12-1-05 Special/Regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 12-15-05 Regular meeting minutes.
Commissioner Weesner requested Item "B" be removed from the consent agenda
for discussion.
The vote for Item "A" of the consent agenda was then taken.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-approve Item "A" of the consent agenda.
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion Carried
Weesner-approve Item "B" of the consent agenda.
Klusendorf
Commissioner Weesner stated on Item "B", page 4, item 8, the second sentence
should read:
She stated that CEDC is not as far along as Planning and Zoning may have
thought to make any decisions on land use for the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 1 of 4
1/5/06 P & Z
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
TABLED ITEMS
4.Discussion and possible action regarding the site plan requirement for gas stations
and auto repair facilities with the Entryway Overlay District (EOD) and
Downtown Overlay District (DOD).
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-remove from the table.
Gibson
Voted For: Bertrand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf
Voted Against: Weesner Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand stated he understood the EOD/DOD ordinance language
to state bays are not to be visible from the EOD/DOD. Staff clarified the
ordinance only states bays cannot face the EOD/DOD, not that they could not be
seen. Commissioner Bertrand stated he thought the bays were not to be seen from
front or sides; only from the back.
Commissioner Gibson asked if this item could be postponed until the workshop is
held. Commissioner Weesner asked why a 5-foot Landscape Buffer is proposed
for gas stations and does the Landscape Buffer still work at 5-feet? Staff stated
the 5-foot Landscape Buffer would work and the Landscape Buffer starts at the
property line and moves into the property, so it would not be in the City right-of
way. Commissioner Weesner then asked if the 5-foot Landscape Buffer is
acceptable to use for gas stations, why not use the 5-foot Landscape Buffer for all
lots.
Conm1ission Bertrand stated when the EOD/DOD was established the intent was
to have a pleasing ingress/egress within the city and it did not matter the use.
Commissioner Bertrand also stated he felt it was inappropriate to only discuss gas
stations and not look at other uses. In addition, this does not take into account all
th� other overlay districts that might apply. Commissioner Weesner stated the
real issue that needs to be addressed is not just Landscape Buffers but all non
conforming issues. Commissioner Bertrand stated for conforming uses a property
should be allowed to redevelop as long as it does not go over 50 percent of the
current value. However, non-conforming uses if they want to expand would need
to be handled differently. Commissioner Gibson stated he liked the idea. Staff
then stated Main Street is seeking a way to allow businesses to redevelop rather
than looking at special exceptions. Commissioner Weesner stated another issue
that needs to be discussed is a requirement for shrubs in the Landscape Buffer, no
matter if parking is facing the EOD.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-table
Gibson
Unanimous
Page 2 of 4
1/5/06 P & Z
Motion to Table Carried
I
5.Discussion regarding purposes and intent of Planned Unit Developments (PUD).Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-pull from table for discussion
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Staff presented a presentation that defined and provided requirements for the tlu·ee
types of Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Friendswood. Staff also explained
PUDs are freestanding zoning districts and not overlay districts. The tlu·ee types
of PUDs in Friendswood are the General PUD, PUD Mixed Use, and PUD
Cluster Home. REGULAR MEETING 6.Discussion and possible action regarding a modification to the sidewalk
statement adopted by Planning and Zoning on March 18, 2004.
Staff gave a brief history of the creation of the sidewalk statement and presented a
draft of a new sidewalk statement to the Commission. Chairman Holland
expressed concerns with the timing for the sidewalks to be required.
Commissioner Bertrand also expressed concerns with regards to sidewalks being
required when they are not on tracks adjacent to residential propeity.
Commissioner Bertrand asked Staff for a construction update on FM 2351. He
also asked since TxDot is closing the ditches is the street going to become curb
and gutter with sidewalks, because is what is being implied. Staff stated they
would inquire about the project and provide that information.
7.Conununications from the Commission
Chairman Holland request to see the Long Range Planning Power Point
presentation City Council had viewed. He also stated he has been told, opening
up the bridge on FM 2351 would not benefit east/west traffic flow.
Commissioner Bertrand asked if Staff could ask City Council about being more
flexible with meeting times because it can effect ones job. He also stated at times,
for workshops, he might not be able to be at the workshop but he could do a
conference call. City Attorney Smith stated he believes attendance by conference
call.is allowed in the open meetings act, but he will verify. Council Liaison Smith
stated he would take this information to Mayor and the City Manager to discuss
the way meetings are handled and to make sure next time Planning and Zoning is
considered when scheduling a meeting.
8.Reports.
Page 3 of 4
1/5/06 P & Z
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Smith stated the Long Range project is a work in process. It is
not a draft and is still evolving and is not to be seen a permanent. Council Liaison
Smith stated he hoped the Commission would be as candied as it has been this
meeting at the workshop with City Council on Monday.
b.Staff
Staff stated a Development Review Committee Report has been provided to the
Commission.
9.Adjournment.
With no further comment the meeting was adjourned at 9: 10 p.m.
\. -I I.,..__,, vt..,, .,.<, ..YU .K.AJ ()le_)
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
1/5/06 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
January 9, 2006
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held
Monday, January 9, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendor
Mark Van Riper-7:00 p.m.
Sherry Weesner
Dan Johnson-Acting Director of CD
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
Rhonda Baker-Administrative Secretary of CD
With a quorum present, Commissioner Brakebill and Commissioner Gibson absent,
Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to consider the following.
4:30 P.M. JOINT WORK SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL
A.Discussion with the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding the following
items:
1.Amending the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate gasoline stations.
Commissioner Bertrand explained the situation and history on Entryway Overlay
Districts (EOD). The City needs to develop a process and make changes. Immediate fix
would be the 50% solution and the long range would be to go through the process of
changing the ordinance. P&Z Commissioner Sherry Weesner stated she has an issue with
pulling out this pmticular gas station for consideration and asked since it is part of a
shopping center, would it make the shopping center exempt too? Interim Director of
Community Development Dan Johnson stated gas station exceptions allow unattached
canopies to extend into required yards (front, side and rear set backs reduced), reduce
landscape buffer requirement to 5 feet, corner lots only garage bays, verbiage from
Ordinance 2005-35 addresses corner lot-overlap. Commissioner Bertrand stated he is
concerned if the City makes an exception for this gas station owner, then everyone else
will start wanting an exception. The City needs to work on the problem for everyone.
2.Considering issues related to the Entryway Overlay Districts.
This item was discussed indirectly among Staff, the Commission, and City Council
during comments for Item# 1. Planning and Zoning was asked to address this and
provide a recommendation to City Council.
3.Developing regulations related to master planned developments.
Chairman Holland stated the Commission did not see the need for a Master Plan and
Page l of 3
1-9-06 P & Z
asked why the City needed a Master Plan. The Conunissions position has been that a
Planned Unit Development (PUD)/Specific Use Permit (SUP) approach would
sufficiently handle any master plan approach. Interim Director of Community
Development Dan Johnson stated the Master Plan concept is great but Staff must work
out the working details.
4.Use of temporary buildings by churches
Staff explained to the Commission and City Council the current ordinance states portable
buildings should only be used for storage. City Council felt allowing a church the use of
portable buildings is acceptable. Commissioner Bertrand gave a little history as to why
they were prohibited in the first place.
5.Relaxing requirements for front yard fencing
Interim Director of Community Development Dan Johnson stated the question from a
Councilmembers was whether it should be 1 acre or 2 acres. There should be some
minimum. There is a lot that is 1 ½ acres on Cowards Creek and he wants to put a fence
up. Mayor Brizendine stated he does not understand why acreage is the issue and not
frontage. Councilmember Goza stated this should be covered by deed restrictions. City
Manager Ron Cox stated some subdivision's deed restrictions have expired.
Councilmember Smith stated if the City allows it on smaller lots there are some older lots
that are larger such as on Sunset that would allow a fence in the front and not just to the
building line. City Manager Ron Cox stated Plaiming and Zoning needs to workshop this
item.
Commissioner Bertrand left and did not attend the public hearing.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Zone Classification change for a tract of land containing 1.000 acre, a portion of
Lot 52 of the Sloan Subdivision, situated in the Jolm Dickinson League, property
located at 2302 Old Road, Galveston County, Texas, from Agricultural District (A
l) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
Trey Weaver, 550 Greens Parkway, representing Friendswood Development, addressed
the Conm1ission and City Council. Mr. Weaver provided reasons the rezoning request
should be approved.
No one spoke against the item.
The following is a synopsis of people who spoke in favor of the item.
Don Seyfert, 2304 Old Road, stated he owns the property along side and to the rear of the
property proposed for rezoning. Mr. Seyfert stated he supports the rezoning request but
Page 2 of 3
1-9-06 P & Z
I
questions how the development is going to provide a required common access. He stated
that he is willing to give additional Right-of-Way, but he did not want to have cross
traffic going across his driveway of his home.
Larry Telger, stated he was neither for or against the rezoning but had questions.
Leo Campos, stated he was neither for or against the rezoning but had questions.
Mayor Brizendine referred any questions to City Staff once the public hearing is closed.
2.Adjournment
With no further comments the Joint Public Hearing was closed at 7: 17 p.m.
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
1-9-06 P & Z
.
Minutes of a Special/Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
January 19, 2006
A special/regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was
held Thursday, January 19, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall
located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were
present:
Bob Bertrand-7:08 p.m.
David Brakebill
Jim Gibson
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
John Olson-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Chai1man Holland and Commissioner Van Riper absent, Vice
Chairman Gibson called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
7:00 PM-PUBLIC HEARING
1.Call to order
2.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding:
a.The Re-plat of 3.1940 acres in the Sarah Mckissick League Abstract No.
151, being a Re-plat of Park 518, Reserve "B",(Vol. 18, Pg. 68; G.C.M.R.)
City Of Friendswood, Galveston County, Texas, located between
Wal greens at 104 E. Parkwood and For Children Only at 1415 S.
Friendswood Drive .
No one spoke for or against the item.
REGULAR SESSION
3.Communication from the public/cornmittee liaisons.
No one from the public or any committee spoke at this time
4.Consideration and possible action regarding a Zone Classification change for a
tract of land containing 1.000 acre, a portion of Lot 52 of the Sloan Subdivision,
situated in the John Dickinson League, prope1ty located at 2302 Old Road,
Galveston County, Texas, from Agricultural District (A-1) to Neighborhood
Commercial (NC).
Motion: Brakebill-to approve
Page 1 of 3
1/19/06 P & Z
Second: Weesner
Commissioner Klusendorf stated at the Joint Public Hearing there was discussion
about the common access being required by the city. City Attorney Olson stated
common access is a platting issue and must be addressed or it could keep the
property from being platted. The common access requirement should be
addressed at the time development occurs and a plat and Commercial Site Plan
are submitted.
Voted For: Unanimous (Brakebill, Gibson, Klusendorf, Weesner)
Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand arrived 7:08 p.m. during the vote of this property.
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Re-plat of Park 518,
Reserve "B".
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Brakebill-to approve
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for
Christian Brothers Automotive located on FM 518, being Restrictive Reserve
"A" of the Final Re-plat of Park 518, Reserve "B".
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve with Staff comments
Brakebill
Commissioner Weesner stated she felt the amount of Staff comments was
significant and she did not feel comfortable approving the item without all the
comments being addressed.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-motion to table
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for
Lary's Florist located at 315 S. Friendswood Drive.
Motion:
Second:
Brakebill-to approve
Bertrand
Conunissioner Weesner stated she did not feel comfortable with approving this
item because the Site Plan was just provided to the Commission. She also asked
what zoning district was the property in and if it meets all requirements.
Page 2 of 3
1/19/06 P & Z
I
I
Staff stated accessory structures are not permitted in commercial districts;
however, the building official has stated it is to close to the existing structure and
it meets the requirements for an addition. Staff defined accessory structure for the
Commission. Indicating this building is not an accessory structure because it is
two feet away from the building, not five feet, as an accessory structure is
required. Commissioner Weesner stated she did not feel comfortable about this,
and the building has already been built. In addition, the Site Plan provided should
show the buildings connected to make it look like one building and not two.
Commissioner Bertrand stated he is concerned about the language in the
ordinance defining what is a structure and what is an accessory structure. He
feels the interpretation issue must be fixed.
Voted For: Be11rand, Brakebill, Gibson, Klusendorf
Voted Against: Weesner
8.Communications from the Commission
Motion Carried
Vice-Chairman Gibson stated the Sub-Committee continues to work on the land
use. It was then stated the next Main Street meeting would be January 23, 2006.
Commissioner Weesner stated she did attend the City Council meeting as a citizen
and there is a workshop planned with Millennium on January 23, 2006, and a
workshop to discuss City Council's five-year plan is scheduled for January 30,
2006.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison was not present at the meeting.
b.Staff
Staff asked the Commission if clarifying accessory structures could be made one
of the Commissions 2006 goals.
10.Adjournment.
With no further action the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Devefopment Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
1/19/06 P & Z
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
February 16, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
February 16, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
John Olson-City Attorney Bob Bertrand-7: 15 p.m.
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Dan Johnson-Acting Director of C.D.
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Sherry Weesner Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Brakebill, Commissioner Klusendorf, and Commissioner
Van Riper absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
No one from the public spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Minutes of the 2-2-06 Regular meeting.
b.Minutes of the 2-9-06 Special meeting.
c.Approval of the Final Plat of One Edgewood Place
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve consent agenda
Gibson
Unanimous
Order of agenda was changed.
Motion Carried
4.Discussion and possible action regarding revisions to the Entryway Overlay District
(EOD) and Downtown Overlay District (DOD).
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to approve
Gibson
Commissioner Weesner stated the new district should be named. After a few suggestions
by the Commission, the Commission decided the new district would be called the
Community Overlay District (COD). The decision made regarding the COD would
combine the EOD and the DOD, in order to create one overlay district. Commissioner
Weesner stated reduction to the setback requirements should be considered (i.e. front and
Page 1 of 5
2/16/06 P & Z
side). Commissioner Bertrand stated he preferred consistency with setbacks.
Commissioner Bertrand expressed there should be no restrictions placed on having
garage doors within an Industrial District. Commissioner Gibson stated garage bays
should be screened and if they are not then they cannot face the street. Commissioner
Weesner stated in Section 3, screening should be added.
The City Attorney stated to the Commission items within a discussion can be separated
and voted on separately.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner: garage bays shall be screened or not face the street.
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand stated the north end of Blackhawk shown on the Major
Thoroughfare Plan (MTP) should be removed, and for the record the current residential
portion of Blackhaw}s: (between FM 2351 and FM 528) should not be part of the MTP or
overlay district. Staff explained the current residential portion of Blackhawk is not part
of the MTP; also Blackhawk will be on the MTP but not in the overlay district.
Amended
-Motion:
Second:
Gibson-remove northside of Blackhawk (FM 2351) and do not include the
residential portion of Blackhawk within the overlay.
Bertrand
Commissioner Weesner felt the northside of Blackhawk should stay in the MTP since it
is a four-lane highway. The Commission also stated, the developer would build the
southside of Blackhawk when one comes forward to develop the area.
Voted For: Bertrand, Gibson, Holland
Voted Against: Weesner Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for One
Edgewood Place located at the intersection of FM 2351 and Woodland Trails, being
Restrictive Reserve "B" of the Final Plat of One Edgewood Place.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve with Staff comments
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Stone Creek
Section One located in the West Ranch development off of FM 518.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-approve with Staff comments
Gibson
Unanimous
Page 2 of 5
2/16/06 P & Z
Motion Carried
11
Chairman Holland and Commissioner Weesner stated the Preliminary Plats did not
indicate the Planning and Zoning's most recent approved sidewalk statement. Staff
explained the Commission had already approved the sidewalk statements for the project.
Commissioner Weesner asked Staff to clarify the recommendation with regards to the
pipeline comment. Staff stated that the title report indicated possibly additional pipelines,
but the location is still in question. Commissioner Weesner stated research should be
done to satisfy there are no pipelines and should be noted for the Final Plat.
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to use the Planning and Zoning's most recently approved
sidewalk statement and with Staff comments.
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of West Ranch
Estates Section One located in the West Ranch development off of FM 518.
Motion:
Second:
Bertrand-to approve with Staff comments using the newly adopted
sidewalk statement.
Weesner
Chairman Holland-asked about the 50-foot right-of-way on the Preliminary Plat. City
Attorney Olson stated a second access point is required because the block length is over
the allowed distance and there are more lots in this section than allowed without
providing a second access point. Commissioner Bertrand clarified that Reserve "D"
currently shown on the Plat would not be a Reserve, but would be a right-of-way. City
Attorney Olson stated some stage in the future the tie in might be required.
Commissioner Be1trand clarified with Staff that the right-of-way would require
sidewalks. Staff stated the right-of-way would require sidewalks along the property that
would become a street. The sidewalks would be placed by the developer along the
property where they would be required if a street were being developed to tie into Rancho
Viejo.
Trey Weaver, representative of Friendswood Development stated that the company is not
in favor of the tie-in into Rancho Viejo.
Voted For:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Unanimous Motion Carried
Be1trand-to approve with Staff comments, approved newly adopted P & Z
sidewalk statement, the strip of land between Block 2, Lot 16 and Block 3,
Lot 1, will have sidewalks placed across the right-of-way in order to
connect the sidewalk, and will remain connected until at a later day the
roadway is constructed.
Weesner
Page 3 of 5
2/16/06 P & Z
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
8. Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Restricted
Reserves A & B located in the West Ranch development off of FM 518.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-approve with Staff comments and P & Z approved sidewalk
statement.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
9.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Creekside Section
One located in the West Ranch development off of FM 518.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-approve with Staff comments and P & Z approved sidewalk
statement.
Bertrand
Unanimous Motion Carried
10.Discussion and presentation by the City Attorney regarding Open Meeting Basics.
City Attorney Olson discussed open meeting requirements and cautioned the Commission
from having any communications outside of a public meeting. He added that new state
laws would shortly require all new Councils, Boards and Commissions to undergo formal
training on Open Meetings. It would be offered after the May election.
11.Discussion and presentation by the City Attorney regarding election ethics for
Commissioners.
City Attorney Olson provided a handout on the City Code of Ethics that outlined City and
State laws, City Charter provisions and general standards of conduct. He stated that
should any Conunissioner wish to endorse a political party or candidate, he or she must
do so as an individual, and not represent himself or herself, as a Commissioner.
12.Discussion and possible action regarding modifications to the Original Business
District.
Although the Staff had prepared a draft document to discuss possible changes to the
Original Business District (OBD), which would allow special exceptions to setbacks,
height, lot coverage and landscaping, the Commission felt the Main Street Zoning
committee was working in a timely maimer to address re-development in the downtown
area and should be allowed to continue their work.
13.Discussion and possible action regarding non-conforming uses and structures.
Page 4 of 5
2/16/06 P & Z
Staff clarified the issues to be researched. The City Attorney asked that Staff review with
him any proposal to change how these things are defined and under what circumstances
they should be allowed to re-develop. Staff will bring this item back to the Commission
for more discussion at a future meeting.
14.Discussion and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Plan Vision and future
Land Use Plan.
Commissioner Gibson asked if there were any additional comments on the draft
document on the Comprehensive Land Plan and Vision. Without any comments, they
would continue to move forward with their work and were asking for a joint meeting with
Community Economic Development Committee (CEDC).
15.Communications from the Commission
There was no communication from the Commission at this time.
16.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
No report given at this time.
b.Staff
There was no Staff repo1t provided at this time.
17.Adjournment.
With no fmther comment the meeting was adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
Page 5 of 5
2/16/06 P & Z
[ I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
April 6, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
April 6, 2006, at 7 :00 p.m. in the public safety building located at 109 E. Willowick,
Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Alison Holland-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Jim Gibson 7:05 pm
Kevin Holland
Rhonda Baker -Administrative Secretmy
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Mark Van Riper 7:06·pm
With a quorum present, Chairman Holland called the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
No one spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Minutes of the 2-16-06 Regular meeting.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve consent agenda
Klusendorf
Unanimous
Commissioners Gibson and Van Riper arrived at this time.
Motion Carried
4.Discussion and possible action regarding the Heritage Tree Ordinance.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to recommend approval of the draft ordinance to City Council
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
The Commission unanimously approved the draft ordinance as provided by the Tree
Preservation Super Sub-Committee. Staff clarified that the Conunission wanted to
recommend Council move forward with a Joint Public Hearing as soon as possible.
Page 1 of 4
4/06/06 P & Z
5.Discussion and possible action regarding non-conforming uses and structures.
Staff presented a draft document which simplified the definitions and application of the
non-conforming regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. It also provided for the re
development of a non-conforming structure by up to 50%. The City Attorney provided
two examples of other cities non-conforming use and structure regulations, which the
Commission would like to review in more detail. There was also discussion regarding
whether the Community was in agreement with allowing re-development of non
conforming uses/structures. The Commission believes a workshop with Council should
be scheduled to discuss this issue.
6.Discussion and possible action regarding modifications to the Original Business
District.
Staff presented some proposed changes to the Original Business District (OBD); the
proposal was not discussed in detail as the Main Street group was also working on similar
revisions. Staff noted however, that the OBD changes included recommendations to the
Permitted Use Table which should also be considered when reviewing the
reconunendations for Main Street Zoning. These included the permitting of residential
uses. Chairman Holland asked that Staffs OBD changes be given to the Main Street
Zoning Committee for their review.
7.Discussion regarding progress of Main Street Zoning Committee.
Staff reported that the Main Street Zoning Committee had completed the majority of its
task and had prepared a list of recommended zoning changes for Main Street. These
recommendations, such as zero set backs and additional height limits, have been given to
the City Attorney for review and preparation into a draft ordinance. The Main Street
Zoning Committee will meet with the City Attorney to review the document before
presenting it to P&Z or Council.
8.Discussion and possible action regarding revISions to the sign ordinance for the
placement of monument signs in pedestrian areas and requirements for the time limits on
temporary political signs.
The Commission reviewed the regulations on temporary political signs and the placement
of monument signs in pedestrian areas. The City Attorney recommended no changes be
made to the language on political signs, although Staff had wanted to add a time limit to
when signs could first be posted. The Commission believes the issue regarding the
placement of monument signs in pedestrian areas should be visited when more
information is available regarding Main Street Zoning.
Page 2 of 4
4/06/06 P & Z
I I 9.Discussion and possible action regarding staff recommendations on minimum width for
access easements.
This item was on the 2005 to do list for the Commission. There was some discussion as
to what the item was referencing and it was determined that it involved the access to
drainage areas. Particularly in situations were a wet pond was involved. The
Commission asked Staff to review with the Fire Marshal what kind of area was required
for emergency rescues and bring back some recommendations which could be included in
the Design Criteria Manual.
10.Discussion with City Attorney regarding Election Ethics, Open Meetings and new state
laws governing vesting of development projects.
The City Attorney provided copies Ordinance 2006-02 and outlined its prov1s10ns
regarding the Conunissioners obligations to not endorse political candidates as
Commissioners, but rather as private citizens. She also cautioned the use of email and
gave examples of when it was not appropriate to communicate using this medium. For
the vesting discussion, a copy of recent state law changes was provided. Staff has
recommended that the Subdivision Ordinance be modified to not require a Development
Review Committee meeting, rather to make it a highly recommended suggestion and not
when vesting would occur. Staff will prepare· some draft lartguage for the Subdivision
Ordinance and present it at an upcoming meeting. 1 ,; , .. • • '
11.Communications from the Commission.
a.Notes from Commissioner Weesner on 3-6-06 City Council meeting.
b.Update on Comprehensive Plan
Commissioner Weesner reported on attending the last tlu-ee City Council meetings. Her
notes where provided in the electronic agenda packet. She also repo11ed on the status of
the Comprehensive Plan. The subconm1ittee will be requesting more information from
Staff.
Commissioner Brakebill repo11ed his attendance at the Main Street Zoning Subcommittee
meeting.
12.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
The Council Liaison was not present.
b.Staff -February and March DRC reports; upcoming Joint Public Hearing
schedule; Report on 3-28-06 Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting; Repo11 on
Texas APA-HGAC Training.
Page 3 of 4
4/06/06 P & Z
Staff Planner noted that the February and March DRC reports had been included in the
electronic agenda packets. She also noted that there would be three items on the
upcoming April 17th Joint Public Hearing, two rezoning requests and an amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance. On 3-28-06 Zoning Board of Adjustment denied a request to
change the front set backs on two lots in the Briar Bend Subdivision. The Staff planner
also reported on her attendance at the Texas AP A Commissioner training offered at
HGAC in March. As this training was poorly attended by Commissioners, she asked if it
might be better attended if held on a weekend. Most Commissioners agreed that the day
of the week mattered and also suggested a Web-based seminar.
13.Adjournment.
With not further comment, the meeting was adjourned at 8: 33 pm.
Page 4 of 4
4/06/06 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
April 17, 2006
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Monday,
April 17, 2006 at 7 :00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
David Brakebill
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
John Olson-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Planner
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Weesner absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to
order to consider the following.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Zone Classification change for property located off Moore Road, being a
3.283 acre tract out of Lot 58 of Section 22 of the l&GNRR Company
Survey, Abstract Number 616, City of Friendswood, Galveston County,
Texas, From: Ordinance No. 81-8 SUP-oil well To: Single Family
Residential (SFR)
Janis Lowe, represented the applicant and provided historical insight regarding the drill
site. She spoke in favor of the zone change.
No one spoke against this item.
B. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, being Appendix C of the City Code
regarding exemptions to Section 8, M -Commercial Activities and
Outdoor Sales for temporary structures.
Staff stated the i·eason for the amendment of this item was to provide a clearer
interpretation of the ordinance.
No one spoke for or against this item.
C.Zone classification change for 2.398 acres out of Lot 5, Block 11,
Friendswood Subdivision, Sarah McKissick League, Abstract No. 151,
City of Friendswood, Galveston County, Texas From: Single Family
Page 1 of2
4/17/06 P & Z
Residential (SFR), To: Planned Unit Development (PUD)-Specific Use
Permit (SUP)-Residential.
The following is a synopsis of people who spoke in favor of the item.
Lisa Walker, 421 Forest Pines Court addressed City Council and the Planning and Zoning
Commission. She stated the request for rezoning is based on suggestions previously
made by Planning & Zoning. This rezoning will allow her to build single-family-resident
and keep the many trees that exist on and near the property.
Jeff Payson, 1013 Quaker Bend Drive stated he was glad the city was providing ideas for
people to be able to use their land.
The following is a synopsis of people who spoke against the item.
Rachel Suarez, 1210 Quaker Bend Drive stated she is not really opposed but has
questions about items such as drainage and the location of the structure.
Kent Harris, 110 Whispering Pines stated he was not really opposed either but he also
had drainage concerns.
Danny Holt, 1010 Quaker Bend Drive stated he is concerned with trees being torn down
in order to construct a pond on the property. Also, he is concerned with Single-Family
Resident (SFR) zoning classification being under a Planned Unit Development (PUD).
He stated the new ordinances do not allow certain things and he felt this item should have
been taken to the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBOA) not to Planning and Zoning.
2.Adjournment
With no fm1her comment the meeting adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
Page 2 of 2
4/17/06 P & Z
I i
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
April 20, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
April 20, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Allison Holland-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Staff Plam1er
Cheri Skelton-Development Coordinator
With a quorum present, Commissioner Brakebill absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to
order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
No one from the public or committee liaison spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Minutes of the 4-06-06 Regular meeting.
Motion:
Second:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to approve
Holland
Weesner-to table
Klusendorf
Unanimous Motion to Table Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding zone classification change for property
located off Moore Road, being a 3 .283 acre tract out of Lot 57 and Lot 58 of the Section
22 of the I&GNRR Company Survey, Abstract Number 616, City of Friendswood,
Galveston County, Texas, From: Ordinance No. 81-8 SUP-oil well To: Single Family
Residential (SFR).
Motion:
Second:
Gibson-to approve
Klusendorf
Page 1 of 4
4/20/06 P & Z
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Ji1mny Thompson with Claunch & Miller, representing the applicant, addressed the
Commission. Mr. Thompson stated the well (located between Lots 8 & 9 of the proposed
development of Sterling Ridge Estates) has been abandoned and plugged. He stated
documentation has been provided to Staff indicating the Rail Road Commission
acceptance of the abandonment. In addition soil samples have been taken and were ok.
Chairman Holland expressed concerns regarding construction of a structure on a capped
well and requested the well be located on the plat. Commissioner Van Riper stated he
knew the extent soil samples were taken when capping a well. He stated he felt
comfortable with the request.
5.Consideration and possible action regarding zone classification change for 2.398 acres
out of Lot 5-1 and 5-2, Block 11, Friendswood Subdivision, Sarah McKissick League,
Abstract No. 151, City of Friendswood, Galveston County, Texas From: S_ingle Family
Residential (SFR), To: Planned Unit Development (PUD)-Specific Use Permit (SUP)
Residential. Property located at the end of Quaker Bend Drive.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to approve
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion Carried
Conm1issioner Gibson provided the Commission the conm1ents made at the public
hearing. He stated while no one was really opposed, the concerns seemed to be drainage
and emergency access. One comment was also if there was a better way of doing this
other than a PUD/ SUP.
City Attorney Holland stated this PUD/ SUP should be taken into serious consideration
by Planning and Zoning.
Lisa Walker, 421 Forest Pines Court addressed the Commission. Mrs. Walker stated the
drainage is being recalculated since a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) has been
approved by FEM.A. Mrs. Walker also asked the Commission to consider since a PUD/
SUP requires the development to be built as approved; does she need to take into account
if she ever wants a pool on the prope11y?
Staff stated the PUD/ SUP ordinance should be written so as to only allow one home on
each lot. Commissioner Bertrand stated he would vote in favor of the zone change, but
did not know if the PUD/ SUP would require a new approval if the site changed from
what is approved. City Attorney Holland stated the PUD/ SUP could be approved to
allow accessory structures in the future by labeling the area around the home as reserved
for a pool or other accessmy structures normally used in SFR's.
Amended
Motion: Weesner-to approve allowing only one home on each lot and 20-foot
building setback from the edge of the current ingress/egress.
Page 2 of 4
4/20/06 P & Z
Second: Klusendorf
Voted For: None
Voted Against:Bertrand, Gibson, Holland, Klusendorf, Van Riper, Weesner
Motion Failed
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve the request contingent the applicant providing a Site
Plan that is corrected with the additional setback, including a reserve area
and limiting each lot to only one residential structure.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding amendment to the Zoning Ordinance,
being Appendix C of the City Code regarding exemptions to Section 8, M -Commercial
Activities and Outdoor Sales for temporary structures.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Bertrand-to approve
Van Riper
Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Sterling Ridge
Estates located at the corner of Mandale Road and Moore Road.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-approve with Staff comments
Bertrand
Unanimous
.. '
Motion Carried
Mr. Jimmy Thompson, engineer, addressed the Commission. Mr. Thompson presented
an exhibit of the preliminary plat which indicated the location of the plugged oil well
between lots 8 and 9.
8.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Weesner reported on her attendance at the Drainage District and City
Council meetings. She also suggested the Commission review the recently completed
Comprehensive Plan from the City of Angleton. Chairman Holland reported his
attendance at the City of Pearland's Platting procedures meeting. Commissioner Van
Riper stated he had visited with Todd Yeager, City IT Supervisor, regarding the ftp site
and discussed with him some options for a more centralized web portal using Microsoft
Outlook. Commissioner Bertrand added that he could assist the city with this process via
a demonstration of Microsoft Sharepoint.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Page 3 of 4
4/20/06 P & Z
No one was available to report at this time.
b.Staff -Liaison Schedule
Staff stated the Council Liaison schedule was provided to the Commission as requested at
the last meeting. Staff also reported on progress on issues identified at the last meeting.
Staff is also reviewing the SUP and Commercial site plan submittal process in an attempt
to streamline and remove areas of redundancy. A copy of the memo prepared by City
Attorney Alison Holland will also be distributed on Monday regarding election ethics.
The GIS work has been outsourced and staff hopes to have new maps and data available
soon. Lastly, staff reported that the Development Coordinator, Cheri Skelton, will be
leaving employment with the City of Friendswood to start her own development
assistance business.
10.Adjournment
With no further comment, the meeting was adjourned at 8:04 pm.
Page 4 of 4
4/20/06 P & Z
I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
May 18, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
May 18, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Dan Johnson -Director of Community Development
John Olson-City Attorney
With a quorum present, Commissioners Brakebill and Bertrand absent, Chairman Holland called
the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
a.Don Seyfert to address Commission regarding vacating of Slone Subdivision
b.Janis Lowe to address Conm1ission regarding setbacks for swimming pools
During Communications from the Public, Mr. Don Seyfert addressed the
Commission regarding the vacating of the Slone Subdivision. Mr. Seyfert
expressed his concern that the vacating document was not clear on the area and
subdivision being vacated. He requested the Commission table the upcoming
item. Mr. Jolm Hammond, of Friendswood Development, also addressed the
Commission and suggested that more detail be added to the vacating document
such as the recorded volume and page of the plat. The City Attorney agreed that
more information should be provided. Janis Lowe also addressed the
Commission regarding the set back requirements for swimming pools. She asked
that this issue be re-evaluated by the Commission. The Commission will add this
item to it's 2006 to do list. Mike Sharp and Billy Gooble also addressed the
Commission regarding the vacating of the Slone Subdivision. However, both
stated that their issues may have been resolved by earlier comments.
Tabled Items:
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the approval of the 4-6-06 Regular meeting
minutes
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Regular Items:
Weesner-to remove from-table and approve
Gibson
Unanimous
4.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 4-17-06 Special meeting minutes.
Page 1 of 4
5/18/06 P & Z
Motion Carried
b.Approval of the 4-20-06 Regular meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the Final Plat of the Monte Bello Subdivision located at Woodlawn
and Shadowbend
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner-to approve the consent agenda
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
Van Riper-to remove Item b. and revise with the following: "Chairman
Holland expressed concerns regarding construction of a structure on a
capped well and requested the well be located on the plat. Commissioner
Van Riper stated he knew the extent soil samples were taken when
capping a well. He stated he felt comfortable with the request."
Gibson
Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the vacating of the Slone Subdivision out of
the B.W. Camp Rice Farms in the John Dickinson League in Galveston County, Texas
and located north of FM 518, so as to conve11 a certain 224.70 acre tract,1.5678 acre
tract, 2.2553 acre tract and a 2.4367 acre tract totaling 230.96 acres as described by metes
and bounds to acreage tracts as same existed before such property was platted, subdivided
and recorded.
Motion:
Second:
Amended
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Gibson-to approve
Klusendorf Motion Withdrawn
Holland -to approve the vacating instrument with additional information
to be added including providing the recording information from the
Galveston County Map Records being Volume 13, Page 91 recorded on
April 12, 1922. Further, the revised document shall be subject to the
review and approval of the City Attorney and City Engineer prior to
acceptance.
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Canied
The Commission discussed at some length the request and where the Slone Subdivision
was located. Based on conunents received from the public and the City Attorney, the
consensus was to add more information to the vacating document which would clarify the
area being vacated.
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for Kroger's
Signature located at 151 N. Friendswood Drive.
Motion:
Second:
Weesner-to approve
Holland
Page 2 of 4
5/18/06 P & Z
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner confirmed with Staff that there were no apparent safety issues
with the redesign of the parking and drive aisles and that the changes had been reviewed
and approved by the Staff responsible for looking at safety issues.
7.Consideration and possible action regarding extension of Preliminary Plat approval for
the Boone Subdivision.
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Holland -to approve
Weesner
Unanimous Motion Carried
8.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of Creekside at West Ranch
Section One located north of FM 518 in the West Ranch Management District.
Motion:
Second:
Gibson -to approve with Staff comments
Van Riper Motion Withdrawn
Amended
Motion: Weesner -to approve with a listing of all Staff requirements for a final plat
and Staff conditions including Ordinance requirements for Open Space.
Van Riper Second:
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner expressed her concerns that all requirements for a final plat had
been received. Paiiicularly she wanted to know if a lighting plan had been reviewed and
if the Open Space/Green Space requirements had been met. The Commission also
discussed the right-of-way in the Estates Section of the development. Staff clarified that
per agreement, the pavement would not be built by the developer and that the road
extension would only be put in place if needed in the future. Plat notes were in place
clarifying this issue. The City Attorney suggested that a list be provided of all the
outstanding items needed to file the final plat be included in the minutes.
Final Plat requirements:
Section III k. (3.) (f.) 2. The developer shall be required to provide and install all
traffic signage and signalization determined by the City to be necessary because
of the construction of the proposed subdivision.
Section V. a. (3.) All public infrastructure improvements within all of the area of
any subdivision or portion thereof given final approval, by the Commission, shall
be inspected and accepted by the City before the plat is filed of record.
9.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of West Ranch Estates
Section One located north of FM 518 in the West Ranch Management District.
Page 3 of 4
5/18/06 P & Z
Motion:
Second:
Voted For:
Weesner -to approve with a listing of all Staff requirements for a final plat
and Staff conditions including Ordinance requirements for Open Space.
Holland
Unanimous Motion Carried
The Commission wanted to use the same conditional approval criteria for each West
Ranch plat being approved.
10.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of Stonecreek at West Ranch
Section One located north of FM 518 in the West Ranch Management District.
Motion: Weesner -to approve with a listing of all Staff requirements for a final plat
and Staff conditions including Ordinance requirements for Open Space.
Second:
Voted For:
Van Riper
Unanimous
11.Conmrnnications from the Conunission.
Motion Carried
During Communications from the Commission, Commissioner Weesner noted that her
written reports on attendance at City Council and CAB meetings had been provided.
Conm1issioner Klusendorf noted his attendance at the Drainage District, as did Chairman
Holland.
12.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
There was no Council Liaison present to give a report.
b.Staff -Liaison Schedule, DRC report, Specific Use Permit (SUP) and
Conm1ercial Site Plan documentation requirements, update on River Oaks@
Friendswood project
Staff gave updates on site plan approval document requirements and the River Oaks
@ Friendswood project. The Commission would like to have more discussion on site
plan approval documents.
13.Adjourmnent.
The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
"?�
Page 4 of 4
5/18/06 P & Z
I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
June 1, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Conunission was held Thursday,
June 1 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Mark Van Riper
Sheny Weesner
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Rhonda Baker -Administrative Assistant
John Olson-City Attorney
With a quorum present, Commissioners Brakebill and Bertrand absent, Chairman Holland called
the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order at 7:05 p.m.
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
No one spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 5-18-06 Regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the final plat of the Collier Estates Subdivision located at 915
Falling Leaf Drive.
Motion: Weesner -to remove Item b. from the Consent Agenda
Second: Van Riper
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Amended
Motion: Jim Gibson -to approve the consent agenda item a.
Second: Sherry Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Amended
Motion: Weesner -to approve Item b., 5-18-06 minutes, with the following revisions:
The motion made under Item 5 should read "Further, the revised document
shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and City
Engineer prior to acceptance." And under Item 6, Commissioner
Weesner's comments should read "Commissioner Weesner confirmed
with Staff that there were no apparent safety issues with the redesign of
the parking and drive aisles and that the changes had been reviewed and
approved by the Staff responsible for looking at safety issues. "
Page 1 of 4
06/01/06 P & Z
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the vacating of the Forestwood
Subdivision, being 3.2895 acres recorded under Harris County Film Code 350061, and
being out of Reserve "A" Forest Creek, Volume 238, Page 50 H.C.M.R., Friendswood,
Harris County, Texas.
Motion: Sheny Weesner -to approve
Second: Kevin Holland
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner confirmed with Staff that the attached metes & bounds and
documentation clearly defined what area and subdivision was being vacated.
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of West Ranch Reserves
A&B located in the West Ranch Management District.
Motion: Sheny Weesner -to approve with staff comments
Second: Jim Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Can-ied
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of the Terra Bella Subdivision
located off W. Bay Area Blvd.
Motion: Jim Gibson -to approve with staff comments (sidewalks on Bay Area Blvd.
required)
Second: Sherry Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Mr. Richard Duffy, developer, addressed the Commission. He stated his concerns that
sidewalks along the Bay Area Blvd. right-of-way would not be connected to any other
sidewalks and would require the removal of several trees. Conm1issioner Weesner noted
that sidewalks might be connected at a later date, particularly as a park was planned off
that side of Bay Area Blvd.
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminaiy Plat of the Kenneth Camp
Subdivision (Fire Station #4) located at the intersection of Woodlawn and W. Heritage
Drive.
Motion: Sheny Weesner-to approve with staff comments
Second: Mark Van Riper
Voted For: Holland, Van Riper, Gibson, Weesner
Voted against: Klusendorf Motion Carried
Commissioner Klusendorf stated his concern that a large reserve on the plat was being
used for detention purposes. He be lieves regional detention should be used if it is
available. Staff noted that the costs for regional detention where higher than if on-site
Page 2 of 4
06/01/06 P & Z
detention were provided for this development. The detention will not only serve the new
fire station but also the commercial tract being offered for sale by the City.
8.Discussion and possible action regarding Specific Use Permit and Commercial Site Plan
documentation requirements.
Commission Weesner would like staff to prepare a draft ordinance which would just
modify the documentation requirements for a Specific Use Permit. She reasoned that
Commercial Site Plans being reviewed by Staff and the Commission would already be at
the end of the development process and would need final drainage and utility plans.
9.Discussion and possible action regarding setbacks for accessory structures.
This topic relates to pools as accessory structures. Staff noted that there already exist
some specific performance measures related to the location of swimming pools in the
Zoning Ordinance. The Commission considered safety issues associated with pools
adjacent to utility easements and fences. Ms. Janis Lowe was asked to address the
Commission with her comments. Ms. Lowe understood that most pools would have a 3
to 4 foot'decking around the pool. Commissioner Weesner noted that there were more
residential lots in Friendswood which had smaller Garden Home or Cluster Home size lot
area, smaller than the traditional Single Family Residential lot. Providing a smaller set
back for pools on these lots seemed logical. Providing a smaller set back for pools would
make pool construction on theses lots easier. Commissioner Weesner felt a 5-foot set
back was sufficient to protect foundations for fences or other structures and adjoining
property. The City Attorney stated that this change will not allow pools to be built in
utility or other easements. The Commission requests that a memo be prepared and
forwarded to the Council requesting a joint public hearing.
Motion: Weesner-to\·equest a change to the Zoning Ordinance to allow a special
exception for the location of swimming pools in the required rear
yard to be as close as five feet from the rear lot line.
Second: Gibson
Vote for: Unanimous Motion Carried
10.Discussion and possible action regarding special exceptions for gas stations.
Staff provided a matrix of the 14 gas stations within the City limits. The matrix indicated
if the stations had canopies, if the canopies or other structures on the site met current set
back requirements, if driveways were in compliance, if landscaping was provided and if
it met requirements, the zoning districts involved and if there were garage bays on the
site. The matrix indicated possible resolutions to non-conforming issues for these gas
stations. Chairman Holland noted that the workshop with Council had indicated .their
desire to allow existing gas stations to redevelop. He proposed the following special
exceptions:
1)Canopies extend over building line to a 5' landscape buffer.
Page 3 of 4
06/01/06 P & Z
2)Reduce landscape buffer to 5' and substitute shrubs in place of
trees and driveways, because of a tree's viability and they obstruct
view.
3)Setbacks -reduce to 5' side and rear and front 25'; exclude canopy
as a structure for tractor-trailers.
4)Driveways -remove requirement of 50' between driveways
5)Remove width of driveway requirement
6)Distance to intersection -remove 125' requirement
7)Lot coverage -increase to allow up to 60% (Light Industrial)
Commissioner Weesner questioned where these special exceptions would be located -
Zoning Ordinance, Design Criteria, etc. The Commission directed staff to prepare a draft
ordinance for their review at the next regular meeting.
11.Communications from the Conm1ission.
Conm1issioner Weesner requested that all Commissioners read the June 5, 2006 City
Council agenda as she felt there were several items which pertained to the Conunission
on it. Since a quorum of Commissioners might also be present at the meeting, the
Commissioners requested that a meeting notice be posted so they could attend Monday's
Council meeting.
Conunissioner Gibson noted that he would not be at the next regular meeting due to
vacation plans.
12.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
There was no liaison present to speak.
b.Staff -Liaison Schedule, DRC report
Staff reported that the Liaison schedule would soon be presented using an
Outlook calendar format which would be available on the FTP site. No DRC's
were held in May except for the bi-weekly scheduled meetings between Staff and
Friendswood Development Company to discuss West Ranch Development issues.
13.Adjourrunent.
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Page 4 of 4
06/01/06 P & Z
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
June 15, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Conunission was held Thursday,
June 15, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
John Olson-City Attorney
With a quorum present, Conunissioners Van Riper and Gibson absent, Chairman Holland called
the meeting to order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order at 7:00 p.m.
2.Communication from the public/conunittee liaisons.
No one spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 6-1-06 Regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the final plat of the Kenneth Camp Subdivision (Fire Station #4)
located at the intersection of Woodlawn and W. Heritage Drive
Motion: Brakebill -to remove Item a. and to approve the consent agenda Item b.
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Amended
Motion: Weesner -to approve Item a. with the following revisions: Item 4 -Remove
'Jim Gibson made a motion and it was 2nd by Sherry Weesner';
Under Item 9 Add -The City Attorney stated that this change will
not allow pools to be built in utility or other easements. And
Commissioner Weesner felt a 5-foot set back was sufficient to
protect foundations for fences or other structures and adjoining
property; Change-Providing a smaller set back for pools on these
lots seemed logical. Providing a smaller set back for pools would
make pool construction on theses lots easier. Chairman Holland also
changed 'that' to 'than' on page 3 of 4.
Second: Klusendorf
Voted For: Unanimous
Page 1 of 4
06/15/06 P & Z
Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for the Shell
Station at 101 S. Friendswood Drive.
Motion: Weesner -to approve with Staff comments
Second: Brakebill
Amended
Motion: Weesner-to table the item
Second: Holland
Voted for: Unanimous Motion Carried
After the original motion to approve with staff comments, Staff Planner, Diana
Steelquist, stated that the staff recommendation was not to approve to site plan because of
the garage bay issue, the other staff comments had been addressed. Commissioner
Weesner asked Staff to explain where the requirements for driveway widths and spacing
come from. The Staff Planner indicated that the requirements follow traffic industry
standards as well as Texas Department of Transportation requirements and are located
within the City's Design Criteria Manual. Modifications to the Design Criteria Manual
are allowed with appropriate engineering justifications.
Commissioner Bertrand expressed his concerns with the Design Criteria Manual and with
a conditional approval for this site plan without the Community Overlay District (COD)
being adopted by City Council. The City Attorney was also concerned about the timing
of the approvals. Commissioner Weesner clarified that the proposed new structure was in
conformance with all other Zoning Ordinance requirements and that the revised site plan
indicated that the Commission was only reviewing the new garage bay structure.
Commissioner Klusenforf was also concerned that even if the Council adopted the COD,
the proposed garage bays would not be screened in compliance with the new ordinance.
Chairman Holland and Commissioner Weesner both stated that the COD addressed
Commissioner's Klusendorfs concern by clarifying that the screening requirement only
affected garage bays facing the front of a development. This site plan has the bays facing
the side. The consensus was to table the site plan until the Community Overlay District
was in place.
5.Discussion and possible action regarding amending the Zoning Ordinance Permitted Use
Table to allow accessory structures in non-residential zoning districts.
Staff addressed the Commission regarding recent changes to the Zoning Ordinance which
created a conflict on the Permitted Use Table (PUT) with regards to allowing accessory
structures on commercial sites. Section 8,M states accessory structures are allowed for
commercial use, but the PUT does not. Commissioner Weesner was concerned about a
lack of set back and screening requirements for conunercial accessory structures. The
City Attorney stated that these types of requirements should be specifically authorized for
accessory structures under the Supplemental requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. In
addition, he recommended that these requirements include information about what was
not acceptable as the type, location and use of a commercial accessory structure.
Page 2 of 4
06/15/06 P & Z
I I
l
Commissioner Bertrand reasoned that the PUT should not include a line for access01y
building use. An accessory building is not a type of use. Further, this area of the PUT is
for residential uses not structures. He reasoned this should be in another area of the
Zoning Ordinance. The City Attorney agreed that this line in the PUT should be removed
and that regulations on accessory buildings and structures should be included in the
Supplemental regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. The Commission requested Staff
prepare a draft ordinance which would remove the reference to accesso1y uses in the PUT
and add language to regulate them in Supplemental regulations.
6.Discussion and possible action regarding Specific Use Permit documentation
requirements.
As discussed at the last meeting, Staff provided an outline of requirements for a Sp ecific
Use Permit which specifically eliminated the need for a final drainage and final utility
plan. The SUP requirements will remain similar to the Commercial Site Plan
requirements except they will not need detailed engineering drawings. The Commercial
Site Plan requirements will now include the requirements for a building permit as
outlined in Section 9, C. of the Zoning Ordinance with the additional need for detailed
engineering drawings. These changes will make the SUP requirements not so onerous as
those of a Commercial Site Plan as an SUP request may not be approved by the
Co1mnission or Council following a Public Hearing. Chairman Holland recalled that the
SUP for a residential lot on Quaker had incurred significant engineering costs before it
was approved. Commissioner Be11rand was concerned that no specific language
regarding the location of easements was shovm as a requirement for a Commercial Site
plan. Commissioner Weesner noted that information regarding the proposed uses for a
Specific Use Permit needed to be part of the requirements. Commissioner Bertrand also
noted that the Galveston County Consolidated Drainage District may not be the only
drainage district providing regional detention. In addition other private developments
may have capacity to provide off-site detention. The references for off-site facilities
needed to be expanded to allow for other off-site detention possibilities.
The changes will be presented to the Coimnission at the next meeting in an ordinance
format before recommending them to City Council.
Motion: Weesner -to approve changes as discussed
Second: Klusendorf
Voted for: Unanimous
7.Communications from the Commission.
Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner reported her attendance at the June 5, 2006 City Council
meeting. She will forward her written repo11 to Staff for distribution to the other
Commissioners. Commissioner Brakebill stated he would not be seeking re-appointment
to the Commission and that he had enjoyed his time on the Commission. Conunissioner
Klusendorf noted he would not be available to attend the Joint Public Hearing on July
Page 3 of 4
06/15/06 P & Z
10th. Commissioner Bertrand thanked Commissioner Brakebill for his service. Bertrand
also asked staff to provide clarification on the ordinance adoption process.
8.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
b.Staff -May 29, 2006 Sun Meadow HOA letter to Council
Staff provided a copy of a May 29th letter from the Sun Meadow HOA to City
Council. The letter expressed the HOA's continued concerns with development of
the Golf Course.
9.Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Page 4 of 4
06/15/06 P & Z
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
July 6, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
July 6, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Kevin Holland
Jim Gibson
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
John Olson-City Attorney 7:25 p.m.
Rhonda Baker -Administrative Secretary
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
Deidre Brown -CEDC Liaison
With a quorum present, Commissioner Van Riper absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to
order to discuss the following:
1.Call to order
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
No one spoke at this time.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 6-15-06 Regular meeting minutes.
Motion: Bertrand -to approve the consent agenda
Second: Brakebill
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the commercial site plan for Reserve "C" of
the Crawford Business Park subdivision located off Winding Way near FM 528 for use as
medical/professional office space.
Motion: Bertrand -to approve the site plan with staff comments
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous
Amended
Motion Carried
Motion: Weesner -to approve the site plan with additional note added on the site plan to
read that the fencing requirement will conform to the Zoning Ordinance as either an
opaque fence or vegetation.
Second: Brakebill
Voted For: Unanimous
Page 1 of 4
07 /06/06 P & Z
Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand was concerned about possible noise issues as a result of the
many air conditioning units shown on the site plan. Chairman Holland asked if the
developer would be agreeable to using vegetation as a screen between the Church
property and the commercial site. Conunissioner Gibson noted a typographical error on
the site plan referencing the acreage and asked that it be corrected.
5.Discussion and possible action regarding accessory structures in non-residential zoning
districts.
The City Attorney arrived at this time.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the definition of an accessory structure, what uses
would be allowed for that accessory structure, and where they would be allowed and
prohibited. The Commission was concerned that accessory structures and temporary
buildings would be confused. They asked staff to look at those and add definitions of
each.
6.Discussion and possible action regarding Specific Use Permit documentation
requirements.
The Conunission discussed the draft ordinance amendment as presented by staff.
Concern was expressed that easements were not listed as being required to be shown on
an SUP site plan. Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist, explained that these type of
requirements will be required on the commercial site plan and building permit
applications. A suggestion was made to add an item to the DRC checklist to inform SUP
applicants that a zone change may be required for additional uses and/or structures. In
addition, staff review checklists should be made available at the builder/developer
forums.
Motion: Weesner-to approve ordinance amendments as presented
Second: Bertrand
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Discussion and possible action regarding the commercial site plan approval process.
Chairman Holland noted that recent City Council actions had included a request to
eliminate Commission approval of Commercial Site plans. Although he was in
agreement that the Staff was capable, he was also concerned that the current level of
staffing was inadequate at this time. He asked the Council Liaison to report his concerns
to the rest of the Council.
The commission took a short break while photographs were uploaded and reconvened at
8:10 p.m.
8.Discussion and possible action regarding special exceptions for Gas Stations.
Page 2 of 4
07 /06/06 P & Z
I
l
Commissioner Weesner shared pictures of gas stations in the Friendswood area and in
other cities that she had taken in order to address issues with the canopies and the
driveways. She explained that of the fom1een Friendswood stations, one station has been
removed and five stations are in shopping centers. She stated that several of the others
are in compliance with current ordinances. She added that one has a garage bay issue,
which will eventually be resolved by adopting the COD and several have driveway
issues.
Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist, explained that the driveway issues for any commercial
use are already being addressed by modifying the Design Criteria Manual.
Commissioner Weesner asked staff to verify whether our DCM requirements are in
compliance with those of the Texas Department of Transportation. A discussion ensued
regarding the difference between a driveway, giving access to the street and the drive
space on a site.
Commissioner Weesner stated that the three gas stations in the OBD are the ones with the
main issues. It was suggested that a change be made to business requirements in the
OBD only to address these specific problems.
9.Discussion and possible action regarding non-conforming uses and structures.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding separating non-conforming uses into non
conformance of uses, lots and structures. Concerns addressed included the six-month
limitation and how to regulate what portion of the fifty percent of repairs to a non
conforming use are done each year.
10.Discussion regarding ordinance preparation procedures.
Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist will e-mail City Attorney to ask him to prepare guidelines
addressing ordinance preparation procedures.
11.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Be11rand noted that his report on the 6-26-06 City Council meeting was
available for review. Commissioner Klusendorf stated he had attended the Galveston
County Consolidated Drainage District meeting at which the Kenneth Camp plat had
been tabled. The District is requesting that the City utilize their regional detention
facilities for this new fire station development.
12.Reports.
a. Council Liaison
Councilmember Hill had no comments.
b.Staff
Page 3 of 4
07 /06/06 P & Z
Staff reported on the DRC's held in June. A quick listing was also made regarding topics
for the July 10 th Workshop and Public Hearings items. A request has been made to meet
in a workshop setting with the Commission to discuss Downtown streetscaping ideas for
a new development being planned in the area. A special early meeting on July 20th will
be planned for this discussion.
13.Adjournn1ent.
With no further conunent the meeting was adjourned at 9: 17 p.m.
Page 4 of 4
07 /06/06 P & Z
Minutes of a Special Meeting
Of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
July 10, 2006
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Monday, July
10, 2006, at 3:00 p.m. in the council chambers in city hall located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive,
Friendswood, Texas.
3:00 P.M. JOINT WORK SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL
The following members were present:
Kevin Holland
Jim Gibson
Sherry Weesner
Diana Steelquist -Staff Planner
Dan Johnson-Community Development Director
John Olson-City Attorney
Mona Miller -Development Coordinator
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
Mayor Smith called the meeting to order. Commissioner Holland asked that the order of the items
be changed to allow item 3 to be addressed first. The following items were discussed:
A.Discussion with the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding the following items:
1.Entryway, Downtown and Community Overlay Districts
Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist, provided information regarding the ex1stmg and
proposed overlay districts through a Powerpoint presentation. A lengthy discussion
ensued regarding the differences in the districts, the areas affected by the districts, the
setback distance for screening, garage bay doors and landscape buffers.
Commissioner Weesner explained that the COD change is a first step. She stated that
this is intended to help the downtown prope1ty owners. She also informed Council
that a subcommittee is working toward revising downtown zoning in order to
alleviate other downtown issues.
3.Setback requirements for private swimming pools:
Commissioner Holland explained that this change was originally proposed to address
a hardship in a garden home development. Conunissioner Weesner clarified that fhe
5' setback requirement is not in-addition-to the easement and does not allow
construction in the easement. She explained that the ordinance would require that
you abide by whichever is the larger of the two (the easement or setback) with the
minimum being 5' off of the property line. Mayor Smith expressed a concern for
whether this was a safe distance. Director of Community Development, Dan Johnson
answered that the 5' distance is consistent with other code requirements. He added
that this would also allow enough space for utility repair to be done in the easement
without damage to the pool.
Page 1 of 6
07/10/06 P & Z
2.Non-conforming uses and structures
Director of Conununity Development Dan Johnson stated that staff and the Planning
and Zoning Commission have been working on this for about two years. He
explained that the existing ordinance states " ... permit non-conforming uses to
continue, but not to encourage their survival." This proposal is to remove the portion
of the ordinance that states " ... not to encourage their survival." A discussion ensued
regarding prohibiting rebuilding if the non-conforming structure is more than 50%
damaged. John Olsen, City Attorney, stated that the 50% requirement is set by state
government.
4.Special Exceptions for gas stations
Commissioner Weesner explained that this change is primarily for gas stations in the
Original Business District.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
The following members were present:
Kevin Holland
Jim Gibson
Sherry Weesner
Bob Bertrand
David Brakebill
Diana Steelquist-Staff Planner
Dan Johnson -Community Development Director
John Olson-City Attorney
Mona Miller -Development Coordinator
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
Commissioner Holland called the Joint Public Hearing to order at 7: 13 p.m.
1.To receive public input, either oral or written rega rding the following:
A.Zone classification change request for a tract of land conta ining 3 .2895 acres, being
out of Lots 1 through 5 of the Forestwood Subdivision, situated in the Sarah
McKissick Survey, property located off of Friendswood Link Road, Harris County,
Texas, from Multi-Family Residential-Garden Home District (MFR-GHD) to Multi
Family Residential-High Density (MFR-H).
David Wyatt, 2501 Briarglen Drive, Pearland, explained that he works for the development
company that would be building the proposed townhomes. He stated that they have met with
many of the homeowners associations in the area in order to address their concerns. He
added that they would extend the water line, build a detention pond on the property and have
only one entrance to the property. Mr. Wyatt explained that they are marketing this new
development to empty nesters; therefore, it would have very little impact on the school
district. He stated that they are proposing a price range from the $ l 40s to $ l 60s and they
have lowered the density to 36 units.
Scott McCollum, 2001 S. Friendswood Drive, stated that he is an 18-year resident of
Friendswood. He expressed his support for the project and explained that the lots have been
vacant for a long time.
Page 2 of 6
07/10/06 P & Z
I
I
Donnie Battenfield, 1208 Silverleaf Drive, supported the request stating that it seems like the
area could use a boost. He added that some buildings in the area are vacant and this project
might help bring in viable businesses.
Ram Aguilera, 2230 Leading Drive, suggested that the project would help to increase
property values in the area.
Elisabeth Wagner, 4427 Paradot, spoke in opposition of the request and expressed her
concerns with traffic; especially the school traffic. She also was afraid that this property
would become investment property for renters and increase crime.
Lou Ellen Hatchett, 16811 Paint Rock Road, stated that she is very proud of living in
Friendswood, and has enjoyed the quiet streets between the subdivisions. She believes that
this development is affiliated with Friendswood Link Road being widened and opened to El
Dorado. She is concerned about traffic cutting through the area.
Bobbie Jones, 16722 Hibiscus Lane, explained that she has lived in Friendswood for thirty
five years. She stated that this development would intrude on the privacy of the homeowners
that this development backs up to. She reiterated the concern about traffic and home values
in the area. She also commented that thirty-six units is too many and does not allow for a
playground, or pool.
James McClain, 16626 Oxnard Lane, restated concerns for traffic and privacy. He explained
that there is a need for a traffic light to slow traffic down as they come across the bridge. Mr.
McClain was also worried about drainage with this additional development. He disagreed
with the earlier comments that this project would increase property values. He feels that it
will lower values.
Shary Luck, 4410 Lucian Lane, commented that she has been a Friendswood resident for ten
years. She added to the previous comments regarding school traffic by stating that it is not a
short term problem. She explained that school traffic runs from early in the morning until
late in the evening.
Marina and Walter Bahn, spoke in opposition of the project. Mrs. Bahn stated that they
purchased their home about a year ago. Now, they are concerned that this project will invade
their privacy, cause drainage problems and destroy the wildlife in the area.
Roger Baust, 16726 Hibiscus, explained that he is a Friendswood resident of thirty-four years
and a volunteer fire fighter. He expressed concern for the development only having one
access and about drainage.
B.Amending the Zoning Ordinance, Appendix C, removing Section 8, I., 2, f., 1-7
Preserving Trees -Historical Significance, by deleting tree survey requirements, tree
mitigation and incentives and tree protection requirements.
Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist, explained that a sub-committee worked on the tree
preservation ordinance for years before it was passed in September 2005. She stated that the
current proposal is to remove certain sections of that ordinance. She also added that it mostly
affects commercial properties.
Page 3 of 6
07/10/06 P & Z
Arthur Hsu, 709 Pin Oak Drive, spoke in favor of amending the ordinance. He
acknowledged how much work had gone into creating the ordinance to keep developers from
clear-cutting properties. However, he stated that the landscape plan for a development
should include the trees, thereby, making these sections of the tree ordinance unnecessary.
Mike Sharp, 1200 Shooting Star, asked for a follow up from the last council meeting on how
many trees have been protected and/or planted by these ordinance requirements in the last ten
months. He stated that if the ordinance has not been effective, then it should be amended.
He submitted photos of the upcoming West Ranch development that had been recently clear
cut. He added that the ordinance did not protect the trees on this property.
Fred Kreh, 209 Dawn, explained that he is a fifty-year resident of Friendswood. He read a
statement regarding the micromanagement of ones life and not infringing on others. He
added that it is not right to tell property owners what they can and cannot do on their own
property.
Judy Kimball, 802 W. Edgewood, spoke in opposition of amending the ordinance. She
explained that she was one of the committee members who worked to write this ordinance.
She stated that the committee was made up of many different types of people, including
developers and builders. She read off a list of committee members and their occupations.
Ms. Kimball stated that there is a lot of confusion about this ordinance, but that it does not
have anything to do with individual property owners. She explained that there are two
different tree ordinances: 1) The Heritage Tree Ordinance, which is strictly voluntary and 2)
the Tree Preservation Ordinance, which was written with developer's involvement.
Mary Yogas, 614 W. Castle Harbour, stated that she has lived in Friendswood for over thirty
years. She believes that the ordinance should be left as-is, if not made stronger. She
explained that it is very important to keep the trees in place in order to maintain better air
quality and even block damage from storms. Mrs. Yogas showed a 1992 forest cover map
and a predicted 2010 forest cover map of the Houston area showing how drastically it is
changing.
Jim Yogas, 614 W. Castle Harbour, explained that after growing up on Galveston Island, he
decided Friendswood was the type of place he would like to live. He stated that he served as
an elected official for the Clear Creek Drainage District for years. He saw this as a duty to
the community. He challenged the council to protect the trees and make the decision whether
their decisions were going to be for people or money.
Lorna Zeitler, 304 Friends Knoll, stated that she is a resident of over forty years. She
reminded those in attendance that the tree ordinance was created because of the trees being
stripped from the landscape. She gave examples of this practice with the Albertson's
property on FM 2351 and FM 528; and Camp Manison. She asked the council not to
sacrifice our heritage for the sake of development.
Commissioner Holland asked that Items C., D. and E. be addressed as one item. He
explained that the proposal is to do away with the Entryway and Downtown Overlay Districts
and create the Community Overlay District.
Page 4 of 6
07/10/06 P & Z
I C.Amending the Zoning Ordinance, Appendix C, creating a Community Overlay
District.
D.Amending the Zoning Ordinance, Appendix C, removing Section 7, R -Entryway
Overlay District.
E.Amending the Zoning Ordinance, Appendix C, removing Section 7.5 -Downtown
Overlay District.
Mehran Jehidi, 101 S. Friendswood Drive, asked council members to support these changes.
F.Amending the Zoning Ordinance, Section 8, J, 4 -Setback requirements for private
swimming pools.
Diana Steelquist, Staff Planner, explained that the ordinance currently requires a swimming
pool, as an accessory structure, to maintain a 1 O' setback. However, that requirement has
created a hardship in cluster and garden home developments with O' lot lines. She stated that
this proposal is to reduce the required setback to 5'.
Janis Lowe, 401 Forest Pines Ct, spoke in support of the ordinance amendment.
G.Releasing rear utility easement located in the Friendswood Lakes Garden Home
Subdivision, Lots 1-13, Block 1, Lots 1-13, Block 2 and Lots 19-27, Block 2.
Janis Lowe, 401 Forest Pines Ct, spoke in favor of the amendment stating that the utility
easement was not used after the final plat was filed. She explained that the utility companies
have installed private utilities in the front of the properties. She added that all of the
homeowners have agreed to and signed this request for release of the rear utility easement.
2.Close Joint Docketed Public Hearing.
The Public Hearing was closed at 8:08 p.m.
3.Adjourn to second floor conference room for consideration and possible action on the
following items:
The Planning and Zoning Commission reconvened at 8:13 PM to consider the following
items:
Commissioner Brakebill suggested that Item B be considered first since the other items
would require so much more discussion.
A.Consideration and possible action regarding repealing the Entryway Overlay and
Downtown Overlay Districts and creating the Community Overlay District.
Motion: Gibson -to approve
Second: Brakebill
Page 5 of 6
07/10/06 P & Z
Since all members were not available for the work session, Commissioner Weesner
recapped their discussions and concerns. A lengthy discussion ensued.
Amended
Motion: Weesner-to approve the proposed ordinance amendments with the following
changes: 1) limit Community Overlay District to apply to first 300' of property or
frontage of one street designated on the site plan, 2) Any microwave/satellite dish
over 24" inches must be screened, 3) Frontage, with regards to garage bays on corner
lots, shall be determined by the commercial site plan 4) Eliminate the South portion
of Blackhawk Boulevard from the Overlay district
Second: Brakebill
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
B.Consideration and possible action regarding amending the Zoning Ordinance with
regards to setback requirements for private swimming pools.
Motion: Gibson -to approve
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous
4.Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 8:33 p.m.
·MkL�
Development Coordinator
Page 6 of 6
07/10/06 P & Z
Motion Carried
I
Minutes of a Work Session and Regular Meeting
Of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
July 20, 2006
A work session and regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was
held Monday, July 20, 2006, at 5:30 p.m. in the city hall second floor conference room and the
council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas.
Worksession 5:30 PM -second floor conference room
1.Call to order
The work session was called to order at 6:25 p.m. with the following present:
Jim Gibson
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Eugene Hammett
Diana Steelquist -Staff Planner
Mona Miller -Development Coordinator
Karen Capps -Economic Development Coordinator
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
2.Discussion regarding downtown streetscaping
Louis Mays and Ken Bailey of Page, Southerland and Page, discussed a proposal by Tony
Banfield to develop his prope1ty as a test of the downtown streetscape program. In
addition, he is proposing to encourage McDonalds to continue the streetscape onto their
prope1ty. They showed a proposed site plan for the properties and explained that Mr.
Banfield would incur all expenses on developing his property in this manner.
The work session adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Regular Meeting 7:00 PM-council chambers
The regular meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. with the following present:
Jim Gibson
Mark Van Riper
Sherry Weesner
Eugene Hammett
Kevin Holland
Bob Bertrand
Roy Klussendorf was absent
Diana Steelquist -Staff Planner
Mona Miller -Development Coordinator
Rhonda Baker -Administrative Assistant
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
3.Oaths of Office: Administer the Oath of Office for the appointment of new and renewing
Commissioners.
Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist, administered the Oath of Office for Eugene Hammett.
Page 1 of 5
7/20/06 Planning & Zoning
4.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
Lou Ellen Hatchett, 16811 Paint Rock Road, a thirty-four year resident, spoke 111
opposition to (Item 7) the zone change in Forestwood Subdivision.
Staff Planner, Diana Steelquist, reminded Chairman Holland that a Joint Public Hearing
had already been held to hear citizen's comments. Therefore, no other comments should
be heard at this meeting.
5.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 7-6-06 Regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 7-10-06 Special meeting minutes.
Motion: Weesner -to table both sets of minutes until the Conunission has time to review
them.
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan for the Shell
Station at 101 S. Friendswood Drive.
Motion: Weesner -to approve contingent upon staff comments and the final approval of
the Community Overlay District
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding a zone classification change request for a
tract of land containing 3.2895 acres, being out of Lots 1 tlu·ough 5 of the Forestwood
Subdivision, situated in the Sarah McKissick Survey, property located off of
Friendswood Link Road, Harris County, Texas, from Multi-Family Residential-Garden
Home District (MFR-GHD) to Multi-Family Residential-High Density (MFR-H).
Motion: Gibson -to approve
Second: Hammett
A discussion ensued regarding past decisions to deny requests to increase density and
intended density for this project. Commissioner Weesner expressed concern about
increasing the density. She stated that historically, the conunission and city council have
refused to increase residential density. Commissioner Gibson asked David Wyatt of
Elegant Estates if their plan included green space other than the detention pond. Mr.
Wyatt answered that there will be green space separate from the detention pond.
Commissioner Bertrand expressed concern for limited commercial sites in the city and
the possibility of this property being used for such. Other concerns expressed were
increased traffic and a loss of privacy for existing homeowners.
Page 2 of 5
7/20/06 Planning & Zoning
l
Voted for: Holland, Gibson, Van Riper, Hammett
Voted against: Weesner, Bertrand Motion Carried
8.Consideration and possible action regarding amending the Zoning Ordinance, Appendix
C, removing Section 8, I., 2, f., 1-7 Preserving Trees -Historical Significance, by
deleting tree survey requirements, tree mitigation and incentives and tree protection
requirements.
Motion: Bertrand -to not repeal the existing Tree Preservation ordinance and to
encourage Council to move forward with the Heritage Tree Ordinance.
Second: Holland
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
9.Consideration and possible action regarding releasing rear utility easement located in the
Friendswood Lakes Garden Home Subdivision, Lots 1-13, Block 1, Lots 1-13, Block 2
and Lots 19-27, Block 2.
The Commission noted that there are no existing utilities located in the rear Utility
Easement.
Motion: Weesner-to approve
Second: Van Riper
Voted for: Unanimous Motion Carried
10.Discussion and possible action regarding special exceptions for Gas Stations.
Commissioner Weesner expressed concern for moving forward with these changes and
not coordinating them with the downtown zoning. Ms. Steelquist advised the
Commission that staff has prepared language prepared by the downtown committee,
however, not in an ordinance form. She would like to take the document back to the
committee prior to moving forward.
Motion: Gibson -to approve
Second: Holland
The discussion continued regarding the proposed exceptions for gas stations. The
Commission recognized that certain existing tracts in the OBD may not be able to fully
comply with zoning standards due to limited frontage or other constraints when
developing or re-developing a gasoline station. They believe allowing these special
exceptions within the OBD will allow existing gas stations to become conforming as to
structure and lot coverage. This in turn will allow any needed redevelopment to occur.
The Commission recommended that a Joint Public Hearing be scheduled to amend the
Ordinance at the next available opportunity to receive public comment.
Amended Motion: Gibson -to approve with the exception of Item A, and that these
exceptions apply in the Original Business District only.
Page 3 of 5
7 /20/06 Planning & Zoning
Second: Holland
Voted for: Gibson, Holland, Van Riper, Hammett, Bertrand
Voted against: Weesner Motion Carried
11.Discussion and possible action regarding non-conforming uses and structures.
Motion: Gibson -to approve
Seconded: Holland
Ms. Steelquist recapped the discussion from the joint workshop. Conunissioner Weesner
expressed concern with the six-month time frame for non-conforming uses. She
suggested that the time be extended or removed.
Commissioner Be1trand was concerned about changes being made to the Permitted Use
Table. He explained that each time a change is made, it could make a conforming use
non-conforming. He suggested that staff survey businesses with a particular use before a
change is made.
Commissioner Van Riper asked staff to provide a definition of abandoned and
discontinued uses.
Amended Motion: Gibson -to approve with the exception of D4, and give staff direction
to place footnote statement on PUT, requiring that an impact study be done prior to a
change to the table.
Second: Holland
Amended Motion: Weesner-to table this item
Second: Van Riper
Voted for: Unanimous
12.Conununications from the Commission.
Motion Carried
Commissioner Bertrand rep01ted on his attendance at the Drainage District meeting.
Commissioner Gibson reported that he attended the City Council meetings.
Commissioner Hammett expressed gratitude for his appointment. He stated that he is
looking forward to his service. Commissioner Weesner noted that the Comprehensive
Plan subconunittee will meet on July 2i11 • Ms. Steelquist provided information on
upcoming Open Meetings training.
13.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Council Liaison Jim Hill reported on his attendance at the Drainage District meeting.
He also stated that they will hold a joint workshop with the Drainage District at City Hall
on Monday, July 24th .
Page 4 of 5
7 /20/06 Planning & Zoning
I
b.Staff -Discussion of ordinance preparation procedures
Commissioner Bertrand stated that this has already been done and no additional
information from Staff was needed at this time.
14.Adjoununent.
The meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m.
Dk-��
Development Coordinator
Page 5 of 5
7/20/06 Planning & Zoning
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 3, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Plairning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
August 3, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood Drive,
Friendswood, Texas. The following will be considered:
1.Call to order
The meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. with the following present:
Jim Gibson Diana Steelquist -Staff Planner
Mark Van Riper Mona Miller-Development Coordinator
Sheny Weesner Jim Hill-Council Liaison
Eugene Hanunett
Kev in Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Bob Bertrand 7:18 P.M.
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
None.
3.Consent Agenda:
------
a.Approval of the 7-6-06 Regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 7-10-06 Special meeting minutes.
c.Approval of the 7-20-06 Regular meeting minutes
Motion: Weesner -to approve the July 6, 2006 and July 10, 2006 minutes and remove
the July 20, 2006 minutes from the consent agenda.
Second: Klusendorf
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Motion: Weesner -to amend the July 20, 2006 minutes to add a sentence to item #7
stating that "Commissioner Weesner expressed concern about increasing the density. She
stated that historically, the commission and city council have refused to increase
residential density."
Second: Klussendorf
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
4.Discussion and possible action regarding non-conforming uses and structures.
Ms. Steelquist explained the definition of an abandoned use that is proposed to be added
into Section 6. B. 2. She also stated that she spoke· to City Attorney Olsen and he
suggested reducing the time frame for discontinued or abandoned uses to thirty (30) days,
instead of the current 6 months.
Page 1 of 3
8/3/06 Planning & Zoning
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding how to accurately determine when a use is
abandoned. Ms. Steelquist explained that City Attorney Olsen suggested that the
property/business owner prove when the business was discontinued. The Commissioners
had several concerns including the length of time allowed for an abandoned use, placing
the burden of proof on the individual, the types of documentation to prove when use was
ceased, and the effect of natural disasters on non-conforming uses. Commissioner
Hammett suggested using a Certificate of Occupancy as required in other cities each time
an occupancy changes. Ms. Steelquist suggested that a lease agreement would be
adequate proof of when a use begins and ends. She stated that if the timeframe differs
from the lease agreement, the owner could appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustments
with evidence for a ruling.
The Conm1ission requested that staff schedule a workshop with City Council for direction
on the following: 1) timeframe for discontinued uses, 2) type of documents for proof of
when use ceased, and 3) how natural disasters affect non-conforming uses. In addition,
staff was asked to provide their suggestions for enforcement and the types of documents
that would be acceptable, at this workshop.
Commissioner Bertrand entered the meeting at 7: 18 p.m.
5.Discussion and possible action regarding Downtown Zoning.
Ms. Steelquist explained how the proposed plan was developed and the components of
the plan that were determined by the committee. Several commissioners, Ms. Steelquist
and Tony Banfield expressed how hard this committee worked to develop this plan. Due
to mixed messages from City Council, the Commission requested staff schedule a
workshop with Council to discuss how they want to proceed with the conunittee and the
ordinance.
6.Communications from the Commission.
City Council meeting report, Comprehensive Plan report
Commissioner Bertrand reported on his attendance at the Drainage District meeting and
apologized for being late for tonight's meeting. He also explained the July 20, 2006
minutes should reflect, under item #7, that he strongly opposed changing to a zoning that
would allow a higher density. Conunissioner Holland reported on his attendance at the
Conmrnnity Economic Development Committee meeting. There was no report on City
Council meetings. Conm1issioner Weesner reported that the Comprehensive Plan
subcommittee will be moving forward with review of the City infrastructure which
includes the CIP, Master Drainage, Major Thoroughfare and Utilities plans.
7.Reports.
a.Council Liaison -no comments.
b.Staff -DRC report, August 10th Open Meeting training
Ms. Steelquist reviewed the DRC report with the Conunission and reminded them of
the Open Meeting training on August 10, 2006.
Page 2 of 3
8/3/06 Plaiming & Zoning
8.Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
�CQ[L
Development Coordinator
I I
Page 3 of 3
8/3/06 Planning & Zoning
[ 1
l
i
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 17, 2006
Minutes of a regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission held
Thursday, August 17, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following was considered:
1.Call to order
The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m. with the following present:
Jim Gibson Diana Steelquist -Staff Planner
Mark Van Riper
Eugene Hammett
Kevin Holland
Bob Bertrand
Mona Miller -Development Coordinator
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
Diedra Brown -CEDC Liaison
Commissioners Sheny Weesner and Roy Klusendorf were absent.
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
None.
3.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 8-03-06 Regular meeting minutes.
Motion: Bertrand -to approve the minutes as submitted
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
The commission took a brief recess to get a new recorder to record the meeting.
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of Quaker Bend Estates.
Commissioner Bertrand asked about the 10' easement on the plat. Ms. Steelquist reminded
him that this was for a PUD/SUP-residential development and the easement was to access
Lot 2.
Motion: Bertrand -to approve with staff comments and drainage district approval
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of Sterling Ridge Estates.
Page 1 of 3
8/17 /06 Planning & Zoning
Motion: Bertrand -to approve with staff comments and drainage district approval
Ms. Steelquist reminded Commissioner Holland that staff received a letter from the
developer asking that this item be tabled.
Amended Motion: Bertrand -to table this item
Second: Holland
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Tabled
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Jacob's Landing
located at the end of Wilderness Trails.
Motion: Bertrand -to approve with staff comments
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Friendswood Lakes,
Section 4.
Commissioner Holland excused himself due to a potential conflict of interest on this item.
Motion: Bertrand -to approve with staff comments
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Be1trand asked about the staff comment referring to the street c01mections.
Ms. Steelquist explained that the three streets will be required to be tied into the existing
streets from Section 3 once the reserves are removed.
8.Discussion and possible action regarding a Pla1ming and Zoning goals retreat with City
Council.
Commissioner Gibson stated the request is to hold a joint workshop/retreat with City Council
in October in order to define the role and goals of the Commission. Commissioner Bertrand
stated that he would like to see the Commission be more involved with the area homeowner's
associations.
9.Communications from the Commission.
-City Council meeting report
No one attended the last Council meeting, therefore, there was no report.
Commissioner Bertrand stated that he will not be able to attend the August 21 st Joint Public
Hearing. He also expressed concern about the duties of the downtown revitalization
committee being different than the original conunittees' focus.
Page 2 of 3
8/1 7 /06 Planning & Zoning
I l
r 1
I l
Commissioner Holland explained that the Commission is requesting a workshop with
Council on the downtown committee and a retreat. He requested that staff bring a liaison
schedule to each meeting.
10.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Mr. Hill stated that he would like more information on the 1' reserve and spite strips in
the Friendswood Lakes, Section 3 subdivision. Also, he believes the new downtown
revitalization committee will report directly to Council, instead of to the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
b.Staff
-Report on the Downtown Revitalization Committee
Ms. Steelquist explained that Council had appointed a new committee made up of the
same members as the original conunittee that would now be called the "Downtown
Revitalization Committee". She added that a discussion regarding downtown will be
held with Council following the Joint Public Hearing on Monday, August 21st .
11.Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. ��
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
8/17/06 Planning & Zoning
Minutes of a Special Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
August 21, 2006
A special meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Monday,
August 21, 2006 at 7 :00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following members were present:
Eugene Hammett
Mark Van Riper
Jim Gibson
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Sherry Weesner
John Olson-City Attorney
Diana Steelquist-Planner
With a quorum present, Commissioner Bertrand absent, Chairman Holland called the meeting to
order to consider the following.
7:00 P.M.-DOCKETED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
1.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding the following:
A.Amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Friendswood Appendix C, to
allow certain special exceptions for gas stations located within the Original
Business District (OBD).
No one spoke either for or against this item.
B.The release of .1481 acres of Right-of-Way and utility easement located in the
Mary Sloan Survey Subdivision, Tract 2, Galveston County.
Jerri Lynne Jobe, 1 lSun Meadow Blvd., addressed the Commission and Council. She
questioned whether the area of the right-of-way being released belonged to the City. She
recalled that in 1982 the city had not accepted this area of R.O.W. and therefore it already
belonged to Dr. Smith. Mayor Smith asked Staff to address this issue with Ms. Jobe.
There were no other comments either for or against this item.
2.Close Joint Docketed Public Hearing.
The Joint Docketed Public Hearing was closed at 7:15 P.M.
3.Discussion with City Council regarding Downtown Zoning District.
4.The Council informed the Commission about the creation of the Downtown Revitalization
Committee. This Co1m11ittee should continue its work and report its findings to the
Page 1 of2
8/21/06 P & Z
Commission. The Council would also like a reconunendation from Chairman Holland
regarding alternate committee members in case not all those who had previously participated
were available. Several council members expressed differing opinions concerning the
requirements for the new Downtown Zone. Encouraging redevelopment and protecting the
citizens were the general themes. Differing opinions were expressed in response to
Commissioner Weesner's question about allowing property owners to opt in to the new
district.
5.Adjournment
With no further comment the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
Page 2 of 2
8/21/06 P & Z
I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 7, 2006
Minutes of a regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission held
Thursday, September 7, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following was considered:
1.Call to orde1;
The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m. with the following present:
Jim Gibson
Sherry Weesner
Eugene Hammett
Kevin Holland
Diana Steelquist -Staff Planner
Mona Miller -Development Coordinator
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
Roy Klusendorf 7 :27 p.m.
Commissioners Bob Bertrand and Mark Van Riper were absent.
PUBLIC HEARING
2.To receive public input, either oral or written regarding:
A.Final Park 518 Reserve "B" Replat and Addition located at the intersection of FM
518 and FM 528.
Dan King of Kandiland Daycare, I 04 Victoria, spoke in opposition. He stated that
the current condition of the detention area is unacceptable. He explained that it has
very high weeds and mosquitoes. Mr. King stated that he is considering installing a
6' wood fence due to complaints from his clients.
REGULAR SESSION
3.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
None.
4.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 8-17-06 Regular meeting minutes.
b.Approval of the 8-21-06 Special meeting minutes.
Motion: Weesner -to remove August 21, 2006 minutes from consent agenda.
Second: Holland
Voted For: Unanimous
Page 1 of 5
09/07/06 Planning & Zoning
Motion Carried
Motion: Holland -to approve the August 17, 2006 minutes as submitted.
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner expressed her disagreement with the way that Item #3 on the
August 21, 2006 minutes was written. She stated that it sounds like there was a
consensus of Council on the direction of the committee. She explained, however, that
she did not agree that there was a consensus, but that there were different comments and
opinions from several Councilmembers.
Chairperson Holland asked Commissioner Weesner to draft verbiage that she would be
comfortable with for this item. Conunissioner Weesner agreed.
Motion: Gibson -to table August 21, 2006 minutes
Second: Hammett
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Friendswood Appendix C, to allow certain special exceptions for gas stations located
within the Original Business District (OBD).
Commissioner Weesner explained that she is opposed to recommending these changes to
City Council for _three reasons: 1) These amendments will not bring the tlu-ee existing
stations into compliance, 2) The current marketing strategy for gas stations is for large
gas stations with many pumps and convenience stores and 3) She feels that these
amendments should be reconsidered after the downtown zoning has been decided.
Motion: Gibson -to recommendation to City Council the proposed amendments as
submitted
Second: Holland
Voted For: 3 to 1 (Weesner opposed) Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Stonecreek at West
Ranch, Section Two.
Commissioner Weesner explained that she did not receive any staff recommendation
letters. Ms. Steelquist read staff comments and stated that they do have preliminary
approval from the drainage district.
Motion: Weesner -to approve with staff conunents
Second: Holland
Conunissioner Weesner asked Jeff Anderson with Friendswood Development Company
about GCCDD Note #2 stating that the maintenance would be the responsibility of the
property owner. Commissioner Weesner asked who the property owner is.
Page 2 of 5 2 09/07 /06 Planning & Zoning
I ; Mr. Anderson explained that note is being changed to state that the management
company will maintain those areas.
Commissioner Weesner asked about GCCDD Note #5 regarding plantings in side lot
drainage easements. Mr. Anderson explained that the drainage district does not allow
anything to be planted in the 3' side drainage easements on each lot. Ms. Steelquist
stated that this is a standard drainage district plat note.
Amended Motion: Weesner -to approve with staff comments and the addition of stating
that the management company will maintain easements, reserves, etc.
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Preliminary Plat of Creekside at West
Ranch Section Two.
Motion: Weesner -to approve with staff comments and the addition of stating that the
management company will maintain easements, reserves, etc.
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
8.Consideration and possible action regarding approval of a bond for the construction of
sidewalks within platted reserves in Creekside at West Ranch Section One, Stonecreek at
West Ranch Section One, Estates of West Ranch Section One.
Ms. Steelquist explained that the ordinance requires that sidewalks are installed prior to
Council's approval of the plat. In this subdivision, she added that there are extensive
sidewalks and trails throughout the reserves. The development is asking to provide a
bond to the City, instead of building the sidewalks now. She stated that they would like
to get all of their landscaping and sprinkler system in prior to installing the sidewalks.
Chairperson Holland asked Mr. Anderson about another agreement that they had made
with the City regarding sidewalks. Mr. Anderson explained that they have agreed to
install sidewalks within their property along one side of Bay Area in the Autumn Creek
subdivision. Commissioner Weesner questioned whether the sidewalk would be built on
both sides of Bay Area. Mr. Anderson said that their agreement with the City was only
for one side of the street. Chairperson Holland commended the developer for taking on
this responsibility.
Ms. Steelquist stated that the proposed bond amount has been figured at four dollars per
foot of sidewalk. Chairperson Holland mentioned that concrete and rebar prices are
increasing. He suggested setting the bond amount at five dollars per foot. Mr. Anderson
agreed.
Motion: Hanunett -to approve with change to five dollars per foot of sidewalk on bond
Second: Weesner
Page 3 of 5
09/07/06 Planning & Zoning
3
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Klusendorf entered the meeting at 7:27 pm.
9.Consideration and possible action regarding Commercial Site Plan of Calvary Chapel
Church.
Ms. Steelquist explained that most of the comments from the September 5, 2006 memo
have been addressed with new drawings. She stated that even though the building
exceeds the normal allowed building height, the ordinance allows additional height for
stage towers and scenery lofts.
Motion: Gibson -to approve with staff comments
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
10.Discussion and possible action regarding the Commercial Site Plan approval process.
Chairperson Holland explained that when the Commission considered staff approving
Commercial site plans previously, he was concerned about staffing levels. However,
now he believes that staff can handle this review themselves, without Planning and
Zoning's review. Commissioner Weesner stated that the process works fine just as it is.
She expressed concern for ·staff overlooking issues on the site plans that Planning and
Zoning might notice. Commissioner Klusendorf agreed with Commissioner Weesner's
comments.
Motion: Holland -to allow staff to review and approve commercial site plans only.
The motion failed due to lack of a second.
11.Communications from the Cornn1ission.
a.CAB report from Kevin Holland
Ms. Steelquist stated that Chairperson Holland provided an agenda and previous minutes
for the Community Appearance Board meeting that he attended.
12.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
None.
b.Staff -DRC report, Release of Right-of-Way to Dr. Larry Smith, Upcoming
American Planning Association Conference October 18-21, Liaison Schedule
Ms. Steelquist mentioned that a DRC report and the Liaison schedule is attached for
the Commission's review. She also informed the Commission of the upcoming Texas
AP A Conference in Corpus Christi in October. She encouraged any Commissioners
Page 4 of 5
09/07/06 Platming & Zoning
4
I :
I
who could attend to do so. In addition, Ms. Steelquist gave an update on the release
of Right of Way with Dr. Smith.
13.Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 7:42 p.m.
OC}.ro� Mona Miller
Development Coordinator
Page 5 of 5
09/07/06 Planning & Zoning
5
I :
I
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
September 21, 2006
Minutes of a regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission held
Thursday, September 21, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 910 S.
Friendswood Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following was considered:
1.Call to order
The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. with the following present:
Jim Gibson
Sherry Weesner
Mark Van Riper
Kevin Holland
Bob Bertrand
Roy Klusendorf
Diana Steelquist -Staff Planner
Mona Miller -Development Coordinator
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
Commissioner Eugene Hammett was absent.
2.Communication from the public/conm1ittee liaisons.
Esteban Pina, 1003 Thomas, expressed the need for a road block at the dead end of
Crawford Road. He explained that there is no cul-de-sac and without a barricade, there is
nothing to keep people from trespassing. He also shared his concern about people dumping
there.
Commissioner Holland stated that the road easement allows for access to the prope11y
behind it, therefore, you can not block access. Ms. Steelquist stated that staff will research
the issue.
Tabled Items:
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the final plat of Sterling Ridge Estates.
Motion: Weesner-to remove the item from table
Second: Bertrand
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Weesner verified that the well heads are marked on the plat.
Commissioner Holland asked why the plat was tabled originally. Ms. Steelquist stated
that the plat was tabled waiting on a water model from the developer.
Page 1 of 3
09/21/06 Plmming & Zoning
Motion: Weesner-to approve
Second: Bertrand
Voted For: Unanimous
Regular Items:
4.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 9-7-06 Regular meeting minutes.
b. Approval of the 8-21-06 Special meeting minutes.
Motion Carried
c.Approval of the Final Park 518 Reserve "B" Re-plat and Addition located at the
intersection of FM 518 and FM 528
Motion: Weesner-to remove Item C. from consent agenda.
Second: Van Riper
Voted For: Unanimous
Motion: Gibson -to approve the consent agenda minus Item C.
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Ms. Steelquist explained that a new plat copy was submitted in order to address the staff
comments on the September 5th memo and to show the Drainage District's approval.
Motion: Weesner-to approve item C.
Second: Van Riper
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding changing regular meeting dates in October
2006.
A discussion ensued regarding the AP A conference and how it will affect the Planning
and Zoning meeting dates in October.
Motion: Weesner -to approve changing the second Planning and Zoning meeting date in
October to October 26th.
Second: Holland
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Discussion and possible action regarding cul-de-sac length requirements.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding cul-de-sacs and blocks, and the reasons for length
requirements of each. Also discussed were the differences between cul-de-sacs and
blocks, and the intent of the ordinance. Ms. Steelquist stated that she will research and
bring back information on how to measure block length, the definition of a block and
reasons for length restrictions.
Page 2 of 3
09/21/06 Planning & Zoning
7.Communications from the Comm ission.
a.Comprehensive Plan update
Commissioner Weesner explained that Ms. Steelquist has provided an updated land use
map for the group, and they will identify all tax exempt properties in the City. In
addition, she stated that Commissioner Klusendorf is working on the master drainage
plan, Commissioner Gibson is working on the major thoroughfare plan, and she is
working on the park plan.
8.Rep01is.
a.Council Liaison
b.Staff -Liaison Schedule
Commissioner Klusendorf stated that he will be gone beginning October 5 111 • Ms.
Steelquist informed the Commission that Jon Branson, Director of Community Services
has taken a position with the City of Pearland. In addition, Ms. Steelquist stated that
John Garner, a professional Engineer who had worked with the City and many
developers, has passed away. She also reminded the Commission that reservations for
the AP A Conference need to be made as soon as possible.
A discussion ensued regarding the Liaison schedule and different ways to schedule for
each meeting. It was suggested that each member attend a few consecutive meetings,
instead of having a different Commissioner attend each time. Also, attending
homeowner' s association meetings was mentioned. The Commission requested that staff
add an action item on the next P & Z agenda for this.
9.Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 7:38 p.m.
QC}'()� Mona Miller
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
09/21/06 Planning & Zoning
I I
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission
October 26, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held on Thursday,
October 26, 2006, at 7 :00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following was considered:
Call to order
The meeting was called to ·order at 7:03 p.m. with the following present:
Jim Gibson Diana Steelquist -Staff Planner
Sherry Weesner Mona Miller-Development Coordinator
Bob Bertrand Jim Hill -Council Liaison
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Marcus Rives
Regular Items
Motion: Gibson -to consider Item #6 first
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
6.Consideration and possible action regarding the preliminary plat of Friendswood Lakes
West.
Motion: Be11rand -to approve with staff comments
Second: None
Commissioner Gibson explained that this item should be tabled due to the fact that it has
three pages of staff comments that need to be addressed. Commissioner Weesner
concurred.
Motion: Weesner-to table
Second: Gibson
Voted For: Unanimous
1.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
None.
Motion Carried
2.Oaths of Office: Administer the Oath of Office for the appointment of new
Commissioner, Marcus Rives.
Page 1 of 4
10/26/06 Planning & Zoning
Ms. Steelquist administered the Oath of Office for new Commissioner Marcus Rives.
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the selection of Chairman and Vice
chairman to serve from October 2006 to October 2008.
Commissioner Bertrand recognized Chairman Holland and Vice-Chairman Gibson and
thanked them for their service on the Board.
Motion: Bertrand -to nominate Commissioner Jim Gibson as Chairperson
Second: Holland
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Motion: Bertrand -to nominate Commissioner Kevin Holland as Vice-Chairperson
Second: Rives
Voted For: Unanimous
4.Consent Agenda:
a.Approval of the 9-21-06 Regular meeting minutes.
Motion: Gibson -to approve
Second: Bertrand
Voted For: Unanimous
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
5.Consideration and possible action regarding the Final Plat of Friendswood Lakes,
Section Four.
Vice-Chairman Holland refrained from discussion on this item due to a possible conflict
of interest.
Commissioner Klusendorf asked about the requirement of an 8' fence around the
development. Ms. Steelquist explained that staff asked them to add that note that a fence
would be required between the commercial and residential developments.
Chairman Gibson inquired about the one foot reserves between this section and the
existing sections. Ms. Steelquist stated that the conflict with the one foot reserves has
been resolved and they will connect to the existing streets.
Glen Kessler of the Friendswood Lakes Home Owners Association expressed the HOA's
support of this development.
Motion: Bertrand -to approve with staff comments
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous
Page 2 of 4
10/26/06 Planning & Zoning
Motion Carried
I i
7.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial site plan for Wachovia
Bank located at 200 W. Parkwood.
Commissioner Weesner questioned why a drainage plan was not required on this project.
Ms. Steelquist explained that this was the site of the old Burger King and that there
would be minimal change to the impervious cover.
Motion: Holland -to approve with staff comments
Second: Bertrand
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
8.Discussion and possible action regarding changes to the Zoning Ordinance to create a
Downtown Zoning District.
After some discussion, the Commission asked that staff make a presentation at the next
meeting to highlight revisions to the ordinance.
9.Discussion and possible action regarding P&Z Liaison schedules.
Commissioner Weesner suggested that the Parks Board be added to the liaison schedule.
Commissioner Bertrand reiterated that he would like to add some type of meetings or
workshops with the homeowners associations. The Commission requested that staff
propose a new liaison schedule with permanent liaisons for each board and two
Commissioners acting as backup liaisons for a period of one year.
10.Communications from the Commission.
None.
11.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
Jim Hill informed the Commission that the City Council had unanimously chosen a
candidate for City Manager named Bo McDaniel. He gave a brief history of Mr.
McDaniel's experiences.
b.Staff -DRC report, Texas APA conference report, upcoming Joint Public
Hearings
Ms. Steelquist reminded the Commission about the attached DRC repo11. She also
gave a brief report of staffs attendance at the recent Texas APA Conference in
Corpus Clu·isti. Ms. Steelquist also reminded the Commissioners of two Joint Public
Hearings scheduled for Monday, November 6111• 12.Adjournment.
Page 3 of 4
10/26/06 Planning & Zoning
The meeting adjourned at 7:46 pm.
m��
MonaM\ller
Development Coordinator
Page 4 of 4
10/26/06 Planning & Zoning
I I
l
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
of the
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 2, 2006
A regular meeting of the Friendswood Planning and Zoning Commission was held Thursday,
November 2, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the city hall council chambers located at 910 S. Friendswood
Drive, Friendswood, Texas. The following was considered:
Call to order:
The meeting was called to order at 7:03 pm with the following present:
Jim Gibson
Sherry Weesner
Bob Bertrand
Kevin Holland
Roy Klusendorf
Marcus Rives
Mark Van Riper
Dan Johnson -City Engineer
Mona Miller -Development Coordinator
Jim Hill -Council Liaison
Chairman Gibson stated that he would like to receive communication from the public under Item
#2 prior to considering Item # 1. The Commission agreed.
Regular Items
2.Communication from the public/committee liaisons.
Janis Lowe, 14 70 Garden Lake Drive, represented the concerns of the Friendswood Lakes
Homeowners Association. Their concerns included the new road to be built to serve the
sand pit with approximately five hundred trucks per day, the density of the development,
and the lack of green space and parks. Ms. Lowe explained that they would like to include
this new development in their association if their concerns could be addressed. She asked
that the Commission require the Commercial reserve in the front of this development be
rezoned prior to final plat approval. In addition, she requested that this new section be
required to follow the original master plan with winding streets and cul-de-sacs.
Glen Grayban, 1628 Mossy Stone, expressed his concern with the density of the new
section decreasing home values if they did not provide more amenities.
Leslie Roque, 1916 Sandy Lake, explained that she would like Mr. Sellers to be successful;
however, she would like to see a lower number of homes with higher values, instead of the
high density.
Tabled Items
Page 1 of 3
11/02/06 Planning & Zoning
1.Consideration and possible action regarding the preliminary plat of Friendswood Lakes
West.
Motion: Be1trand -to remove from the table
Second: Klussendorf
Voted For: Unanimous
Motion: Bertrand -approve with staff comments
Second: Van Riper
Motion Carried
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the proposed road through the subdivision, the
sandpit traffic, the lot sizes and layout, the drainage, the detention pond, the Commercial
reserve, sidewalks and parks.
Motion: Weesner-to table and hold a special meeting next week
Second: Holland
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
3.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial site plan of Fire Station #4.
Motion: Weesner-approve with staff comments
Second: Holland
Commissioner Klussendorf recommended that the detention area be sodded.
Motion: Weesner -table until special meeting to provide site plan
Second: Bertrand
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
Commissioner Holland requested that the City Attorney attend the special meeting.
4.Consideration and possible action regarding the Commercial site plan for Linna's
Donuts located at 301 W. Edgewood, Suite One.
Motion: Weesner -approve with staff comments
Second: Bertrand
The Commission expressed their concern with the site plan including the lack of lighting
in the proposed drive-thru area and the radius of the driveway.
Amended Motion: Bertrand -approve with staff comments, lighting of the drive-thru
area and staff verifying that the turning radius is maneuverable.
Second: Weesner
Voted For: Unanimous Motion Carried
5.Discussion and possible action regarding definitions of Streets and Blocks.
Page 2 of 3
11/02/06 Planning & Zoning
I i
I
[
Mr. Johnson explained that Ms. Steelquist was preparing for this discussion; however,
she is not able to attend the meeting tonight because her son is in the hospital. He stated
that it will be moved to a later agenda.
6.Discussion and possible action regarding P&Z Liaison schedules.
The Commission asked that staff change the proposed schedule to a six month schedule,
then rotate the alternates for the City Council and the Drainage District, and rotate other
Commissioners onto different boards. Commissioner Bertrand suggested that someone
attend the Zoning Board of Adjustments and the Construction Board of Adjustments
meetings. Chairman Gibson agreed to cover those meetings.
7.Discussion and possible action regarding changes to the Zoning Ordinance to create a
Downtown Zoning District.
Mr. Johnson stated that this is another item that will be placed on a later agenda for Ms.
Steelquist to present.
8.Communications from the Commission.
Commissioner Weesner stated that she attended the Clear Creek Nature Tourism Council
meeting and gave a brief explanation of the group and some of their activities.
9.Reports.
a.Council Liaison
None.
b.Staff -upcoming Joint Public Hearings
Staff reminded the Commission of the upcoming Joint Public Hearings on Monday,
November 6th at 7 pm.
10.Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 8:20 pm.
(Yb�� Mona Ann Miller
Development Coordinator
Page 3 of 3
11/02/06 Planning & Zoning