Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutP&Z Minutes 2008-01-24 RegularPLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING THURSDAY, JANUARY 24, 2008 7:00PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL 910 S. FRIENDSWOOD DRIVE FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00pm. The following people were in attendance: Chairman Jim Gibson Vice Chairwoman Sherry Weesner Commissioner Roy Klusendorf City Planner Mona Miller City Attorney Bobby Gcrvai::. Commissioner Michael Brown Commissioner Mark McLean Commissioner David O'Farrell Development Coord. Aubrey Harbin City Council Liaison Laura Ewing Weesner made a motion to move the consent agenda item to the top of the agenda. No opposition. 2. Consent Agenda: a. Approval of Minutes for the January 10,2008 Regular Meeting Motion to Approve: Weesner 3. Communication from the public/committee liaisons Rick Eckersley, 209 Charleston, spoke in regards to the zone change request for 1501 Winding Way. He stated that CEDC considered 13 properties within the City for commercial use and declined two; this was one that was declined. He also stated that the homeowners within 200 feet signed a protest, as well as six surrounding businesses. 4. Consideration and possible action regarding a zone change request at 1501 Winding Way from Single Family Residential (SFR) to Office Park District (OPD) Motion to Deny: McLean Second: Brown Vote: 3 to 1 (Klusendorf opposed) Motion to Approve: Klusendorf Second: Brown Vote: 1 to 3 (Weesner, McLean, Brown opposed)Motion Failed 5. Consideration and possible action regarding a request for Preliminary Plat approval extension on Clearwood Business Park on FM 2351 Motion to approve one six-month extension: Weesner Second: Brown Vote: Unanimous Motion Carried 6. Consideration and possible action regarding Resolution #2002-55 Planning and Zoning Rules and Procedures Motion to adopt: Weesner Second: Brown Vote: Unanimous Motion Carried Commissioner Moghaddam entered at 7: l5pm. 7. Consideration and possible action regarding possible amendments to Appendix A, Sign Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances Commissioner McLean eXplained that the subcommittee reviewed Section 216 of the Local Government Code, which addresses non-conforniing and uosolete signs. He explained that they feel like they have come up with some resolmions. He explained that the proposed Competitive Fairness signage is not needed. The consensus of the subcommittee was that the non-conforming and obsolete sign ordinances were adequate and if a property owner had a special situation, they could apply for a variance. It was decided to change the November 30,2005 date to "prior to date of ordinance." 8. Consideration and possible action regarding proposed amendments to Appendix C, Zoning Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances regarding Downtown District: a. building heights Motion to approve as previously written: Weesner Second: Brown V ote: Unanimous Motion Carried b. on-street parking Motion to approve as previously written: Weesner Second: Brown V ote: Unanimous Motion Carried 2 c. trees in tree wells Motion to approve as previously written: Weesner Second: Brown V ote: Unanimous Motion Carried d. sidewalk widths and sidewalk alternatives Motion to approve as previously written: Weesner Second: Brown Vote: Unanimous Amended motion to remove "head-in parking" from sidewalk portion of the Downtown District zoning ordinance and that sidewalks may be located on private property and within the public ROW as needed: Weesner Second: Brown V ote: Unanimous Motion Carried Upon advisement from the city attorney, this will go back to City Council as a recommendation and hold a new public hearing due to the significant change in wording. 9. Consideration and possible action regarding proposed amendments to Appendix C, Zoning Ordinance and Appendix D Fees, of the Code of Ordinances regarding Commercial Site Plan fees Motion to recommend as previously written: Weesner Second: Moghaddam Vote: Unanimous Motion Carried It was stated that there were no comments at the public hearing and CEDC has no strong feelings either way. 10. Consideration and possible action regarding proposed amendments to Appendix B, Subdivision Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances regarding: a. Rights of Way widths Motion to approve as previously written: Weesner Second: Moghaddam V ote: Unanimous Motion Carried b.creation of a sidewalk fund Motion to approve as discussed Monday night: Weesner Second: Brown Weesner withdrew the original motion. 3 Motion to recommend the sidewalk fund ordinance as written with the following changes: 1) fee is for the approved sidewalk 2) remove escalation clause: Weesner Second: Brown Vote: Unanimous Motion Carried Upon advisement from the city attorney, this will go back to City Council as a recommendation and hold a new public hearing due to the significant change in wording. 11. Consideration and possible action regarding specifications for the Downtown District streetscape The Commission asked Les McMahen, Director of Community Development, where he thought the best place would be to place Downtown District streetscape requirements. McMahen stated that a chapter should be added to the Design Criteria Manual. The Commission requested specific requirements to achieve consistent design in the Downtown District including surfaces, benches, lighting and sidewalks. 12. Update from the subcommittee reviewing Appendix C, Zoning Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances for possible amendments Subcommittee and staff are still working on this. 13. Communications from the Commission Chairman Gibson explained that he would be out of town for the first CEDC meeting in February and asked Moghaddam ifhe would attend in his place. Moghaddam agreed. Klusendorf thanked McLean and Moghaddam for their hard work on the sign ordinance reVlSlOns. 14. Reports a. Council Liaison - Ewing thanked the commissioners for their research and hard work. b. Staff - Miller informed commissioners about a conference coming up on March 5- 7. She explained that if anyone is interested in attending, the city will pay for all expenses and to let her know. 15. The meeting was adjourned at 7:51pm. These minutes respectfully submitted by: 4