Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution No. 93-24
, � A RESOLUTION NO. R93-24 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN APPROVED, AND THE IMPACT FEES IMPOSED, BY RESOLUTION NO. 90-22, PASSED AND APPROVED THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 1990, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 91-4, PASSED AND APPROVED THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1991; MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. * * * * * WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the qualified professionals of the City's staff to prepare an amendment to the City's Capital Improvements Plan and to recalculate impact fees in accordance therewith; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held public hearings as required by law to amend its Capital Improvements Plan and adjust impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such amendment, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and for all things is made a part thereof; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS: Section 1. The facts and matters set forth in the preamble of this Resolution are hereby found to be true and correct. Section 2 . The Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Study, as amended, originally adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 90-22 , passed and approved the 4th day of June 1990, is hereby further amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, said Exhibit "A" being entitled "City of Friendswood Amendment to C.I.P. FWD\IM PACTFEE.RES\061293 g and Impact Fee Study Dated April 27, 1990, Amendment - March 10 , 1993 . " Section 3 . In the event any clause, phrase, provision, sentence, or part of this Resolution or the application of the same to any person or circumstance shall for any reason be adjudged invalid or held unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect, impair, or invalidate this Ordinance as a whole or any part or provision hereof other than the part declared to be invalid or unconstitutional; and the City Council of the City of Friendswood, Texas, declares that it would have passed each and every part of the same notwithstanding the omission of any such part thus declared to be invalid or unconstitutional, whether there be one or more parts. PASSED, APPROVED, AND RESOLVED this 17th day of �a.y. , 1993 . � Evely B. Newman Mayor ATTEST: . �► De oris McKenzie, CMC City Secretary FWD\IMPACTFEE.RES\061293 -2- . • • BROWN. 81L GAY ENGINEERS, INC. • UPDATE STUDY FOR LAND USE AssumPTIoNs) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS-PLAN AND IMPACT FEE • • r • Proposed Waiter and Wastewater Systems • • • Presented T ` . to: • City of endswood Community Development Department March r.y 1• ..• . . • , vEYRS�—H�l]ST�N TEXAS.::,f r �- - •_ -__�_ J: __ •__. __�_�.. • • .:;,s" ,:�� t.�=.::.�- CIVIL ENGINEERS-&SUR �._ - L :� .w. -'w.• • • •. -; {, ' ._.• L • .. ' is a•.r_4jy..•,.n-• _ • ` � of -.,• �r_'•r• ,4 � • �.' .. .=t, _��.+++•'r,- -- . .. . 1° __- z rry OF FRIENDSW . . . . ... ONS, CAPITAL IMPROVE MENTS uSE ASSUNErn ermi. n FOR LAND - . . Acr FEE UPDATE...,-- ---1( PLAN AND II" . .. • wAsTEwATER sysTEMS C 00D .. , . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ' March 10, 199 , . , . . . ... Town a nine rs nc. uitera sDrive, . _. -• Houston, Texas 77077-651.3 : . ,..„.‘.3,,...c,.;„..4 it 2 fr 1''.i.s?.N1'I s:N i.1 t I, -L----c ....... ____ A .iss,.4 . . i Ar"...S.:•'s . . . ,....7,,, . ,... . . i ." A -.31.;'. _ P ..4.i ii.:„1,1.a O. •-•-.. fr4 /: ,,&-----,:p. SV S W KRUSE ....-------;,. .' _ A...-•-"''-—"; . z'' :, re • 1. 52 I521FO e.,.,..!.. 6(?`.* -.:,' - WMGOVINCOF03F) - -- t-c!, ..,•9 6_ - Vt'Pel•s -Gi '1,‘,..*."(),,. .. ' .. Itlx,(`.4 ■i ■■ c,‘.-,..:40.- \WS!0,i PA-_-,.:;..-- .. , .,„..,_ .i. _.: , . , .. N-k%:&..,..i.,. ---7-' ...., .'...,-, :::.'.,.-:,.:_.-„H.-:,,:. .;.'. : . . , ,. , . i., . . . . ,,• . ,.._. ....„..• ,. ..,..•..•.,..,,..,.,..,.. ...,...,_,.•r.. .,_.... .,.,...:,... ... . ._..,, .,_ .. .- .. '•i,.-,_.-:.--.-_.--:-t.---.---.,,.,::-:,.,_. -. _6. .,... ....:..-:-r,.,_.., :.,i..,A,,,. .,:,—,.-i-.,'::,,•,..,.:—.!--- -.:.,:- « ......_ — _"�—� �.�._��.__r.-._.� f. !- .�. ....—_i ...",'— ' ,�'�fir .•y•••i' _.s::..,:,:_•:.;,:_,.i:,•,-,,---- ,. -,,,:-:',,.:,.... ,,`:.,,4 •r ':: �.;•L .y F }tip•...�••_�•e•-t�-`•41:r ,�.' r.` .. "' i �i.��•� C Tye'-,�•}. t•i` .. .. ' .. - - . ' `..'' OF FRMNDSWOOD ` ` CAPrrAL PLAN AND FEE !-'l'`' ' ' .. PROPOSED WATE'' AND _EWATER COLLECTION WAST SYSTEMS � .. . . ' ' . Mayor New'-' ` ` City Council .` . . - .. � '. Ms,, tten aj ecate .. Mel P. .. ' Mr. To Mamson ' Mr. Ed Stuart . . Mr. Harold-Raley . . .. Mr. Frank Frankovich .. .. . . ` .. , . ' - .. City Ronald'E. `'' . . . ` JamesT11o . ',�/ ` .,`'."� � Publ ic.Wor1c9, '.`.``.`.`',.`.. or. ^ Roecker Roger F ance Director ' '`'^, Delo, ris ```''.' CMC City Atto ey . John Olsen .. ' ` ` .. . .. i. It z .. '' p p .. ' CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD UPDATE STUDY FOR LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND IMPACT FEE PROPOSED WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chairman: Vice Chairman: Benny Baker Kenny Koncaba 1203 Silverleaf 409 Morningside (h) 482-1120 (h) 482-2207 (w) 286-8587 (w) 482-7941 Jan Jordan Hans Van Dyke 31 Hideaway 701 W. Edgewood (h) 482-6954 (h)482-1426 (w) 482-2112 (w) 338-4225 Don Dickson Jeanie McHugh 2004 McKissick 1104 Lost River (h) 996-0653 (h)482-9122 (w) 945-7362 William R. Finger John Watson P.O. Box 879 104 Pecan (h) 482-0108 (w) 482-0557 Staff: James E. Thompson, P.E. City Engineer & Community Development Director 4824438 Claudia Brinkman Planning & Zoning Secretary 4824438 CITY of FRIENDSWOOD UPDATE STUDY FOR LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND IMPACT FEE PROPOSED WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page I, Executive Summary 1 II. Introduction 4 III, Review of Land Use Assumptions 6 IV. Review of Water Supply Impact Fee 9 V. Review of Water Distribution System Impact Fee 12 A. Melody Lane Service Area B. Bay Area Boulevard Service Area C. South Friendswood (Central) Service Area VI. Review of Wastewater Treatment Impact Fee 14 VII, Review of Wastewater Collection System Impact Fee 17 A. Melody Lane Service Area B. South Friendswood (Central) Service Area C. Mills, Murphy, Briarmeadow Ave. Service Area Vifi. Exhibits A. Water System Service Areas B. Melody Lane Water Distribution System C. Bay Area Boulevard Water Distribution System D. South Friendswood Water Distribution System E. Wastewater System Service Areas F. Melody Lane Wastewater Collection System G. South Friendswood Wastewater Collection System H. South Friendswood Wastewater Collection System I. Mills, Murphy, Briarmeadow Ave. Wastewater Collection System IX. Appendices A. South B. CollectionSystem South Wastewater Cost Estimates C. Impact Fee Calculation per Segment of South Friendswood D. Criteria for Estimation of Sewage Contribution • - Special Uses 1 E. Impact Fee Legislation • • • . . • •. •, . . • . • .t., • . ••- .• ti • � •• r•_�r :1 :,`•"-•r{h7`'••`.'. �. - . _. � .• . .1 •- • :G.".ter_'�•�•�'i.. rr-�• , .. �...,-- Y •� • .. _ '. s ,•�•`�,•s `wf~ -�i� Y �, .i `1� -..a ,y J •. -3...��•..:.�.�y'�� s,L.' +-..r��.�•;:�=:��.. r��• ,• .,..• • • �,,s•__ � � ,�; ,r•• Sri•' •] F t`: -�•• •. .' .. _.5'1T-' 's�•r''�','_.� •• �•.�;�:� yam+ i� ;, :, ,�* ' •�; I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Friendswood adopted an Impact Fee Resolution in 1990 in conformance with the state Impact Fee legislation (IJTCA Local Government Code Section 395.001 et seq.). The state legislation included the provisions for municipalities and certain other political subdivisions to assess and collect Impact Fees on land development activities that would fund the planning, right of way acquisition, and construction of infrastructure (water and wastewater utilities, drainage, roads, etc. ) to meet the needs of the new development. The legislation provides that no fees can be assessed or collected on land considered as existing development. The City developed an Impact Fee for water supply capacity, water distribution systems, wastewater treatment capacity, and wastewater collection systems based on the results presented in an engineering report "Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Study -Proposed Water Distribution and Wastewater Collection Systems" prepared by Brown&Gay Engineers, Inc. (BGE). The study included an analysis of future land use and population projections, an analysis of water and wastewater capital improvements needed to meet the demands of the projected development, and established "Maximum Allowable Impact Fees" to be assessed and collected on land development projects to fund the costs for the improvements. In Summary the 1990 Impact Fee (and 1991 Fee Amendment) components per Equivalent Service Unit (ESU) were as follows: A. City Wide Impact Fees: 1. Surface Water Facilities $711 2. Wastewater Treatment Facilities 122 3. Impact FeeICIP Study 7 Total $840 B. Water Distribution Impact Fees: 1. Melody Lane Service Area $854 2. Bay Area Blvd. Service Area $294 3. Central Service Area $358 C. Wastewater Collection Impact Fees: 1. Melody Lane Service-Area $450 2. Central Service Area Segment A: $830 Segment B: $618 Segment C: $397 Segment D: $234 Segment E: $186 3. Mills, Murphy, Briar Meadow Avenue Service Area $2532 The Impact Fee legislation provides that any impact fees adopted would be reviewed at least every three years from the date of adoption. BGE has prepared an Update Study that reviews the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan, and Impact Fees and has proposed adjustments based on recent water demand data, wastewater flow data, and revisions and extensions to the 1990 Service Areas targeted for future development. 2 Essentially the City Wide Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Capacity Impact Fees are proposed to be reduced based on recent city water demand and wastewater flow data. The Melody Lane, Bay Area Boulevard, and Mills, Murphy, and Briarmeadow Avenue Service Area Impact Fees remain the same as calculated in 1990. The Central Service Area was enlarged to include areas to the south of the 1990 service area andri efined as the South Friendswood Service Area to be consistent with planning and design of the wastewater collection system that has occurred in 1991 and 1992. New sub areas have been added to the sub areas defined in the 1990 report based on planning work accomplished over the past 3 years. BGE proposes the following adjustments to the Impact Fees per ESU currently in place: A. City Wide Impact Fees 1. Surface Water Facilities $685 Z. Wastewater Treatment Facilities $ 69 3. Impact Fee Study &Update Study (1) $ 36, Total $790 B. Water Distribution Impact Fees 1. Melody Lane Service Area $854 2. Bay Area Boulevard Service Area $294 3. South Friendswood Service Area $293 - ' C. Wastewater Collection Impact Fees 1. Melody Lane Service Area $450 2. Mils,Murphy,Brirameadow Ave. $2,532 3. South Friendswood Service Area Area A $378 Area B-1 $378 AréaB-2 $378 Area C $285 Area D $161 AreaE-1' $784 Area E-2 (2) $784 AreaE-3 $161 AreaE4 $161 Area F $378 (1) Based on estimated $100,000 for 10 year study costs and 2,757 ESU. (2) Originally calculated to be $5,743 but elected to be equal to Area E-1. Requests for service, in areas in which water and wastewater infrastructure necessary to support new development is neither currently available nor proposed as a part of the Capital Improvements Plan, will have to be coordinated with City officials. .• • ,„ • , •• _ The Impact Fee Legislation provides for assessing the Impact Fee before or at the time•of • recordation of the final plat. In cases where new development occurs without platting, the Impact Fee may be assessed at any time during the development and building process. Collection of the Impact Fees will occur: 1. When the final plat is recorded, if the development is platted, or • - 2. When connections are made to the City's water and wastewater system 3. At the time.the City issues either a building permit or certificate of occupancy. After assessment of Impact Fees attributable to a specific project or the execution of an agreement for payment of Impact Fees,no additional Impact Fees may be assessed.to the particular property for that project unless the number of ESU is increased, in which case the additional fees rto be imposed shall apply only to the additional service units. If a property owner pays an Impact Fee and the construction of the Capital Improvement, for • •_ - which the fee was paid, is neither under construction within 2 years after payment nor complete • for service within 5 years after payment, the Property Owner may request a refund of the fee. We recommend that in cases,of special uses (such as churches, schools and building additions) • or partial use of a tract, the City Engineer would estimate water demands and wastewater flows based on locally accepted criteria and make a recommendation for an equitable impact fee,to the Advisory Committee for their approval (See Exhibit D). Parks, sprinkler systems, and construction trailers will not be assessed any Impact Fees. • ,• , •, . . ...• • . . •. . _ . 4 II. IN1TtODUCTION The City of Friendswood adopted Resolution No. R90-22 on June 4, 1990. The resolution established an Impact Fee to recover the costs for water and wastewater system improvements (water supply, water distribution, wastewater treatment, and wastewater collection) that have been or will be constructed to meet the needs of future development. The Impact Fee was adopted in accordance with state legislation (UTCA Local Government Code Section 395.001 et seq.) subsequent to the preparation and review of an engineering report prepared by Brown& Gay Engineers, Inc. (BGE). The engineering report had developed the calculation of a "Maximum Allowable Impact Fee" for the various "Service Areas" of projected future development. The process included reviewing "Land Use Assumptions - (LUA)" for the 10 year planning period, by determining the required water and wastewater system capital improvements or "Capital Improvements Plan -(CIP)" required to serve projected development, and determining the cost per "Equivalent Service Unit" for the improvements to serve future development within each service area. The Impact Fee could be used to fund improvements to serve new development only and could not be assessed and collected to upgrade facilities - ie. update, expand, or replace existing capital improvements to serve existing development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, or to perform maintenance functions. The calculated Impact Fee involved four components: City wide water supply Impact Fee City wide wastewater treatment Impact Fee Service Area water distribution system Impact Fee Service Area wastewater collection system Impact Fee The City of Friendswood has purchased capacities in a surface water supply plant and wastewater treatment plant that are in excess of existing demands and the excess capacities can be used to provide service to proposed development for the ten year planning period. The cost that has been and will be spent to provide capacity for future development can be retrieved by assessing and collecting a City wide Impact Fee for water and wastewater plants. A "Maximum Allowable Impact Fee" component was determined for the two plants. There were three Service Areas identified in the original engineering report for water distribution system and wastewater collection system Impact Fee analysis due to their potential for development within the ten year planning period: Melody Lane Service Area Bay Area Boulevard Service Area Central Service Area An amendment (R91-4) to the Impact Fee Resolution was adopted on January 7, 1991 that included an additional area identified as Mills, Murphy, and Briarmeadow Avenue between Sunset Drive and Greenbrier Drive. Over the past three years a significant amount of planning and design work (wastewater collection system) has occurred to prepare for the development within an expanded Central Service Area (as defined in the 1990 Impact Fee Study) and the area has been renamed the South Friendswood Service Area in those planning efforts. We have renamed the Central Service Area to be the South Friendswood Service Area in this report to correspond with the 5 current planning. The four areas were analyzed for water distribution and wastewater collection Impact Fees by reviewing the development projections and determining the required capital improvements to serve future needs. The proposed "Maximum Allowable Impact Fees" determined from the engineering study were discussed during required public hearings prior to City Council approval. The approved Impact Fees and the administration procedures were established and presented in Resolution R9O22. The Impact Fee legislation includes a provision that an identified capital improvement project, for which an impact fee has been collected, must be in the construction phase within two years after fee collection and be ready to serve the property owner within five years after fee collection or the property owner may request a refund. The impact fee legislation includes the requirement for a City to review the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee at least every three years from the original adoption date. BGE was authorized by the Friendswood City Council on January 18, 1993 to perform the update study. r_ , 6 III, REVIEW OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS The Impact Fee legislation requires an analysis of Land Use Assumptions for a ten year planning period as the initial step in the determination of an Impact Fee for a Service Area. Land Use Assumptions are defined as "a description of the service area and projections of changes in land uses, densities, intensities, and population in the service area over at least the ten year planning period." At the time of the 1990 Impact Fee Study, the City anticipated an annual growth of approximately 5% for the duration of the 10 year planning period. In 1990, the population of Friendswood was estimated to be 22,500 and the 5% annual growth rate represented an additional 14,150 people over the 10 year planning period. The Additional 14,150 people would correlate to an additional 4,8(X) equivalent single family connections. A significant amount of planning for the wastewater collection system for the South Friendswood Service Area has occurred in 1991 and 1992 by City staff and Wayne Smith& Associates. Two reports have been prepared for the City : "Feasibility Study on The Transport of Wastewater From The Southern Portion of the City to Blackhawk Regional Treatment Facility" (109-91) and "Engineering Letter Report-Extension of Sewer Service to Unsewered Area (South Friendswood) " (9-25-92). The 1991 feasibility study produced land use and population projections for the entire City utilizing the City of Friendswood Zoning Map and Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC)population projections. The projections were verified using historical population data, and three different mathematical forecasting models. BGE has reviewed the current population projections performed in the recent planning studies and have recommended to Staff that these projections serve as the Land Use Assumptions for the Update Study for Impact Fees. The recent projections indicate a 1990 population of 22,814 (1990 Census Data), a 1995 population of 30,850, a 2000 population of 38,900, and a 2005 population of 46,940. These projections indicate a 7% annual increase from 1990 - 1995, a 5% annual increase from 1995 - 2000, and a 4% annual increase from 2000 -2005. By interpolation, the City would have a population of approximately 43,724 by the year 2003, the end of a ten year planning period. Four areas of growth identified in the 1990 study and the January 7, 1991 amendment are described below:- BGE has met with City staff and the same four areas have been identified as the areas most likely to develop over the next ten years. (See Exhibits A&F) 1. Melody Lane Service Area: Approximately 298 acres of.undeveloped land proposed for the water distribution service area and 458 acres of undeveloped land proposed for the wastewater collection service area located west of FM- 2351, north of Melody Lane, and south of Clear Creek. The Update study utilizes the same service area as defined in the 1990 study. 2. Bay Area Boulevard Service Area: The 1990 study identified 204 acres of developable land bisected by Bay Area Boulevard and located south of FM-528 that would be considered for water distribution Impact Fees (based on a 1985 contract between the City and Bay Area Land Company, Ltd. that included a provision for repayment by the City of the prepayment of fees by a developer to construct a water line extension). �--- '! 3. Central (Now South Friendswood) Service Area: In 1990 the area was essentially defined as east of FM-528 and extending from Clear Creek near the eastern boundary of the City across FM518 to the undeveloped portions of Mission Estates. The area has now been expanded to include approximately 3,357 acres of undeveloped land and 1,991 acres of developed land located within the City limits south of Chigger Creek. Additional areas include the Slone Tract, undeveloped portions of Rancho Viejo, and the undeveloped land south of Sunmeadows and San Joaquin Estates on south to the City Limits. The area is bound on the south and east by the contiguous City Boundaries for Friendswood and League City. The City limits and Galveston County boundary form the west boundary. 4. Mills, Murphy, Brairmeadow Ave. Service Area: Includes 48 residential lots along Mills Drive, Murphy Lane, and Briarmeadow Ave. between Greenbrier Ave. and Sunset Drive to be considered for wastewater collection impact fees. A Capital Improvements Plan, in the form of a conceptual service plan to provide for the extension of water distribution and wastewater collection lines was previously developed for the Melody Lane, Bay Area Boulevard, and Central Service Areas and has been reviewed and revised where required in this study. The proposed extension of water and wastewater lines into each of the Service Areas generally corresponds with the proposed alignment of major road arteries as illustrated on the Major Thoroughfare Plan. The Bay Area Boulevard Service Area water line and the sanitary sewers in the Mills, Murphy, Brairmeadow Ave. Service Area were constructed prior to preparation of the 1990 study. The Bay Area Boulevard Service Area has already been provided with water distribution under the terms of a 1985 contractual agreement previously mentioned. The impact fee determined in connection with the Bay Area Boulevard Service Area was based on the actual cost of the 14" water line that was extended along FM528 to the tract. The 1991 amendment to the 1990 Impact Fee resolution identified the Mills, Murphy, Briarmeadow Ave. sewer project that had been constructed to serve new development in 1986. Land Use in the Melody Lane and Mills, Murphy, Briarmeadow Ave. Service Areas is single family residential. Land Use in the Bay Area Boulevard Service Area is mixed with Community Shopping Center, Office Park, and High Density Multifamily areas being present. 8 Land Use for the South Friendswood Service Area is predominantly single family residential (See Appendix A for connection breakdowns in each sub area). Property adjoining FM528 in small areas is zoned Commercial. The Friendswood City Ordinance limits residential development to an approximate density of 2.7 homesites per acre which results in approximately 8 to 9 people per acre of residential development. Population projections for the City of Friendswood and the South Friendswood Service Area taken from the Wayne Smith&Associates Feasibility Study report are as follows: Planning Friendswood South Friendswood Year Servic Area 1990 22,814 5,185 1995 30,850 7,806 2000 38,900 10,375 2005 46,940 13,345 2010 54,980 19,620 Fully Developed - 36,007 9 IV. REVIEW OF WATER SUPPLY IMPACT FEE In the past, the City of Friendswood has purchased 3.0 mgd capacity in the City of Houston Southeast Water Purification Plant. The purchase was in response to direction by the Harris - Galveston Coastal Subsidence District that the service area in which the City of Friendswood is located would convert to surface water for supply such that 80% of the total demand would be served by surface water and that a maximum of 20% of the total water demand would be served by the City's existing groundwater water wells. The 3.0 mgd capacity will serve approximately 11,196 Equivalent Service Units (ESU) (@ 80% of total demand) and there is currently 8621 existing ESU to the Friendswood water supply system. The City has recognized that the costs of purchasing surface water capacity and constructing pumping, storage, and system wide improvements to accommodate the surface water in the system should be allocated to future development that will be served as well as to existing water system ESU. None of the costs considered for the water supply impact fee component are to upgrade, update, improve, or replace facilities that serve existing development. Surface Water Supply: Water consumption in Friendswood for 1992 averaged approximately 2.89 mgd for 8621 ESU (335 gpdfESU). The 80% surface water component of the existing daily average consumption would be approximately 2.31 mgd which would leave 0.69 mgd of the 3.0 mgd capacity that the City of Friendswood owns that could be used to serve future development. At the current rate of consumption, the surplus capacity could serve an additional 2575 ESU. The Land Use Assumptions assumes a total of 3111 proposed equivalent single family connections requiring water supply over the term of the 10 year planning period which implies that additional surface water will have to be purchased during the later stages of the 10 year planning period. As indicated in the 1990 study, if the unit cost of additional surface water capacity is different than the initial allocation in the Southeast Plant, adjustments will have to be made in future updates of the Impact Fee structure. Surface Water Transmission Pumping, and Storage: The surface water transmission, pumping, and storage projects that have been completed to date have previously been estimated to be sufficient for the City's requirements through the 50% build out level, or approximately 12,500 equivalent connections (based on current ultimate connection projections of 25,000). Ultimately, a second surface water line is envisioned along the alignment of Beamer and FM-2351 with the attendant storage and pumping facilities to complete the conveyance and handling of surface water for the City. 10 ( , . , , ,,___j Sygem Wide Improvgments: Several components of the surface water conversion effort including the Surface Water Monitoring Equipment and the Modifications to Existing Water Plants to Accommodate Surface Water are not particularly sensitive to " levels of buildout " and are intended to apply to the overall system. Basis of Service Units: A total of 11,732 Equivalent Service Units (ESU) are projected for purposes of this study including 8,621 existing ESU and an additional 3,111 proposed ESU for the 10 year planning period for the Capital Improvements Plan. The following is a summary of the metered connections in service as of January 1993: Type of Customer Individual Equivalent Connections connections S F Residential 7,036 7,036 S F Construction 167 167 M F Residential (Units) 1,344 740 Single Business Commercial 207 414 Multi Unit Commercial 109 55 * . 'Parks, Schools, Churches 38 209 * _ Sprinkler Systems __§.3. 0 c , - Total 8,964 8,621 \-,..,...___„) * Computed based on water usage factors developed in 1990 Impact Fee Study. The Equivalent Service Unit(ESU.)is defined in the Impact Fee legislation as a " standardized measure of.consumption, use, generation or discharge attributable to an individual unit of : . . development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards for a particular category of capital unprovements or facility expansions." Previqiysis of; the water distribution s�y�t3em���Y ,��14� indicated a reasonable value for�� ��Y, ,. c3nsujfrt ' ����- -'� � ,e�a a �,i-.:17.,_e A single family dwelling assuman occupancy otTpeople would generate an average daily water deinan00300074.�� e'�� '.'-'.. • This update study will continue to use to use the 450 gallons per daydemand as t�ie d m i&?' . of an Equivalent Service Unit. The following table illustrates the ESU's for various land use requirements: Land Use Units/Ac Occupancy/ Demand @ ESU/ACRE a Unit 150 ocd 450 gpcd/ESU SFR 2.7 3.00 1,215 2.7 Garden Homes 6 1.65 1,485 3.3 MFR-L 6 1.65 1,485 3.3 MFR-M 9 1.65 2,228 5.0 MFR-H 18 1.65 4,455 9.9 MHR 10 1.65 2,475 5.5 CSC (1) - - 1,665 (2)• 3.7 11 Note (1): 3.7 ESU/Acre also applies to other Land Use designations including NC, LI, OBD, OPD, BP, RSC and PUD. Note (2): Based on 55 people/Acre 30 gpcd. Note (3): Based on 1,800 gpd/Acre Projected Service Units: The surface water components described above are each adequate to serve the 8,621 existing ESU in addition to the portion of the ESU proposed for the ten year planning period and future ESU beyond the ten year planning period as itemized below:. Total 2003 Future ESU ESU ESU 1. Surface Water Capacity 11,196 2,575 0 2. Transmission, Pumping, and Storage 12,500 3,879 0 3. System Wide Improvements 25,000 3,111 13,268 calculation of Impact Fees per ESU: I. Surface Water Capacity $5,467,450/lI,196 = $488 2. Transmission,Pumping,Storage $2,161,110/12,500 = $173 3. System Wide Improvements $593,582/25,000 = 24 Total $ 685 These fees differ from those calculated in 1990 as follows: 1990 1993 1. Surface Water Capacity 531 488 2. Transmission,Pumping,Storage 157 173 3. System Wide Improvements 23 24 Total $711 $685 The difference is basically due to the fact that the per capita consumption of water has decreased from the levels that were indicated in 1990 which allows the cost of surface water capacity to be allocated between more ESU than in 1990. The surface water supply components addressed in the report are capable of serving various levels of development as discussed earlier. The Impact Fee proposed for the City's surface water improvements is based on the cost of each of the three component categories itemized above divided by the number of Equivalent Service Units that are appropriate for each category. 12 V. REVIEW OF THE WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPACT FEE The Capital Improvements to be provided for water distribution in undeveloped areas are indicated in Exhibits A, B, C, and D that indicate the boundaries, existing water lines, and proposed water lines for Melody Lane , Bay Area Boulevard, and South Friendswood Service Areas. The City will assess and collect an Impact Fee to provide the proposed facilities based on an estimated total cost for the water lines and their appurtenances allocated over the total number of proposed ESU in each Service Area. Project Costs: Melody Lane System (1): Construction $242,400 Engineering 29,088 Right of Way 56,000 Bond Issuance&Finance Costs 359,869 Total Cost $687,400 Bay Area Boulevard System (1): Contract Cost (Exist. 14" Line) $369,338 Engineering 44,322, Total Cost $413,700 South Friendswood System(1): Construction $390,600 Engineering 46,872 Right of Way 80,800 Bond Issuance&Finance Costs 342,140 Total Cost $860,400 (1) m See 1990 Impact Fee Study for details of costs -no significant change in the project costs are anticipated from the estimates developed in 1990. (No adjustment for inflation). Projected Service Units; Total Proposed Future Service Area ESU ESU ESU 1. Melody Lane 298 acres SFR @ 2.7 ESU/acre 805 805 0 2. Bay Area Boulevard 40 acres CSC @ 3.7 ESU/acre 148 59 acres OPD 3.7 ESU/acre 218 105 acres MFR-H 9.9 ESU/acre i&tQ Sub-Total 1,406 400 1,006 3. South Friendswood 1,088 acres SFR 2.7 ESU/acre 2,938 1,552 1,386 Total Projected ESU 5,149 2,757 2,392 � i 13 Proposed ESU are those projected within the ten year planning period. Calculation of Water Distribution Impact Fee: 1. Melody Lane Water System $687,400/805 ESU = $854/ESU 2. Bay Area Boulevard Water System $413,700/1,406 ESU $294/ESU 3. South Friendswood Water System $860,400/2,938 ESU $293/ESU The project costs were allocated over the ultimate number of ESU to more equally distribute costs between proposed and future development. These fees are identical to those calculated in 1990: 1990 1993 Impact Fee Impact Fee 1. Melody Lane $854 $854 2. Bay Area Boulevard $294 $294 3. South Friendswood $358 $293 The water distribution improvements specific to the service areas identified above are ultimately intended to serve a total of 5,149 ESU including 2,757 proposed during the ten year study period and an additional 2,392 when the subject areas are built out.. 14 VI. REVIEW OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT IMPACT FEE The City of Friendswood owns 4.875 mgd of capacity in the Blackhawk Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The 1990 Impact Fee study included an analysis of-the costs that had been incurred by the City to acquire the capacity and the resulting Impact Fee to future development for unallocated capacity. The report indicated that there was sufficient capacity to serve the projected number of Equivalent Service Units (ESU) as well as existing service connections at the time. Friendswood has purchased capacity in each of the two Phases of the Blackhawk Plant. Although the cost of the City's capacity in Phase I was paid for through EPA participation, it later assumed the debt ($272,000)of the Clearwoods Improvement District upon annexation of the land. The City owns 2.5 MGD in the Phase I construction which serves existing development. The 2.375 MGD treatment capacity obtained by the City in the Phase II construction is available to support new development. In addition; Friendswood participated in a construction effort distinct from the two Blackhawk construction phases referenced above for the extension of a temporary access road from FM528 to the plant. Costs attributed to the Phase II treatment plant expansion and to the access road are considered in the Impact Fee calculation. There are no costs allocated in the proposed Capital Improvements Plan for upgrading, updating, improving, expanding, or replacing any of the existing capital improvements described above in order to meet existing needs, safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards. The City of Friendswood is currently using approximately 2.5 MGD of its allotted capacity of 4.875 MGD. The remaining 2.375 MGD will serve an estimated 10,722 ESU of future development (@ 2.7 people per FSU and 82 gpcd -per Wayne Smith&Associates analysis of current dry weather flows). The Land Use Assumptions have indicated that there will be approximately 2727 -ESU (805 ESU - Melody Lane; 16 ESU -Mills, Murphy, Briarmeadow; 1906-South Friendswood) developed over the 10 year planning period. The unallocated capacity will serve the City through the ten year planning year based on the projections. Basis of Service Unit: In the 1990 Impact Fee Study a 390 gpd per ESU was derived using the dry weather flow for the City's wastewater system. This value was defined as the Equivalent Service Unit (ESU) for wastewater treatment plant capacity. Infiltration and inflow data indicated that a peak two hour flow of approximately 1,355 gpd per ESU was appropriate for designing the wastewater' collection system. 15 (Th In 1991 and 1992 Wayne Smith and Associates performed a detailed analysis of the existing wastewater flows as part of their planning effort for the South Friendswood Service Area. Their study indicated that the average daily dry weather flow per capita was approximately 82 gpd and that the peak two -hour flow was approximately 4.2 X the average daily dry weather flow or 345 gpd. The wastewater treatment capacity is typically analyzed on an average daily • dry weather flow basis for process considerations and on a peak 2-hour flow basis for hydraulic considerations. Utilizing a density of 3 people per single family connection, the Equivalent • Service Unit wou14prçuce..221 gpd average dry weather flow and 928 gpd peak 2 -hour flow. The more current 221 gpd sand 928 gp l will be used to define the ESU for wastewater treatment and wastewater collection system purposes respectively. ESU for various land use requiremnts: Land Unit/ • Occupancy/ Max Q/Acre ESU/Acre l� Use Acre JJnit gpd 1050 gpd/ESU SFR 2.7 3.00 2,835 2.7 Garden Homes 6 � 1.65 3,415 3.2 MFR-L 6 1.65 3,415 3.2 MFRM 9 1.65 5,123 4.9 MFR4I 18 1.65 10,246 9.8 MHR 10 1.65 5,692 5.4 CSC (1) - - 5,775 (2) 5.5 - I . 6,048 (3) . Note(1): 5.5 ESU/Acre also applies to other Land Use designations including NC, LI, OBD, OPD, • BP, RSCandPUD. Note(2): Based on 55 people/acre-@ 25 gpcd for base flow Note(3): Based on 1,440 gpad for base flow Projected ESU: - • Existing Proposed • Future • ESU ESU ESU Phase II Treatment Capacity - .2,727 8,000 • Temporary Access Road 8,621 •2,727 10,710 The 2.375 mgd treatment capacity obtained by the City of Friendswood in the second construction phase is available to support new development. Assuming an updated average rate of flow of 221 gpd per connection used as the basis of an Equivalent.Service Unit in this Impact Fee Update Study, the additional capacity will serve approximately 10,727 ESU. The temporary access road constructed in the Blackhawk plant provides service for both • construction phases of the Blackhawk plant. Based on the 2.5 mgd capacity in the initial phase, • an additional 2.375 mgd in the second phase and the 221 gpd per ESU referenced above, the cost of the road should be amortized over a total of 22,058 ESU. . , . .• . • _ • . . . :; . „•,....,,, . _ ..• .• - " - ' - - ;- • 16 calculation of the Impact Fie: • Blackhawk WWTP Capacity (1) $541,129/1O,727 = $50• Blackhawk Access Road (1) $41 1,431/22,058 = $19 Total _$69 •(1) Costs indicated in 1990 Impact Study (No adjustments for inflation) These fees vary from those calculated in the 1990 Impact Study as follows: • 1990, 1993 Wastewater Capacity $ 89 $50 Blackhawk.Access Road • 33 $19, Total $122 $69 The difference in the two fees is that the planning work by Wayne Smith and Associates, Inc. has developed a more in depth study of wastewater flows per ESU and the results are that the average dry weather flow per ESU has decreased from 390 gpd/ESU in the 1990 Impact-Fee Study to 221 gpd1ESU in our Update Study. • L r` . . • , • ciU • .• . • • •„_•.\ . • , -.• " _ - :•• , ,•..,•,. i„.,. . . . • , . • • . , • • =Z 17 VII. REVIEW OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION IMPACT FEE The wastewater collection systems to serve undeveloped areas within the City are indicated in Exhibits E, F, G, H, and I. The systems to serve the Melody Lane Service Area, and the Mills , Murphy , Briarmeadow Avenue Service Area (built in 1985) are merely extensions of the existing collection system and include trunk sewers that could serve the needs of the entire service area and convey flows to the system that ultimately flows to the Blackhawk Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The South Friendswood Service Area has been expanded from the Central Service Area defined in the 1990 Impact Fee Study and contains a total of 5,348 acres as opposed to the 2210 acres defined in the original Service Area (includes 3,357 acres undeveloped and 1,991 acres developed land). Exhibit G indicate the South Friendswood Trunk Sewer, Lift Station, and Force Main project that has been defined in the two previous studies performed by Wayne Smith and Associates. The project Service Area has been enlarged from the 1990 Impact Fee Study project to include sub area F within the Service Area and the proposed trunk sewer is of sufficient depth that the sub areas can tie lateral sewer systems to it in the future as development occurs. It is anticipated that the system extensions, except for the CIP projects defined below, will be paid for by developers when development occurs in the future - this manner of planning will allow for a maximum of flexibility in land planning for the developer. Two additional projects are included in this Impact Fee Study to provide service to the-future residents of the Slone Tract and West Rancho Viejo areas. The first project includes a 24" trunk sewer which would extend from the South Friendswood Interceptor at Falcon Ridge Boulevard through the Slone Tract along a future road to W. Viejo Drive. The second project �--' includes 12" sewers which would provide service to West Rancho Viejo from the Slone Tract sewer These systems are illustrated in Exhibit G. Project Costs: Melody Lane System (1): Construction- $ 180,400 Engineering 21,648 Right of Way 63,400 Bond Issuance&Finance Costs 291 695 Total Cost $ 557,200 Mills, Murphy, and Briarmeadow Ave. Service Area: (2) Total Construction & Engineering (1985 costs) $ 121,554 South Friendswood System: (3) Segment 1: (27" Sewer between Clear Creek Drainage Easement and Falcon Ridge) (3) Construction $ 329,400 Engineering 34,400 Right of Way � Bond Issuance&Finance Costs 239,500 Total Costs $603,300 18 Segment 2: (Sewer from Oak Drive Life Station through Falcon Ridge) Construction $ 602,800 Engineering 62,900 Right of Way 0 Bond Issuance &Finance Costs 43L9( ! Total Costs $1,103 600 Segment 3: (Oak Drive Lift Station&20" Force Main) Construction $ 537,000 Engineering 87,400 Right of Way 76,400 Bond Issuance&Finance Costs 659,200 Total Costs $1,660,000 Sb 'e'Trunk Sewer (3) Construction $478,000 Engineering 50,000 Right of Way 19,800 Bond Issuance &Financing Costs 360,400 Total Costs $908,200 (1) See 1990 Impact Fee Study for details of costs no significant change in the project costs are anticipated from the estimates developed in 1990. (No adjustment for inflation) (2) Costs obtained-from January 7, 1991 Resolution R914 that amended original Impact Fee Resolution (3) See breakdown of costs in Appendix B . . . . . . _ __ _ . _ . _,._,..________ ' . • , , . 19 __,, Projcted Service Units: Exist. Proposed Future Service Area ESU ESU ESU, 1. Melody Lane 458 acres 0 2.7 ESU/Acre 0 805 432 Total ESU: 1,237 2. Mills, Murphy, Briarmeadow 32 16 0 3. South Friendswood (See Appendix C) Area A 639 323 459 Area B-1 0 238 1,270 Area B-2 43 263 2,585 Area C • 89 302 209 Area D 449 64 0 AreaE4 8 448 1,321 . AreaE-2 26 i 18 0 AreaE-3 162 20 9 AreaE4 0 113 590 Area F 14 266 381 Totals Areas AF 1,430 2,055 6,824 , -_, ', ,,_„J Proposed ESU are those projected for the 10 year planning period. Calculation of Wastewater Collection System Impact Fee: 1. Melody Lane $557,200 / 1,237 ESU $450/ESU 2. Mills, Murphy, Briarmeadow $121,554 / 48 ESU $2,532/ESU 3. South Friendswood (See Appendix C) ., Area A $378 Area B-i $378 Area B-2 $378 Area C $285 Area D $161 AreaE-1 $784 Area E-2(1) $784 AreaE-3 $161 Area E-4 $161 Area F $378 (1) Originally calculated to be$5,743 but elected to be equal to Area E-1 with the r ) exclusion of the West Viejo Drive system. 20 The wastewater collection system Impact Fee for the Melody Lane and Mills, Murphy, Briarmeadow Avenue Service Areas did not change from the 1990 Impact Fees. The South Friendswood Service Area Impact Fees changed due to an enlargement of the service area and a current project cost estimate. Also, the impact fee for Sub Area E has variation in it due to the addition of the Slone Trunk Sewer. .,.- _ ....___.. , APPENDIX A South Friendswood Sub Areas SUB ACRES EXIST. FUTURE CONNECTIONS AREA � CONNECT 1995 • 2000 2003 ULTIMATE A Sun 504 504 504 504 504 Meadow 1111111111 1693 1693 1693 1693 1693 Windson•_ 26 28 III 36 40 87 94 121 134 Boca, ail 0 55 73 73 73 Raton 0 185 245 245 245 • Somerset 0 20 32 32 32 Place 0 67 108 108 108 Mission Ili 79 83 87 91 95 Estates 269 283 297 312 324 San 11111 12 '13 15 18 41 . • Joa.1Jif7 41 44 50 60 138 9 III" 18 61 30 60 78 433 101 202 263 145 10 50 0 30 60 78 125 O 101 202 263 420 18 Ili 0 0 0 12' 38 0 0 0 40 128 20 16 0 20 40 40 40 - . 0 67 134. 134 • 134 B -i .11 320 0 100 130 148 ' 800 (_,_-'I\ 0 336 437 496 2688 6 283 0 50 90 708 O 165 111%1111 303 2379 • B-2 Tower 18 24 24 24 45 Estates 60 • 81 81• 81 151 sports 42 20 20 zo 20 20 .. .Corn•lex -. . 9 149 26 8717452 • - 67, 226 • 11,1111111111 00 0 38 . 6p. . _ • . 383 • 128 21.3 1286 - Ill 126 0 0 0 - :18 315 0 0 0 61 :. 1058 . -111 48 0 0 0 18 120 - ' . . 0 0 0 61 410 . i:, 14 42 0 1 0 I 0 • 0 105 i ' - - 0) i 0 0 0 353 46 0 0 0 0 115 O 0 0 Q 386 16 1 27,0 0 0 0 42' 675 0 • 0 0 141 2268 Ili . 296 0 • 0 • 0 54 740 O 0 • 0 181 2486 ^ � .` `. . ' ' ` ' A CRES EXIS'' FU,,/�.` TIONS SUB L TI&M TE ARE4 CONNEC T 1995 2000 2003 U 80 99 99 99 Falcon Ride e 2 269 333 333 333 Fladon 3 80 83 83' . 83 Ridee 3 10 269 279 27'9 279 167 84 90 105 .209 418 286 306 353 702 1404 D Fox ''' '' ^' `` ^' Meado". 85,, .. 101 101 101 . Falcon 120 125 130 134 134 ' Ridee `'` `'" ''� `'' ^'`.` '' .` 68- `. Keystone Meadows 82, 134 `., 228 228 Eagle ' kes- 4 .` 276 276 276 `'' 276�- Regency 927 ,.' `,' `^' '. . ' 456 1..7 Slone ^'` ,. 262 .' 2.28 878, 15-28 595 Rancho `` ^' `^ ^` '` ^ 1/ `' ', 14Ve0 `.=��.m._ 162 .`` .7� `'' ''' '`'. ' 545, ..' ^.` '.. ''''`' =UN_.m�_.m E---o4 �' ... .. ., . ,. ''' ' 703 ` �_- - . 235 379 2363 -' . '' `' 120 133 ' .� ." 222 333 402 '. . . . ^ 100 160 528 . '. 336 ''. .'/, /.. � . � .` � ' ' .. ` ' .. , Totals: -Connections `/``. 21067 29784 39336 . 10,309 Flopulation . .�'.' ' 61886 ' `,`" � '`''' .,.'` ` . .. .. ' .. .. . ' .. ` ` / ) , to Blackhawk RegionaL-Troatment Facility"The Transport of Wastewaterfromthe Soutf-)em . -Area Des' 'Ignations ` projections) by Wayn - eSm.-.Associates.Portions of the City . .. 0 number indicates estimated PoPulation ` . e. r , - .�� '� ` ���A, I f'� '` ` ..- .•..',,••-•-----' , •._:,•,..,,..,,,...._____. .. , .. , • .. , APPENDIX B . -----__,.,, ' . , , South Friendswood Wastewater Collection System Cost Estimates . . ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST Segment I (Includes 27"Gravity Sewer from the Clear Creek Drainage Easement to Falcon Ridge) 1. 27"Sewer Pipe 3,520 LF $79.00 $278,080.00 . - • 2. Standard Manholes 6 EA • 1,400.00 8,400.00 Subtotal $286,400.00 . . Constriction Contingencies, g15% 43,000.00 • Desi•n and Construction Phase En•ineerin., @ 12% 34,400.00 Subtotal $363,800.00 Bond Issuance and Finance Costs 239,500.00 _ , TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS $603 300.00 Segment 2 (Includes Gravit Sewer from Falcon Rid•e to the Proposed Lift Station) , . , 1. 36"Sewer Pipe 3,682 LF $100.00 $368,200.00 2. 27"Sewer Pipe 1,800 LF • 3. Standard Manholes •9EA 1,400.00 9,800.00 Subtotal , . i . . $524,100.00 Construction Contingencies, @ 15% 78,700.00 . . . . Desi.n and Construction Phase En•ineerin•,•@ 12% 62,900.00 ( Subtotal $665,700.00 `'�--J Bond Issuance and Finance Costs . . $`�7���•� , . ' TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS $1 103 600,00 Segment 3 .. . (Includes Pro.osed Lift Station and 20"Force Main) . : 1::-...20W Force Main Pipe 8,474 LF $48.00 $406,752.00 2-,: Driveway Replacement, I LS 800000 a._ Aerial Crossing 1 LS '100,000.00 4.•Pump Costs 10,000.00 ' - •• S.-:Pump Installation 30,000.00 '0,. Excavation 239 CY 200 478 00 7. -Concrete (Structure) 50 CY , 40000 2000000 8., Valves & Fittings' 125,000.00 . : , 9. Electrical 27,800.00 ,. , Subtotal $728,000.00 _ .. Construction Contingencies, @ 15% 109,000.00 ,Design And Construction Phase Engineering, @ 12% 87,400.00 Right-of-Way Costs 0.52 acre @ $22,000/acre 11,400.00 6.65 acre @ $10,000/acre 65,000.00 Subtotal - . $1,000,P00.00 Bond Issuance and Finance Costs 659,200.00 ,-- ,U TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS $.1,660,000.00 . _ • . -717.7-. . . ., , . , • , . . . . ., , . ..• _. . , . .., ,, . . . ., . . ... . , , - - . • ,.., ..„. ...... , „ .. .•,._ •,,,,._,„•,_,_,,,,, • . ..._ . . ... .• .., .. ,. .._..,„....-...,. i , • • ...• .•_ ,. , _.,_.., . , . , • • - ., . _,.--•,.,...,--,,,...,',„-:. „-=,... • ._.. - . . , ...,,,,• ,.,...,,.. , . . •_„•. •„ ,.,.. ., _, ,..,_ ., „ . • ., , ,.. ,,..•„,„....,,...,.....,_, , _ . - • • :,--,..,__.., ,.• - , _ . , -: ..-_• _,L,:_,-;::::::,.,:i_r,..;:;.sT-ii,:..-,-_,-_,:-:,--.,_ . . , _ . . ,_ • -. -. -. , ..• ..,....:. :- -• - „ ,..,.,::,-, -,:,--_,•,..„,,,,,„:;:-,,,-,..,:._:-,. .:,,.,4„:::f••,.,.,,,,.-,-,=,,,,,,.,.......•:.. . . - . .-. .....-, :- ,..._,-,:-..--,:-.---- -_ ., '..-.'::L.:•..---,-T.:-.:-.', ,-_-:'.."'.,:::.:-•:.::;1;'::;','J. ...,.:_-_-;''.‘:-1,.. .-:---- - '. '_, . -..-.• , , . .. ,:. ,I:.:'::::-...:-..::',....-.i.:;,.:Ii',::;., ..:--- -,-_-..::::::-;7)-;.',,...H.--i'i;-''''-.4. -:.?:',T,',:iT.,,,_'-.0...7.-7.-7-:.:'::.r..: _...: '. - •: . . :. •: .-.,. .,_:,' :-__.:.:,.,r.',.:;j:i.-::.,,•,,,i':--:.',...'_._ ••.,: :--:.,_. i-.-.::-,-.-.--,i=" i. . • .. .. .•,.,. ..,,..,...,,,.,..,,•••,••:,%,•_,L,...,,.,....,.•,.. . _ • . ,.‘. .._ .. • ... .:, .,•.„...., .:.• ....,.,,,_ _....•.,••.::,.... .. . • • ITEM • QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST Slone Trunk Sewer (Includes 24W Gravity Sewer) 1. 24W Sewer Pipe 5,700 LF $70.00 $399,000.00 2. Standard Manholes 12 EA 1,400.00 16,800.00 Subtotal $415,700.00 Construction Contingencies, @ 15% 62,300.00 Right-of-Way Costs 1.98 acres g$10,000.00 19,800.00 Design and Construction Phase.Engineering, @ 12% 50,000.00 Subtotal $547,800.00 Bond Issuance and Finance Costs 360,400.00 TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS $908 200.00 West Viejo Drive System Includes 12'Gravit Sewer • 1. 12'Sewer Pipe 4,065 LF $20.00 $82,500.00 2. Standard Manholes 12 EA 1,400.00 16,800.00 3. Bore, Includin• 12"Pi•e 60 LF 65.00 3,900.00 Subtotal $1-03 200.00 Construction Contingencies, @ 15% 15,500.00 Design and Construction Phase Engineering, @ 12% - 12,500.00 • Subtotal $131,200.00 Bond Issuance and Finance Costs • • - 87,000.00 TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS $218,200.00 • • .. • . . • . • . :•-. •• -,•- • • . • •,••• . .• • . •_ ▪ . • •.._ . . ,.,• ,:•. •r , e • • • - ` ` APPENDIX C { | Impact Fee for of`.`x', ' SEGMEN T SER-`'''~, SEGMENT IMPACT `. ARE4 ESUs COST FEE 1,421 11508' 2j891 -F 661 Total's 6481 $603300 $93 ' A -1`21 B . i 19508 13�2 - 29891 ' 600 E�l 197 . E�2 ^' F. 661 Totals 81902 $1,103j600 $124 ' .. 11421 ' `. .. B ) 19508 13'2 2,891. C 600 D 513 E w,-o 1 19 7, E-2 E-3 191 E--4 703 F 661 Totals' `' 10309. $1660000 �.' $161 Slone 1,777 ' Totals 1.821 $9081200 .... '`'''.'`.. '. Totals ._, $2180200 $499,59 . .. ` ' ` ` ' ' ` ' ' ` ` '^ 711 ' ` �� �x������ • • • - Impact Areas SEGMENTS • 3 Slone W.Viejo Tota A $93 $124 $161 $378 B- 1 $124 $161 $378 B_ 2 $161 -- -- $378 S R --- — -- $285 $124 $161 • E D r �- $161 -- -� - $1si-- $499 -- $784 � 1 �124 $161 S E- 2 $124 $161 �- 99 $4,959 $5,743 E 3 $161 $161 E 4 $161 $161 • • $161 — � -- $378 $93 $124 • ( ) • 1 _ 1 • ' S r , 4 ti ,y•••T r .„ 'b' r`s■?'il a't•t t .. •r ' _ ' • - •• �t•! ' iyf TA••'�• •—,:_ .. 1 • .•.' '• S' 1 __ ry-. - •• it;}-' i "• .' l " -•. ,•• . _ . , • ,•., , . _ • • - :. s;~••1.;4-.�a .' :, , .. - �• - .�F.• �-. 'i _' • • " r •� ■�._!�ti r�L ;�•,1�� r - ! • . 'i: - •• 4• r..-, .:a },.,}Zia:�....��iy��J..••1 .•- APPENDIX D Criteria Estimation Sewage Contribution - f . - �fi 1. -. �._ _._. _/ ..• '+'ry '•T^� ____....... - . 7 __ —.- C,_,) CRITERIA FOR ESTIMTION OF SEWA&( CONTR1VUT1OM FACILITY I CITY OF HOUSTON I STATE HEALTH I STATE HEALTH 1 kECOMENDED � I DESIGN CRITERIA 1CONSTRX. STANDARDS � � I FOR PRIVATE SEVASE � � I fACIlIT1ES MOTEL L HOTEL I BO SPD/ROO I SO LPD/ROOfl I SS &PD/ROOs I 60 6PD/ROOM RESTAURANT 1LL SERVE) I 35 SPD/SEAT I 15 OR 5 /MEAL I 15 &PDfl1EAL I 35 SPD/SEAT (FASTFOOD) I 10 6PD /SEAT I . (2HOURJ I 5O6PD/SEAT I 8 OFFICE BU1DIN 1 20 SPD/PERSON I 20 SPD/PERSON i 15 GPD/PERSOW I 0.1 SPD/SQ. FT. 1(1 PERSO /L9O SQ.FT.)I SCHOOlS W/ OWtRSl 15 &PD/STUDENT I 20 SPD/STUDENT I 25 SPD/STUDENT 1 20 SPD/STUDEWT WO/SHOWERS (INC. DAY CARE) 1 10 6PD/STUDET I 15 SPD/STUDENT I 20 6PD/STUDET I 15 SPD/STUDENT (-Th DORMITORIES /BOAR !WS HOUSES I O &PD/ ED I 100 SPD/BED I 100 &PD/BID I 100 6PD/PED CHURC} 5 l 1 SPD/SEAT 1 — I — 1 1 SPD/SEAT NIJRSINS )1OE I 90 &PD/BED I 100 GPD/BED I - 1 100 GPD/8ED SERVICE STATIOkS 1 500 SPD/PUflP I 10 6P0/VEHICLE 1 10 GPD/VEHICL( 1 500 6PD/ PtJtP HOSPITALS I 200 GPO/BED I 200 &PD/BED I 200 6PD/ ED I 200 SPD/ ED THEATRES i 5 6?D/SEAT I 5 SPDISf4T I 5 SPD/SEAT I 5 SPD/SEAT RETAIL STORES I 0.2 6PD/5O.FT. 1400 SPDI VASHROON I OO SPD/ WASHROOM I 0.2 6PD/SQ.FT. I 400 6FD/ ASKROOM I . FACTORY/INDUSTRI I 20 6PD/PRSOW f 20 SPD/P(RSON 1 20 6PD/PERSO I 20 SPD/PERSOW CAR WASH I .150 PD/BM I -- I — I 150 CPD/BAT LAUNDRY I SOO SPD/Mt1CH1W( I SO SAL/ SH 1 - I 500 6PD/MACHINE BARBER SHOP/ I 150 SPD/SLAT I -- I — I 150 6PD/5ET BEAUTY SHOP I APPENDIX E Impact Legislation .• _::___:._ . ____ _•,_._ . - • '1 . PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § 394.907 Esemptloa [roes Etequirementi and (b1 Except as provided by thin chapter. no pro- °�4nt1� f 1*4.9.4. RestrlcUona Applying to Public seeding,notice,or approval ii required for the orga- he loan pty nization of the hoaxing finance corporation, the prtent issuance of bonds. or the issuance of any inztru- . person (4 The acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation merit as security for the bonds. is deliv. w s private residentisl development or a home is subject to ��menta relating to public build- (c) This chapter does not deprive this state or a � tlie � structures, grounds, works, or improverfleflt3 governmental subdivision of this state of their re- .,��'�� "pii-seiby the laws of this state, or to any other spective police powers over property of the hoaxing iiii requirements. finance corporation and does not impair any power ����of r over the property that is otherwise provided by law fug. (b) joa Any competitive bidding requirement or re- to any official or agency of the state or its goverm coimposed on the procedure regarding the mental subdivisions. -So^s=ar f contracts for ttut acquiaitioa conatruo-��rt[� Acts 1987, 70th Leg., eh. 149, f 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. A of a opo,or rehabilitation or regarding the lease,axle,or odgr disposition of property of the local govern- CFIAPTEK 395. FINANCING CAPITAL IM- lu� a ��I not applicable to any action taken under this PROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY NEW DE engj. �r ( VELOPMENT IN MUNICIPALITIES. COUN Corpo. uts i7. 70th Leg., eh. 149. f 1, eft. Sept 1, 1987. TIES. AND CERTAIN OTHER LOCAL Prnent GOVERNMENTS nent on I 3,005. Exemption From Taxation The housing finance corporation, all propty SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS aimed by it,the income from the property, all bonds ..iment icipates jollied by it, the income from the bonds, and the 395.on t7wIf&of the bonds are exempt,as public property �(, wfor toed 'public purposes, from license fees. record- [Sections 395.002395.010 reserved for expansion] rng fefees,.and aU mmother tszea ped by this state or SUBCHAFFE' B. AUTHORIZATION omber_ . �7 Politiesl subdivision of this state. The corpora- OF" iMPACT FEE *. the. pon I exempt from the franchise tax imposed by 395.011. AuthOrizatio• lf Fee. chapter if the corporation171, Tax Code, oniy is 395.012. Items Payai by Fee. ns or exempted by �t chapter. :c head � 395.013. Itecna,Not F :able by Fee. 'a, and Acts 1987, 70th Leg• ch- 149, 4 1, eff. Sept 1, 198T. 39b.014. CapitaIm mpr :eents Plan- � 395.015. Maxmnun Fee per Service Unit. 34.9O6. Conditions Under Which Federal 395.016. Time for Assessment and Collection of Fee. . • 1, 1987. Guarantee or Home Mortgage In- 395.017. Additional Fee Prohibited; Exception. 395.018. Agreement With Owner Regarding Payment • . surance not R1qUIIt11 395.019. Collection of Fees if Services not Available. nene: A home mortgage does not wire a federal �5•�- E"titlement co Services. �B � 396.on. Authority of Political Subdiviaors to Spend guirintee or home mortgage insurance if the princi- Rinds-to Reduce Fees. y this pa!of and interest on the housing finance corpora- 395.022. Authority of Political Subdivision to Pay Fees. , i +ern- tx)flS bonds issued to make or purchase the hom 395.023. Credits Against Roadway Facilities Fees. . , mortgage or t make loans to lending institutions 395.024. Recounting for Fees and Interest. .. . ,.;-..• 395.025. Refunds. ,.., . are guaranteed or insured by an agency, depart- nt ..... i '- ........-. y resi- , or instrumentality of the United States or by [Sections 395.026 to 395.Oa0 reaer�ed for expuuion) ..,.1,. 'rPe- in insurance or surety company authorized to issue -,''‘..'.! j. the municipal bond insurance-. SUBCHAPTER C. PROCEDURES FOR 'er by .. ' ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEE e roc- ACa 1�'t, 70th Leg., ch. 149, f I; efi Sept. i. i987. . , 395.041. Compliance With Procedures Required. tries J 395.042 Hearing on Land Use Assumptions. 3 in 4 I 31&907. CorporUon Powers Not Rtatritted: 395.043. Information AboutA np to Police Poweri Not Affected Public. e site 3gb.p�{. Notiee of Hearing on Land Us�.As+umptiocs. the I (a) This chapter does not restrict or otherwise 395045. Approval of [.and Use Asaumpcions Raquired - .. limit any power that the housing finance corpora- 395.0455. Systemwide Land Use Assumptions. tion may otherwise exercise under the laws of this 395.046. Capital Impvement2 Plan.Required After Ap- proval of Land Use Assumptions. . ,, wnc Lxaa,.-I MO-u 601 . .. if . . olio . '6 4 'at .- . 11 . . . .• • • .. 74*--,, • • ! i - e ' • 1 • ., . §395.001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE !! � Section (B) roadway facilities. i) . r 396.047. HrrflEonGpitsl Improvements Ptaa and (2) "Capital jmprpvemeats plan" means ampaet Fee.;�P f aired by this chapter that identifies capita � About Plan Avaasble to 11' movements or facility expansions for wig •i . 396.W9. Notios of Hewing on Capital ImprovementsImprovementsP and Impact Fee. impact fees may be assessed. 395.050. Advisory Committee Comments on Capital Izn (3) "Facility erasion"ion" mesas Lhe provements Plan and Impact Fees. of the capacity of as existing facility that serves� � 396.061. Approval of Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Required. the same function as as otherwise necessary new ii, -: 395.0615. Consolidation of Lead Use Auumptons and capital improvement, in order that the extingCapital Improvements Plan. facility may serve new development The term 396.062. Periodic Update of Land Use Asstunptions and Capital Imprcrrements Plan Required. does not include the repair. maintenance,modern.i 395.053. Hearing on Updated ii u.. A.uuptionsm ��4 or expaauon of an existing facility to ;.. Capital � and Improvements Plan. ' better eerie existing development 395.051. Haring on Amendments to Land Use AI$UII1P (q) "Impact fee"means a charge or auesaneat . tionz Capital Impmvementa Plan, or Impact imposedby a politkal subdivision agsinst ieR Fee. development in order to generate revenue f, . 395.055. Notice of Hearing on Amendment to Land Use AuumptionL Capital Improvements Plan,or funding or recouping the coats of capital improve. Impact Fee. meats or facility expaniionz necessitated by sad 396.066. Advisory Committee Comments on Amend- attributable to the new development The tetm mean. includes amortized charges. lumpsum chargei, 396.067. Apprerral of Amendments Required.IP capital recoV&yfees,.contributions in aid of coo- 37b. Determination That No Update of Land Uae P Aaaumptionz, Capital Improvements Plan, or struction, and any- other fee that functions.ill - Impact Fees is Needed. described by this definition. The term does not 396.068. Advory Comiittee. include: [Sections 395.059 to 395.070 reserved for expansion] I) dedication of land for public parka or p;::ment in lieu of the dedication to serve park SUBCHAPTER D. OTHER PROVISIONS nt.ids; 395(YTI. Duties to be Performed Within Time limits. (B) dedication of rights-of-way or easements 395.072. Records of Hearings. or construction or dedication of on-site water 395.073. Cumulative Effect of State and Local Restric- . distribution, wastewater collection. or drainage i. dons. v, 395.074. Prior Impact Fees Replaced by Fees Under This facilities, or streets, sidewalks, or curbs if the • � + Chapter, dedication or construction is required by a valid !L ' I 395.075. No Effect on Taxea or Other Charges. ordinance and is necessitated by and attribute i %:• � I 345.076. Moratorium oa De.elopment !Waited. ble to the new development; or 3%.(177. Appeals. (C) lot or acres e fees to be laced in taut it, I - 395.078. Subatsntial CompliancepWith Notice Require- g menu_ funds for the purpose of reimbursing develop r; .4'. ' 395.079. Impact Fee for Storm Water, Damage, and ers for oversizing or constructing water or sep- '; � ,;;.;:: • s- ;�}; Food Control in Populous County. er mains or lines. :i'�` 395.080. Cdapter hot Appliczble to Certain WaterRelat-, : � Special Ditrxtg. However, an item included in the capital improve ..., - t ments plan may not be required to be conatructed ' !.- . . • .. - ' SUBCHAPTER A. ,GENERAL PROVISIONS except in accordance with Section 395.019(2),and an;• :�� owner may not be required to construct or dedicate;i !: § 395.00L DefiflitiOni facilities and to pay impact fees for those f&eilities. .• . . .• In this ch&pter (5) "Land use assumptions" includes a de1eriP. -,.. (1) "Capital improvement" means any of the tion of the service area and projectionz of chaziges following facilities that have a life expectancy of in land uses, densities, intensities, and p0pUJ*tX)C three or more years and are owned and operated in the service area over at least a 10-year pemd.�' by or on behalf of a political subdivision: (6) "New development" means the subdi� . .iI � (A) water supply, treatment, and distribution of land; the construction, reconstruction. redeye!' 9 ! }" fw1ities wastewatera; wastewater collection and treatnient �opment, conversion, structural alteration. l0°r ti i . � facilities; and storm water, drainage, and flood tion, or enlargement of any structure;or anY' e control ficilitie ; whether or not-tbay-are locat- or extension of the use of land; any of villa 1 1 ed within the service area; and increases the number of service uniti. . , . 602 . ,.. , . -.- -.. ',., • •,. . . . • . .:V.'":':: el s-`•` ) . • pLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § 395.012 conforms the [.ocal Go�rernmenc Cody w attain Acta or M»70th . i (7) "PoGti�xl tubdiviaion meaas s municiPvi�� t,e + tawre.000.ubac�n�i eb�in w.c.o mod° tain created under Article III, ,c ww. .ad .act+ mak.� � �" OT tl1tt10[tLy ames►dmen4.u amended b�t1►is wc�� diItrLCt n 52, or Article XVI, Section 59, of the •sue. 2. Ordinances.oraa..oe peoad+�n. °c.d order Seuiol), 1981 paaj � or, for the purposes set forth Chapter 967,Acts of we 70th LgiL&D1rS. �,- ConititutiOfl, (Artick 1269j-4.II. Vernon's Texu Civil statute). Prior to the ��h Tau SeCt0I1i 395.079, certain counties dscribed by--::,--. ! effective date of this Act shall not bs lisid jyii as a result of any p�-� - t ieCtoG. inconsistency with�y provision of this Act. "get.8. Nothing in this Ad shall of impact .�i �[,+�.-_.. �� �'�wt� f1C1�1tiCs�� II1eiI18 �ti81 Oi COS- water.drajnag*,�tor sweets or roads that have been designs►ted tea 6ecewfoee kvied foc�t�.c�a.na oQ«+�s,��adopted roadwsY Plaa of the plio- r.cu;cca by a eounm►iae 59,of the Tczss CoostiWtion in a o�9sprovisions of Article XVI.Sectc w eye last preceding tederat ,,�� � du�lYtsiG4 �Be�er With alb neCesaStY � county of 2�100:000 or a►ore i by.aeh a The term does not include any «n.n...�d au impact te..heretofe� 'ern.. purtenances. district ire hereby RGdst�d.:+siti.d. oefirma." T04W1Y$or associated improvements designated in the federal or Texas highway system. [Sections 395.002 to 395.010 reserved vent (9) "Serrxe area" meani the area within the for expansion] new corporate boundaries or extrsterritorial ]urisd1O' SUBCHAPTER B. ALTHOBIZATION ,or tion, U _determined under Chapter 42, of the OF_IMPACT FEE ,tpolitical subdivision to be served by the capital and proveInentz or facilities expansions specified in § 395.011. AuthOriz*U0n oC Fee the capital improvements plan, except roadway authorized by ' {amities and storm water, drainage, and flood (a) Unless otherwise specifically The service area, for the put state law or this chapter. s goveramenb►1 entity or _:. ; cntrol faditka• of political subdivision may not enact or impose an �. : . poses of this chapter'. may include all or part fee.°L' i the impact land within the political subdivision or itsenact or impose im- roadway (b) Political subdi�. siona may � extraterritorial jurisdictiOfl. except for drainage, and flood pact fees on land µ•i-sin their corporate boundaries facilities and storm water, only by rnmplyiag control fac�7itiea. For roadwsY facilit'ea, the setor extraterritorl jrisdiCt1Ofl3fees may no six area is limited to an area within the corporate with this chapter, except� hat impact the extraterritorial juris- notbOuadariea of the political aubdivisioa and shall be enacted or impoa exceed a distance equal to the average trip diction for roadway facilities. a Te length from the new development,but in no event (c) A municipality may contract to provide capital �e maw than three miles,which sernce area shall be improvements, except roadway facilities, to an area �d � served by the c�oadway faclitiea designated in the outside its corporate boundaries and extraterritorial its- I ap�l improvements plan. For storm water, jt10 n and may charge an impact fee under the ! drainage, and flood control facilities, the service contract, but if an impact fee is charged in that st I include all or part of the land within the �a the municipality must comply with this chap ;.,�' .. arcs may ;• .op- � political subdivision or its extraterritorial ji. 1ir ter. �� ems'' � lion, but shall not exceed the area actually served Acta 1989. 71st Leg•. ch. 1. § 32(a). eff. Aug. ?S. 1989.by the storm water draina8e, and flood control :•}r' ticilities designated in the capital improvements § 395 012 Items Payable by Fee fed plea sad shall not extend across watershed fee may be imposed only to paY the .. (a) An imPact capital improvements or facili- �n boundaries. coats of constructive P e I alp) "Service unit" mesas s ats�ndardized ores' ty ex�ioas, including and limited w the: ante of oomumPtio0. �. gyration, or dis- .-i unit of deve}- (1) construction connct price; sttributabIe Go an.individusl and engineering fees: Ps- - charge calculated in secordance with generallY (2) surveying cost. including land pur- od• . . ��engineeringor �8 s�dards for s (3) land acquisitiOn 's fees. n o capital improvements or chues, court awards and costa. attorney P�u� a�°� and expert witness fees: and io- facilitY expansions. (4) fees& tU&lly Paid or contracted to be paid to Aeb 1%9, 71st Lag., � 1, ; Leh 566.1 1(e).el off. Aug. Y.A�. an indepeadeat qualified engineer or fines Amad.d b�Acts 1989.71at LK•. 3.fltPreParing or updating the capital irn- :-.!,1�e 28,19�. who is not an emPlo�ee of the i .. A1e1,ttst Lag.,ch.5561 I(s),2 and S prov+dr provernentS pun . ' - - S.c. L .W amour�.Local Government Cod..as added by IUVIOo. '. ':tL.:Aet of Vie list Legislature,Regular�"101• 1989.wttiee Act p01iti &1 . .: , . : Oa . -, . . . .. ., , • . , . . _.- .-.-..-------_____ , ....• ,...... . _ ,... .• , . -- . I ' ''''''11-'-'--'-*.I . ' . . ------ . .. i_____ , -'• • , ___" . . ,. , § 395.012 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE (b) Projected interest charges and other finance ' improvements plan must contain specific enumet. costs may be included in determining the amount of ation of the following items: impact fees only it the impact tees are used for the (1) a description of the existing capital improve. payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, mea4 within the service area and the costa to or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the upgrade. adste improve, expand, or replace the political subdivision to finance the capital improve- improvements to meet exiAting needs and usage `• meets or facility expansions identified is the CIPItLI and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or improvements plan and are not used to reimburse ngulatery standirds, which shall be prepared by , . -bond funds expended for facilities that are not a qualified pro(euiorial engineer licensed to per. ` identified in the capital improvements plan. form the professional engineering service. in thin (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this state; chapter, the Edwwii Underground Water District (2) an analysis of the total capacity, the level of ii or a river authority that is authorized elsewhere by current asage, and commitments for usage of state law to charge fees that function as impact capacity of the existing capital improvementi, fees may use impact fees to pay a staff engineer which ihtfl be prepared by a qualified profession- who prepares or updates a capital improvements al engineer Licensed to perform the proteuonil plan under this chapter. engineering services in this state; Acts 1989, 71st Leg., di. 1. f 82(a). eff. Aug. 28, 1989. (3) a description of all or the parts of the wi- ts.' icy. rovements or facility expansions and their i 395.013. Items Not Parable by Fee costs ecessitated by and attributable to new Impact fees may not be adopted or used to pay devel, rent in the service area based on the for. appro• d land use assumptions, which shall be (1) construction, acquisition, or expansion of prepay .1 by a qualified professional engineer li public . . ,, facilities or assets other than capital im- i rensed to Perform the professional engineering ` _ ' provement.s or f&cility expansions identified in the services in this state; capital improvements plan: (4) a definitive table establishing the specific (2) repair,operation,or maintenance of existing level or quantity of use, consumption, gefler&t)Ofl, or new capital improvements or facility expan- or discharge of a service unit for each category of siona•, ( capital improvements or facility expansions and (3) upgrading, updating, expanding, or replso- an equivalency or conversion table establishing ing existing capital improvements to serve exist- the ratio of a service unit to various types of land ing development in order to meet stricter safety, uses, including residential, commercial, and indui- efficiency, environmental, or regulatory star- trial; &Hz; (5) the total number of projected service units (1) upgrading, updating, expanding, or replac-_ i necessitated by and attributable to new develop- ing exisdng capital improvements to provide bet- meet within the service area based on the ap- ter service to existing development; proved .land use assumptions and calculated in (5) administrative and operating costs of the accordance with generally accepted engineering political subdivision, except the Edwards Under or planning criteria; and ground Water District or a river authority that is (6) the projected demand for capital improYe authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees meets or facility expansions required by new ser [hat function as impact fees may use impact fees vice units projected over a reasonable period of to pay eta administrative and operating costs; time, not to exceed 10 yearn. (6) principal payments and interest or other (I- (b) The analysis required by Subsection(aX3)may nance charges on bonds or other indebtedneu, be P"Pareli O° a srsumwide basis within the set' except as allowed by Section 395.012. vice area for each major cate(OCY of capital ink' Acts 1989. Tlat Let.. di. 1, 1 82(s), eff. Aug. 28. 1989. Pmvemeat or facility .xpsnzk tot the d. 3gn &ad service area. I 396.I1L Caplt&1 IDIptoven%tflta Plan (c) The governing body of the pOl1ti *l subdivision (a) The political subdivision shall use qualified is responsible for superrising the mpkrnent&t101 of , - , pretessioadda to prepars tim capital improvements th. capital imwuvem.áta plan in a timely man 'S . . p5u and to calculate the impact tee. The capital Acts 19. list Ur_ ch. 1. 4 Sa%. Of. Aaq. .'MIL _,, __' PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § 395.017 06.016. M�Ienum Ft* per 3er►iee Unit which is Platted in accordance with Subchapter A. fChapter 212, or the subdivision or platting proce' The impact fee per service unit may not ex- dures of a political subdivision before the adoption �Abe amount determined by dividing the costs of of an impact fee,an impact fee mar not be collected the capital improvements described by Section ns.- on any service unit for which a valid building permit 0144(3) by the total number of projected gyiceis issued within one year after the date of adoption stag described by Section 395.014(aX5). of the impact fee. (b) II the number of new service snits projected eve a rewrnib1 period of time is less than the (d) This subsection applies only to land putted is octal number of new service units shown by the accordance with Subchapter A. Chapter 212, or the spprared land use assumptions at full development subdivision or platting procedures of a political sub- ./ the service area. the maximum impact fee per division after adoption of an impact fee adopted mice unit shall be calculated by dividing the costs after June 20. 1987. The political subdivision shall of the part of the capital improvemefltz necessitated aueu the impact fees before or at the time of by and attributable to projected new service units recordition of asubdiys°n plat or other plat under described by Section 395.014(aX6) by the projected Subchapter A. Chapter 212, or the subdivision or oew service unita described in that section platting ordinance or procedures of any politics! Aces 1989. hit Let.. ch. 1. f 82(a), ell. Aug. 28, 1989. subdivision in the official records of the county clerk of the county in which the tract is located. f fl5.016. Time for Assessment and Collection Except as provided by Section 395.019, the political of Fee subdivision may collect the fees at either the time of (a) This subsection applies only to impact fees recordation of the subdivision plat or connection to adopted and land platted before June 20, 1987. For the political subd :ision'i water or sewer system or land that has been putted in accordance with Sub- at the time the pi itiJ subdivision issues either the - - chapter A. Chapter 212, or the subdivision or plat building permit. the certificate of occupancy ling procedures of a politiczi subdivision before For land or which new development occurs or June 20. 1987, or land on which new development is (etooccur 'withoutplatting, the political occurs or is proposed without placing. the politicallpr0p08ed 0 subdivision may users the impact fees at any time subdivision may assess the impact fees at any time during the development approval and building pro- during the development and building process and cess. Except as provided by Section 395.019, the may collect the fees at either the time of rec- political subdivision may collect the fees at either ordation of the subdivision plat or connection to the the time of recordation of the subdivision plat or political ubdiY3jOnS water or sewer system or at connection to the political subdivision's water or the time the political subdivision issues either the sewer system or at the time the political subdivision building permit or the certificate of occupancy. issues either the building permit or the certificate of (n An as8e55meflt means a deterrninabofl of occupancy. the amount of the impact fee in effect on the date (b) This subsection applies only to impact fees or occurrence provided in this section and is the adopted before June 20, 1987, and land platted after maximum amount that can be charged per service that date. For new development which is platted in unit of such development No specific act by the accordance with Subchapter A. Chapter 212, or the political subdivision is required- subdivision or platting procedures of a political sub- division Acts 1989, 71st Leg.. ch. 1. i 82(a), eff. Aug. ZS, 1989. after June 20, 1987, the political subdivision may assess the impact lees before or at the time of � 395.017. Additional Fee Prohibited; Exception recordation. Except as provided by Section 395.019, After assessment of the impact fees attributable ° the pøliUcal subdivision may collect the fees at either the time of recordation of the subdivision plat to the new development or execution of an agree- or connection to the political subdivision's water or meet for payment of impact fees, additional impact sewer system°g.at the time the poetical iubdiriaioa f Qincreases fees may not be assessed issues.ither the building psrinit or the certificate of against the tract for any ruoa union. the number occypancy, of..rvs units to be developed on thit tract incr.a*- (c) This subsection applies only to impact fees es. In the eventof he thei�aa�eaae in the number of adeptad after June 20. 1987. For new development service units. 605 . ,__,,,, ______,ii § 395.017 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE limited to the amount attributable to the additional I the new service unita, subject to compliance with service units, other valid regulations. Acta 1989. list Leg., eh. 1, 1 82(a), off. Aug. 28. 1989. Acts 1989. list leg., ch. I. f 82(a), :ff. Aug. 28, 1989. f 39&O1& Agreenent With Owner RetardIng ( i 395.021. Authority of Political SubdItsLotta to Payment Spend Funds to Reduce Fees A poetical subdivision is authorized to enter into Political subdivisons mad spend funds hom aa� as agreement with the o.vner of a fact of land forfor all or apartof thewhich the plat hss been reoocded pcoviding for the lswrful wurae to PiY capital improvements or facility expanaionz to cednae the and method of payment of the impact ices. amount of impact fees. Act. 1989: list Leg.. ch. 1. i 82(a), eff.. Aug. 28. 1989. Acts 1989. 71st Leg, eh. 1. f 82a), eff. Aug. 28, net I 39& 1L Collection of Fees if Ser1ces not Availsble i 35.022. Authority of Politic*1 Subdiv1so to i Except for roadway facilities,impact fees may be Pay Fees assessed but may not be collected in areas where Political iubdivisiOni and other goYermfl4fltaJ co- seances are not currently available unleu fees apposed under this chapS (1) the collection is made to pay for a capital ter. improvement or facility expansion that has been Acts 1989. 71sc lAg., ch. I. I 82(a), eff. Aug. 28. 1989. identified in the capital improvements plan and the political subdivision commit tO commence f 35.O23. Credits Against Roadway Fadlitics construction within two years. under duly awed- Fees ed and executed contracts or commitments of staff time covering substantially all of the work Any 0n.tTtiO of, contributions to, or dedica required to provide ucvice, and to have the ser tions. of off-site roadway fscilities agreed to or vice availabk within a reasonable period of time required by a political subdivision as a condition of ,_ _ considering the type of capital improvement or development approval ihail be credited against facility expansion to be constructed. but ii no roadway facilities impact fees otherwise due from event 1ger than five Yeah: the development (2) the political subdivision agrees that the Acts 1989. 7:it Leg.. ch. 1. I 82(a) eff. Aug. 28. 1989. owner of a new development may •construct or �5.O24. Accounting for Fee. and Interest the capita! improvements or facility ex- 4 panilons and agrees that the costs incurred or (a) The order, ordinance, or resolution levying an funds advanced will be credited against the im- impact fee must provide that all funds collected pact fees otherwise due from the new develop- Hugh the adoption of an impact fee shall be ment or agrees to reimburse the owner for such deposited in interestbear1ng accounts dearly iden costa from impact fees paid from other new devel- tifying •the category of capital improvements or opmenta that will use such capital improvements facility expansions within the service area for which • or facility expansions, which fees shall be collect- the fee was adopted. ed and reimbursed to the owner at the time the Interest earned on impact fees is considered other new development records its plat; or (I* (3) an owner voluntarily requests the political funds. of the account on which it is earned and is subdivision to reserve capacity to serve future subject to all restrictions placed on use of impact (ees under [his chapter. development, and the political subdivision and owner enter into • valid written agreement. (0 Impact. fee funds may be spent only for the Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, i 82(a). eff- Aug. 28. 1989. purposes for which the impact fee was imposed as shown by the capital improemefltI plan and as I 396.020. Entithmeut to Services authorized by this chapter. Any new development for which an impact fee (ci) The records of the sca,unts into which impact has been paid is entitled to the Permanent use and fees are deposited shall be open for public inapeo- benefit of the services for which the fee was exact- ed ti°12 and °PY during 0 '7 business hours. and is entitled to receive.immediate service from _ , --, any existing facilities with actual capacity to serve Acts 1989. 71st Let., ch- 1. i 82 ). off. Aug. 28. 1989. ,,___,,,,i . 6041 .. ..,..„ ._....„.::„..,-.,,,,-..,...,.:„ ,....,... . -. •. +' 1•'•. -, , , ill , . . , ,. , 4, . ,...,__ . .,... .. ,.,•._, ,..,. . . .. .., . , -. ..,---r-'1. -:-..,,, r -___ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § 395.044 -e witill � Refunds I § 395.O42 Hearing on Land Use Auumptlona i a on the request of an owner of the property on To impose an impact fee, a political subdivision "8. 19$9 ( � impact fee has been paid, the political must adopt an order, ordinance,or resolution estab- • ��iou shall refund the impact fee if existing lishing a public hearing date to consider land use -.one to taities are available and service is denied or the assumptions within the designated service area that *'=�•:- ,,,;01 subdivision has. after collecting the fee will be used to develop the capital improvements r, _•-•• mi P� erV1ce was not av le commence � Aiii, ction within two years or service is not avail- 1989. �p� � 'thin a reasonable period considering the type Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch 1, i 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, qua the... 7pitaJ improvement or facility ezpanaion � � 395.043. InformatIon About Auumptions aucted, but in no event later than five years § Available to Public .-ratio. from the date of payment under Section 395.019(1). ro) On completion of the capital improvements or facility expsllsiOns identified iw the capital improve-ve- On or before the date of the first pub1icstion of -,-4.-- 0-,.. the notice of the hearing on land use uiumptOfl$, oats plan.the political subdivision shall recalculate the poetical subdivision shall make available to the gal en- the inpsct fee using the actual cosh of the capital public its land use assumptions. the time period of _a chaP OPmfementi O f&Cilty expansion. If the imPact the projectioni, and a description of the general *calculated based on actual cost is U than the nature of the capital improvement facilities that .. opict fee paid, the political subdivision shall re- may be proposed. 1989. fund the difference if the difference exceeds the ^:!Wes . julPict fee paid by more than 10 percent Acts 1989. 71st Leg., ch. i. } 82(a), di. Aug. 28, 1989. (c) The political subdivision shall_refund any irn- § 395.044. Notice of Hearing on Land Use As- p�et fee or part of it that is not spent u authorized ��� l��- by �a chapter within 10 years after the date of v o� yment (a) Before the 30th day before the date of the n pa d) Any refund shall bear interest calculated from hearing on land use usuxnptions,the Political subdi- ,__ .the date of collection to the date of refund at the vision shall send a notice of the hearing by certified .n , statutory rate u set forth in Article 1.03, Title 79, mail to any person who has given written-notice b Revised Statutes(Article 50694.03, Vernon's Texas certified or registered mail to the municipal seae- 989. Civil Statutes), or its sucxeasor statute. tary or other de-:gusted official of the political ,•,.,., (e) All refunds shall be rnadto the record owner subdivision requeszing notice of the hearing within at the time the refund is paid. two years precea:ng the date of adoption of the of the property order, ordinance, or resolution setting .the public an However, if the impact fees were paid by another 2ed political subdivision or governmental entity, pay hearing. 1 be sent shall be made to the political subdivision or (b) The political subdivision shall publish notice of en- governmental entity. the hearing once a week for throe consecutive or (f) The owner of the property on which an impact weeks,the first notice to appear before the 30th day hich fee has been paid or another political subdivision or but on or after the 60th day before the date set for governmental entity that'paid the impact fee has the hearing, in one or more newspapers of general EK1 standing to sue for a refund under this section. circulation in each county in which the political Acts 1989. 71st Leg., ch. 1, f 82(i), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. subdivision lies. However, a river authority that is "' is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees pact [Sections 395.026 to 395.Od0 reserved the re- for expansion] that function as impact fees may publish quired newspaper notice only in each county in --ie SUBCHAFFER C. PROCEDURES FOB which the service area lies. The notice of public as ADOPTION OF IMPAGT FEE hearing may not be in the part of the paper is which a legal notices and classified ads appear and may not I 395.041. COlpliaflce With ProCedUres Re- be smaller than one-quarter page of a standardize quired or tabloid-size newspsper, and the headline on the 'etprovidedthis chapter, a notice must be in 18-point or larger type. _.� Except as otherwise by P lithm1 subdivision must comply with this subchap- (c) The notice must contain: levyter to an impact fee. • 39,,,- Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, I 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. (1) a headline to read as follows: ,. , 607 .. , • . . . . . . , .. c-, . • I j - _ - 1 __ ( __.\) .- �� ° § 395.044 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE - , - i ; .. "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON LAND USE consistent with the systemwide land use au .. • ASSUMPTIONS RELATING TO POSSIBLEI tions. +: ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES" Act. 1989. 71st Leg., ch. 566, i 1(b), eft. Aug. 28, tom. • (2) the time, date, and location of the hearing; S.ctioni 2 to 4 of the 1989 Act provide: -,' f (3) a statement that the purpose of the hearing "�� 2 Ordinance.•°��a�procedures implemented I i is to consider the land use assumptions that will Chapter 957, Acts or u,.70th Legislature, Regular Sesaios.wee (Article 1269j-4.11, v '. TSU aril St&t71ts), pi*ta Ze 1- be used to develop a capital improvementh plan effective data of th Act shall not be Iwid inv&1d an a nsak of •I under which an impact fee may be imposed; inconsistency with aay peo.;sion of this sec•i ' . !I I (4) an eudy understandable map of the service "see.�. Nothing in this Act shall affect the validity,� (ees ber.tofs',Tied for sooem water.driinsg.,or fkod o�� 11 area to which the land use assumptions apply;and t&ait by a oouncy..ia.ditrt created and operating,,,der ;i: I � (5) a statement that any member of the public pravions °f Artkls XVI,Section 59,°t th'Texas Cstitt1o.it the ri ht to prdri - has 8 appear at the hearing and present oensa.,and all àct f levied ac..w..d bymidi ,, evidence for or against the land use auuxnptiona. digtrictn a hae.bY.abdar d,raad,s. and m,d t� ,; Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, f 82(a), elf. Aug. 28, 1989. � �' If�°�provision°d this Act°r its application to. person x is Mid invalid, the invalidity dose� '.I j� i 395.045. Apprv&l of Land Use Auuinptáon.s •neec other peo.�ioo.a app8�tioos of thi.Aec tb.c eao b,p effect without the mealid provilion or appliestioq gad to this r 4' Required the provisions 0 tbis Ad UI declared to be Simira,ble.- ,-;.- r,=;t (a) After the public hearing on the land use era- . f 395.046, Capital ImprovemeImprovemenImprovements Fun1 la p Required sumptions, the political subdivision shall determine After Approval f i Use whether to adopt or reject an ordinance, order, or ptions resolution approving the land use assumptions. � (b) The political subdivision, within 34) days after If the governing body adopts an ordinance,order, _ 1.1 or resolution appmvin� the land use aaanm the date of the public hearing, shall approve or Pam, •,.. -= disapprove the land use assumptions. the Political subdivision shall provide for a eapitaj :: improvements plan to be developed by quilifj 10 . (c) An ordinance, order, or resolution approving professionals using generally accepted engineering -. Land use assumptions may not be adopted as an and planning practices in accordance with Section i. 1 emergency measure. 395.014. ! Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, ¢ 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. Acts 198 71st Leg., ch. 1, f 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. I .. § 3950455. Systemwide Land Use Auumptioni § 395.047. Hearing on Capital Improvemei4 (a) In lieu of adopting land use assumptions for - Plan and Impact Fee If : each service area,a political subdivision may,except I On completion of the .. . for storm water, drainage, flood control, and road- P capital improvementi pisii, j way facilities, adopt systemwide land use asumg- � the governing body 8hLll adopt an or der or nso ln- . j lions, which cover all of the area subject to the boa setting a public hearing to discuss the adoption jurisdiction of the political subdivision for the P11- of the plan and imposition of the impact fee. The pone of imposing impact fees under this chapter. � public hear ing must be held by the governing body of the political subdiv is ion to discuss the proposed .. ... (b) Prior to adopting systemwide land use ace- ordinance, order, or resolution adopting a capital ;, ,,.. ,,,:, ,, ;;,,,, aumptions, a political subdivision shall follow the I improvements plan and imposing an impact fee. .1�� �.sr�� I public notice, hearing, and other requirements for .--,4,:f.,. i. adopting land use assumptions. Actft 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1. ¢ 82(a), eff. Aug. 28. 1989. , . , -,. . --,-. . . --. (c) After adoption of systemwide land use era- f 395.048. InformatIon About Plan ATallable to sumptions, a political subdivision is not required to Public - , adopt additional land use assumptions for a service 4 area for water supply, treatment, and distribution On or before the date of the first publication o - t or wastewater collection and teatznent the notice of the bearing on the capital improv.- facilities f&clhties as a prerequisite to the adoption of s °e°� plan and impact fee. the pine shall be made , r• t capital improvements plan or impact fee, provided available to the public. the capital improvements plan and impact fee are 4 Act 1989, 71st Leg., eh. 1, i 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. r-) 608 . .. .. .._. • -- ' - -- , . : . . . , •▪- l '' .,1',.,,•. . , , ,. , . . . . • • ':'. • .. '.•. . • .•I . . i , ' .s • i ._ ___... . • ,.. • . r s 410 . . 4 . 6 . ''-: ---'-- ,i;",...‘ `' 395.0515 � PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § before the fifth buainesa day before the date of the Notice of win(on Capital ImprOve. public hearing on the plan and fees. am� 1 3967049. menu Plan and Impact Fee�a (a) Before the 30th day before the date of the ACts 1989. list Leg•. ch. 1. 4 82(a). eff. Aug. 28, 1989. on the capital improvements plan � un' § 395.051. Approval of GPital Impro�e�nen��, tie political subdivsion shall aead a noticePIS and Impact Fee Required o�� fearing by certaf�ed mail to any person pho �'"` ``. registered (al 'Thy Political sbdi�aion. pithm 30 days after ""�* �n �vntten notace by certified or on the capital im �� municipal secretary or other designated the date of the public hea�ng or �� s��0notice provementa plan sad impact fee, shall approve �`'f�� owl of the political subdivision requesting the adoption of the capitl improvementse beariaB min two yeas precedin8 the date disapprove of an impact fee. � of the�p�n of the order or resolution settiaB the plan and imposition met.-:1..met.-: . of (b) ,fin ordinance. order. or resolution approving ��t�,;�' Public hearing. anti innpoeition.of an "�r�• ►io.... subdivsion shall publish notice of the capital impmvementa plantwilitro) once a week for three conseCUtie impact fee may not be adopted u an emergency weeks,� • the first notice to appear before the 30th day measure. 1 to anyior liter the 60th day before the date eat for Acts 1989. list Leg.. ch. 1, i 82(s), elf. Aug. 28, 1989. � � but o of neral fiven e Wig, in one or more newipaperl 8�. . of lAnd Ose Assua+p�y� in each coanty in which the pohtics § 396.0616. CwlidstuaImprovemeflt iztlons atd CaPit�1 bdi,isiofl lies, However, a river authority that Plan elsewhere by state law to charge fees land use fired that function as impact fees may publish the re- (a) In lieu of separately adopting'�'• quared newspaper unlace only in each -county � assumptions and capital improvements plan for a which the service area lies. The unlace of public service area, a Pouf subdivision may consolidate may not be in the part of the•Paper in which the land use assumptions and the capital improve- beeuinS ar anmyd classified ads aPPe p• ,_ _. smaller than one-quarter Page of a atsndaid�size s rrand the headline on the iii or tabloid-size °e�P'P� ' (b) If a political subdivision etZ to COI1SOI1(L%t � must be is 18-point or larger type. improVernefl�g the land use aasumptioaa and capital • lion (c) The notice must contain the\fflwing� plan as $uthorizt-d by Subsection (a), the P9iit#al (1) a headline to read as follows: subdivision shall first comply with Section 395.043 __. ,_,,. _989 and follow the public notice and hearing require- nenti "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON for adopting a capita1 improvements plan and ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES" impact fee, except the hearing-, (1) the headline for the notice by publication ' (2) the time, date, and location e the hearing shall read as follows: lan, (3) a statement that the purpooffee; „olu. is to coider the adopon of as impact "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON ApOP- .. ption (4) an easily understandable map of the service['he area on which the proposed fee will be levied; TION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS , . IMPACT FEES"; .,. �dy (Sj the amount of the proposed impact fee per aubdi. •:•• service unit; and (2) the notice must state that the political �oicel (6) a statement that any member of the public vision intends to adopt land use asBumPh°n8, a It ee, ar at the hearing and present capital improvements plan. and impact fees at the has the right W appe fee. hearing and does not intend W hold:separate lgg. evidence for or against the plan and proposedhearings to adopt the land use assumptions. csPr Acts 1989, list Leg., ch. 1, i 82(a). eff. Aug. g, 1989. tal improvements plan, and impact fees; toCommentS (3) the notice must specify a date, which date is •• •' i 395.050. AdvzorY Committee on not uxli& than 60 days after Publication of the Capita Improvementi Plan aid Iiit ai d of pset Fees � first oot . and must state that if a person, by not later than the date specified, makes a written �e- hearings, the governing de The advisory committee created under SecUan �t for separate 395.058 shall file its written comments on the pro- �Y must hold separate heuinas W adopt the ;. , , posed capital improvements plan and impact fees 609 • • • . .,. . •• • . .• • . •.•,.,• . •• , • 'i • 4110. . 1 . if ii _ § 39&0515 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE t punprovementi395.053. Hearins oa Updatcd Land Use ,V. taad use aaaamptions and cs ital § sum�� and Capital Improy .• � Plan; (4) thenoticemUZtPT0V1deth & dfu1i�- menu Plan . 4 i '- ing addreu of the official of the political subdivi- The governing body of the political subdivision 1. 1 iion to whom a request for separate hearings 8h111, within 60 d&yi after the date it receives the • t shall be sent; and update of the land use assumptions and the capita! (5) the certified mail notice, if applicable, shall improVeiflentA pl&fl, adOpt an order setting a public rhearing to discuss and review the update and'ha ! tt. contain the information in Subsections (bX2H4). determine whether to amend the plan. . � (c) In addition, the political subdivision shall com- Acts 1989. lIlt Leg., ch. 1, 4 82(a), efL Aug. 22, 1989. ply with all of the other requirements for adopting land use assumptions. a capital improvements plan. i 395.054. Hearing o� Amendments to Land Use i and unpsct fee. Asstunptions,Capital Improvements ? (d) If, within the date specified in Subsection Plan. or Impact Fee (bX3), i person requests, is writing, separate hear` A public hearing must be held by the governing • . ings on the land use assumptions and capital im- body of the political gbdivi8IOfl to discuss the Pro- prOYeNeflt8 plan, the political subdivision may not posed ordinance, order,or resolution amending lead ... utilize this section. In such event, the Political use assumptions, the capital improvelfleflt8 place, or - subdi,iii°n may proceed with the public hearing for the impact tee. On or before the date of the fuze t.:_ : which notice has been published, but such hearing,:-. . publication of the notice of the hearing on the .. will address land use assumptions, and a second amendments.the land use assumptions and the cspi- i hearing as required by Sections 395.O4& 395.O51 will tal improvements plan, including the amount of any be necessary to address the capital improvements proposed amended impact fee per service unit, shall #11 plan and 1miactaviilablefee. be made to the public. , 4.- Acts 1989. 7lit Leg., eh 566, i 1(c), eff. Aug. Z3, 1989. Acts 1989. hit Leg.. ch. I, i 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. -- �: . Sections!to 4 o[the 1989 Act prcrride: TPi -sic.2 Ordin&mc1 den.or proeedur implemented nn3a ¢ 395.055. Notice of Rearing on Amendments to Ch&pt 967.Ac of the 70th L.gislaturt. Regular session. 1987 Land Use AuumptiOfll, Capital lm. (ArticieX,, i9j-4.11. Vernon's Texis Cml staUztei), prior to the provementa PCan. or Impact Fee .-..... effective date of the ivlid a.Aet shall not De Geld irl a result of saybefore the date of the inconsistency with a°7 prOY °of this Aet (a) Beforethe .3� day "Sec.s. Nothing in this Act shall affect the.zlid;ry of impact hearing on amendments to the laced use wump 1. fees heretofore levied for storm water,drainage, or fkxxl control fcilit by.oouncy..;de dtrt created and cv.r+ang under the tiona, capital ünproveroentl plan, or impact fee,the I _ proii Article,tArticle xvt,Section 59.or the Tee.Constitution in• political subdivision shall send a notice of the hear county of 2iOO. or more according to the ha t precedini fedefil ing by certified mail to any person who has gwen c.f. 1 census,and all impact fees heretofore kvi.dorassessed by such a written notice by certified or registered [nW to the district are hereb7.alidated.ratified,and oonfirmed. i a "See. 4. If any provisiwi of this Act or its application to any municipal secretary or other designated official of Perscin or circumstances is held invalid, the invalidity does not �e political subdivision requesting notice of the � I. affect other provisions°�wv�'�+.°OO'of�,i.ea s�c.a b.�i..n within two dears preceding the date of etieet witus the m.alid prvision or appti a tocat and this end hearingthepublic., thepm n�iaios of N Kis Act are deelared to bt *�k' adoption of the order or resolution setting • .:. '.` i hearing. ... �-��"-:' § 395.(52. Periodic Update o[Land Use Asaum� The litical subdivision shall publish nonce of �'-�-�=?`:`'`�''�°� � lions and Capital Improvemeflta the(b)h once a week for three consecutive. .,, .. . plan pqtifred weeks, the first notice to appear before the 30th day (a) A political subdivision imposing an irnpact fee but on or after the 60th day before the date set for 1 shall update the land use assumptions and capital the hearing, in one or more newspapers of general .. , improvesneab plan at least every three years. The circulation in each county in which the pOIitk'l ' -- initial threeie&r period begins on the day the awl- subdi ' ion lies. However, a river authority that it 1.. tal improvements pull is adopted. authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees .. r (b) The political subdivision shall review and eva}- that function as impact fees may publish the K' ;' oats its current land zees assumptions and shall quired newspaper notice only in each COUDtY in cause an update of the capital improvements plan to which the service area lies. The notice of pUblie in accordance with Subchapter B. hearing may not be in the part of the paper in Which be prepared � and msY n�c . . • Aeon 19013, list Lag., ch. 1. I 82(a). eft. Aug. 28, 189. legal notices and classified ads appear .. _____ _ . .r a . , ,•• . . . . , .• . • - . .••,,, . I, . - - -- .T, • ... . . i . . . • • 1111 • , . . , . . , , . ._,. , . _ ., _ , ,, . -\'� - pLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § 395.0575 � s�ler than one-quarter page of a standard-size improvements plan, or impact fee ii needed, it may, tabloid,u ne.►saPer � requirements. and the headline on t tohe as an alLernstive the updz ' g of 395.052-395.057. do the following: woe must be in 18-point or larger type• i body of the political subdivi- The notice must contain the following: (1) The governing � (c) Ilion shall, upon determining that an update is • (1) a headline to read u follows: unnecessaxy .and 60 dye before publishing the tal ul notice under this section. send notice of its •NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON fo ., determination not to update the land use auump- tionsAdIINOF IMPACT FEES" , capital improverneflta plan, and impact fee ,,•,.. (2) the time, dite, and location of the hearing; by certified mail to any person who has, within p of the hearing fro years preceding�e�� �t the final notice ' (3) a statement that the urpoee Sive written is to consider the amendment of land use asaum� of this matter is to be published, mail to the munic .: lions and a capital improvements plan and the notice by certified or registered imposition of an impact ee; ipal secretary or other designated official of the (4) as easily understandable description and political subdivision requesting notice of hearings.o. map of the service area on which the update is related to impact fees. The notice must contain . ld being prepszed and the information in SubsectiOfli (bX2H5). (5) • a statement that any member of the public (2) The poetical ibdiiiiOfl shall publish notice has the right to appear at the hearing and Present of its determination once a week for three consec' le evidence for or against the update. olive weeks in one or more newspape!° with ,i_ bra 1989. 7lit Leg.. eh- 1, 4 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. general circulation in each county in which the political subdivision lies. However, a river au- ..... f 39&056. Mv1IOfY Committee Comment on thority that is authorized elsewhere by tate_law Aaiendmeflta to charge fees function as impact fees may Section pblih the required newspaper notice only in The advisory ��ittee crested undereach county is which the service area lies. The .. , , 395.058 shall file its written comments on the pro- notice of public hearing may not be in the part of 1_ posed amendmentl-----. to the land use assumptions,re the paper in which legal notices and clusified ads capital improvements plan. and impact appear and may not be smaller than one-quarter hearing on the amendments.the.fifth business day before the date of the public gf a standard-size or tabloid-size:newspaper. eff 8, 1989. and the headline��n the notice moat be in 18-point =, Acts 1989, 71et Leg.. ch• 1. 4 82(a), . Aug.g• ,..•,:....•.... .• or larger type. 395.057. Approval of Amendments Required (b) The notice must contain the following: - . (a) The political subdivision. within 30 days after (1) a headline to read as follows: ... the date of the public hearing on the amendments, "NpTICE OF DETER3dINATION NOT TO UP- $ha11 approve or disapprove the amendments of the DATE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL • Land use & iflpti° 3 and the capital improvemerith IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. OR IMPACT FEFS"; plan and modifcst'Ofl of an impact fee. (2) a statement that the governing body of the . ,. (b) An ordinance, order, or resolution approving political subdivision has determined that no . . the amendments to the land uge assumptions, the change to the Iand use asaumptiona, capital im- 4 _.V.:' capital improvements plan. and imp08iti0fl of � pvemeflts plan. or impact fee is necess ... pact fee may no[ be adoPCed as an emergency (3) an easily understandable description and a �`. measure. map of the service area in which the updating has Acts 1989. 71st Ley.. eh 1. 4 82(a). eff. Aug. 28, 1989. ... ., ''''''s been determined to be unnecesaarT, !,; •,,'; . i (4) a statement that if, within s specified date � 396.0575. Determination That No Update of Land Use Assumptions,. Capitalwhich date shall be at least 60 days after publici- Improvementa Plan. or Impact lion of the first notice, a person makes a written Fees is Needed request to the designated official of the political (a) If, at the time an update under Section 395.- subdivision 1 requesting�A�tat the lo.land i�P��g� be • ' 052 ii required,the governing body determines that must comply with no change to the land use ssaumptions, capital updated, the governing body ., 611 . . : _ , ,,.. . .. ..,. ...•. ,_,• .. . , . . ,•., • • . _ , . _. , ., .,,. ••,,.._,.,... . . . • . . ,,_ ,., ..., ,. r .„ ..•.. . . , , . . .. . •, . . , . • • - . , . , . .. , , . . ... •.. • . - --- ---- „ . -, . .. ,• ____ • .._.•.„..,.,,..:..... .. ..: .. , . , • • /„._ ., ,. ,,,. .,...„...,. . ... _,_.„... ..... , i .. Ci.'• •-__ ' • ' , • . . •.. .. . , .,,-.:,- .,t.,.',.,7,--7,----.:-;---,•.:i. . ,. 4 0. . 3: ...;.:.. . r • .i i�.•: § 395.0575 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE . .( ,I ri i , ' II • the request by following the requirements of Seq> commission, the commission may act as the advisory tiona 396O52- 395.o57; and committee if the commission includes at leut one ii (5) a statement identifying the name and mail- representative of the real estate, development, or ... ing address of the official of the political subdivi- building industry who is not an employee or official Sion to whom a request for an update should be of a political subdivision or governmental entity. If sent. no such representative is a member of the P!&riniiig , 9 (c) The advisory committee shall file its written and zoning commission,the cornmiuion may still act • . i comments on the need for updating the land use as the advisory committee• if at {east one such °i; assumptions, capital improvements plans, and irn representative is appointed by the political aubdivi. pact fee before the fifth business day before the sion as an ad hoc voting member of the planning 4: earliest notice of the government's decision that no and zoning COlfllfliUlOfl When it&cta as We advisory • • update is necessary is mailed or published. committee. If the impact fee is to be applied in the (d) It. by the date specified in Subsection (bx4), sextraterritorial jurisdiction of the poetical anbdivz. /ii person requests in writing that the land use as- sumptions, S1OQ, the membership must include a representative a capital improvemente plan, or impact fee from that area. . . . be updated, .the governing body shall cause an up- (c) The advisory committee serves in an advisory date of the land use assumptions and capital un capacity and is established to: provements plan to be prepared in accordance with (1) advise and assist the political subdivision is { • Sections 395.062495057. adopting land use assumptions; 1 �' (e) An ordinance,order,or resolution determining (2) review the capital improvements plan and 7ioi the need for updating land use assumptions, a capi- file written comments; tail improvement plan,or an impact fee may not be � (3) monitor and evaluate implementation of the i adopted as an emergency measure. capital improvements plan: i ,- Acts 1989, 7lit Lei., ch. 566, i 1(d), eff. Aug. 22, 1989. I (4) file semiannual reports with : - Se000s Yo01oft�198Y Aet pro.ide: respect to the 2 Ordinances,orders,oe procedures implemented ender Progress of the capital improvements plan and - - Cb&pt.r 967.Acts of the 70th Ltgialatuze, Raguiar Seux)a, 1987 report to the poetical subdivision any perceived • ''. (Ar 1269j-4.11, Vernon's Tizas Civil Ststut Prior to the inequities in implementing the plan or imposing effective data of this Ad shall not M held invalid as a result of any . intency withw and provision of this Act. the impact fee; and i "Sec s. Now in shallt,;.sec•h. attest cha.alid;cy of impact (5) advi-a the political aubdiviaion of the need•• feeh.xetofor.I.vi.d for storm water.drainage, or flood controlto update •)r revise the land tscthties by a countywide duthet operatingated and operating under theuse assumptions , + provisions of Article xVi,S.ctioo 59,of the TConstrntioius in, capital im- rovementa plan, and impact fee. county of 2,1(),O(X)or more according to the last preceding federal oen+ua,and all impsct feesheretofore kvicd or saed by sueh a ( ) The p�..:cical subdivision shall make available assessed distzict are hereby validated,ratified,and confirmed. to the advisory committee any professional reports . . "Sec. 4. If any provision of this Act or its application to any with respect to developing and implementing the perion or circumstances is Held nvJid, the invalidity does not ' affect other provisions or applications of this Act that u be given capital improvements plan. i , . effect without the invalid proviszoa or application,and to this end (e) The governing body of the political subdivision 1 the provissonz of this Act are declared to be severable." shall adopt procedural rules for the advisory corn- ..-: • =' �- § 395.O&8. Advisory mitt mittee to follow in carrying out its duties. (a) On or before the date on which the order, Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. 4`:!�j ordinance, or resolution is adopted under Section Gans 395.059 to 395.070 reserved �4- 395.042, the political subdivision shall appoint a for expansion] ?v�'-�''� capital improvements advisory committee. .! �-v`;�{;A"afyfi, � j i _ (b) The advisory committee is composed of not SUBCHAPTER D. OTHER PROVISIONS ..,: •.. less than five members who shall be appointed by a • majority vote of the governing body of the political 4 395.071. Duties to be Performed Within Time subdivision.I. Not less than 40 percent of the mem- Limits berihip of the advisory committee must be repre- If the governing body of the political subdivision i :'' sentatives of the real estate, development, or build- does not a dutyperform imposed under this chapter - . ing industries who are not employees or officials of within the prescribed period, a person who has paid t. a political subdivision or governmental entity. If an impact fee or an owner of land on which an . .: the political subdivision has a planning and zoning impact fee-has been paid has the right to present a ., i 612 j , t. i • .r) r *. p a. : • . . -'' 'A' '''''. . . . • .•.• , - - . • • . - s • . .. , . 1 . ,• 0. a i) . ,,,... .. . . . . . . . . . , , , _ • ,---- , PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § 395.079 ,.___,,,, - regnest to the governing body of the pol►ti- I all or any part of the process necessary todevelop,at o� ittefl aubdiviaioa stating the nature of the upper- adopt, or update the impact fee. nentp o (0(14i duty and requesting that it be performed Acts 1989, 7lat Leg., ch. 1, ¢ 82(a), eff. Aug. 28. 1989. official vijoin 60 days after the date of the request. If the tY. v e rn in g body of the political subdivision finds § 395.077. fliflDIf fat the duty is required under this chapter and is (a) A person who has exhausted all sdminiatrs- still t late in being performed. it shall cause the duty to tive remedies within the political subdivision and 'e such commence within 60 days after the date of the who is aggrieved by a final decision is entitled to bdiv}. quest and continue until completion. trial de novo under this chapter. nning Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28. 1989. (b) A suit to contest an impact fee must be filed dvlsory' �n th i 395.072. Records of Hearings within 90 days after the date of adoption of the xlivi. A record must be made of any public hearing 1 ordinance, order, or resolution establishing the im- :,Lative Provided for by this chapter. The record shall be pact fee- maintained and be made available for public inspec- (c) Except for roadway facilities, a person who aory tioci by the political subdivision for at least 10 years h id an impact fee or an owner of property on which an impactafter the date of the hearing. fee has been Paid is entitled to lion in Acts 1989. 71st Leg., eh. 1, ¢ 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. specific performance of the services by the poetical subdivision for which the fee was paid- 4 395.073. • CumulatiTe Effect of State and Local and Restrictio ns (d) This section does not require construction of a Any state or local restrictions that apply to the specific facility to provide the services. '` the imposition of an impact fee in a political subdivision (e) Any suit must be filed in the county in which where an impact fee is proposed are cumulative the major part of the land area of the political 3 the with the restrictions in this chapter. subdivision is located. A successful litigant shall be and Acts 1989, 718t Leg., ch. 1, f 82(a), eff. Aug. 28. 1989. entitled to recover reasonable attorneys fees and court costs. •,,, § 395.074, Prior impact Fees Replaced by Fees Acts 1989. list Leg.. ch. 1. I 82(a), eff. Aug. 28. 1989. v Under This Chapter ,-ed An impact fee that is in Place on June 20, 1987, § 395.078. Subtafltift1 ComPlisliCe With Notice is, must be replaced by an impact fee made under this R lufrements ,. chapter on or before June 20, 1990. However, any An impact fee .gay not be held invalid because the able political subdivision having an impact fee that has Public notice rep, .irements were not complied with if is not been replaced under this chapter on or before compliance was substantial'andin good faith. ,e June 20, 1988, is liable to any party who, after June Acts 1989, 71st Leg.. ch. 1, § 82(a). eff. Aug. 28, 1989. 20, 1988, pays an impact fee that exceeds the maui- . . mum permitted under Subchapter B by more than I § 395.079. Impact Fee for Storm Water. Drain- 10 percent for an amount equal to two times the age. and Flood Control in Populous t difference between the maximum impact fee al- � County towed and the actual impact fee imposed, plus rea• 89. 1 sonable attorneys fees and court costs: Acts 1989, 71st Leg.. ch. 1, i 82&). elf. Aug. 28. 1989. (a) ANY county that has a population of 2.2 mil- lion or more or that borders a county with a popula I ,, Lion of 2.2 million or more, and any district or .. X,: _, § 395.075. No Effect on Taxes or Other Charges authority created under :article XVI, Section.59, of . .:, ...c, This chapter does not prohibit, affect, or regulate � the Texas ConsuluuOfl within any such county that �4 is authorized to provide storm water, drainage, and any tax, fee, charge, or assessment specifically au- flood control facilities, is authorized to impose im- ie .... thorized b y state law. pact fees to provide storm water, drainage, and Acts 1989, 713t Leg.. di. 1. i 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. flood control improvements necessary to aceommo- § 395.076. Moratorium on Development Prohib- date new development I - Ittd (b) The imposition of impact fees authorized• meo of - A moratorium may not be placed on new develop- Subsection (a) is exempt from the req meat for the p•urpose of awaiting the completion of Sections 395.025, 395.O52-395.O57, and 395.074 un- 613 . . , . . , . 1 1 . . • s a ,o41110 .� • ih I 1 § 395.079 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE i kuthe politics] iubdiviilon proposes to increase (1) paid by or cKarged the imact fee. to district created under Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas Con_ .:. � (c) Any poetical subdivision described by Subsec. stitution to another district created under that tion(a) is authorized to pledge or otherwise contras- constitutional provision if both districts are re- tually obligate all or part of the impact fees to the quired by law to obtain approval of their bonds by : payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, the Texas Water Commission; or or other obligations issued or incurred by or on behalf of the political subdivision and to the pay. (2) charged by an entity if the impact fees, i-' went of any other Contzctua1 obligations. contributions charges, fees, uaeuiflenta, or contributions are (d) An impact fee adopted by a poetical aubdivi- approved by the Teas Water Comrnis,5lon. ° •-• . sion under Subsection (a) may not be reduced if: (b) Any district crested under Article XVI, Sec_ • : (1) the political subdivision has pledged or oth- tion 59, or Article III. Section 52, of the Texas erwise contractually obligated all or part of the Conztitution may petition the Teas Water Commie- 1 impact fees to the payment of principal and inter 'ion for approval of any proposed impact fees, est on bonds,notes,or other obligations issued by charges, fees, aueumenta, or contributioas. The or on behalf of the political subdivision; and commission shall adopt rules for reviewing the peti (2) the political subdivision agrees in the pledge tion and may charge the petitioner fees adequate to or contract not to reduce the impact fees during the term of the bonds, notes, or other contractual cover the cost of processing and considering the obligations. petition. The rules shall require notice aubatsntial '; - Accs 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, � 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. ly the same u that required by this chapter for the adoption of impact fees and shall afford opportunity § 395.080. Chapter Not Applicable to Certain for all affected parties to participate. Water.Relaled Special Districts Acts 1989, 71it Leg., ch. 1. f 82(a). eff. Aug. 22, 1989. (a) This chapter does not apply to impact fees, charges, fees, aueumentz, or contributions: [Chapters 396 to 400 reserved for expansion] 11110 • • • ; 4.4 ,* .7.; • s: • , � 4 a4 : ' 614 t • • I T ' V, A � � II tett.. ° E '� � ' Epp tee t;IW44 % 4t* '� �,� .� , # • A S 1 (.),.p> tat 401.Skatilk) ar 40S / PCL • 4# .fr Gi 'ri- (t #4" c “2 400,fr"04 / [i i y0 yjC FN p� y /�. . •: II 4411 III: . �i �%.•♦ ��40'�♦ '�'♦ .: .. i O © ♦1' ,'•- k- # S1UDY AREA BWNDARY� w '� '♦� ♦�� ' . `� � ''� 4 STUDY C SANITARY _ _ _ _ _ — '', '♦�� ''' , � '��'''' PROPOSED SMATARY — _. _ _�—� �.' ,'�� � �,7 / ^ '�� �� '0� , • EXISTIPROPOSED FORCE FCRCE MAIN _ _ _ _�4. ]— ����` �.•s ♦,� � � ,' •.4v# ♦© watt:"©© 1 CITY OF FRIENDDSWOOD �r,4 �� �', '' ♦.�.,, ♦♦�:► C �( i BROWN de GAY ENGINEERS, `Ai 4�� ��Rit .w ^ �♦ uston, TOM UPDATE STUDY OF s l� IMPACT FEES MILLS, MURPHY do BRIARMEADOW AVE. - WASTEWATER COLLECI1ON SYSTEM I ! - ' c ' cale Job No.: Dot.: Exhibit: 1S"45:001 (COF03 FEB., 1993 I II 1--------------------Th i • t� BAY AREA BOULEVARD :•`; 1 SERVICE AREA W5 _ i . ,...,: v,,.., 4 , .... :7:........ ,44 , ofi - -N ,. \ .; �' Y ,..; ' SOUTH FRIENDSINOOD 1 . „I . % % y t/ /0.4,.. it , ?� " • .. SERVICE AREA ,00 I • . , - ' -......, ‘k-,. ,/ -,4 :` . taiihr-----44 I , //. Yam! { 41 / -„is /f , 1 y - / I // ii .0 '47. -)Pi .,41!"At14.41. 414 IV' . .. ' 4411° • • • ' • • r 7 ‘ \ "'es\ . ,‘ "4/7<,d4rigk..irti..,%74,4i: \ II'c4',,\,...7-rakti-_,,,c.:// : '-:--s:,.-60 \ •______ .'"41"'"' - g is, // „ . ..,.;:./...i.r ..;.:...7,..:...::..;,..t.,,..:.;: :.:46. , ,xassit;: „„44 . , .;•, ,,, ..,,,v2 , . . . y ,...Thka a nit I 4.-• / :::-•Y .?.. ,--;LI%CCA)\-.:?e\•i\.\\V-:•:•n--:\-*.%/-E.%• .A\..'I%s.,.:.;.---7-'4'-.-.,t-..-'-/---..00.%.t2.3.-.‘.:,.:'4v-:4§,;-_a-).:.{--t.,w•t'e...t-•4..,,•-:7--e-_a1•,,\e'',7.511.'..-,,•i,/,'i:4 I/..•(S„1 • ;` j . „ i 4i,ivl.r i.i/la,t ! 44C4„4N.1,..cit•7„. \)fri: " Nei r�i l.7t.1_cI111ii ' V•o MELODY LANE trst . , j/ A !I".::T�1r'u• 1 /i11 SERVICE AREA ` ' , ‘ ' !l�r�; 111%i CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD ' g BROWN & GAY ENGINEERS, INC.1� Houston, Tezes UPDATE STUDY OF 13, \` IMPACT FEES WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OVERALL SERVICE AREAS Scale: Job No.: Date: Exhibit: I 1 N.T.S. COF03 FEB., 1993 A , I ' �.../ 2 rs' • ✓.•/ 1. / • 'lc-1 ❑LDM• I . ... ., Ici - A -- ::::----t 4 .. .. . . :, „......, h......„..A/ ./ 111t •041.:a,t.••6 v\e I" . 4 TEND WJD- /0 /: . / . . I MCdOH9kd d. •+yq•.. SS // / . LONGWO) a.,' �/% // / t \T` • •. r tier 4 # I Q-' NG r—•� �. � ���� _ 1. # 1k 0 4? j 1 .e NO y re - t,s. </ a tiVa • . • . . . •.. • .. • • • • • ..,. . , +.+,,„ NI itAfrifr / /\ ..‘. • . . . I. et ' N. IILLAGEEC>FPpr • fuREE11,u2F. 44 .. C/, t,��it* ft4-. """bbb��� •• ••, • •, . �'j.• Y • FRANKIE CARTER > • CrO.p�, .��i�♦I `v� r, HANDOLPH PARK4ts, a • y1 �i.., �►w♦ 1i/, �. �� • , v mop: , %# ♦:* vv1♦� I FqR� ���♦ +�v�•e�G-said,,,,,• ' , •�• • •N A �I '•`fr..' ♦ '+' °� LEGEND F A d t is `1' // _ ,, •r • ./ SJ ,Q, A ,k.< snuY AREA BOUNDARY— — — I FA/HlG Pie ♦♦ �` f�� `'',����yI♦��,\` Q�OQ \\\ "ENCHANT, o D I/1 . ✓ �,,�I�Sr � �rT - ' /i • �i �# COSTING WATER MAIN— — — ——- — yI✓g9 o0d +� • ' O� " '• �0 \ • G MPERIAL . � ' vim-- 001 PROPOSED WATER MAIN - -- ---- �0 Rp'd I;� � Q, rr' ��''` �,.�� � • �`•% 4- �. ' ESTATE CI v n vei CITY OF FRIENDSW000 . --, . '�i,r ‘q ���♦ 4 , / •• � �� <� '':Ini p� HBO11NdoGAYENGINEERS, INC.ti ♦ ♦ , ♦ .• .. ,e�1pI♦ Houston. Tezesy~�~"�Rt M �� . . . �'44 �44,41 jt� . 4 SS.. O`4G�. ,;t• A•� UPDATE STUDY OF a • ,=•y��v yFit fe RI �A. •�i`,WRD *� ��� , �l'•r►�`/� i ♦i ♦! . 1..t IMPACT FEES ifit " °uttt,.!+ O� `, ay�♦J. goo q� ♦ ,� .4isy ♦1� � �� MELODY LANE �cc�� ��OO�♦♦ <y '// RCR • �- t . � er 's =•.. /h�ni gnct,li WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM )3 4407:1I�.•0 tee.®0,* 4,4 •.� 4 '�e ' e �p �. nmr.•a:`.4• •. ♦�� .♦ �..�` Aix / - ,e .. �\ h/l r I ., SWr. Job No.: Dots:— Exhibit 1•1•1000• COF03 FEB., 1993 8 l�.I II II / Ij te:0,q• IyII IIIII II vr`�;IIIGI�I're �'��/IIII�III '�d eI I j Ii i I I I I I I C I AND e de. Ia • IyIII /IyIII IIIIII II J/ II S7ER I ? ✓II, w'II 1• ' ♦ I ♦ I CO 4 II SPACE ✓lIII IIa,°Y !�fj f✓�IIIiI,IIIIj`P,� ?��I�� 11,t .1CNNSONEB CENTER i 4%IIIII•�I�II ���III �r�III I/jIIern •'i I� A:. I/ y✓I II II ^.. I I�1 I \ t \ CITY �tHtT / I /,c p 40, IIII , ,,,I0. i,j✓I II. I� , 1 I,• 4.• I !IyI I .4�IIY • / � I t \ gD 52B P , IC� .• ,II ► Fa t 4i` #�t, � • ,�# FM. > ;0 � • • 4% FOREST,: 1 I SP . 4" ```.+� / 1 r r l II / V ' / \ ' < / / 19 \,,i7, 1 0., 470 13 ♦ , • CREEK Q A.S,4410N • i 4PP 44111# - . . . , , / �`����' ► i�a'__--- � \/ = / 0 A_tn.,.tr9,„ 4441r 1111 / • 0 IP est♦ ♦ tALsj -r / ,*� _ e ,'�ell �� LEGEND e, STUDY AREA BWNDARY 4fr�,,� ��Air clig ,,,EO�P" SSSCIN COSTING WAGER YNN— — — — — — — `� 4Z$t 1: =�.• Q~,� \ GR PROPOSED WATER MAIN — — — — — �I A� CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD •,,,� ,,�� •• ��, �'��' BROWN & GAY ENGINEERS, INC. , I� 1 I l KP S ,,,,,� /k4t �w©iii '�,,,��. / /-- Houston, Team �S�►��le �,©y47*4�•` �" UPDATE STUDY OF ; M?,�� 41S • IMPACT FEES r ��~ , , p ...• BAY AREA BOULEVARD ' o�� % t ''•� / WATER DISTRIBU710N SYSTEM • • %( / Scdc Jab No.: Date. TOOL' mJi 11. 1000' CCF03 !FEB.. 1993 C I .I �'• ILDERNESS PINES C, ♦♦ ♦i .•♦ 3� ♦♦ ♦ 4 \/v (may ( \A‘el)HL ' \‘ �.•�/.1�i ANE FOREST uR,Ct.v,1litS t, r4 ♦♦A�`'pit194%. i``�1 #4♦,,�11:. E' O.a 4,- eV ♦♦�►`C it �b .� • p.4%�4 ERNVCC0 . ♦ir ♦♦� • �♦ ,oAL• 4,... .„.4 ♦4, a4r,,, 'I.t.1 ♦, at .Q I • l%Act. � S� �•��1 ♦♦� ♦♦��♦♦�1'i ♦♦♦♦♦yS♦♦p^6,0�4'♦♦�♦♦♦, ♦.4 cl, „OP a r4�♦%se♦� ,♦� �♦' �Ape, \.f l.�y� �:+.� �,t9'v • .O ♦ ♦,y, ♦�y ♦+.♦ ♦I►♦ ♦:. ♦c� ♦ v� ♦♦vim •♦♦ ♦•C.;••♦�' ca. ♦�v 1♦i �.i��• ,,' '♦41 '�`r����� .,,'�t�' �� P�tO @ P \„ ♦♦♦C• ♦�w ♦ @• ♦„•♦ I' �• ♦♦i4, ♦r ♦♦V ♦ •♦wn ♦♦y9 ♦♦,.Y' •et •w'O!��. h ♦ !v 4.''EI `- I 4� •. 1'�.,., �":v4- o 1\ t ^I♦♦�.i•'ii,•♦'�.'♦�:+ ♦.� ♦i�1�>. ►♦�♦.♦:��1♦♦ �+ . 1♦���♦�'" .,,7i11 ���,°�,♦° ,v �:�j1;..�J , . ��,, ilCALL 2 .1\ ,a",,,,p •• <P444t • • / g-4,-.wiii 4 Ali 0,, A., • SE • ___A / sit ,.. 4 i ar \A\\\c,:1;414's.:4:::::.4:::::,,,,::::::::.4t4:, �♦j0 .!!� ,��> y'oyp ,t'� ,p%Er1�p°Avg-xi�.♦/'�_ '.•.� �� I� At*, S, ÷44I,s st t.f. O • 1? 7. ' Q `♦ `E"ASS TRAIL \\ lb) ((--UCH ,1♦•A Jf=Wplt♦IW♦I k. aV�� .♦��:.: :• ♦. , ..'EAGEE s A w r ♦ ` , �I.1., alp 4 % 1,: AGLE .;.♦� i.'EAK S.:.: % .•, HARRIS M1' • '\\1 G�••• ''.•I;Gi',III���'!.'1'p11Ij� � ' p�': : C K£5:.,.:. 5EC ,2. :: •''... ''`;.: coos, tv t� ..•u-_�� L� <�./ • 111♦,gy11." ���11'♦4` �• ..1 '.5�6.4., ,.•• -�CAy N • .�' •. a.., •.,•'.'RIDGE• '- q, / o41,1*(4116 • :..��i1 v�/ ,:tacit.N%♦1�'O� SECT:.2. \, *A\: , /8-fi-Y:, :::::.::::- ,...•-,-:::: % Ill osorr; t� V ••'S�•''°e`s''nr♦.vR 44...�♦♦d� CDN \� • ... V ta /• • 1:;-:• • '•.• ..:''. •.•..:2-':;c..::!...'I'.:.•:.-±•• dr ..,/ bEittiir---,., Itik •. #4 w♦ 4. % e . . ...: -✓ ., ,� . ,.:- .: •/ LE'YA.E by ♦�A 11 .' a �:.:.,..: - : ..•:......•., it.oNiii /�. '7vyi O!p''a A ES \ :,;Q,',' :..., .is "wry • ' ,`/ a . CIRCLE *.l II pq.,",fvp i1 ♦� 'r � ' `, . r. i f`"A•,Ifs 7J1�. ' NI /4":„titirAyriti. [I 4. 4%1'4% kta.•.'•/ ••„...,,......i.i.,.r.,....... i...:...... *V% --..•:::': , : ,. ..... . 1 I * 11 / /, wq , ICITY USIl -- . - CRY LIMIT CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD I BROWN & GAY ENGINEERS, INC. Houston,:fan/ I $ UPDATE IMPACT FEES DY OF LEGEND ' STUDY AREA BOUNDARY ------ SOUTH �I�VDSWOOD �, • — _.EXISTING WATER MAIN - - —-�_— WATER DISTRIBtATON SYSTEM LDS PROPOSED WATER MAIN ------ -� — Scat Job No.: Du Exhibit: " 1"=1500' COf03 �.. 1993 0 �i I \� • --_, . SOUTH FRIENDSWOOD SERVICE AREA - 1 4 „.„, ,•4, ir....: ,,. ...,,:..„..,• -, ...,,,......•„ ..,,,....,.,:.„..., ,....::.,_,.:....: , .-. 0.,,,. ,,,. . __...." i.:,, ,,..:,..:: : ---,:ii.,....,..,',.„,,,,,I,-,-,..,.:,7....,..-.-„,...;:. / 1 • f., • ,/,‘„ , ,,,,,,..-•_„_. „Ary,,a ...:„.:.,:..r., .. .:.,,,,, ::,......... ...;,::.,,;,... : , ..i. • ,..7/4-ey,,, (,e4.• 41. -- • , gn,,..:,..,,:y. 4.,:,-.:7.:-...:....,.:..i.y.....,.. ...•_,... 1 . ra. . . . : 50,,:„../st, ...3, -•,„,,,,... . ,.....: „.,,,,,,,,....,. •.... ..:....:. ,.:. „......-L.__....c.„...„,„.. iIiI ,1 A/ , d,,,/ illIffrits. s6I,v.,7.- 44..,.4.):74A:5,.c,1,1,-6\4-_\‘t,.-4-,„)e,t,,4.n.,-4,l t,a,,,..1-.4:-N'7,s—.,,.-./,„,t.,_,,-A,',,,ti)'.r,.,-S.s,frIe,,1(t)t.•),i1sVee.,i:Tl,4/i-,r,e"I-•.kl,:fr‘.4l-1., 7,,>.,".„2,,.4.l;..,.,iki:,,1r a/-,77(4e,-*..y%.s7o, .,-, T!,,:,-t-;t,-1,;„y/-,-,-",t.Az.m„,i1^,s iv,,l,,.i,.,.i i'',, -7t,4.,t1k4 7---4)-::.);:)‘4-0'44 1 .1 11f' ktJ L� ..;4/;1_ i1' }i r X� 1r r _ f .: I If l7 �,7 rI '� ., JLr 1' \'.-1.!;.'),,...:.f.:.,.1.:1.3•:..:...::•:„..::.i.,.:..::..s:;.:.:..:.,.-..1...,:,.,'.,..„.:-.:1..,.-„..:•..:,„•.': .:.... ,:. ��� rrq - 1fie• �. .�.,-0,...:,..,.:_:....::....::..::-....-:..::..:1,....-:.: ev"_--:—;t ,' T 1 '`..• , ,,,,,: tilta, q :, I MELODY LANE N�t3/4 ' '�� ^.,, �1' .:.�:�,• ' .. .• ... . ..,., ,. .4.4 , .1 ./Ns4s4( :5 -• .. '''' -St- .. •••-;•::•-?!•••-,-,;,k„-,..-','-z:, 6' • ;'),.,1•,....f.i..!,!'... ft„-- -1/4--(--- -.,,,,,,b,, T191 kre-H44.- '‘',if i [<L��1 ��' \� SERVICE AREA p,IL ��+��,� 1 i CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD I ��j' � ���� MILLS, MURPHY & BRIARMEADOW AVE. BROWN & GAY ENGINEERS, INC. r, t SERVICE AREA Houston, Texan J % UPDATE STUDY OF IMPACT FEES .;..,` en WASTEWATER SYSTEM n SERVIRE - _ Scale: Job No.: CE DatAe: Eeh1014 LL N.T.S. COF03 FEB., 1993 E I . ❑L_DM / .. . • .. .. : :. / • e�oo 'IEND WADS / / v Mope: d. • III •`�,1. a S S � // l LONG WGRt // / �/ \ c. 4t) : 1 • o� di. � *, 44. I E / a ! �o• y 940 ?it / 4? . .. .. 1/ - • - / .:" .-• • •. . :•• r [I LLAGFOcrFppr e .. . - • I // 0.CT L�4/4P. /� • ��� py • FRANKIE CARTER ' ' 'i0 t�v�r \ A- *P • r RANDOLPH PARK Ql Cr pI fl.�Yi�.� �`���CAJ • / . ,,���0 A. � . • = HARRIS COUNTY '.��� FO 1 / tit-a44aftfi '�►�.4'4i4 t. t�\5t f� ��+ ' �Vj�+���j 1 END I p +I� ��•' `,1~' n�� �I �G. �I y. �� BIDDY AREA BOUNDMY — — — 1 fgRC l. 4 V . 4 46 0.48t.all • ' •/ \\ ,,I v��\lyv��♦,�i�,cfl` E)'S11NC SANITARY — — — — ——o — — F , peg/ �,, �e• 1 �`tc., not 4, �* b' <. ♦ ��s'���01 �� Cfy PROPOSED SANITARY - - - - __�_ — H fy ♦���„� ♦ (�@S`t`S'I►�d.� ♦ • A \\ • ENCKANT' 1 I�.v' ♦ fr HIO osl yf• 1021111* ,, �V,�♦ �0� \\. WOODS�3 ��, .A•♦!♦� , COSTING FORCE wuN - - - - 7 H1rq y N DOd O. ROxto 11 = • Ai. C`��i IMPERIAL •• !v��?1. • Doi PROPOSED FORCE MAIN - - - - -�- sis • \ • ESTATE • s r: 1 ere li'a p qti/\\ �� �te�� r \ ! �p� CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD fr 41tio py�\ �% ♦ �,�. .G!,� g �� �:a:: BROIIN do GAY ENGINEERS. INC. I . SP.� \ :• ..� �i , ,�I- .. :. �,G::iHouston. T N OFj yA o R-4 '•e\/^'A/^ ;� ,RD Q ��� `��A'!�•ii I .'�;'�o y`� UPDATE STUDY.r4s41 ► `� RrfN �, ar � 4 -f•.", .` . '• IMPACT FEES �:u' i► <.. ds ••� Q " I � , \ • by ♦�+i .1< MELODY LANE Hi:in -•!r Oi •44, . woo \al5�♦♦ ��, I .! 0o ellimmi s l� ��♦� 01 f��< ° de CR • * \'_ tit ... �, :a It4az., i i iii�,�nua,fl WAS1EWAlMR COLLECTION SYSTEM 2 neRFi • 174.744 `®'® 1•�•3/4, �•` ••' `'•'`/�XT////r - -. ' ' •/0 • •. \ \\ IV 1 __ \ , )Y I• Scala: Job.No.: Date Exhibit: Iu 1'=1000• COF03 FEB., 1993 F j V,potLE' t V, \♦ 144FV.4 �jj�!'�I � i' 1�1t�1� �`e��.�s;��.`e�.`'� • � �♦�►�%i° s `�' � � !i° �• , /♦.' •* .rile 4♦!♦�'�O °iaOji1i . ' �'®•` � �l -itl .,44., * I \ � �1 � III�'��.�O ,�,�taT s� �� q4 O `!�y>♦� .� fit+ �!,�, �► - 4k NI P SAC. 4..,rip, . . 'Iv %. t.tAtettitSAItt v i 4111). ILDERNESS PINES C,�♦ O♦♦ ♦ai� ,,}♦,♦ •♦00♦♦074• ''t!d.• .a":'G p♦♦ ♦., •'' ,�� •T,�'• t , - �� Vill ♦�♦a��I: LM� FOREST M. { O•14.4•♦ ��. a !lt,4. ♦o APENe 4T "' M .J 'i► ;` i ' [I ',.. ' e• i a� . irlb *se. I�O��♦�L.� eRNvoon 0:l .• ♦J ��t ♦t; eI�O.R® ♦ *pro ' '+ Oja' / z\ .. . ♦♦f ♦♦♦ •♦�♦ O ♦♦,♦Q Oy ♦♦0 41:: spi ♦♦ ? (P. 44Cre • • �r � I��I � D•PP t�'n• ♦♦;� O fp:,• Oa♦ ♦�11♦ ♦y► ♦♦'. ♦ �'� ♦ 'i 0 O•b ♦•♦ , ♦ c ♦ 4.W S ', � et p! opt' P ! C ♦♦v ♦ < ♦♦ ♦ ��•� ♦♦4� ♦VI'. !O♦VJ O♦ ♦♦P.,.,O OO♦O ,♦ D .�.;�o�L•o •,'s ♦jQ ;Ic't art �I, so O�rv~�'r. .•f \ti tr'��♦♦♦.3 ♦�C •♦♦ w♦�b �bt'♦Qv♦♦ c�♦♦ ♦Old�OQ,'{,.O♦ ,w )'' ; '4n♦O jO I, •�8r P a t ♦.y" ♦ ♦T IOW' ♦ . .♦ ♦ 6 v !! 6V�. �'s • Obi °�J ,,'>� t�i4 �� e !�Qc•>!!! ♦♦♦,�L♦♦♦4•C!•♦�♦���a♦♦<i�♦♦h:;O n �/ �S�'f.�♦ : ';:f°°j����;.°° • I, pep ♦ �• �+ ®. �� ,� \Ii�i♦'♦♦�''O�A♦♦:v' •♦i��O�, rv'�♦♦' "`' !♦,:'�,�4`„1 jj�s��O°j /�y�O�1•�O '� rlP�.4�t�""I'�`'�jL+ es����t 1 • /F f T♦J \`\ ♦♦A p♦�♦♦♦�'a♦!'1�♦3' ! r i/!"2v5Y3�,y♦ eQ2•ICAO ..�.yl$f �,� �' ♦�.• SEC ♦♦*♦♦♦ �♦♦610 ♦o•''� 'A' ! 4 :• �tT y a��. t O�4p ,d 4. :' • .. ���®���rs� �0 ` .♦etc, C ♦O�.rs^o�;dy �7� �` �. -*Pe . ♦C . STAT1O r . tss *eui \\ ♦►4 . O♦ yJ``pA•n vsJt v.9`� �! � • +r. OC.: I �ycR ♦ • r^ O ♦♦jj ,d•,L� q _ .:� ♦ .'eAGLE;. '' � I `,� " jj ? Ijj 3jA rj♦.♦0•.�♦•�®• it, SEC;4., ' E-4 1 9, RAS.;:..1:-..:f;. ::::.?;;-4.k.iii::::1 illf;:•.:...:11-**.1::::i:::.1:...:r':.71'.:.1.: :. t.-::•:: ttivt • ..:: , \ ....c....... ...,...:-/.........;;..:::::;.,-... Iiii.iki.: %, ivii,ry •‘gi 12 AAREEF' ii.;..-..:7.:....f j,:7I1 i #*31)%fas,, L G .. B 1Eo I or IN ♦♦vi p•,�p�'e. ESTATES. ...��; .. ..,__,. , � �... . CIRCLER 1f* k% ! ";/•'. 'QQ• ill, 1. r ' �� CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD '•4. `. itiffr BROWN & GAY ENGINEERS, INC. eilliiii LEGENDY Y . ..® .,' UPDATE STUDY OF 1 BOUNDARY STUDY AREA BOUND . . IMPACT FEES EXISTING SANITARY 0 — ��� s an OPTtit ORI SOUTH FRIENDSWOOD PROPOSED SANITARY - - - - - �.. K WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM di EXISTING FORCE MAIN - — — —-- —e 7 - --- 1 PROPOSED FORCE MAIN — — — — •- 7Scale Jab No.: Dote: Exhibit: 1"=1500• COF03 FEB., 1993 G .. {a, OW i XIAP - - Ilf��l lO i � oil- de •. •al �� a / �' \ .> �/ e w JO0"s� � �fCQ � r� • :l B-2 . ik o`er ° .\ \.,, , cl�� OG�a GITB9t \ ` c- . -\�, \JJh \\ lj uunnra� � �r',i e = IT \ \ / \ 7 \ \, \ co pn - as .,,� I� q wad 1 /4C/\ \ / <'Q \,,�/\\\ \\ j z '�. i. ¢sa��le Qu""`; --/ N . w !y � `� (� T\ I ` I; /r� \ p�r ,// \\ i .•C Tii�i"""" a• _ 3[7l f tl �.. �� / .iBi�Ja� g Mli .(✓.,t( \ . AO.LS'3,l7N^ (• ''ai I'.r1O.l _` , q rn t CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD BROWN & GAY ENGINEERS, INC. LEGEND Houston, Texas I o STUDY AREA BOUNDARY - - - - UPDATE STUDY OF u EXISTING SANITARY 0 IMPACT FEES I PROPOSED SANITARY - - - - - �' SOUTH FRIENDSWOOD SERVICE AREA N N EXISTING FORCE MAIN - - - - - -3 3 - WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM i - - Exhibit: u _ PROPOSED FORCE MAIN - - �e4 Scale: Job No.: Dote: I1"=1500' COF03 FEB., 1993 H