The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution No. 2017-13 o � A RESOLITTION ADOPTING A CAPITAL II��'RO`VEl�E1�T�' PRO�CTS 19�[A1��JAL COl�T'TAIl�Il�TG A SUMMARY OF ALL PROPOSED PROJECTS TO BE ACQIJIRED DURING A FIVE YEAR PERIOD, COST ESTIMATES, METH4D OF FINANCING AND A RECOMMENDED TIMETABLE FOR CONSTRIJCTING THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN IN THE CITY OF FRIENDSWO�D, TEXAS. � � � � � WHEREAS, the City of Friendswood ("City") has determined that there is a need for a comprehensive financial planning document detailing the City's infrastructure needs, priorities, method of financing and the costs and tlming of the undertaking for those improvements to be made within the next five years within the City, and such is required by the Subsection (a) of Section �.03 of Article VIII of the Charter and provided for in Section 395.014 of the Texas Local Gover��nent Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Friendswood has reviewed its existing ordinances and has determined and desires that this information should be contained in one document that is separate from the arinual budget sa as to allow for examination in greater detail, simplified modification to reflect the changing needs of the community at the direction of the Council, and revision and updating annually; and WHEREAS, attached hereto is a manual containing a detailed list of infrastructure needs, priorities, methods of financing and detailed cost estimates programmed for undertaking over a five year period; 7 9 � � . Section 1. Pursuant to the Charter of the City, Section 8.03 (a) as amended, the City Council hereby adopts the attached, Exhibit A, "The Ci of Friendswood FY 2017 to 2021 Capital Improvement Proiects Manual" as an official document of the City and directs that the information contained and referred to therein shall control and determine the Capital Improvement Proj ect efforts undertaken by the City until such time as the document is amended as called for by this resolution and the City Charter. Section 2. The Director of Public Works is hereby directed to maintain copies of the "The City of Friendswood FY 2017 to 2021 Capital Improvement Projects Manual" and related documents and make them available upon request, for a reasonable fee, to any individual who requests one. The Director is further directed to review and evaluate this data annuall and y make recommendations to the Council an�ually for additions and revisions to the lan contained . p ereln. . PASSED, APPROVED AND�RESOLVED on this lst day of Mav, 2017. . ��... : �� - -��._._�r � �{ ��._�.�_��_ - Kevin M. Hollarid Mayor ATTEST: ��•��• � ��' �,� • ,�/ ,� ,�i �••°°•p.�1► �► � � �o � � ' � � � � � �� e� •� � �� "� ,►� �,� �r_ �m �$ � � �`°� �a � _ �� .�,a'Nw''r�r��-_.1� �:a�..`y` � 1 `b ,�I��__""_� �. . __ ' '-i $ � -�� ' . � '"=�- � �.�`�`+'��-`.. o � � _ Melinda Welsh, T�C � ; : � o • * �+ City Secretary � :P •; � � � . . o• ,� �/ •e ,/o `•. a � o o r��a• • ♦ � •e• �� ♦�♦ •. • � i .o 0 R2017-13 2 RZO�7-�3 ExhibitA . � __ _�o-' , _ �-�_. �.. - :�, -°'�.� � ��;-*g � g y. � �� +(�� , ', � S' '�k �Ty �;��'d'�� Y �„ . � f �.r..1� .a�'. Ya��.e r � y��j . n�(`'!.' r ; � � ��,,:�. �. .:� . . � .. 'vK4 :.� . - ` '�` ,� "�s L `� �-,� ^r ` rs % t `. , �..,n„ °�'�.,..,�.� /�i. �..��f -�s ��".,�4. �''�.�F�I�.�=�� +!!�. s...�„1 �� ` '.`x� . I 4. 4 h�_ 'p•� �•f�c'�fi � � /� 91l" '�� p a��,i �. •.�..- �:. W`! � -��..� `� �.�,.J ; ,�� .. :'s " �"�y....,,,, .r '`' i ,. �` A � � 1!�„p�,�:� ��*R - �� # f �± � .� � -..�.. . ��''m y.�,n��'$-''y� :. { 'E- '�� . I� I f . -.�,s�, � ^�+��r�.'��++' r s''`� -:i 'ar� � . 4 j_k� `} ` ��::.,,�...R�'�;Q�� .`.a.. _ .��3��. � . � . ��.y� . , ,� ,�. 1,y1��t: :' - .. � � ..e..�� t .i. . •1�.��t- �.. -1., �; e as��i}i'� � ` rin� �� '�Z `�c� e t " .rr ,n�, j�� t h � - .- - - . M.., �� ,� ,,,,. �R,� i � `, ��k3` -a .. -"- -`-��-��',}� �"" �� , .y _ y .:'.. ; i .� .� ..r1�t��E..e ...w.R.�. � k� f':x� � { ,7C�'��+ �'�. f . �� '�..� ��., � ,�„ k•�•--Y'�,,."'bsy..-� :4�x ,Y, ��- . _. _...__. ___ . >;� f� �-a. y�" 4 �,;�-�'e��'ctic s'�t.rexw%'��. ^,x�� . .� .:�'r.+l ..S=' .�t �, j'^ Y" i`�.b a�'` �:W��-"`�V.—t- "�a.'�.'�.K'�C'_i1Yt.,_„c.,.�}�":�afM`+ly, .� ' :. '� . . .... ` . 1 fr S., f� t,. w.�....,a � d�:T•, y 1 * ! .� �, � `4 ..�f.� ��`pp.: � CyF�T" -Wt.�� ..� f:� Y �.4YkcLCD /�,,�Y�i�l 1 � �4 . "�,��r�♦, � �� "'��53..1 . j .. � `Ji�` ..�� ^ � :� � `, �(�t� ; �� .}. ��.-.�- � A� � ..`� ��' ��F��...,,.. ��.e.! 4 :� � �cc i � `�<�` ,i'k° ��'t.� . .�.ii - � • Q,^."CR.� � . ... ��w F . : ��`;; {�t��+.zX �� •�.- �� ',`€� w � i� F,�" F rao' �s';` �; .a�, s �a i .ti+. - 1� . A�s . n' -:�.;�. 5- 1•:'P°a+r- Y ` . �rr �:., .. �i : �'� ��';,;,.r� ��' ,r ' �a.�"��`( ' M`� �I �Y �� 'NF it ,� 4_ `.0�.1 ..��'�..�� _,._.....�.� . > "`� t yt � "`�� x �i � ; �, . �� ..' .. ..Y.K..i_....,_.,.�....._..�.. ..t.._o.a4ucSA...:;..... .. 3.._,.�.,..>._,..��.,_....�._J...:.__,tl..a.,.: .�Gi6rary �o�vnto�vn St�eet�Sca e p . _ _ _ __ _ _ _ . :.__ _.; �6 !?'�'„ � , 'P �e ,�r [ .Y 4«'. �� #�� . �.''f` '� w6= .Y ; � �r �'4 &�.. . "F >'IC., t` �,. '� �` R �� z ��,. r !,� +�� i RN3 ti .}�� N `" +��t F �`'ry.� � ��: �r+;r: +.�: .. , . � ,, . � r � - ^ -A , -• �.: . . . < > ,' ' . .r...,R_ ° -r- • Y,..:......_�..--x... '� � . .. � ,..� +.�^y�`aC'. .r �, �b ik �"' .Y.�.�. .. . �.• "`<.��a.i,� �.vna �� 1 1&,_ t _ . . '� ��.P�iM2ry,`"�c . � ...�. ,� , : , � .w . Fr". .: < . . y�.., . . . .. ,...,�. . ..: - �� r �� xy;�� 3 y . j . . . -, . •. J',_.�� . �� tioM'.-�.� ��: .�• �,.,�'. :�''� rt+wr••�. . �`, �j. .. ....._. . -� . t,_ �� r�" <.,r.: " ;.;..wr' S�.�,i ' ._ _ � ' . s � - ;, . . � .. _ �� .... �.. . �� .. _ T-' C._ ., ..a .-,.... .. . « .:: ... ... '�.,t. ' . . ��.... � .. � '1 ..,� � j�+�y .. � .. . ..... . .. �rt.'�,,t,}.4 �A .. . ��cr� .�.�1 j.;�� .. ,x �-i x� '� . � . . . . �- . . . ., ,#.. 1-'� . — . . ., . . ; � .,,«F'.a''�� . ��' j t � � F � � �� m� � : , "....._ . .;,.. � . . , .y. N��....�.�»....�. '!�.1 '+�,X` .},, x � ` v � vx'_ �� • � � c _ ,; ; k�'t�,xy s ';�`w''�' °: d �} w�::.' '; � '�� , �� ., ' rtYa. ` ''" •, � + � _ . . , . ._,.:... : x ,.� ;: , .,. � . „.« . , �._.,":. .. ...: , . . .,. , «. __, ..,_.. ,�-.a.,..,.<......._._,..........w..�...._._..__......._._..._�____..._....._�..�.W.�....�.,o...__.............._��.._.._..�.�_._. � �vater�'lant #T �I'o�vnes�,oad r� >_-_� .T-;w:,;�cR'�-+�+r��^ �s« ,,.�. ...�A,�_.•.,.�.s,�' �"��a. �� ;s. ,z .�� . . �' ir?c.�.�r� ��Fs�rf,e � . � ', �� F��ukC+ � �� . . e�@�„AJ z�.�F . � ^ t �., .;. P�'-a`+''g#��:�'��r:� �. , .. ... � ,� �. .. . .. , . .. . . . , .�� . .. . . . .�:� f`�g,m�i� . . . � ..�� M"� � . . . . . . . � ��f�l� �b � . � . . � . ', ��+gy:.M i��'�� X�.�� . . . .. . - �. � �...gi� �y.�- ,�e�r . a. �° , ��„+a�� .. y�. . �q;.�� ,s�,�",.� .s!�'M : �. .e..zSA�R. t�� .T3. � t ` .'�.. . . .. . � � ;� . ; ....... ..... ... .... t,'. 3 . . . � •yp� . � a s� ,� �� . y� � i , .' '"l" , '� v��"' j � ,' ` ` y ` �� A..Nr � � � �. , .__.__. .. � t .. ' . ��1:`a. ��..f�`�'�,��'- #��e!'.ffT°`y>;ci� a � ".i .�}: - .:e ,,.a+�� ,.r �, . . - � �. � � *'��{ziyY�y a '�'� �--��w�' � :¢ ....__ 'MWk,a� `Y *,i w ;.s ,�_•� �?sstr �<X xwr*1� � -. � .--� � , h ..F.-,��MI�^"'� � . i��...'..7 ... .. _ .. .. � ,..,t. ' ?�6:c��..,. , '4 . � � . . � .��, .. � , . . .. ... _. ,..-._ ..» ._ „�..�-� �� - � _ ; . .r �^>' � j ' �r+��"�' _ "- � c � ' . .� �a1 d., ..., . .. .. ..`._"` . �.� ,. . . {� N� ^,� .--^,�'^„y•t—°.- -r __ _ � —g. .. - .�� r . ..... . . .. � . .. "�- „�y -. o tt4i�'y;�� r.��r.�, .. . ._. .... .-� Fa ,,,} 'b,... . a, .�y3-�ci-f�� x��a i'�+ t ."�� r � .Pe v�� j t �� -.•.r�Yifo"'(. . �� .A� �..i 4� � . � �ry.�, p:�T� ��`..�;k�.. . . .. �. . . 1 �.:�F� . � L ....1.C7°K' l� A..ta" \. .. �� " Y�:.�'..'� ' z ,r[it A?��? � .�.1 3,�..:"'�`•�.w�t� .:"01.� .. . . . . +' }�y �r.f.%�.,, J� li � S '' .,yi'Kj �! ��',� 0.i� � �� f � .. � ��,`f k?�+ ��.�`�` <°��`-at .�ca.�� °��`y*,x�'y t fkk,�'a�`.1.J �„`£.�.�„�it,,..�Y¢ .. � ,- _ .�.,' I�� .�.. ��s". �. . .. . .:.".,.:."'_.._.,._.;._,:..v:_�:..'.:_� �- �" �...:tY,:Y.�:sL3..:s.ii..��yir t�a..,.{�,6 S.,"7ti#:.�;r�'ti„k.YV,'y:'::.�d �.�!'��.��9�...x � _ ......__..._' _.__'_.. .____..______.e,v-wju.��'. �,�. ,. „� �ake �Fr�ien�'s�u�ood �enneth Camp �'ire,�tation Table of Contents SECTION ONE—Table of Contents Tableof Contents.................................................................................................. 1 Esecutive Summarv.............................................................................................. 3 FundingTotals (Table 1)................................................................................. 3 Capital I�nprovements Prograin Update ............................................................... 5 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................... 5 2.0 The Impact of Gro�vth............................................................................... 5 3.0 The Plamiing Effort &the EvO1L1Y1011 Of YIlZ DOCL1111ZI1Y............................ E) 4.0 Changes to the Document......................................................................... 8 5.0 Bond Issue Costs....................................................................................... 8 6.0 The Challenge at a Glauce........................................................................ 9 CIP FI" 2017 Total Spending (Table 2).................................................... 9 7.0 Summarv ofthe Program.......................................................................... 9 8.0 The Nest Five I�ears................................................................................. 10 9.0 Projects Completed Since CIP Inception.................................................. 10 Completed Project Statistics and List (Table 3) ....................................... 10 SECTION T�VO—FIVE I"E�R GENER�L GOVERNnIENT PROJECTS 2017—2021 Capital I�nprovements Program (Table 4) Five I�ear Plan—General Govenunent Projects ............................. 13 1776 Park................................................................................................................ 14 Blackhawk Boulevard Phase IL.............................................................................. 15 Dlud Gullv Detention and Convevance................................................................... 16 OldCitv Park.......................................................................................................... 17 W egner Ditch—Tributarv 2.................................................................................... 18 Woodlawn _�venue.................................................................................................. 19 Brittanv Bav Boulevard Phase L.............................................................................20 _�ctivities Center.....................................................................................................21 Corporal Weslev J. Camiing Sportspark.................................................................22 Fire Department Training Fields.............................................................................23 Fire Station #2 Reconstnution................................................................................24 Parks and Recreation Building................................................................................25 Park Trail Dlaster Plan............................................................................................26 Pedestrian Bridge at Brookside Intennediate .........................................................27 Public Safetv Building Phase II..............................................................................28 SidewalkDlaster Plan .............................................................................................29 Stevenson Park Reclauiation...................................................................................30 Stevenson Park aud Swimming Pool Restrooms....................................................31 Street Dlaintenance Dlaster Plan.............................................................................32 Sub-regional Park—Lundv Lane............................................................................33 1 SECTION THREE—FIVE I"E�R�V�TER�ND SE�VER PROJECTS 2017—2021 Capital I�nprovements Program (Table 5) Five I�ear Plan—Water and Sewer Projects ................................... 34 COHRaw Water Buv-I�i.........................................................................................35 Lift Station #22 Reconstnution..............................................................................36 Water Plaut #1 Tauk Rehabilitations......................................................................37 Fortv-Two Inch Water Dlain Replacement.............................................................38 Lift Station #1 Reconstnution................................................................................39 Lift Station #4 Reconstnution................................................................................40 Lift Station #17 Reconstnution..............................................................................41 Lift Station #23 Reconstniction..............................................................................42 Sauitarv Sewer Svstem _�ssessment Phase IV - Constnution................................43 Sauitarv Sewer Svstem _�ssessment Phase V - Design...........................................44 Second Elevated Storage Taiil:Rehabilitation........................................................45 Water Plaut #3 Tauk Rehabilitation........................................................................46 Water Plaut #4 Tauk Rehabilitation........................................................................47 West Water I�itercomiect.........................................................................................48 Sauitarv Sewer Svstem _�ssessment Phase VI - Design.........................................49 Sauitarv Sewer Svstem _�ssessment Phase VII - Design........................................50 Sauitarv Sewer Svstem _�ssessment Phase VIII - Constniction.............................51 SECTION FOIIR—BEI"OND FIVE I"E�R GENER�L GOVERNnIENT PROJECTS 2022 —2032 Capital I�nprovements Program (Table 6) Ten to Fifteen I�ear Plan—General Govenunent Projects ............. 52 SECTION FIVE—BEI"OND FIVE I"E�R�V�TER�ND SE�VER PROJECTS 2022 —2032 Capital I�nprovements Program (Table 7) Ten to Fifteen I�ear Plan—Water aud Sewer Projects .................... 53 2 Executive Summarv Submitted for City Council's information is the FY 2017 to FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the City of Friendswood. Currently, there are thirty-three (33) General Government and forty-one (41) Water and Sewer bond identified CIP projects. This submittal represents the siath update of the CIP since its creation in 1999. City Staff has committed to updating the projects and manual every year. Once adopted by the City Council, this document will provide Staff a clear direction on the funding and scheduling of remaining projects, which will be a part of long range budgeting plan subject to approval by the City Council. Staff will meet with the City Council in work sessions to seek approval of funding sources, updating project schedules and to seek guidance for every Fiscal Year regarding subsequent implementation phases. Estimated total funding for individual funding sources and their cumulative totals are given below for the neat five-year Capital Improvement Program as well as projects beyond that period (ten to fifteen years). Included in these estimates are two (2) large drainage projects (North Panhandle Detention — 8.2 Million and South Panhandle Detention 23.0 Million) as well as estimates for Brittany Bay Boulevard (15.2 Million) which are part of the Capital Improvements Program, but should be Developer driven. FUNDING TOTALS FOR FIVE YEAR AND BEYOND CIP Table 1 F'I'2017 - F'I'2021 CIP 5-Year Program General Government Funds $ 39,979,000 - $ 44,203,000 Water and Sewer Funds $ 34,370,000 - $ 35,990,000 FYve Year Total $ 74,349,000 - $ 80,193,000 General Government Funds* $ 67,595,000 - $ 67,595,000 Water and Sewer Funds* $ 46,909,000 - $ 46,909,000 Be ond FYve Year Total $ 114,504,000 - $ 114,504,000 GRAND TOTALS $ 188,853,000 - $ 194,697,000 *In 2017 Dollars The five-year CIP identified with this update is spread among all categories, with water improvements having a majority of projects scheduled. The driving force for utility projects are generated by population growth requiring more new infrastructure and an existing utility infrastructure that requires maintenance or replacement. Community Development and Public Warks focus on implementing the preventive maintenance programs to prolong life of streets. 3 Friendswood is a Cit�� with aging infrastnichire. The infrastnichire installed b�� the Cit�� or dedicated to the Cit�� as a condition of development has a usefiil life that depreciates aumiall��. Via Govenunental _�ccounting Standards Board (G_�SB) #34. Staff has detennined the value of these fised assets, their average usefiil life, the stahis of depreciation, and estimated the firture replacement. Long range planning and scheduling remains a critical issue at all times. These projects have been identified in various studies aud master plans as projects needing attention b�� the Cit��. Cit�� Council and Cit�� Staff is currentl�� working diligentl�� on all possible fiuiding sources aud plamiing on these projects. 4 CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM UPDATE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Cit�� Charter, the Cit�� l�Ianager is required to submit a Capital I�nprovements Program (CIP) to the Cit�� Council. B�� agreement, this prograui is to be updated periodicall��to reflect the completion of projects, the addition of new projects, and to update project costs for financial projection and management efforts. This is the sisth CIP document, the original being created in 1999 aud updated in 2003. 2007. 2009. 2012, aud 2014. The intent of the updated program is to identif��, describe, aud prioritize the infrastnichire needs of the communit�� as it grows and evolves. This task inchides au effort to increase the accurac�� of the program's cost estimate for all prospective projects, but more specificall�� within the initial five-��ear period. The overall goal of the CIP is to maintain the sauie high qualit�� of life for all citizens tlu-ough the timel�� anticipation of the Cit��'s needs, plamiing of improvement projects aud detennining fiuiding sources as the conununit��grows. The program is also intended to depict finaucial challenges of the Cit��'s gro�vth and maintenance of infrastruchire that characterize the Cit��'s firture aud the associated fiuiding requirements to meet these objectives. The programming portion inchides fonmilating preliminary plans, projecting estimated project costs, setting priorities, identif��ing fiuiding sources, and scheduling the implementation of the plaus. 2.0 THE IMPACT OF GROWTH In the 2000 Census, the population of the Cit�� of Friendswood was listed as 29.037. _�ccording to current staff estimates, the population has increased to 38.469 as of _�pril 2014. Indications are the Cit�� will likel�� reach its build-out population of 55.000 between 2020 aud 2030. Population gro�vth contimies to be a primar�� driving factor in the CIP process, particularl�� as it relates to utilities. During the 2003-05 period, capital project focus was primaril�� on drainage issues, with the completion of four (4) projects which addressed eleven (11) of the rivent�� (20) identified problem areas from the 1993 l�Iaster Drainage Plan. Four (4) others are currentl�� in various stages of resolution. Contimied population growth and development pressures shifted the focus for the 2005-06 period to improvements in utilit�� infrastnichire. I�i the 2009-2010 period there were four (4) water and sewer projects in constniction, as two (2) sewer projects were completed and one (1) facilit��was completed. In the 2011-2012 period there were five (5) water and sewer projects in constniction. During the 2013 to 2014 period there were seven (7) street projects. three (3) facilit�� projects, sis (6) parks projects, one (1) drainage project, and twelve (12) water and sewer projects. Currentl�� there are three (3) drainage projects, four (4) street projects, five 5 (5) facilit�� projects, eight (8) park projects, seven (7) water projects, and eleven (11) sewer proj ects. 3.0 THE PLANNING EFFORT & EVOLUTION OF THE DOCUMENT In Fiscal I�ear 1999, a Capital Improvements Program was presented to Cit�� Council that described the infrastnichire gro�vth and maintenauce needs of the Cit�� through a ten (10) ��ear period. This was the first time that such an estensive and comprehensive plau had been developed. _�s was noted at that time, the Cit�� was facing its heaviest burden of maintaining esisting infrastnichire, and plauning for the constniction of new gro�vth-related infrastnichire. This remains tnie todav. In 2002, prograin categories were detennined b�� the requirements set forth in several of the Cit��'s planning documents, most notabl�� the Cit��'s Comprehensive Plan and Vision 2020. the Cit��'s Strategic Plan. During that sauie time, the Cit��'s CIP was centralized under the Communit�� Development and Public Warks Department Under this centralization, projects sponsored b�� individual departments were passed to the new Capital Projects Division for incorporation into the new plamiing document for evenhial implementation. With the voter's approval of the General Obligation Bond election in Febniar�� 2003 the Cit�� embarked on the 2003-2008 five-��ear program guided b�� Council's reaffinnation of project priorities with drainage issues topping the list. In implementing the initial projects from the 2003-08. Drainage Program. Staff discovered that preliminar�� plauning documents used to estimate both the scope of work and its costs had not accuratel�� anticipated ph��sical and market conditions for some of the projects. During design phase, engineering additions to the scope of work were required to provide for the unanticipated impact on private properties surrounding a project. For esample, if detailed sun�e��ing done during the design phase of a drainage project revealed additional areas of conceni, the impact of the additional work to the overall scope of wark and the affected areas had to be addressed. _�11 of the initial projects fell victim to unprecedented material and labor cost increases esperienced throughout the region as a result of market forces. Staff responded to these issues with a procedure to prioritize the objectives within each project and constnut the infrastnuture required to achieve those prioritized objectives first This approach has allowed each project to go for�vard and provide the central core improvement souglrt, aud to add as mau�� additional secondar�� and tertiar�� objectives as approved fiuiding allowed. Thus far, this approach has proven a valid means for meeting the affected project's objectives while coping with rising costs and espanded scope: however, it falls short of the intention of both Cit�� Council and Staff for the bond fiuided projects. These conditions have forced several changes in the process as well as the document. 3. 1 Project En«ronment: Development pressure contimies to drive the schedule of man�� projects aud frequentl�� impacts the scope as well. Opportunities to shape and influence private development activities are considered in the plamiing and estimating phases of the effort. CIP staff is involved in Development Reviews and frequentl�� interface with developer plans at earl�� stages to coordinate efforts and reduce costs that might other�vise be bonie solel�� b�� the Cit��. This effort helps stabilize and quautif�� the scope of the project at earlier stages providing 6 increased confidence in the cost estimates. Staff has successfiill�� integrated developer provided additions to the Cit��'s infrastnichire to reduce the scope of Cit��fiuided improvements. 3. 2 Strategic Planning: Strategic plamiing is a part of the above processes and the Preliminar�� Engineering Reports (PER) for projects. I�i instauces where the scope of a PER cau reasonabl�� be espanded to include a strategic esainination of a s��stem, or au area to provide guidance for specific plamiing aud programming of recognized needs is being addressed with budgetar�� constraints in perspective, staff will recommend espanding the scope. This small effort assists in the development aud refinement of project scope, and helps to identif�� opportunities to co-participate with private developers to provide needed infrastnuture at a lower or no cost to the Cit��. This infonnation is also fed back into the development review process to assist plamiing staff in guiding developers as the�� assess their needs and requirements. The combination of the l�Iaster Drainage Plan Phase II, the Pavement l�Iauagement l�Iaster Plau, and the Utilit�� l�Iaster Plau has been an inunense help in identif��ing the aging infrastnuture and receiving general pricing on constniction. 3. 3 Project Prioritization: The original CIP l�Iamial, generated in 1999, consisted of fort�� (40) General Govenunent (GG) bond projects aud twelve (12) Revemie (Utilit��) bond projects. _�11 projects identified were drawn from departmental needs assessments and the Cit��'s series of l�Iaster Plans. (Vision 2020, l�Iaster Drainage Plan Phase I. Parks l�Iaster Plan. Streets l�Iaster Plan, and the Ground Water Reduction Plan). Initiall��, these projects were ranked within the sponsoring departments and then Senior Staff ranked those lists to produce a final prioritization of the projects. l�Iuch of the original prioritization remained with eight (8) of the original 2003 GO bond projects and seven (7) of the original Utilit��projects which have been completed, with another two (2) pending bid a�id two (2) under constniction. The 2006 Utilit�� Bond identified eight (8)projects, five (5) of which have been completed and three (3) are under constnution. New projects entering the list are fed into this prograin stnicture and the final location among other projects remains a product of departmental needs aud "forces at work." Forces at work are increased maintenance requirements aud breakdown frequencies aud developmental pressures. _�final factor influencing the ultimate location of a project in the prograui is the effort to balauce the munber and dollar value of the projects within a mauageable time frame for the sponsoring department. Drainage projects have been top priorit�� since Tropical Stonn _�llison, and with the advent of Hurricaues I�atrina. Rita, aud Ae have brought these t��pes of projects to the forefront of all capital projects. In the past, aud contimiing on to this current CIP l�Iamial, hindrauces to effective drainage have been established in the engineering criterion. First and foremost, the Design Criteria for drainage in Friendswood accounts for a five (5) ��ear event within the roadside s��stem, and with an overall development designed to account for a one hundred (100) ��ear event. _�lthough this is optimal for new constniction. Friendswood has aimesed areas that have been sub-par in drainage standards. I�i efforts to prioritize area flooding, projects were divided into three categories. Priorit�� drainage projects address flooding where there is danger or alread�� have been flooding in or near homes. Secondar�� drainage projects address flooding that denies access to areas but is not a threat to propert��. Tertiar�� drainage projects address areas where the street floods, but no water ever goes over the curb: streets are designed to hold estra capacit��of stonn water during estreme events. 7 4.0 CHANGES TO THIS DOCUMENT 41 Like its predecessor from 2012, the 2017 CIP incorporates significant changes. Every effort has been made to make this the most useful planning tool available for Council and Staff. This update incorporates Water and Sewer bond projects, and General Government bond proj ects. 4.2 Project Scope: This update includes a complete re-work of the Description/ Justification discussion for each project. The accuracy of long-range estimates is directly proportional to the completeness of the scope at the time the estimate is performed. An eatensive effort to improve scope definition for all projects has been made as a component of this update. The enhanced level of project information directly improves the accuracy of the estimate and helps to guard against "scope creep". This provides the sponsor department and the planner a better concept of what the project will and will not provide. For these reasons, the estimate will identify if a study was available and, what level of study the estimate is based on. If easements are required for the project, they are roughly quantified and a figure is included for their acquisition. Likewise, survey and other professional services are considered specifically when estimating professional service fees. For these reasons, there are likely to be several different percentage factors used in the estimate for this cost category. It is the intent of staffthat when a project becomes part of the five (5) year plan, a more definitive scope will be utilized by contracting Engineering or Architectural Services to provide a Preliminary Report on the project that will include estimated quantities, project, and engineering/architectural costs. 4.3 Organization: The document has been reorganized in an effort to improve user friendliness. Previously, the contents were arranged only by their relative priority providing no intuitive link to the location of the project description and estimate within the General Government Fund section, or the Water & Sewer Fund section. The revised document is organized by fund type, either a General Government or Water & Sewer. The projects beyond the Five-Year Plan are also separated into these two categories and sorted by projected year of the project. The Five Year planned projects have details, scope, justification, and locations for them. The Beyond Five Year Projects also have these features, but to keep this manual to a manageable size, only project name and a location map are included. As the Projects from the Beyond Five Year Plan fall into the Five Year Plan, they will be added in full. 5.0 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS: This document DOES include Bond Issuance Costs in the listed project estimates. Actual and final bond sale amounts may vary depending on the number of projects being funded and the timing of the cash requirements; therefore it is impractical far the CIP to estimate bond issuance costs. 8 6.0 THE CHALLENGE AT A GLANCE Due to increasing construction costs and an aggressive CIP, the greatest challenge to the City is funding. The following tables present a summary far the plan (Current Five-Year and Five-Year Plus divided into projecttypes): CIP FY 2017 TOTAL SPENDING Table 2 Current Five Year Program 2017—2021 Drainage $ 1,000,000 - $ 1,000,000 Facilities $ 9,749,000 - $ 10,657,000 Parks $ 7,518,000 - $ 8,309,000 Streets $ 19,485,000 - $ 20,845,000 Sewer $ 418,000 - $ 461,000 Water $ - - $ - $ 38,170,000 - $ 41,272,000 Beyond Five Year Program (2022 -2032)* Drainage $ 39,258,000 Facihties $ 8,449,000 Parks $ 14,888,000 Streets $ 5,000,000 Sewer $ 24,812,000 Water $ 22,097,000 $ 114,504,000 *In 2017 Dollars 7.0 A SUMMARY OF THE PROGRAM An analysis of the preceding tables provides a number of quick observations that require specific mention. Approximately forty-nine (49) percent (73.3 million dollars) is planned for improvements to General Government Projects. General Government Projects form the single largest spending category in the Five-Year Plan 2015-2019. The General Governments category includes Drainage, Facilities, Parks, and Streets infrastructure replacement, and upgrades. The spending requirements are based on needs to accommodate growth and maintain the current level of services to neighborhoods where existing streets and drainage are aged and in need of replacement. Utilities, especially water projects, are the second largest category. 9 Finally, the financial commitment to drainage has lowered to 3.6 percent of the total seventy-three (73) million dollars in spending. This level of commitment has changed with the Master Drainage Plan Phase II and the addition of the previous projects that have not been completed due to depletion of funding. These constitute the Secondary and Tertiary Drainage Proj ects. 8.0 THE NEXT FIVE YEARS The Five-Year Plan identified with this update shifts the emphasis to the Water & Sewer category, especially sewer projects which are 28.8 percent of all projects included within the five year plan. As previously discussed, the driving force for spending on water and sewer is generated by growth and an aging utility infrastructure. Long term emphasis has shifted to the aging water and sewer facilities and lines network as the Public Works Department focuses on implementing the preventative maintenance programs (assessment, line, and equipment repairs, etc.) to prolong the life of those utility services. This will require a consistent financial commitment to pre-empt the need for large scale replacement efforts later. By quick observation, the effort levels in the Five-Year Plan are as balanced as ea�ternal forces will allow. In addition, City Staff is involved in the accountability of identifying possible needed easements and relocations of public utilities. City Staff recommends that the processes of easement acquisition and/or utility relocations begin two (2) years priar to the design of each proj ect. 9.0 PROJECTS COMPLETED SINCE THE CIP INCEPTION Citv of Friendswood Table 3 Capital Improvement Program- Completed Projects Statistics PROJECT NPE #OF PROJECTS Drainage 6 Facility 10 Parks 12 Streets 13 Sewer 16 Water 20 General Gwzrnment Funds 41 Water&Sewer Funds 36 Total ofAll Capital Impro�ement Prqects 77 10 DRAINAGE PROJECTS PROJECT NAME COMPLEfED Annalea/Whitehall/Kings Park Dreinage Phase 1 2004 Closer Acres Dminage 2007 FM 518 Dreinage Phase 1 2010 Glenshannon Dminage Phase 1 2008 Sunmeatlow Dreinage Phase 1 2005 W Shatlowbend/WOOtllawn Dminage Phase 1 2004 FACILITY PROJECTS Animal Conirol Facility 2011 Emergency Genemtors-Fires Stations#1&2 2012 Fire Station#3 Rehabilitation 2012 Fire Station ri4 2008 Librery Lantl Acquisition 2000 Librery Expansion Municipal Court Reno�ations 2003 Public Safety Builtling 2006 Public Works Atltlition 2001 Public Works Security Gate 2010 Public Works Vehicle Stomge Builtling 2004 PARK PROJECTS BakerROatl 2016 Centennial Park Phase 1 2002 Centennial Park Phase 2&3 2006 DowMOwn Sireet Pasers 2016 FM 2351 Imigation 2014 Fnentlswnotl Sporis Park 2000 Jogging Treil Stesenson Park 2002 Lake Fnentlswootl Phasel 2015 Lake Fnentlswootl Phasell 2016 Renv�nck Park LigMing 2016 Sporlspark 2016 Stesenson Park Bntlge 2016 Stesenson Park Treils 2016 STREET PROJECTS ActiNty Builtling Parking 2003 Atltlitional Qty Hall Parking 2009 Blackhawk BIW -Phase 1 2012 Fnentlswnotl Link Roatl Extension 2008 Fnentlswnotl Link Roatl Phase II 2016 Public Librery Parking 2011 Melotly Lane 2012 SunnyHew/SkyNew 2011 Sunset Drne 2003 Statlium Lane Parking 2011 Trel�c Signal at Blackhawk 2012 W Shatlowbend/WOOtllawn 2004 W hitaker Drne 2004 11 Capital Improvements Program- Completed Projects to Date Water and Sewer Working Capital Projects SEN/ER PROJECTS Autumn C7eek Sewer Line 2000 Beamer Road Lift Station 2011 Beamer Road Sewer 2011 Deepwood Face Main 2009 Deepwood Lift Station 2009 E Hentage 8"Sanitary Sewer 2001 Emergency Generetors Water Plants#1 &Surtace Water#2 2012 Friendswood LinkNVhittier Oaks FM Replacement 2004 Lift Station#3 2016 Lift Station#6 2014 Longwood Park Sewer 2003 San Joaquin Estates Sewer 2003 SCADA System 2016 South Fnendswood Face Main 2009 Sun Meadow Lift Station 2008 WATER PROJECTS 16"Transmission Water Line(Sunset to WW#4) 2009 16"Watetline(Melody to Sunset) 2001 24"Trunk Line 2003 2nd Surtace Water Take Pant-Phase 1 2003 2nd Surtace Water Take Pant-Phase 2 2003 2nd Surtace Water Take Pant-Tank Addition 2003 Additional Water Purchase 2008 Bay Area BIW Water Line 2007 Beamer Road Water Line 2011 Blackhawk FM 2351 Watetline 1999 Blackhawk Water Line 2008 Emergency Generetors-Lift Stations 2012 Longwood Park Water Line 2004 Neighbahood Water Line Replacements 2006 Water Plant#1 Rehab 2002 Water Plant#2 Rehab 2017 Water Plant#3 Rehab 2003 Water Plant#4 Rehab 2003 Water Plant#5 Rehab 2013 Water Plant#6 Rehab 2012 Water Plant#7 Rehab 2016 WWTP Water Line Loop 8" 2006 12 General Government Projects - Five Year CIP Plan TABLE 4 Funded Pro'ects 5 Year Plan FY2017 - FY2021 1776 Park Improvements $ 430,000 - $ 473,000 Blackhawk Boulevard Phase II $ 7,067,000 - $ 7,651,000 Mud Gully Detenrion and Coxiveyance $ 1,000,000 - $ 1,000,000 O1dCityPark $ 1,102,000 - $ 1,206,000 Wegper Ditch- Tributary II Woodlawn Avenue $ 777,000 - $ 865,000 TOTAL $ 10,376,000 - $ 11,195,000 Unfunded Pro'ects 5 Year Plan FY2017 - FY2021 Brittaxry Bay Boulevard Phase I $ 6,141,000 - $ 6,829,000 Acrivities Center $ 2,394,000 - $ 2,615,000 Corporal Wesley J. Canning Sportspark $ 1,294,000 - $ 1,417,000 Fire Deparhnent Traixring Field Upgrades $ 550,000 - $ 605,000 FireStarion#2Reconstrucrion $ 1,871,000 - $ 2,045,000 Parks andRecrearionBuilding $ 1,159,000 - $ 1,271,000 Park Trail Master Plan $ 100,000 - $ 100,000 Pedestrian Bridge at Brookside Intermediate School $ 770,000 - $ 925,000 Public Safety Building, Phase II $ 5,675,000 - $ 6,762,000 Sidewalk Master Plan $ 500,000 - $ 500,000 StevensonParkReclaxnation $ 50,000 - $ 55,000 Stevenson Park and Swixmning Pool Restrooxns $ 971,000 - $ 1,158,000 Street Nlaintenance Nlaster Plan $ 5,000,000 - $ 5,000,000 Sub-regjonal -Park Lundy Lane Development $ 3,128,000 - $ 3,726,000 TOTAL $ 29,603,000 - $ 33,008,000 13 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT 1776 Park Im roeements Parks and Recreation COUNCIL GO_�L: #6 l�Iaintain High Level of Public Sen�ice Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Park Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In an effort to upgrade area parks, and make them more usable to the residents, there are different items being used around the City to enhance esisting Parks. Nest door to 1776 Park in the Imperial Estates is a new Frisbee Golf course. This project will add a I�ayak Launch.Dog Park, and 6'wide trails to the esisting amenities at this park. JIISTIFIC�TION: The demand for�•ersatile Parks for all ages and all types of acti�•ities, require the City to add and enhance the esisting City fields. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $�Od.000 Professional Sercices: $90.000 10°o Contingency: $�0.000 Testing Sercices $6.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $-130,000 14 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Blackha�vk Bled Reconstruction Phase II Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #13 Improve Transportation Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Streets I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project replaces approsimatel�� 7.150 linear feet of esisting concrete roadwa�� (25-feet wide) that was constnicted nearl�� 35 ��ears ago. The project contimies work that was started 3 ��ears before, replacing deteriorated sections of roadwa�� that have succumb to heav�� traffic loads aud high vohunes of vehicles. In addition, the project will also address failed inlet aprons and sidewalk issues throughout the corridor. JIISTIFIC�TION: The Cit�� currentl�� maintains this road, but its age and condition warrant significaut repair and replacement of specific sections. While this is not a wholesale replacement of the facilit��, it will estend the life of the facilit�� and put- off replacing the entire road for a munber of��ears. FIINDING SOIIRCE: The identified fiuiding source for this project is the voter approved 2013 Street Bonds. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $5.097.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $1.019.000 Professional Sercices $8d9.000 Testing Sercices $102.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $7,067,000 15 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Mud Gullv Detention and Coneevance Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #5 Improve Drainage TI"PE: Drainage I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Friendswood, in participation with the Gal�•eston County Consolidated Drainage District. Harris County Flood Control District. Harris County, and Gah•eston County are undertaking clearing and de-snagging acti�•ities along Clear Creek that were made possible by the 1�1ud Gully project that was led by HCFCD. JIISTIFIC�TION: The abo�•e impro�•ements would drop the surface ele�•ation of Clear Creek and the 1�1ud Gully and pro�•ide benefits to o�•er 700 structures that are within the 100-year flood plain. This is a component of the Clear Creek Federal Flood Control project which is being re- e�•aluated by the U.S. Arxny Corps of Engineers. FIINDING SOIIRCE: The funding for this project is from the General Fund Balance. City of Friendswood Participation: $1,000,000 16 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Old Citv Park Parks and Recreation COUNCIL GO_�L: #14 Develop _�dditional Parks Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Parks I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2017 SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed plan has identified the requirement to renovate and update Old Cit�� Park. The park has been connected to Stevenson Park via a footbridge. _�dditional auienities include a dog park. 10' wide sidewalk, paved parking for 75 vehicles, new entr�� road from Brianneadow and l�Ierriewood, new picnic pavilion, new restroom building, pla��ground equipment, and improved drainage throughout the site. JIISTIFIC�TION: Since 1993, the Parks and Recreation Board have recommended the comiection of Old Cit�� Park to Stevenson Park via a footbridge. Once comiected, additional parking for special events such as, the ammal Fourth of Jul�� Celebration. Concerts-I�i-The-Parks, the Halloween Festival, and the Car Show can be accommodated. During the spring and summer soccer seasons, the esisting gravel entr�� road generates estensive amounts of dust and debris that settle on nearb�� resident's homes and vehicles. Paving the entr�� wa�� aud providing paved parking at the site will resolve this issue aud will create a safe enviromnent. FIINDING SOIIRCE: The identified fiuiding source for this project is the voter approved 2013 Park Bods. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $801.000 25°o Contingency: $200.000 Professional Sercices: $8d.000 Testing Sercices: $17.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,102,000 17 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT We ner Ditch — Tributarv 2 Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #5 Improve Drainage Plamiing Document l�Iaster Drainage Plau Phase I TI"PE: Drainage I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In 200d, the Tesas Departrnent of Transportation (T_�OT) prepared a comprehensi�•e Drainage Plan for the F.1�Z 2�51 corridor behceen F.1�Z 518 and the proposed Brittany Bay Boule�•ard. The purposes of the study was identify critical drainage issues that would affect the widening of the roadway to 5 lanes and then propose solutions that could be addressed by the�•arious agencies affected by the project Three problem areas were identified. This project addresses problem area 2 and is joint project behceen the City. Gal�•eston Consolidated Drainage District, and TSDOT. The project calls for the construction of outfall (bos cuh•ert or ditch) located bericeen Garden Street and Sunset Dri�•e. The outfall facility would estend from F.1�1. 2�51 all the way to Cowards Creek, for a distance of��00 feet. JIISTIFIC�TION: The proposed outfall would address se�•eral drainage areas along the F.1�1 2�51 corridor that currently do not ha�•e outfall drainage. The benefits would be realized on both sides of F.1�Z 2�51, from Stadium Dri�•e to Oak Dri�•e. In addition, the proposed project would facilitate the de�•elopment of the roadway and relie�•e traffic congestion along the corridor within the city limits of Friendswood. FIINDING SOIIRCE: The identified funding source for this project is from the General Fund Balance. The Gah•eston County Consolidated Drainage District(GCCDD) is currently constructing this project through a grant with CDBG. The City's cost share was in the amount of$75.000 for Engineering and Surceying, which was paid in FI"2010. 18 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Woodla�vn Aeenue Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #13 Improve Transportation Plamiing Document: Pavement l�Ianagement l�Iaster Plau TI"PE: Streets I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Currentl��, the roadwa�� esists from Laurel Drive to F.l�L 518 and is approsimatel�� 650 feet long. The esisting road is 2 lanes of asphalt with au average width of 28 feet and concrete curb and gutter and au associated stonn sewer. The ultimate cross-section proposed for this street is a 2-laue, undivided concrete roadwa�� (28- feet wide)with curb and gutter. JIISTIFIC�TION: In 2002, the Cit�� perfonned an inventor�� of esisting asphalt roads tlu-oughout the Cit�� in au effort to determine which of these roads, based upon their age, esisting condition and traffic loads and volumes and other factors would warrant conversion to concrete. Woodlawn _�vemie evolved, based upon these criteria, as a prime candidate for conversion. Finall��, the conversion of this street to concrete will reduce the maintenance costs, the scope of maintenance activit��, and the frequenc��of maintenance on this highl��traveled Collector Street. FIINDING SOIIRCE: The identified fiuiding source for this project is the voter approved 2013 Street Bonds. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $569.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $11d.000 Professional Sercices $8�.000 Testing Sercices $11.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $777,000 19 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Brittanv Bav Bouleeard Phase I Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #13 Improve Transportation Plamiing Document l�Iajor Thoroughfare Plau TI"PE: Thoroughfares I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: ST0017 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project would constnut a four-lane concrete curb aud gutter boulevard section from the Friendswood/League Cit�� corporate limits to F.l�L 528. I�i addition, the project includes the constniction of an associated underground stonn sewer s��stem. The thoroughfare would traverse tlu-ough the West Ranch and Friendswood Lakes developments on the east side of F.l�L 528. Ultimatel��, this roadwav would comiect Pearland Parkwav in Pearland with Brittanv Bav Boulevard in League Cit��. JIISTIFIC�TION: The project will provide an additional north/south corridor tlu-ough the Cit��. which will help decrease the congestion along both F.l�L 518 and Sunset Boulevard. The constniction of the Brittan�� Ba�� Corridor will also prepare the Cit�� for the firture development of this section of the Cit��. In addition, the proposed stonn sewer should provide improved drainage in the area along the Brittanv Bav Boulevard Corridor. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $d.6d6.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 15°oContingency $697.000 Professional Sercices $708.000 Testing Sercices $91.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $6,1-11,000 20 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Actieitv Center Renoeation Parks and Recreation COUNCIL GO_�L: #9 Develop Civic Center Plamiing Document: Parks and Open Space master Plan TI"PE: Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 199� Parks and Open Space 1�laster Plan identified the need to pro�•ide a modern state of the art facility to handle the recreation needs of a population of 55.000 citizens. A more detailed scope is espected to be identified during the preliminary study phase of the project The scope outlined abo�•e was based on currently identified needs of the Sponsor Departxnent. JIISTIFIC�TION: The Parks and Open Space Plan identified the need for a Civic Center to meet the needs of a diverse communitv of 55.000 citizens. The current _�ctivities Center provides a public facilit��where residents of all ages will be able to come together and socialize, recreate aud participate in a wide variet�� of conununit�� events and activities. Currentl��, the _�ctivities Center is undersized for the population. The Cit�� is currentl�� in a feasibilit�� shid�� for options on espansion. The Cit�� is looking to renovate the esisting building and add another 8.800 SF onto the site and install more parking. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $1.7dd.000 25°o Contingency: $d�6.000 Professional Sercices: $178.000 Testing Sercices: $�6.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $2,39-1,000 21 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Corporal Wesley� J Canning Parks and Sportspark Recreation COUNCIL GO_�L: #6 l�Iaintain High Level of Public Sen�ice Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Park Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In an effort to obtain additional acreage for much needed ball fields, the City has been working with Gal�•eston County Consolidated Drainage District (GCCDD) to utilize a dry detention for lacrosse fields. GCCDD has graded the Baker Road detention pond for the de�•elopment of secen (7) lacrosse fields. In order for the fields to be utilized, the City will de�•elop restroom facilities and lighting for the fields JIISTIFIC�TION: The demand for youth ball fields within the City is growing at an alarming rate. Accordingly, this is an opportunity to utilize thirty (�0) plus acres that would otherwise sit dormant,for lacrosse fields. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $9d2.000 25°oContingency $2�6.000 Professional Sercices $96.000 Testing Sercices $20.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,29-1,000 22 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Fire De artment Trainin Field U rades Fire De artment COUNCIL GO_�L: #6 l�Iaintain High Level of Public Sen�ice PL_�NNING DOCUDIENT: None TI"PE: Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would utilize the esisting 1.0 acre site at Fire Station #2 (2601 West Parkwood) in the Sun l�Ieadow area. The project would constnut a fire evolution training stnuture aud ancillar�� facilit�� with a ground level footprint of approsimatel�� 1070 sq. ft. and inchides a 265 sq. ft. tower stnichire 30 feet high with 4 decks, steel doors and multiple window openings and open stairwa��s and a residential training section consisting of approsimatel�� 500 sq. ft. two stor�� building with steel doors multiple window openings steel shutters and a 2°d floor buni room based on a prepackaged, purpose built stnichire. Site improvements include installation of an 8-inch water main aud provision of gas main aud electrical site upgrades. Requires installation of additional access pavement of approsimatel�� 16.200 sq. ft. _� more detailed scope is espected to be identified during the preliminar�� stud�� phase of the project The scope outlined above was based on currentl�� identified needs ofthe Sponsor Department. JIISTIFIC�TION: _�ppropriate training facilities become more important to maintaining the current level of sen�ice provided b��the vohuiteer fire department The new Headquarters facilit�� will provide classroom facilities but practical field training is a requirement for providing this sen�ice. Providing needed training facilities in the Cit��keeps the vohurteers here, training in the cit��, and available to respond to au�� emergencies aud minimize training espenses required to send vohurteers outside the cit�� for the training. Current training locations include: La Porte. College Station, and Beaumont. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $d50.000 10°o Contingency: $d5.000 Professional Sercices: $50.000 Testing Sercices: $5.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $550,000 23 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Fire Station #2 Reconstruction Fire De artment COUNCIL GO_�L: #6 l�Iaintain High Level of Public Sen�ice PL_�NNING DOCUDIENT: N_� TI"PE: Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The current project consists of a sub-Station sized facilit�� of approsimatel�� 2800 sq. ft. sihiated on approsimatel�� 1 acre at 2601 West Parkwood (Fl�I 528). The proposed sub-Station project contains about 2020 square feet of living/ administrative/ workspace and approsimatel�� 4625 square feet of apparahis and support space. Stnicture is plauned as a pre-engineered metal building frame and roof designed to current wind-load requirements of 120mph with pennauent walls constnicted from Cl�IU/ brick veneer aud temporar�� walls from metal pauel or composite materials. Site improvements inchide approsimatel��24 parking spaces along the perimeters of the access and equipment drivewa��s. The station contains two double-loaded equipment ba��s, storage, aud a utilit�� room. Inside is a da�� room, dispatch office, small kitchen, locker-room and donn room for three volunteers. Provisions have been made to include emergenc�� power for the station. JIISTIFIC�TION: The current station is a metal frauied building and past its life use. It is not feasible for the building to be brought up to code and useable during emergenc�� sen�ices in all t��pes of weather. The decision is to demolish the esisting building and constnict a new fire station like the Fire Station 4. Estimated 2017 Costs ConstructionCosts: $1.�6�.000 25°o Contingency: $�d1.000 ProfessionalSercices: $1�9000 Testing Sercices: $28.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,871,000 24 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Parks & Recreation Buildin Renoeation Parks and Recreation COUNCIL GO_�L: #6 l�Iaintain High Level of Public Sen�ice Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The esisting Parks aud Recreation Building, located at 220 Shadwell, will need major renovation to bring the stnicture up to current building codes for public use from a single famil��residential stnicture. JIISTIFIC�TION: The Building will need renovations to set up as the headquarters for Parks aud Recreation to house 5 — 8 emplo��ees. The esterior and interior doors will need to be modified. The esisting electrical would have to be upgraded. The facilit�� would need to be made _�D_�accessible. The first task will require a sun�e�� to detennine implications of the current and proposed flood zone maps. The adjushnents to the stnicture will necessitate hiring au appropriate professional Sun�e��. Design, and Engineering team. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $750.000 25°o Contingency: $192.000 Professional Sercices: $16�.000 Testing Sercices: $�7.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,159,000 25 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Park Trails Master Plan Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: N/_� Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Sidewalks I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: N/_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project would constnict a series of trails comiect all the Cit�� parks. The project would use esisting routes where possible and constnict new routes in the drainage areas. JIISTIFIC�TION: This project is part ofthe Parks l�Iaster Plan. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $100.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 25°o Contingency Professional Sercices Testing Sercices Total Projected Project Cost: $100,000 26 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Pedestrian Brid e at Brookside Intermediate Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: N/_� Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Sidewalks I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: N/_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project would constnict a 169 linear Foot pedestrian bridge across the drainage chamiel from Brookside Intennediate School to the back side of the Gallowa�� school, along the drainage chamiel. JIISTIFIC�TION: The Cit�� was approached b�� Clear Creek I�idependent School District (CCISD) about the possibilit�� of installing a pedestrian bridge to make access from the _�uhumi Creek Subdivisions easier and safer for the children, instead of walking along Ba�� _�-ea Boulevard to Fl�I 528 and then crossing Ba�� _�rea Boulevard and walking along Fl�I 528 to get to Brookside Elementar�� School. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $520.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 25°oContingency $1�0.000 Professional Sercices $116.000 Testing Sercices $11.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $777,000 27 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Public Safetv Buildin , Phase II Police De artment COUNCIL GO_�L: #6 l�Iaintain High Level of Public Sen�ice Plamiing Document: Communit��Facilities Plan TI"PE: Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project would espand Phase I of the PSB to accommodate the persomiel space requirements for a total Police Force of approsimatel�� 117 officers and civiliau personnel and up to 9 personnel in the Fl�IO. These figures are based on percent gro�vth of the various divisions aud would be finalized b�� a programming shid�� done at the time. The assumptions made b�� this projection are based on available infonnation and inchide espansion in _�dministration areas, inchiding the FDIO to total approsimatel�� 3.500 sq. ft., in Patrol of 4J00 sq. ft., in CID of approsimatel�� 4.300 sq. ft., aud auother 3.500 sq. ft. in courts area. This estimate inchides required espansion of Evidence storage and annor�� spaces. The _�dministrative area is plamied to be stonn hardened to match the esisting stnichire. No additions were foreseen for the Jail area. Records Storage areas at this time. _�pprosimatel�� 100 parking spaces would be added: 40 in secure area and 60 in public. _� more detailed scope is espected to be identified during the preliminar�� stud�� phase of the project The scope outlined above was based on currentl�� identified needs ofthe Sponsor Departments including l�Iunicipal Courts. JIISTIFIC�TION: _�t BL111CI-OL1Y the PD espects to have a total persomiel accompauiment of approsimatel�� 117 officers and civilian persomiel. _�dditionall��, the Fire l�Iarshal's Office can be espected to grow b�� nearl�� 100°o, from four to between 8 aud 10. Phase One of the facilit�� was designed with some room for gro�vth through about 2014-16 based on current projections (assuming the departments maintain a 1.5 officers to 1000 population ratio.) This facilit��will require a major espansion to house these critical fiuictions and to contimie to sen�e as the Cit��'s Emergenc�� Operations Center during severe weather events. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $d.Odd.0000 25°oContingency $1.011.000 Professional Sercices $5�9.000 Testing Sercices $81.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $5,675,000 28 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Side�valk Master Plan Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: N/_� Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Sidewalks I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: N/_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project would constnict sidewalks tlu-oughout the Cit�� starting at high pedestrian areas. The Cit�� is proposing to spend $100.000 a ��ear to replace or install new sidewalks. The priorit��would be near schools throughout both school districts to make safe passage for children that walk to aud from the schools, then it would shift focus to the needs of different subdivisions. JIISTIFIC�TION: The Cit�� staff and Cit�� Council has been approached b�� residents on the subject of sidewalks, either new to be installed or fised or replaced. The Cit��has decided to institute this Sidewalk l�Iaster Plan to start the process of t��ing in sidewalks throughout the Cit��. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $500.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 25°o Contingency Professional Sercices Testing Sercices Total Projected Project Cost: $500,000 29 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Steeenson Park Reclamation Parks and Recreation COUNCIL GO_�L: #6 l�Iaintain High Level of Public Sen�ice Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Park Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The esisting Fire Station Site will be unoccupied and the land will recert back to Stecenson Park. In an effort to espand Ste�•enson Park, the esisting building and parking will be demolished and the area will ha�•e grass installed. JIISTIFIC�TION: The new Fire Station on Harold R'hitaker Dri�•e will become the New Headquarters for the Friendswood �%olunteer Fire Department The City has decided to re�•ert this land that the esisting Fire Station 1 is on back to parkland. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $d0.000 25°oContingency $10.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $50,000 30 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Steeenson Park and S�vimming Pool Parks and Recreation Restroom Renoeations COUNCIL GO_�L: #6 l�Iaintain High level of Public Sen�ices Plamiing Document: Parks and Open Space master Plan TI"PE: Facilities I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2017 SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project requires the demolition of the esisting restrooms aud office area aud constnict new restrooms and office space with new utilities and fistures. _�lso. the esisting restrooms near the Gazebo will be removed aud the restrooms at the Pavilion will be replaced aud espanded. JIISTIFIC�TION: Both esisting restrooms have had munerous operational problems. The main utilities are undersized and are not known where thev are fed. New constnution. after the demolition, would verif�� the conditions of the esisting utilities aud recommended upgrades. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $705.000 25°o Contingency: $176.000 Professional Sercices: $76.000 Testing Sercices: $1d.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $971,000 31 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Street Paeement Master Plan Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #13 Improve Transportation Plamiing Document: Pavement l�Iaster Plan 2008 TI"PE: Streets I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Currentl�� a number of streets, using various t��pes of pavement, have been identified as being at the end of their usefiil c��cle. Cit�� Staff is recommending that a five ��ear plan on replacing the road surfaces identified be implemented. JIISTIFIC�TION: In 2008, the Cit�� perfonned an inventor�� of esisting roads throughout the Cit�� in an effort to detennine which of these roads, based upon their age, esisting condition and traffic loads and volumes and other factors would warrant replacement The Cit�� is plamiing to complete a new shid�� in the 2017 Fiscal I�ear. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $5.000.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $5,000,000 32 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Sub-re ional Park— Lundv Lane Parks and Recreation COUNCIL GO_�L: #14 Develop _�dditional Parks Plamiing Document: Parks and Open Space l�Iaster Plau TI"PE: Park I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Constniction PROJECT NUDIBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed plau has identified the requirement to espand the park s��stem to include the addition of one fifteen-_�cre Park conunonl��known as a Sub-Regional Park. Using 2013 Park Bonds dedicated for Park Land Purchase, the Cit�� Purchased 24 _�cres at the conier of Lund�� Laue and W. Parkwood _�vemie (Fl�I 528). Improvements to this lot will be parking. Picnic Pavilion. Restrooms. 7 fields, liglrting, and fencing. JIISTIFIC�TION: The Parks a�id Open Space l�Iaster Plan aud the Park Dedication Ordinance identifv the need for Communitv Parks within the citv limits of Friendswood at Build Out The Cit��esperiences ever increasing demand for��outh sports fields. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $1.d29.000 25°o Contingency: $�57.000 Professional Sercices: $15d.000 Testing Sercices: $29.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,969,000 33 Water & Sewer Projects - Five Year CIP Plan TABLE 5 Pro'ects 5 Year Plan COH Raw Water S stemB -In $ 3,SOQ000 - $ 3,500,000 Lift Station#22 Reconstruchon $ 2,372,000 - $ 2,637,000 Water P1antNumber One TankRehabilitation $ 1,207,000 - $ 1,339,000 For -Two Inch Water Main Re lacement $ 12,656,000 - $ 12,656,000 Lift Station#1 Reconstruchon $ 1,594,000 - $ 1,774,000 Lift Station#4 Reconstruchon $ 1,594,000 - $ 1,774,000 Lift Station#17 Reconstruchon $ 1,594,000 - $ 1,774,000 Lift Station#23 Reconstruchon $ 3,54Q000 - $ 3,935,000 Samtary Sewer SystemAssesment Phase IV- Conshuction $ 1,464,000 - $ 1,464,000 Samta Sewer S stemAssesment Phase V-Desi $ 1OQ000 - $ 100,000 Second Elevated Water Storage TankRehabilitation $ 954,000 - $ 1,059,000 Water P1antNumber Three Tank Rehabilitahon $ 636,000 - $ 706,000 Water P1antNumber Four Tank Rehabilitahon $ 636,000 - $ 706,000 West Water Interconnect $ 418,000 - $ 461,000 Samtary Sewer SystemAssesment Phase VI- Design $ 1OQ000 - $ 100,000 Samtary Sewer SystemAssesment Phase VII-Design $ 175,000 - $ 175,000 Samtary Sewer SystemAssesment Phase VIII- Conshuction $ 1,83Q000 - $ 1,830,000 TOTAL $ 34,370,000 - $ 35,990,000 34 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT COH Ra�v Water Svstem Buv-In Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Water Distribution I�nprovements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a purchase of raw water capacit�� from the Cit�� of Houston through their centralization of the Raw Water feed svstem to the Southeast Water Purification Plant The Cit�� of Houston has for��ears operated and maintained their raw water collection aud distribution s��stem used for providing the water suppl�� to treatment facilities individuallv. _� decision was taken recentiv to share the costs of operations, maintenance, and improvements out among the municipal customer-participants currentl�� acting as co-owners in the treatment and transmission facilities. In order for Houston to contimie suppl��ing raw water in firture and prevent the sole burden of the cost being shared onl�� b�� Houston all firture co-participauts desire more capacit�� are to share the cost. I�i order to do this fairl��, all raw water supplies are group to create a raw water s��stem with a 200 DIGD capacit��. JIISTIFIC�TION: This is a component of the Surface Water suppl��-treahnent aud distribution s��stem that the Cit�� has bought into as an outgro�vth of the 2001 Ground Water Reduction Plau. The Cit�� of Houston is sharing out the cost of this s��stem with its co-participants. FIINDING SOIIRCES: The identified fiuiding source for this project is the Water & Sewer Working Capital. Total Projected Friendswood Participation Cost: $3,500,000 35 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Lift Station #22 Reconstruction Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2018 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete reconstniction of the Lift Station #22 facilit��. The facilit�� is located in Forest Bend Park. Rehabilitation would include wet well, pumps and controls. The reuse of esisting generator ma�� not be possible if the pumps are upgraded. The new installation would replace a facilit�� 33 ��ears old and in deteriorating condition. In general, the project would have within its definition the installation of tlu-ee submersible sewage pumps of the 25 to 30 HP range, controls and associated instnunentation all in stainless enclosures. Unless provision are to be made for force main relocation, the pumps would have to have a high head capabilit�� due to the fact that the�� discharge into the force main of lift station number 2. This might also signal the use of variable speed drive technolog�� to regulate flow. Controls and associated instnunentation should be in stainless enclosures. _� new fence should also be inchided in this project The current 480 volts 3 phase 150 auip sen�ice aud natural gas for the generator is esistent at this site. JIISTIFIC�TION: This lift station sen�es the Forest Bend subdivision and is the third largest lift station in tenns of flow in the cit��. This site is prone to being over�vorked in heav�� rain events. Due to the condition of the lift station aud piping changes made in 2009 to its force main, au upgrade of this site in critical. _� new facilit�� with an increased pumping capabilit�� would sen�ice the Forest Bend area with a far greater degree of reliabilit��than the esisting site can offer. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $1.800.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $�60.000 Professional Sercices $176.000 Testing Sercices $�6.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $2,372,000 36 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Water Plant #1 Tank Rehabilitations Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Water Distribution I�nprovements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project includes sand blasting and painting of both ground storage tanks and some minor equipment repairs and replacements. JIISTIFIC�TION: A pre�•enti�•e maintenance program prolongs the life of the facilities. The ground storage tanks require blasting and painting e�•ery 10 to 12 years to assure their integrity and usefulness. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $950.000 25°o Contingency: $2�8.000 Professional Sercices: $19.000 Testing Sercices: Total Projected Project Cost: $1,207,000 37 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Fortv-T�vo Inch Water Main Re lacement Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2018 SUBTI"PE: Water Distribution I�nprovements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a co-participation project with the Cit�� of Houston and other participants in the upgrade of the main north / south surface water transmission pipeline from the Southeast Water Purification Plaut along State Highwa�� 3. Tesas Department of Transportation plaus to widen State Highwa�� 3 and it will be necessar�� to remove the esisting pipeline from the State right-of-wa�� in preparation for that project This presents an opportunit��to up-size this transmission line when it is removed from the easement The removal / constniction project will be mauaged b��the Cit�� of Houston and Participant's cost share will be based on a pro-rata use according to their distribution allocation. There are three different scenarios being discussed regarding additional capacit�� for League Cit��. The largest proposed line is a 54-inch down to 48-inch from the current 42-inch line. Friendswood's distribution allocation from this line is balanced bv its distribution allocation from the 36-inch line on Beamer and potential increases of capacit��. JIISTIFIC�TION: The Cit�� of Friendswood is a participaut in the operation and maintenance of the 42 inch Water Line. That pro-rata participation is reduced b�� its participation in the Beamer Road 36 inch transmission line. The Cit��is dependent on these as the source of surface water required to meet the Ground Water Reduction Plan as established in 2001, and to meet growing population requirements tlu-ough build- out The original 42-inch line was installed in the earl�� 1970's and has been esperiencing a larger increase (both size and munber) in leaks in recent ��ears. Total Projected Friendswood 10.9%Shared Cost: $12,656,000 38 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Lift Station #1 Reconstruction Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2020 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete reconstniction of the Lift Station #1 facilit��. This is the last lift station in the cit�� using above ground pumps. Reconstniction would inchide wet well. pumps and controls. The reuse of esisting generator ma�� be possible. The new installation would replace a facilit�� 40 ��ears old aud in poor condition. The project should have within its definition the installation of two submersible sewage pumps of the 15 to 20 HP range, controls aud associated instnunentation should be in stainless enclosures and located above flood level. _� new fence should also be inchided in this project The current 230 volts 3 phase 150 amp sen�ice should be upgraded to 480V if possible and nahiral gas for the generator is esistent at this site. JIISTIFIC�TION: The facilit�� is located in I�nperial Estates and serves that area and some areas on the north side of F1�I2351. This is the last lift station in the cit�� using above ground pumps. Replacement of these units which are now entering their 30�h ��ear is advised. The wet well is begimiing to deteriorate. _� new facilit�� with an increased pumping capabilit�� would sen�ice the above mentioned area with a far greater degree of reliabilit�� thau the esisting site can offer and eliminate an old and unsightl��facilit��. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $1.200.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $2d0.000 Professional Sercices $1�0.000 Testing Sercices $2d.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,59-1,000 39 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Lift Station #-4 Reconstruction Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2019 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete reconstniction of Lift Station #4 facilities would inchide wet well. pumps aud controls. The reuse of esisting generator is possible. The new installation would replace a facilit�� over 40 ��ears old and in deteriorating condition. The project would have within its definition the installation of rivo submersible sewage pumps of the 20 to 25 HP range. Unless provision are to be made for force main relocation, the pumps would have to have a high head capabilit�� due to the fact that the�� discharge into the force main of lift station number 23. Controls aud associated instnunentation should be in stainless enclosures and placed above the flood level. _�new fence should also be inchided in this project The current 480 volts 3 phase open t��pe, which might limit it to 100 amp sen�ice, and nahiral gas for the generator is esistent at this site. JIISTIFIC�TION: This lift station sen�es the Poll�� Ranch Subdivision. Though not auiong the largest facilities in tenns of flow, the site is in very poor condition. The facilit�� is also prone to flooding aud was partiall�� destro��ed b��the floods of 2001. _� new facilit��, built with the potential flooding dangers in mind aud using the efficienc�� of modeni design aud pumping techniques, would greatl�� increase the reliabilit�� of sen�ice to the area mentioned above aud eliminate an aging and unsightl�� facilitv. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $1.200.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $2d0.000 Professional Sercices $1�0.000 Testing Sercices $2d.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,59-1,000 40 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Lift Station #17 Reconstruction Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2019 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete reconstniction of the Lift Station #17 facilities would include wet well. pumps aud controls. The reuse of esisting generator is possible. The new installation would replace a facilit�� over 30 ��ears old and in deteriorating condition. I�i general tenns, the project would have within its definition the installation of three submersible sewage pumps of the 15 to 20 HP range, controls and associated instnunentation should be in stainless enclosures and placed above the flood level. _�new fence should also be inchided in this project The current 480 Volt. 3 Phase 150 amp sen�ice aud nahiral gas for the generator is esistent at this site. JIISTIFIC�TION: This lift station sen�es the Wedgewood area bordered b�� Clear Creek to the west. Blackhawk Boulevard to the east. F1�I2351 to the north, aud Shadv Oaks Drive to the south. The facilit�� also receives sewage from lift station munber 37 located at our surface water station munber 2 plant It is in tenns of flow, within the 10 largest lift station facilities in the cit��. The facilit�� is also prone to flooding aud was partiall�� destro��ed b��the floods of 2001. _�new facilit��will need to be built with the potential flooding dangers in mind would greatl�� increase the reliabilit�� of sen�ice to the areas mentioned above. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $1.200.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $2d0.000 Professional Sercices $1�0.000 Testing Sercices $2d.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,59-1,000 41 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Lift Station #23 Reconstruction Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2017 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete reconstniction of the Lift Station #23 facilit��. The facilit�� is located on Fl�I 518. Reconstniction will inchide wet well, pumps and controls. The reuse of esisting generator will not be possible. The new installation would replace a facilit�� 23 ��ears old and in deteriorating condition. In general, the project would have within its definition the installation of three submersible sewage pumps of the 70 HP rauge, controls and associated instnunentation all in stainless enclosures. The use of variable speed drive teclmolog�� to regulate flow will be required on this station. _� new fence will be inchided in this project as the wet well and control buildings will be relocated to the unoccupied area adjacent to the station. Due to changes in TCEQ regulations, the esisting force main will have to be downsized. The current 480 volts 3 phase 150 amp sen�ice and nahiral gas for the generator is no at the site but is close. JIISTIFIC�TION: This lift station sen�es the westeni portion of the Cit��and is the second largest lift station in tenns of flow in the cit��. This site is prone to being over�vorked in heavv rain events. Due to the condition of the lift station and overflows, au upgrade of this site in critical. _� new facilit�� with an increased pumping capabilit�� would sen�ice the Cit�� with a far greater degree of reliabilit�� thau the esisting site can offer. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $2.600.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $520.000 Professional Sercices $�68.000 Testing Sercices $52.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $3,5-10,000 42 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Sanitarv Se�ver Svstem Assessment Public Phase IV Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2018 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Basins Eight aud Eighteen was part of the original group of areas esperiencing the greatest inflow and inf'iltration. Basins Eight and Eiglrteen consist of approsimatel�� 75.029 linear feet of gravit�� sanitar�� sewer lines and 179 maiilioles. Basin Eiglrt encompasses the westeni portion of Fl�I 2351 (Coward Creek subdivision) from Sunset to Hackne�� aud from Falling Leaf to the cit�� limits across from Fl�I 2351. Basin Eighteen encompasses the eastern most portion of the cit�� along Ba�� _�-ea Boulevard. The subdivisions of Friendswood Oaks aud Terra Bella primar��areas. Phase IV will be the constniction of the design plans from Phase III. JIISTIFIC�TION: _�s part of the Sanitar�� Sewer S��stem _�ssessment Phase I au overall master plau was developed to fiirther investigate specific basins based on the original flow monitoring data. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $1.200.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $2d0.000 Professional Sercices Testing Sercices $2d.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,-16-1,000 43 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Sanitarv Se�ver Svstem Assessment Public Phase V Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2018 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Basin One was part of the original group of areas esperiencing the greatest inflow and infiltration. Basins Eight aud Eighteen were studied as part of Phase II. Basin One consists of approsimatel�� 34.750 linear feet of gravit�� sauitar�� sewer lines and 270 maiilioles. Basin One encompasses the northeni portion of Blackhawk Boulevard (Wedgewood Village) from Cedar Gulle�-to Fl�I 2351 and from Beamer Road to Clear Creek on Fl�I 2351. JIISTIFIC�TION: _�s part of the Sanitar�� Sewer S��stem _�ssessment Phase I au overall master plau was developed to fiirther investigate specific basins based on the original flow monitoring data. Phase V will be the second such in-depth investigation into specific basins. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $10.000 Professional Sercices $90.000 Testing Sercices Total Projected Project Cost: $100,000 44 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Second Eleeated Tank Rehabilitation Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Water Distribution I�nprovements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The rehabilitation of the esisting elevated storage tank will inchide the saud blasting and painting of the storage tank aud some minor repairs to pumping equipment. JIISTIFIC�TION: _� preventive maintenance prograui would prolong the life of the facilities. The ground storage needs to be painted ever�� 10 to 12 ��ears to assure its integrit�� aud L1SZfL1111ZSS. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $750.000 25°o Contingency: $188.000 Professional Sercices: $16.000 Testing Sercices: Total Projected Project Cost: $95-1,000 45 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Water Plant #3 Tank Rehabilitation Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Water Distribution I�nprovements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project includes sand blasting and painting of the ground storage tank and some minor equipment repairs and replacements. JIISTIFIC�TION: A pre�•enti�•e maintenance program prolongs the life of the facilities. The ground storage tanks require blasting and painting e�•ery 10 to 12 years to assure their integrity and usefulness. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $500.000 25°o Contingency: $125.000 Professional Sercices: $11.000 Testing Sercices: Total Projected Project Cost: $636,000 46 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Water Plant #-4 Tank Rehabilitation Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Water Distribution I�nprovements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project includes sand blasting and painting of the ground storage tank and some minor equipment repairs and replacements. JIISTIFIC�TION: A pre�•enti�•e maintenance program prolongs the life of the facilities. The ground storage tanks require blasting and painting e�•ery 10 to 12 years to assure their integrity and usefulness. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $500.000 25°o Contingency: $125.000 Professional Sercices: $11.000 Testing Sercices: Total Projected Project Cost: $636,000 47 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT West Water Interconnect Public Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: NI"P SUBTI"PE: Water Distribution I�nprovements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed improvements would estend an independent 12" line to intercomiect the esisting 16"transmission water main line on Wildeniess Trails to the 12"main on Fl�I 528. JIISTIFIC�TION: Currentl��, limited un-looped water lines sen�ice various developments throughout the southeni region of Friendswood, therefore limiting the availabilit�� of needed constant water pressure on the farther westeni regions of Friendswood. The proposed transmission water main would provide the needed direct constaut suppl�� of water to this proposed area, ultimatel�� providing development opportunities along the far westeni regions of Fl�I 528. FIINDING SOIIRCES: The identified fiuiding source for this project is the Water & Sewer Working Capital. Estimated 2017 Costs ConstructionCosts: $�10.000 20°o Contingency: $62.000 Professional Sercices: $d0.000 Testing Sercices: $6.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $-118,000 48 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Sanitarv Se�ver Svstem Assessment Public Phase VI Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2019 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Basins Five aud Twent�� are part of the second tier group of areas esperiencing the greatest inflow aud infiltration. Basins Eight. Eighteen, aud One were studied as part of Phase II and Phase V. Basins Five aud Twent�� consists of approsimatel�� 67.770 linear feet of gravit�� sanitar�� sewer lines aud 352 maiilioles. Basin Five encompasses the northern portion of the cit��from Fl�I 2351 to the cit�� limits west of Fl�I 518 down to the drainage ditch east of North Sunset Drive. Basin Twent�� encompasses the southeni portion of Blackhawk Boulevard (Wedgewood Village) from Cedar Gullev to Friendswood Liiil: Road and from the citv limits down to Clear Creek. JIISTIFIC�TION: _�s part of the Sanitar�� Sewer S��stem _�ssessment Phase I au overall master plau was developed to fiirther investigate specific basins based on the original flow monitoring data. Phase VI will be the third such in-depth investigation into specific basins. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $10.000 Professional Sercices $90.000 Testing Sercices Total Projected Project Cost: $100,000 49 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Sanitarv Se�ver Svstem Assessment Public Phase VII Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2020 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Basins One. Five, and Twent�� will have comprehensive shidies conducted on their s��stems to detennine deficiencies. Based on the results, engineering will need to be designed to correct the areas. Basins One. Five, and Twent�� consists of approsimatel�� 100.000 linear feet of gravit�� sanitar�� sewer lines aud 625 maiilioles. Basin One encompasses the northeni portion of Blackhawk Boulevard (Wedgewood Village) from Cedar Gulle�� to Fl�I 2351 and from Beamer Road to Clear Creek on Fl�I 2351. Basin Five encompasses the northeni portion of the cit�� from Fl�I 2351 to the cit�� limits west of Fl�I 518 down to the drainage ditch east of North Sunset Drive. Basin Twent�� encompasses the southeni portion of Blackhawk Boulevard (Wedgewood Village) from Cedar Gulle�� to Friendswood Link Road aud from the citv limits down to Clear Creek. The limits of the areas needed to be designed will become clearer after completion of Phases V and VI. JIISTIFIC�TION: _�s part of the Sanitar�� Sewer S��stem _�ssessment Phase I au overall master plau was developed to fiirther investigate specific basins based on the original flow monitoring data. Phases V and VI will be the second and third such in-depth investigations into specific basins. This will be the second engineering design project for the assessment. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $25.000 Professional Sercices $150.000 Testing Sercices Total Projected Project Cost: $175,000 50 PROJECT N_�DIE SPONSOR DEP_�RTDIENT Sanitarv Se�ver Svstem Assessment Public Phase VIII Works COUNCIL GO_�L: #2 Improve Infrastnicture Plamiing Document: N/_� TI"PE: Utilitv I"E_�R PL_�NNED: 2021 SUBTI"PE: Sauitar�� Sewer Improvements PROJECT NUl�IBER: NI"_� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Basins One. Five, and Twent�� will have comprehensive shidies conducted on their s��stems to detennine deficiencies. Based on the results, engineering will need to be designed to correct the areas. Basins One. Five, and Twent�� consists of approsimatel�� 100.000 linear feet of gravit�� sanitar�� sewer lines aud 625 maiilioles. Basin One encompasses the northeni portion of Blackhawk Boulevard (Wedgewood Village) from Cedar Gulle�� to Fl�I 2351 and from Beamer Road to Clear Creek on Fl�I 2351. Basin Five encompasses the northeni portion of the cit�� from Fl�I 2351 to the cit�� limits west of Fl�I 518 down to the drainage ditch east of North Sunset Drive. Basin Twent�� encompasses the southeni portion of Blackhawk Boulevard (Wedgewood Village) from Cedar Gulle�� to Friendswood Link Road aud from the citv limits down to Clear Creek. The limits of the areas needed to be designed will become clearer after completion of Phases V and VL Phase VIII will be the constniction of the design plans from Phase VII. JIISTIFIC�TION: _�s part of the Sanitar�� Sewer S��stem _�ssessment Phase I au overall master plau was developed to fiirther investigate specific basins based on the original flow monitoring data. Phases V and VI will be the second and third such in-depth investigations into specific basins. This will be the second constniction project for the assessment. Estimated 2017 Costs Construction Costs: $1.500.000 Easement Costs: Easement Acquisition Sercices: 20°oContingency $�00.000 Professional Sercices Testing Sercices $�0.000 Total Projected Project Cost: $1,830,000 51 TABLE 6 Pro'ects Be ond 5 Year Plan� Annalea/Whitehall Drainage Improvements Future Phases $ 1,207,000 Brittany Bay Boulevard Phase II $ 9,084,000 F.M. 518 Drainage Improvements Phase II $ 3,871,000 Fire Station#4 3rd Ba $ 917,000 Hike and Bike Connecting Trails $ 5,804,000 Northern Panhandle Regional Detention $ 8,192,000 Parks Maintenance Building $ 2,377,000 Public Works Buildin $ 4,480,000 Records Retention Center $ 675,000 Shadowbend Drainage Improvements Future Phases $ 438,000 Southern Panhandle Regional Detention $ 22,967,000 Street Maintenance Master Plan $ 5,000,000 Sunmeadow Drainage Improvements Future Phases $ 2,583,000 TOTAL $ 67,595,000 *In2017 Dollars 52 TABLE 7 Pro'ects Be ond 5 Year Plan� Automated Meter Reading System $ 3,030,000 Baker Road, Falling Leaf, Stable - Sewer $ 1,203,000 Beamer Road Sanita Sewer Future Phases $ 4,210,000 Beamer Road Water Line Future Phases $ 2,043,000 East Water Loop $ 1,354,000 El Dorado/Lundy L,ane Sanitary Sewer $ 3,880,000 FM 528 - Falcon Rid e to Windson Sanitar Sewer $ 1,005,000 FM 528 - Lundy L,ane to Tower Estates Sanitary Sewer $ 1,585,000 Friendswood Lakes Water Loop $ 358,000 San Joaquin Estates Water Line Replacement $ 1,913,000 San Joaquin Water Loop $ 358,000 Sanitary Sewer System Assesment 10 Year Plan $ 7,153,000 Siateen Inch Transmission Line Phase III $ 1,290,000 South FM 518 Water Line $ 878,000 South Friendswood Service Area Water Loop $ 955,000 Stable Road - Water $ 251,000 Water Plant Number Five Tank Rehabilitation $ 1,587,000 Water Plant Number Six TankRehabilitation $ 636,000 Water Plant Number Two Tank Rehabilitation $ 636,000 West Transmission Line $ 9,064,000 Wilderness Trails Water Loop $ 292,000 Windsong Lane - Water $ 167,000 Windsong Sanitary Sewer $ 3,061,000 TOTAL $ 46,909,000 *In2017 Dollars 53