Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 2012-05 RESOLUTION NO.R2012-OS
A R�SOLUTION ADOPTING A CAPITAL ZMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS MANLTAL CONTAINING A SUMMARY OF ALL
PROPOSAL PROJECTS TO BE ACQUIRED DURING A FIVE
YEAR PERIOD, COST ESTIMATES, METHOD OF FINANCING
AND A RECOMNI�NDED TIM� TABLE FOR CONSTRUCTING
THE IMPROVEMENTS TO B� UNDERTAIC�N IN THE CITY
OF FRIENDSWOOD,TEXAS.
% % % % ]i
WH�REAS, the city of Friendswood ("City") has determined that there is a need for a
comprehensive financial planniug document detailing the City's infrastructure_needs, prioriYies, method
of financing and the costs and timing of the undertaking for those impirovements to be made within the
next five years�vithin the City, and such is required by the Subsection(a) of Section 8.03 of Article VIII
ofthe Charter and pirovided for in Section 395.014 ofthe Texas Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, tl�e City of Friendswood has reviewed its existing ordinances and has determined
and desires that this infoimation should be contained in one document that is separate.fi�om the annual
budget so as to allow for examination in greater detail, simplified modification to reflect the changing
needs of the commnnity at the direction of the Council,and revision and updating annually; and
WHEREA5, attached hereto is a manual containing a detailed list of infi�astrucfire needs,
priorities, methods of financing and detailed cost estimates programmed for nndei�taking over a five year
period;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRIENDSWOOD,TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the Charter of the City, Section 8.03 (a) as amended, the City
Council hereby adopts the attached, E�ibit A, "The Citv of Friendswood FY 2012 to 2016 Capital �
Immrovement Proiects Manual" as an official document of the City and directs that the information
contained and referred to therein shall control and determine the Capital 7�nprovement Project efforts
I
undertaken by the City until such time as the document is amended as called for by this resohrtion and
the City Charter.
Section 2. The Director of Commimity Development is hereby directed to maintain copies
of the "The City oF Friendswood FY 2012 to 2016 Capital Improvement Proiects Manual" and
related documents and make them available upon request, for a reasonable fee, to any individual who
requests one. The Director is further directed to review and evaluate this data anmtally and make
recommendations to the Council annually for additions and revisions to the plan contained herein.
PASSED,APPROVED AND RESOLV�D on this 5th day of March ,2012.
1�
avid 7. . ith � �
Mayor
ATTEST:
��� r�tl�(�fy�,�
�l,t,__� �� ' ��
Melinda Welsh, TRMC �
City Secretaiy �
* �
sr ��
R�� OF f��
I
i
R2012-OS 2
. R2012-05
Exhibit A
Capitallmprovement �ro�ram
2012 vpdctte
r $
�
,
3 - � � . �
%fl! ��
t �
:., . . .._. '
L
�
NewAnimalControlFaciCty S�um Lane�Parf}ng
� . , �� a .�,.bi ,
� k .;
�r`k �' V. -
�; � � �
p
�' "�^� � � ���j �
� � F' �: .-„ ' I� 'y �
� :v.�-�.�, ,� "`.r _.��.T � ,� 3 y,r �.5� �,.
v �
.<--�= s s_.`�"� .�-.`w � +f r>
� .
.. . _ ,.. ry�y y2�_•• :..'
3 � _ �b"1 � S."y£. «
&
�rf �� ,rr�-� �'` ' "`ua _ �� _� �.� ..
I
,c�,rz.�vx���i.'.,r�„5;� ..� -`�' ''- I �-^ .
rA'w's .s�"C3'=r r?n3;��*''�`%"
( v
r���^SV���rvm �- � � .
M�����v..w�'v —�-r—�� : �:�:Y .
Beamer�arf vtiCties Sunnyview/Sf{yview Street
���
���" -
����:�,-,
• �, �� �
�= i� �i
<
,��� i
, ;
i
_„_��__
F�1f S18�Drainage Improvements Surface 'Water7an(��tion �
RpsoCution 2�XXX-XX.Appmve�f 6y Frien�fswoodCity Councilon Afontk�Day,7ear.
Table of Contents
SECTION ONE—Table of Contents
Tableof Contents.................................................................................................. I
Executive Summary.............................................................................................. 3
Funding Totals (Table 1) ................................................................................. 3
Capital Improvements Program Update ............................................................... 4
1.0 Introduction............................................................................................... 4
2.0 The Impact of Growth............................................................................... 4
3.0 The Planning Effort&the Evolution of the Document............................ 5
4AChanges to the Document......................................................................... 7
5.0 Bond Issue Costs..............................................:........................................ 7
6A The Challenge at a Glance..............................,........................................ 8
CIP FY 2012 Total Spending(Table 2).................................................... 8
7.0 Summary ofthe Program.......................................................................... 8
8.0 The Next Five Years................................................................................. 9
9.0 Projects Completed Since ClP Inception.................................................. 10
Completed Project Statistics and List(Table 3) ....................................... 10
S�CTION TWO—Five Year General Governmeut Proiects
' 2012-2Q16 Capital Improvements Program (Table 4)
'Pive Year Plan General Government Projects......................................... 12
General Government Project Location Map......................................................... 13
General Government Project List..:...................................................................... 14
Annalea/Whitehall Drainage Improvements—Phase 2........................................ 15
Blackha�vk,Wandering Trail,Oak Vista Paving.................................................. 15
Civic Center/Meeting Facility.......................................:....................................... 17
FriendswoodLink Road—Phase 2....................................................................... 18
LibraryExpansion................................................................................................. 19
Melody Lane Street Reconstruction...................................................................... 20
Mud Gully Detention and Conveyance...................................,............................. 21
Ne�v Fire Station................................................................................................... 22
Pavement Management Master Plan Implementation........................:................. 23
TDRA—Disaster Recovery Grant Project(NG Generators)................................ 24
TDRA—Disaster Recovery Grant Project(Fire Station 3) .................................. 25
Tributary 2—Cotivards Creek Conveyance Improvements.......... .:............... 26 �
S�CTION THREE—Five Year Water& Sewer Proiects
2012-2016 Capital Improvements Program(Table 5)
Five Year Plarc Water& Se4ver Projects....................... 27 �
...........................
Water and Sewer Fund Project Location Map................:..................................... 28 I
Water and Sewer Fund Project List...................................................................... 29
Blackhawk Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation...................................... 30
COH Forty-Two Inch Water Main Replacement.................................................. 31
COH Ra�v Water System Buy-In.......................................................................... 32 I
East FM 528 Waterline......................................................................................... 33
1
i
Lift Station#3 Replacement................................................................................. 34
LiftStation#6 Replacement................................................................................. 35
Second Elevated Storage Tank Rehabilitation...................................................... 36
WaterPlant#2 Replacement................................................................................. 37
WaterPlant#5 Replacement............................:.................................................... 38
WaterPlant#7 Replacement................................................................................. 39
SECTION FOUR—Bevond Five Year Proiects
2012-20]6 Capital Improvements Program(Table 6)
Beyond Five Year Plan General Government Projects............................ 40
2012-2016 Capital Improvements Program (Table 7)
Beyond Five Year Plan Water& Se�ver Projects..................................... 40
2 I
� � Executive Sum�narv � �
Submitted for City Council's information is the FY 2012 to FY 2016 Capital Lnprovement
Program (CIP) for the City of Friendswood. Cun•ently, there are rivelve (12) General
Government and ten (10) Water and Sewer bond identified CIP projects for the next five (5)
fiscal years. This submittal represents the foui�th update of the CIP since its creation in 1999.
City Staff has committed to updating the projects and manual every year.
Once adopted by the City Council, this document will provide Staff a clear direction on the
funding and scheduling of remaining projects, which will be a part of long range budgeting plan
subject to approval by the City Council. Staff will meet with the City Council in work sessions
to seek approval of fimding sources, updating project schedules and to seek guidance for every
Fiscal Year regarding subsequent implementation phases.
Estimated total fimding for individual funding sources and their cumulative totals are given
below for the next five-year Capital Hnprovement Program as well as projects beyond that
period.
FUNDING TOTALS FOR FIVE YEAR AND B�YOND CIP
Table 1
Period Total Fskimated Cost Available Rm�ds Ruuds Needed
FY 2012-2016 � 5$373,296 $ 28,887,734 $ � 29,485,562
Be-o�xl Five Years" $ 60,51.t,873 � - �^ 6Q5(1,873
Totnls $ 118,885,169 $ 28,887,734 $ 89,997,435
'�Costs ara in 2012 Dollars.
The five-year CIP identified with this update is spread among all catega•ies, with water
improvements having a majority of projects scheduled. The driving force for utility projects is
generated by population growth requiring more ne�v infi•astructure and an existing utility
infrastructure that requires maintenance or replacement. Community Development and Public
Works focus on implementing the preventive maintenance programs to prolong life of streets.
Friendswood is a City with aging infi•astructure. The infrastructure installed by the City or
dedicated to the City as a condition of development has a useful life that depreciates annually.
Via Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) #34, Staff has detennined the value of
these fixed assets, their average usefiil life, the status of depreciation, and estimated the fuh�re
replacement.
Long range planning and scheduling remains a critical issue at all times. This CIP Manual
Update acknowledges thirteen (13) General Government Projects and fifteen (IS) Water and
Sewer Revenue Projects beyond the five-year CIP Program. These projects have been identified
in various studies and master plans as projects needing attention by the City. City Council and �
City Staff is currently working diligently on all possible funding sources and planning on these ,
projects.
I
3 I
CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
: UPDATE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Ciry Charter, the City Manager is required to snbmit a Capital Lnprovements
Program (CIP)to the City Council. By agreement, this program is to be updated periodically to
reflect the completion of projects, the addition of new projects, and to update project costs for
financial projection and management effoits. This is the fifth CIP document, the original being
created in 1999 and updated in 2003, 2007, and 2009.
The intent of the updated program is to identify, describe, and prioritize the infrastructure
needs of the community as it gro�vs and evolves. This task inchides an effort to increase the
accuracy of the program's cost estimate for all prospective projects, but more specifically Fvithin
the initial five-year period. The overall goal of the CIP is to maintain the same high quality of
life for all citizens through the timely anticipation of the City's needs; planning of improvement
projects and determining funding sources as the community grows.
The program is also intended to depict financial challenges of the City's gro�vth and
maintenance of infrastructure that characterize the City's firture and the associated fimding
requirements to meet these objectives. The programming portion includes formulating
preliminary plans, projecting estimated project costs, setting priorities, identifying funding
sources, and scheduling the implementation ofthe plans.
2.0 THE IMPACT OF GROWTH
In the 2000 Census, the population of the City of Friendswood was listed as 29,037.
According to current staff estimates, the population has increased to 37,247 in just rivelve (12)
years. Indications are the City will likely reach its build-out population of 55,000 beriveen 2020
and 2030. Population growth continues to be a primary driving factor in the CIP process,
particularly as it relates to utilities.
During the 2003-OS period, capital project focus �vas primarily on drainage issues, �vith
the completion of four (4) projects which addressed eleven (11) of the hventy (20) identified
problem areas fi•om the 1993 Master Drainage Plan. Four (4) others are currently in various
stages of resolution. :Continued population growth and development pressures shifted the focus
for the 2005-06 period to improvements in utility infrastructure. In the 2009-2010 period there
were four(4)water and sewer projects in construction, as rivo (2) se�ver projects were completed
and one (1) facility was completed. Currently, there are five (5) water and se�ver projects in
wnstruction for the 2011-2012 period, three(3) street projects, and one(1)facility.
4
3.0 THE PLANNING EFFORT & EVOLUTION OF THE DOCUMENT
In Fiscal Year 1999, a Capital Improvements Program�vas presented to City Council that
described the infrastructure growth and maintenance needs of the City throi�gh a ten (10) year
period. This was the fiist time that such an extensive and comprehensive pian had been
developed. As was noted at that time, the City was facing its heaviest burden of maintaining
existing infrastructure, and planning for the construction of ne�v groivth-related infrastructure.
This remains true today.
In 2002, program categories were determined by the requirements set forth in several of
the City's planning documents, most notably the City's Comprehensive Plan and Vision 2020,
the City's Strategic Plan. During that same time, the City's CIP �vas centralized under the
Community Development and Public Warks Department. Under this centralization, projects
sponsored by individual departments were passed to the new Capital Projects Division for
incoxpoxation into the new plamiing document for eventual implementation. With the voter's
approval of the General Obligation Bond election in Februaiy 2003 the City embarked on the
2003-2008 five-year program guided by Council's rea£firmation of project priorities with
drainage issues topping the list
In implementing the initial projects from the 2003-08, Drainage Program, Staff
discovered that preliminary planning documents used to estimate both the scope of work and its
costs had not accurately anticipated physical and market conditions for some of the projects.
During design phase, engineering additions to the scope of work were required to provide for the
unanticipated impact on private properties surrounding a project. For example, if detailed
surveying done during the design phase of a drainage project revealed additional areas of
concern, the impact of the additional work to the overall scope of work and the affected areas
had to be addressed. All of the initial projects fell victim to unprecedented material and labor
cost increases experienced throughout the region as a result of market forces.
Staff responded to these issues with a procedure to prioritize the objectives within each
project and construct the infrastructure required to achieve those prioritized objectives first. This
approach has allo�ved each project to go forFVard and provide the central core improvement
sought, and to add as many additional secondary and tertiary objectives as approved funding ,
allo�ved. Thus far, this approach has proven a valid means for meeting the affected projecYs '
objectives while coping �vith rising costs and expanded scope; however, it falls short of the
intention of both City Council and Staff for the bond fimded projects. These conditions have
forced several changes in the process as well as the document.
3. 1 Project �nvironment: Development pressure continues to drive the schedule of many
projects and frequently impacts the scope as well. Opportunities to shape and influence private
development activities are considered in the planning and estimating phases of the effort. CIP
staff is involved in Development Reviews and frequently interface with developer plans at early
stages to coordinate efforts and reduce costs that might otherwise be borne solely by the City.
This effort helps stabilize and quantify the scope of the project at earlier stages providing
�
5
�
increased confidence in the cost estimates. Staff has successfully integrated developer provided
additions to the City's infrastructure to reduce the scope of City funded improvements.
3.2 Strategic Planning: Strategic planning is a part of the above processes and the
Preliminary Engineering Reports (PER) for projects. In instances where the scope of a PER can
reasonably be expanded to include a strategic examination of a system, or an area to provide
gnidance for specific planning and programming of recognized needs is being addressed with
budgetary constraints in perspective, staff will recommend expanding the scope. This small
effort assists in the development and refinement of,project scope, and helps to identify
opportunities to co-participate with private developeis to pirovide needed infrastructure at a lo�ver
or no cost to the City. This information is also fed back into the development review process to
assist planning staff in guiding developers as they assess their needs and requirements. The
combination of the Master Drainage Plan Phase II, the Pavement Management Master Plan, and
the Utility Master Plan has been an immense help in identifying the aging infrastructure and
receiving general pricing on construction.
3.3 Project Prioritization: The original CIP Manual, generated in 1999, consisted of forty
(40) General Government (GG) bond projects and hvelve (12) Revenue (Utility) bond projects.
All projects identified were drativn fi•om departmental needs assessments and the City's series of
Master Plans, (Vision 2020, Master Drainage Plan Phase I, Parks Master Plan, Streets Master
Plau, and the Ground Water Reduction Plan). Initially, these projects were ranked �vithin the
sponsoring depaitments and then Senior Staff ranked those lists to produce a final prioritization
of the projects. Much of the original prioritization remained with eight (8) of the original 2003
GO bond projects and seven (7} of the original Utility projects which have been completed, with
another two (2) pending bid and rivo (2) under construction. The 2006 Utility Bond identified
eight(8)projects, five(5)of�vhich have been completed and three (3)are under construction.
New projects entering the list are fed into this program structure and the final location among
other projects remains a product of departmental needs and "forces at work." Forces at�vork are
increased maintenance requirements and breakdown frequencies and developmental pressures.
A final factor influencing the ultimate location of a project in the program is the effort to balance
the number and dollar value of the projects within a manageable time frame for the sponsoring
department,
Drainage projects have been top priority since Tropical Storm Allison, and with the advent of
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Ike have brought these types of projects to the forefi•ont of all
capital. projects. In the past, and continuing on to this current ClP Manual, hindrances to
effective drainage have been established in the engineering criterion. First and foremost, the
Design Criteria for drainage in Friendswood accounts for a five (5) year event within the
roadside system, and with an overall development designed to account for a one hundred (100)
year event Although this is optimal for new construction, Friendswood has annexed areas that
have been sub-par in drainage standards. In efforts to prioritize area flooding, projects were
divided into three categories. Priority drainage projects address flooding where there is danger
or already have been flooding in or near homes. Secondary drainage projects address flooding
that denies access to areas but is not a threat to property. Tertiary drainage projects address areas
where the street floods, but no water ever goes over the curb; streets are designed to hold extra
capacity of storm water during extreme events. '
6 I
I
4.0 CHANGES TO THIS DOCUMENT
4.1 Like its predecessor from 2009, the 2012 to 2016 CIP incorporates significant changes.
Every effort has been made to make this the most useful planning tool available for Council and
Staff.' This update incorporates Water and Sewer bond projects, and General Government bond
projects.
4.2 Project Scope: This update includes a complete re-work of the Description/Justification
discussion for each project The accuracy of long-range estimates is directly proportional to the
completeness of the scope at the time the estimate is performed. An extensive effort to improve
scope definition for all projects has been made as a component of this update. The enhanced
leveG of project information directly improves the accuracy of the estimate and helps to guard
against "scope creep". This provides the sponsor department and the planner a better concept of
what the project�vilt and will not provide. For these reasons,the estimate will identify if a study
was available and, Fvhat level of study the estimate is based on. If easements are required for the
project, they are roughly quantified and a figure is included for their acquisition. Likewise,
survey and other professional services are considered specifically when estimating professional
service fees. For these reasons, there are likely to be several different percentage factoi•s used in
the estimate for this cost category. It is the intent of staff that when a project becomes part of the
five (5) year plan, a more definitive scope will be utilized by contracting Engineering a•
Architectural Services to provide a Preliminary Repo��t on the project that�vill include estimated
quantities, project, and engineering/architectural costs.
4.3 Organization: The document has been reorganized in an effort to improve user
friendliness. Previously, the contents were arranged only by their relative priority providing no
intuitive link to the location of the project description and estimate �vithin the General
Government Fund section, or the Water & Sewer Fund section. The revised document is ',
organized by fund type, either a General Government or Water & Sewer. The projects beyond �
the Five-Year Plan are also separated into these rivo categories and sorted by projected year of
the project. The Five Year planned projects have details, scope,justification, and locations for
them. The Beyond Five Year Projects also have these features, bttt to keep this manual to a
manageable size, only project name and a location map are included. As the Projects from the
Beyond Five Year Plan fall into the Five Year Plan, they will be added in full.
5.0 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS:
It should be noted that the staff has NOT INCLUDED the Issuance Costs to sell bonds
in the projectcost estimates contained�vithin this document. This document focuses specifically
on construction and engineering costsassociated with each project. While these costs will need
to be taken into account when presenting program information to the voters in the future, they I
are not considered pai�t of the construction and engineering costs. Actual and final bond sale
amounts may vary depending on the number of projects being funded and the timing of the cash
requirements;therefore it is impractical for the CIP to estimate bond issuance costs.
�
7
6.0 THE CHALLENGE AT A GLANCE
Due to increasing construction costs and an aggressive CIP, the greatest challenge to the
City is funding. The follo�ving tables present a summary for the plan (Cuirent Five-Year and
Five-Year Plus divided into project types):
CIP FY 2012 TO7'AL SPENDING
Table 2
- . Current Five Year Program . � . . - .
. . �� . 2012-2016 � . . � . . . . . . . . �
Drainage $ 5,462,000
Facilities $ 8,059,489
Parks $ _
.Streets . . . .. . .. . � $ . � . 22,038,215 . .
Sewer $ 4,091,000
\Vater $ 18,722,592
$ 58,373,296 '
� � . . . . �. Beyond Five Year Programx* .. � � � .� .. . � .
Drainage $ 6,303,000
Pacilities $ 6,593,000
� Parks � � � � '� � � � � � � � " $ � ����� 1,911,514
Streets $ 15,028,359
Sewer $ 18,248,000
Water $ 12,428,000
$ .60,511,873 "
* Figures rep�•esent total spending all sources for the time period for all planned projects -
#°Costs are estimated in 2012 Dollars.
7.0 A SUMMARY OF THE PROGRAM
An analysis of the preceding tables provides a number of quick observations that require
specific mention. Approximately forty-nine (49) percent or fifty-eight (58) million dollars, of
the one hundred nineteen (119) million dollars in total program requirements come in the first
five-years. Of that, sixty-one (61) percent (35.6 million dollars) is planned for improveinents to
General Government Projects. General Government Projects form the single largest spending
categary in the Five-Year Plan 2012-2016. The General Governments category includes
Drainage, Facilities, Parks, and Streets infrastructure replacement, and upgrades. The spending
8
requirements are based on needs to accommodate growth and maintain the current level of
services to neighborhoods where existing streets and drainage are aged and in need of
replacement. Utilities, especially water projects, are the second largest category.
In the Five-Year Plus Plan the emphasis stays on streets and water. The improvements
will be required to maintain the quality of city services as the City approaches build out.
Finally, the financial commitment to drainage has lowered to nine (9) percent of the total
fifty-eight (58) million dollars in spending coming in the Five-Year Plan. This level of
commitment has changed with the Master Drainage Plan Phase II and the addition of the
previous projects that have not been completed due to depletion of funding. These constitute the
Secondary and Tertiary Drainage Projects.
8.0 THE NEXT FIVE YEARS
The Five-Year Plan identified with this update clearly keeps emphasis to the General
Government category, especially street projects which are thirty-eight(38) percent of all projects
included within the five-year plan. As previously discussed, the driving force for spending on
streets is generated by growth and an aging utility infi•astructure. Long term emphasis has
shifted to the aging street nerivork as the Community Development and Public Works
Depaitment focuses on implementing the preventative maintenance programs (i.e.joint sealing,
concrete point repairs, etc.) to prolong the life of those streets. However, this will require a
consistent financial commitment in the operations budget in order to delay or pre-empt the need
for large scale replacement efforts latter. Staff currently believes this program has the ability to
postpone the total replacement of those streets for a number of years.
By quick obseiroation,the effort levels in the Five-Year Plan are as balanced as external
forces will allow. In addition, City Staff is involved in the accotmtability of identifying possible
needed easements and relocations of public utilities. City Staffrecommends that the processes
of easement acquisition and/or utility relocations begin rivo (2)years prior to the design of each
project.
�
I
,
,
g I
I
9.0 PROJECTS COMPLETED SINCE THE CIP INCEPTION
Citv of Friendswood
Table 3
Capital Improvement Program -COmpleted ProJectsStatistics
PROJECT TYPE #OF PRQIECTS
Drainage 6
Facility 8
Parks 4
Streets 9
Sewer 11
Water 17
General Governrtent Funds 27
Water&Sewer Funds 28 �
Total of All Capital krprovement Rojecis 55
Capital ImprovementsProgram -Completed Projectsto Date
DR.4INAGE PROJECTS
� -� �� PROJECTNAME �� � � -�'LOMPLEfm ��:
AnnaleaM/hitehaNKings Park LYainage Phase 1 :: 2004 .
qover Acres LYainage 2007
FM 5181kainage fhase 1 2010
(�enshannon Drainage Phase 1 2008
Sunmeadow [kainage Phase 1 2005 �
W.ShadowbendMloodlawn Draina`e Phase 1 2004
FACILITY PROJECTS
An'ur�l Control Faciliry. 2091
Fre Station#4 2008
� Library Land AcquisNon 2000 .
NLnicipal Cqurt R6novatio�s 20Q3
FUbGc Safety Bu�ding�.. 20q6
WbSc Works Addftiom:� 2001
PUbLC Works Security;Gate 2010
FUbic Works Vehqle Storage Building 2004 �
PARK PROJECTS
Centennial PdrkFhase f 2002
Centennial Park ffiase 2&3 20Q6
Eriendswood Sports Park 2000
,bgging Tra1 Stevenson Park 2002
��
i
STREET PROJECTS
Activ'Ay Building Paridng 2003
Aaan�onei ary Han�ara�y zoos
Friendswood link Road Extension : 2008
FUbBc Library Parkng S 2011
Sunnyview/Skyvtew ��:: 2091
Sunset DrivO 2003
Stadium Lane Parkng.: 2011
W.Shadowbend(Woodlawn 2004
Whitakef Orive 2004
SEWER PROJECTS
AuWrtn'.Q'eekSewer:Line 2000
Beart�riRoad Li(t Skation 2071
Beart�rRoadSewer �. 2011
Daepwood Force t�Aa�i 2009
Oeepwood l'rft Statbri 2009
E Neritage 8"Sanftary Sewer 2001
FriendswoodlinkMhiOtierOaksFMReplacert�nk'�� 2004
Longwood ParkSewer 2003 .
San Joaquin fstates Sewer 2003
South Frientlsw ood Force Nein 2009 .
Sun Meadow Lift SYation 2008 �
WATER PROJECTS
16"Trensmission Waker Line{Sunse[to VW?1#4) '; 2009 .
16"WaterUne(Melodyto Sonset) i 2009 ��,
24"Trunkline ��. , 2003 �'�
2�Surfaee UYater Take Point-Ehase 1 2003 I
2nd Sur{ace Water Take Wint Fhase 2 2003 .
2nd Surfac0 Water Take Fbint TankAddNOn 2003
Additional Water Purcbase ,2098
Bay Area BNd Water Line 2(107
Beart�r koad Wate[l�ne ?091
Blackhaw k t-TA 2351 VJakerl'Ne 7999
Biackhawk Water Line 2�08
Longwood Park Water Line 2004
Neighborhood VJater Line Replacerrents 2006
Water ffa�t#7 Rehab'�. 2002
Water flant#3 Rehab P� 2003
WaterPlant#4Rehab�: 2003 � . �
1MN�P Water Line Loo 8" 2006 �
�
11
�
I
a � � ' � ' ' � o ' � S
� o a o 0
� � o a � � �
� rl N N O (!j
V� V�N V�h VI VI N N N N 1n .
'O � V .. . .. .
. Ol N p � y N � j � W �
a+ C O fp � +' O LL . �
ll �' l� � T�i
'c 'c N c . 'c .
ti = C N w � v r w � �� � .
m m � � v �° w v n a m Z L° n .
n a a c a 2 a c c� N � a . .
� (�9 � � m° o E � � �m° °� y a4 � �
° v 'u� c � w c � o � .
� o � � a > y � a N !- � ..
H � y
❑ � V � Q
m v U a m y a �l d � .
�n in . � p � � . .-�.y . .
.. �� .N V � � .
' O ' �.O ' O� O� . . �Q O 1 . . �
� O O O O p1 . . � .
l�0 N O M N
. ro V�.. �V �.ti . . � � . �.N. . .
6
� Vf V�N N V!1/� N ✓f Vf .�N N V} • .
N
d
Y
L' � N} a Ny N} ?N N � }N N N � �
M Z LL Z�LL LL LL W Z ti � u�. Z .
D
N
� � °o N �o � S �o �o .�o °o a o �o
' � d ~ [{pV m o �$ o 0 0 �p �+�i p °p .
� . �� OJ N O l0 O N O N � M �N t0 . �
E n'I rl O N V rl N O . N.fh . � .
Yp
O
. . . � � H h V�V�t/� N N N N N ��A.Lf . �.
. �. . ..� . . .
d
C
d
�
C
O
N ? C M p t
O U'
N C � O C E
N U
N L O
� N N y� N
b A � d � a
� N N _ z E
E > � � � �
N Y W N 1 N
� �� y � C q � �p �p � �.
. . O._ N � � �' d 6 C
v m � t O ~ � � y . . .. . . .
. . ry C � d C U � � � 1 . . . . .
C V LL a N N � Y W V � . .
N N > >
. � � N � K � CO � U U •NO
W Y N
.—"� 3 v � a w '� t °"� rc ¢ 3 .
« � � � �n « ° c « Y � .
L pl i O O. C � VI � �N N fV
Y y ry
� N N N W ? � i O! � 0 �N
d S U "O 2' "O (7 LL � {'
' . � � p a �o o .0 3 m �a Qa a
� m > .LL a w � a m
Q m u :� � � Z d � � F.
12
GENEFAL
GOVEHNMENT
� � FUND PROJECTS .
�'^�\/�w��v�, �`�'l���, . � .
J
i ��
�`
. . . � ..G6 i7 . . . . . � .
. . ,2svj ��. . � .
�` }
� �„ � `S. J�.. ..
. G7� �— .�"/ . .
r �j
�
. .�. � . � `�l%' G2 . . ...
. . . ' :1� :. '�`'.
G12 � Git �� I � qi
:� � / $
. . � � nt,�...� ...�. _ � 1��` .
�� ?� ��
i
f � �
� � (
�/ ��_..��i
t
� �n� �` c.v..`v! � � �� � . .
. , n.^'� ' � �\I
j✓�...f. Q8 '� . � .
�
�.. j �-��"� 7 6 9 CN�Ce�teriMeatinBFaWty ' .
� � : G 7 h4udGUUjDetenliw�aM
Ji �� � �1 ��. COtIYeYanCe
t G 9 ParemenlhWnagembnt
Mastx Plan-Fulure Pha ses
/ GtU TDftqOiuste�Reqrrery -
�.�,....oY.,w .
/� ;,.�.r9��: . . GaMPtqect .
i
. . �NG Gene�atasl �
��-1____ r_ �.�
_ _ _ f. _ _�� ,� _1
__r�
`Y/ ` \` � t��
p.0
27ylxraex
r...�..:�� � ��, i
` �����«
wx.w ri ranfrmramv m..p�na�i+^me!� p nY.»�ne.K r� �^+a �..r �mwts..�v A+r a�. .uNwwV n c a)sr
krtnAlL Wf ++lTm .eiN�e+3"'oc�y#bvi+ti'+a+� JR5w0.TM W/nhW�MltYN��pa'J�iv(O�tlkl»£Y.+n'T. kri.srh.ryvn JCNeyuuMe.iftr'ifJel
M1wm; i art.ASioturfirrr<naaX�a,va[NaMa9HCw:aa.ti9ew�ey . ..
QltyWfdendswood��. � : , � .
°,0$e�"�'�, °"' ` Friendswood GIS Mapping
F�OHD1ISfA
.• � �ranaeMraeeercw
i`equa/s 5,000'.
�
13 II
I
�
GENERAL GOVERNMENT FUND PROJECTS
PROJECT NAME PAGE
G 1 AnnalealWhitehall Drainage Improvements Phase 2 15
G 2 Blackhawk, Wandering Trail, Oak Vista Paving 16
G 3 Civic CenterlMeeting Facility 17
G 4 Friendswood Link Road - Phase 2 �g
G 5 Library Expansion 19
G 6 Melody L.ane Street Reconstruction 20
G 7 Mud Gully Detention and Conveyance 21
G 8 New Fire Station 22
G 9 Pavement Management Master Plan- Future Phases 23
G 10 TDRA- Disaster Recovery Grant Project(NG Generators) '24
G 11 TDRA- Disaster Recovery Grant Project(Fire Station 3) 25
G 12 Tributary 2 - Cowards Creek Drainage Improvements 26
I
14 ;
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
AnnalealKingspark/Whitehail Drainage Community Development
Im rovements Phase 2
COUNCIL GOAL: #5 Improve Drainage
Planning Document: Master Drainage Plan Phase I
TYPE: Drainage YEAR PLANNED: N!A
SUBTYPE: Construction PROJECT NUMBER: N/A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Master Drainage Plan designated the AnnalealKingspark/Whitehall subdivision
as Problem Areas No.14, 19, and 20. Phase I was completed in mid-2005 with
the construction of the major improvements to the Whitehall Ditch Outfall. The
proposed improvements consist of the repiacing an 18-inch storm sewer
reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with approximately 340 feet of 30-inch storm
sewer RCP, replacing two B Inlets on Brandywyne across from Dover and
Stonehenge, and the installation of two'new storm sewer outfall structures in
addition to one manhole.
JUSTIFICATION:
The Annalea/Kingspark/Whitehell subdivision area has been a common flooding
problem area. Initial phase work enlarged both the main outfalis as a first step
towards addressing the flooding concern. Follow-up on the projects are aimed
primarily at replacing the undersized and inefficient systems to assist in reducing
street ponding and threats of structural flooding to a more proposed tolerabie
level.
Estimated Project Costs $862,000 '
I
15
I
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Blackhawk Blvd.,Wandering Trails, and Oak Vista Public Works
Street Rehabilitation
COUNCIL GOAL: #13 Improve Transportation
Planning Document: Major Thoroughfare Plan
TYPE: Thoroughfare YEAR PLANNED: 2013
SUBTYPE: Construction PROJECT NUMBER: N!A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Blackhawk Boulevard, Wandering Traiis, and Oak Vista Street have been
identified in the City's Pavement Management Master Plan as needing
replacement. The proposed improvements wiil consist of replacing the damaged
roadways and upgrading / improving the storm sewer systems and water /
sanitary sewer systems within the boundaries of these roadways. The limits of
each section inciude: (1) Blackhawk Blvd from Friendswood Link Rd to Thursa
Ln; (2) Wandering Trail from Geneva Dr#o Kingsmill Rd; and (3) Oak Vista from
Magnolia to Spreading Oaks.
JUSTIFICATION:
As identified in the Master Plan, replacing these roadways will help reduce on-
going reducing operation & maintenance costs for both the City and motorists.
FUNDING:
Funding has been allocated for this project from remaining, 2003 General
Obligation Bonds.
Estimated Project Costs 3,238,215
16
PROJECT NAME S onsor De artment
Civic Center Communit Services
COUNCIL GOAL• #9 Develop Civic Center
PLANNING DOCUMENT: Parks and Open Space Master Plan
TYPE: Facilities YEAR PLANNED: N/A
SUBTYPE: Construction PROJECT NUMBER: PK0200
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The 1993 Parks and Open Space Master Plan identified the need to provide a modern
state of the art faciiity to handle the recreation needs of a population of 55,000 citizens.
The preliminary scope cails for a site of 5 acres of land to support the building, exterior
operations; parking for.375 vehicles and required detention. The facility would be
hardened to meet Category 3 hurricane standards and would serve as a "Shelter of Last
Refuge° during emergency situations. The facility's preliminary space planning includes:
a 1500 square foot commercial kitchen, 2100 square feet of ineeting!conference rooms,
a 1500 square foot arts and crafts room and a 4500 square foot rental Banquet room.
The Community Services administrative offices would be relocated to a 1000 square feet
of this facility thaf would also include a 15,600 square foot gymnasium with shower/
restroom/ locker room facilities, and a 10,500 square foot theatre and/or auditorium.
Alternate amenities might also include possible racquetball and/or handball courts and an
outdoor plaza area for small community gatherings. With a tare factor of 30%, this facility
totals approximately 48,392 square feet. A more detailed scope is expected to be
identified during the preliminary study phase of the project. The scope outlined above
was based on currently identified needs of the Sponsor Department.,
In 2009, the City evaluated the possibility to renovating fhe current library into a
meeting/civic center type faci�ity. The assumption made at the time, a new library would
be constructed elsewhere and the scope of the new civic center would be reduced
significantly.
JUSTIFICATION:
The Parks and Open Space Plan identified the need for a Civic Center to meet the needs
of a diverse community of 55,000 citizens. The Civic Center will provide a public facility
where residents of all ages will be able to come together and socialize, recreate and '
participate in a wide variety of community events and activities. The facility shall be
constructed to meet Hurricane Standards and shall be able to accommodate up to 500
people during a disaster situation. Currently the City of Friendswood does not have a
single facility that will accommodate more than 200 i�dividuals for an extended period of
time. The commercial styie kitchen will be the home base for the city to distribute meals ;
and supplies during a disaster situation. The Community Services Administration offices '
would move to the new facility to provide expansion space for the City Managers o�ce
and for Administrative Services at City Hall.
I
i
Estimated Project Costs $1,OOQ000 I
17
�
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Friendswood Link Road Phase 2 Public Works
COUNCIL GOAL: #13 lmprove Transportation
Planning Document: Major Thoroughfare Plan
TYPE: Thoroughfare ` YEAR PLANNED: N/A
SUBTYPE: Construction PROJECT NUMBER: N!A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project is intended to expand Friendswood Link Blvd from Blackhawk Blvd to FM
518 to a four-lane curb and gutter section. A previous phase was recently completed as
EI Dorado Bivd by Harris County. In addition, the project inciudes the construction of an
underground storm sewer system and widening the existing bridge over Clear Creek '
JUSTIFICATION:
This project is a part of the short-range transportation plan for the region. Once the
Environmental Assessment/Preliminary Engineering is completed, the project will be
eligible for HGAC's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The project will provide
an additional north to south corridor through the City, which will assist in improving the
congestion along both F.M. 528 and 2351.
Estimated Project Costs $4,600,000 I�
18
I
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Libra Expanslon Library
COUNCIL GOAL: #6 Maintain High Level of Pubiic Service
Planning Document: Community Facilities Plan
TYPE: Facilities YEAR PLANNED: N/A
SUBTYPE: Construction PROJECT NUMBER: FL6001
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project provides for the construction of a new Library in order to meet the
growing needs of the community. The description is based on a March 2003
study. The proposed 26,000 square foot facility is sized to serve the community
up to and including build-out.
JUSTIFICATION:
The New Library is in accordance with the Houston Area Library System's
recommendations for facility requirements and is recommended by the
Friendswood Public Library Board.
;
�
Estimated Project Costs $2,000,000 '
19
�i
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Melod Lane-Street Communit Development
COUNCIL GOAL• Improve Transportation
Planning Document: Major Thoroughfare Plan
TYPE: Thoroughfare YEAR PLANNED: 2012
SUBTYPE: Construction PROJECT NUMBER: ST0203
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Currentiy, the roadway exists from F.M. 2351 to the City of Friendswood north
corporate limits, and is approximately 6,600 feet long. it exists as a 2-lane
asphalt road with an average width of 24 feet and large open ditches located on
each side of the right-of-way. The Major Thoroughfare Plan (MTP)for the City of
Friendswood identifies Melody Lane as a minor collector. The ultimate cross-
section proposed for this street is a 2-lane, undivided concrete roadway (28-feet
wide) with curb and gutter. The section of roadway betwreen F.M. 2351 and the
Woodland Park Drive is proposed as a 40-foot wide, three-lane concrete street
with a continuous left turn lane. The purpose of this wider section provided with
a turn lane is to accommodate the significant number of driveways along that
stretch of the roadway. In addition,where possible the open drainage ditches will
be re-constructed as an improved underground storm sewer system.
JUSTIFICATION:
In 2002, the City performed an inventory of existing asphalt roads throughout the
City in an effoR to determine which of these roads, based upon their age, existing
condition, traffic load volumes, and other factors; would warrant conversion to
concrete. Melody Lane, based upon these criteria as well as the additional
development along this corridor, became a prime candidate for the conversion
program. The conversion of this street to concrete will reduce the maintenance
costs, the scope of maintenance activity, and the frequency of maintenance on
this highly traveled Collector Street.
FUNDING:
The funding source for this project shall be from the 2008 Galveston County
Bond Election.
I
Estimated Project Costs $4,200,000 I'
�I20
i
I
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Mud Gull Detention and Conve ance Public Works
COUNCIL GOAL: #5 Improve Drainage
TYPE: Drainage YEAR PLANNED: 2015
SUBTYPE: Construction PROJECT NUMBER: NYA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The City of Friendswood, in participation with the Galveston County Consolidated
Drainage District, Harris County Flood Control District, Harris County, and
Galveston County will undertake the Mud Gully Detention and Channel
Improvements. This wiil inciude 120-Acre Detention Basin providing 1,550 acre-
feet of detention capacity and approximately 1 mile of conveyance
improvements.
JUSTIFICATION:
The above improvements would drop the surface elevation of Clear Creek and
the Mud Gully, and provide benefits to over 700 structures that are within the
100-year flood plain. This is a component of the Clear Creek Federal Flood
Control project which is being re-evaluated by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers.
FUNDING
Funding has been allocated from General Reserves.
I
�
�
� i
Friendswood Share of Project Costs $1,000 000 �I'
�
�
21 I
�
I
I
PROJECT NAME S onsor De artment
New Fire Station Fire De artment
COUNCIL GOAL: #6 Maintain High Level of Public Service
PLANNING DOCUMENT: Munson-Kennedy Study
TYPE: Facilities YEAR PLANNED: N!A
SUBTYPE: Maintenance PROJECT NUMBER: FFS001
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Programming for this project came out of the Fire Station #4 planning effort to
produce a design that was capabie of being reproduced at any location. The
new Fire Station would consist of a sub-station sized facility of approximately
6,650 square foot located on approximately 2 acres. The project contains about
2,025 square feet of living / administrative workspace, and approximately 4,625
square feet of apparatus and support space. The structure is planned as a pre-
engineered metal building frame and roof, designed to withstand wind-load
requirements of 120 mph. Site improvements include approximateiy 24 parking
spaces along the perimeters of the access and equipment driveways. The
apparatus bay portion of the station will contain two double-loaded equipment
bays, storage, and utility rooms. The interior will consist of a day room, dispatch
office, smail kitchen, locker room, and dorm room for three volunteers.
Provisions will be made to inciude emergency power for the station.
JUSTIFICATION:
The 2002 Munson-Kennedy study recommended improving Departmental
response times by constructing a fourth station in the northwestern portion of the
City currently served oniy by Station One. That fire station, Fire Station #4 has
been completed. It then stated that upon that completion, a fifth station would be
recommended to replace Fire Station#1.
Estimated ProJect Costs $2,500,000
22
PROJECT NAME S onsor De artment
Pavement Management Master Plan—Future Public Works
Phases
COUNCIL GOAL: #13 Improve Transportation
PLANNING DOCUMENT: Pavement Improvement Master Plan
TYPE: Street YEAR PLANNED: N/A
SUBTYPE: Construction PROJECT NUMBER: N/A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposed improvements include rehabilitation of twenty streets,
compromised of roughly 33,000 linear feet of new concrete paving and curbs.
Each of the roads identified throughout the City are at various stages in their life
cycle. Please note, the below estimate is simply for the next phase of roadway
improvements/reconstruction.
JUSTIFICATION:
In February of 2008, a consulting firm commissioned by the City compieted the
inventory and categorization of the roadways within Friendswood. Subsequently,
the Pavement Management Master Plan was presented to the City Council at
their March 3, 2008 meeting. ',
The Pavement Management Master Plan identified fiventy-five areas that are in
need of rehabilitation due to unacceptable conditions of the roadway. The
suggested projects are anticipated to be completed over the next five to ten
years.
Estimated Project Costs $10,OOQ000 '
I
23 II
�
I
I
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
TDRA—Disaster Recovery Grant Project Natural Public Works and
Gas Emergency Generators Fire Marshal's Office
COUNCIL GOAL: N/A
Planning Document: N(A
TYPE: Emergency Services YEAR PLANNED: 2012
SUBTYPE: Critical Facilities PROJECT NUMBER: N/A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposed improvements provide naturai gas generators to thirty plus utiliry
facilities (lift stations, water plants, etc.), and two fire stations.
JUSTIFICATION:
As a result of Hurricane Ike, the City pursued and obtained a Disaster Recovery
Grant from the Texas Department of Rural Affairs. The proposed improvements
provide much needed backup emergency power to a number of critical city
facilities.
FUNDING:
Funding has been allocated for this project from a 2009 TDRA Disaster Recover
Grant.
Estimated Project Costs $2,209,056
24
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
TDRA—Disaster Recovery Grant ProJect Fire Fire MarshaPs
Station#3 Office
COUNCIL GOAL: N/A
Pianning Document: N/A
TYPE: Emergency Services YEAR PLANNED: 2012
SUBTYPE: City Critical Facilities PROJECT NUMBER: NlA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
As a result of Hurricane Ike, Fire Station #3 sustained quite a bit of damage.
Utilizing a grant from the Texas Department of Rural Affairs, the City is
undertaking repair efforts to (1) replace the roof; (2) harden windows and doors;
(3) remediate mold; (4) replace sheet rock and flooring; (5) install a natural gas
generator; and (6) extend bay areas.
JUSTIFICATION:
As a result of Hurricane Ike, the City pursued and obtained a Disaster Recovery
Grant from the Texas Department of Rural Affairs. The proposed improvements
restore ail operational functions of the facility and provide much needed backup
emergency power.
FUNDING:
Funding has been allocated for this project from a 2009 TDRA Disaster Recover
Grant. Project costs exceeding $367K will be funded out of the General
Reserve.
i
Estimated Project Costs $350,433
I
25
,I
I
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Tributary 2—Cowards Creek Public Works
Conveyance Improvements
COUNCIL GOAL: #5 Improve Drainage
TYPE: Drainage � YEAR PLANNED: N/A
SUBTYPE Construction PROJECT NUMBER: NYA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The City of Friendswood, in participation with the Galveston County Consolidated
Drainage District will undertake the proposed Tributary 11 Channel Improvements.
This will include a combination of underground box culverts and surface swales
from FM 2351 to Cowards Creek.
JUSTIFICATION:
The above improvements will assist in improving drainage flows and capacities
within the surrounding areas.
PUNDING:
Funding will be sought through possibie grant opportunities.
Friendswood Share of Project Costs $3,600,000
26
n o 0 0
. �i °o8 gpry] °o . � . .
�. �. . . N O OJ M .. .
I� eI
� U f V� N N t R U!V I N N t?�
�
. . . . . n �n � v v -o a a . ,.. . .. . �
C CO C C
' . . m m m m m m m � � . .
Y
3 � 3 � 3 3 � 3 3 3
[L W N N N N N
3 3
� � o � 8 8 � � � m
o; d vq � oi ed !�
a �i �' m � L'ii io � . � . � .
N M (� �-1
6 N 41 N N N Y? N N Y?N
U
N
T .� .� .�-i .� .� .� .`�-� .� .� � .. .
d Ny �Ny Ny Nyy�N �N> N N? N N
4L LL LL LL LL LL LL � LL t�i. �
� �
o s $Q $ $ $ o S 8 S � �m
`w ~ Y �o $ � � m m w v�i �
3 - m t� m ,ti rci .-i
v
h
05
d �? t? V�vttR �/lNNV1N
�
3
a
�° c
c y
� E
c �m
a a
�
�
w c
E '� �
rv � �,
� N m c c � y y -
a w
- av. 3 v a E E a�i � w - � .
n �
c �
v c.an `u `-0 q � n a o.� .
n n y y y
� � 3 � 3 C K V N vl I�
3 F > � m m p
Y > N G G r N N N
3 � 3 '^ o o �} - - �.
q 0 � � �� � � 6 6 O.
-Y �' N Vf O v v d
� oo � x ;� 333
muu f5 :� v°�i �
I
2�
I
. . . . .. . . . . . � � ATERANDSEWER�. .
� FUND PR6JECTS
. . . �. �� � . .
.� t� .�,�/� � � .
/�^�����.��y/, � ~ '�`,{1� ��' . �.
/'�. - �t.. ..
.. /f� ,. .. . .
` '
r�� �y
s
. US ��`- "' `l,,K � `I✓ �� . .
✓��,
uto
. �Jfl � �'* .
... \ � . . .. � �.. .
— � ���� :��S+..r .�S �� w i� .� � �Pr
J
� i% ♦
�t ��
UB
F_- ! �.I . �� .
. ,� U� ...' .
r~ ',y
�
� � . �� ��J �`C y tlt.. T . �~ .
��f. ��
� �.,.-.r�N~ � �r^
/v .
. . . ..!`r . � .
/� ,. 7
� (�f
rj / ,�
� � ..� .... . ..
� � U2-COHRawWaterSy5iem8yydn
:�. , ���....+ U3•COH421nchWaterMaln
� � �7.��. � .. ft¢P•atEmznt ... ..
_�::___—'_.`—
. �.. U7 �. :. �_'_?.__—'�. . � � �
. _ '_� ,.— ri_—�J� . . \ ..._��'--� . .
R
. �����\ � �..
� �.� � � � 1�� �
. .� � . � )Pv4 .
. . . . . . �/AR�+Ji .
5V�K8
� . � . . . Sm'c�i
[n:sm«rer (qha4war a� Ivy. aee�n {ecE. t'q m:w-.aisF
WiHL1fRaI� au�weav NMWhexrv'e� ��I ti++TM�Y�It���¢f!-a�e.mwmbb�SmSe�Cr� kf aki'X,�w*MS.mxyuNdrenlPf�?1x
WYNM'W IWadi`J�F1Yb°Y�Ck'.✓NGMNbN.9 NOJAPOSO:an*JW W iML.b. ',
CHYWFAendawuPd� .�: .. .:: . .: �� �'.
"05° '�"'�'°"°a"° Friends�tuood GIS Mapping I
frandsnwtl.iam i�6{6
Rapa>aaav �
. � m.xaaK�mROOeem . � 1'equats6,000':
�
I
2g
,
��I
WATER AND SEWER FUND PROJECTS
PROJECT NAME PAGE '
U 1 Blackhawk Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 30
U 2 COH Forty-Two Inch Water Main Replacement 31
U 3 COH Raw Water System Buy-In 32
U 4 East FM 528 Water Line 33
U 5 l.ift Station#3 Replacement 34
U 6 Lift Station#6 Replacement 35
U 7 Second EST Rehabilitation 36
U 8 Water Plant#2 Replacement 37
U 9 Water Piant#5 Replacement 38
U 10 Water Plant#7 Replacement 39
i
�
�
�
�
29 I
I
�
PROJECT NAME S onsor De artment
Blackhawk Treatment Plant Rehab Public Works
COUNCIL GOALS: #2 improve Infrastructure
PLANNWG DOCUMENT: Waste Water Flow Study
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2013
SUBTYPE: Wastewater Treatment Improvements PROJECT NUMBER: NYA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project consists of the rehabilitation of (1) the head works structure; (2)
mechanical bar screens; (3) aeration blowers, piping and valves, (4) fine bubble
diffusers; (5) media filters; and (6) UV disinfectant system.
JUSTIFICATION: .
The Blackhawk Wastewater Treatment Facility is a facility owned and operated
by the Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority. In 2010, the GCWDA
commissioned an assessment of the facility and identified areas needing repair.
Friendswood is the majority capacity owner within the plant.
Estimated Project Costs $3,000,000
30
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
COH 421nch Water Main Re lacement Public Works
COUNCIL GOAL: #2 Improve Infrastructure
Planning Document: None
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2015
SUBTYPE: Water Distribution Improvements PROJECTNUMBER: NYA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a co-participation project with the City of Houston and other participants in
the upgrade of the main north 1 south surface water transmission pipeline from
the Southeast Water Purification Plant along State Highway 3. Texas
Department of Transportation plans to widen State Highway 3 and it will be
necessary to remove the existing pipeline from the State right-of-way in
preparation for that project. This presents an opportunity to up-size this
transmission line when it is removed from the easement. The removal /
construction project will be managed by the City of Houston and ParticipanYs
cost share wiil be based on a pro-rata use according to their distribution
allocation. Friendswood's distribution allocation from this line is balanced by its
distribution allocation from the 36-inch line on Beamer. Replacement and
movement of the 42-inch line to a location outside of the Highway 3 ROW is
planned for completion by 2015 in order for TxDOT's project to proceed on
schedule.
JUSTIFICATION:
The City of Friendswood is a participant in the operation and maintenance of the
42 inch Water Line. That pro-rata participation is reduced by its participation in
the Beamer Road 36 inch transmission line. The City is dependent on these as
the source of surface water required to meet the Ground Water Reduction Plan
as established in 2001, and to meet growing population requirements through
build-out.
I
i
I
Estimated Project Costs $7,000,000 '
31
I
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
COH Raw Water System Buy-In Public Works
COUNCIL GOAL: #2 Improve Infrastructure
Planning Document: Ground Water Reduction Plan
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2012
SUBTYPE: Purchase PROJECT NUMBER: UW0501
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a purchase of raw water capacity from the City of Houston through their
centralization of the Raw Water feed system to the Southeast Water Purification
Plant. The City of Houston has for years operated and maintained their raw
water collection and distribution system used for providing the water supply to
treatment facilities individuaily. A decision was taken recently to share the costs
of operations, maintenance, and improvements out among the municipal
customer-participants currently acting as co-owners in the treatment and
transmission facilities. In order for Houston to continue supplying raw water in
future and prevent the sole burden of the cost being shared only by Houston all
future co-participants desire more capacity are to share the cost. In order to do
this fairly, all raw water supplies are group to create a raw water system with a
240 MGD capacity.
JUSTIFICATION:
This is a component of the Surface Water suppiy-treatment and distribution
system that the City has bought into as an outgrowth of the 2001 Ground Water
Reduction Plan. The City of Houston is sharing out the cost of this system with
its co-participants.
I
�I
Estimated Project Costs $3,500,000 I
32 �
�
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
East FM 528 Waterline Public Works
COUNCIL GOAL: #2 Improve Infrastructure
Planning Document: None
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2015
SUBTYPE: Water Distribution Improvements PROJECT NUMBER: NYA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project consists of the installation of 2,850 linear feet of fourteen-inch
waterline that would extend water service to the East Service Area, and then loop
the line back into the existing system by installing 6,600 linear feet of twelve-inch
wateriine down to Bay Area Boulevard.
JUSTIFICATION:
The Water Distribution System is stretched thin when it gets beyond Bay Area
Boulevard, south of FM 528. There are also not enough loops back to sustain
pressure in this area. This wiil give potable water to the eastern most area of the
City and loop the FM 528Jine to the Bay Area Boulevard line.
i
I
Estimated ProjeCt Costs $1,828,000 '
33 ',
�
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Lift Station#3 Re lacement Public Works
COUNGL GOAL• #2 Improve infrastructure
Planning Document: Utility Master Plan
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2013
SUBTYPE: Lift Station Improvements PROJECT NUMBER: N/A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project would replace the existing lift station that serves the Annalea-
Kingspark-Whitehali area. A new wet well would be poured, new pumps and
controis for the lift station wouid be installed and new fencing will be erected.
JUSTIFICATION:
The existing lift station at Annalea/Kingspark/Whitehall has reached the end of its
useful life span and is in need of repiacement. Current estimates indicate that
this system will be severely taxed and incapable of handling even normal
combined flows in the next few years.
Estimated Project Costs $735,000
34 ',
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Lift Station#6 Re lacement Public Works
COUNCIL GOAL: #2 Improve Infrastructure
Planning Document: Utility Master Plan
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2013
SUBTYPE: Lift Station improvements PROJECT NUMBER: .NIA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project would replace the existing lift station that serves the Regency
Estates area. A new wet well would be poured, new pumps and controls for the
lift station wouid be installed, and new fencing erected.
JUSTIFICATION:
The existing lift station at Regency Estates has reached the end of its usefui life
span and is in need of replacement. Current estimates indicate that this system
will be severely taxed and incapable of handling even normal combined flows in
the next few years.
�
I
I
Estimated Project Costs $356,000 I
�
35 I,I
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Second Elevated Water Storage Tank Public Works
Rehabilitation
COUNCIL GOAL: #2 Improve Infrastructure
PLANNING DOCUMENT: None
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2014
SUBTYPE: Water Plant improvements PROJECT NUMBER: NYA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The rehabilitation of the existing elevated storage tank will include the sand
biasting and painting of the storage tank and some minor repairs to pumping
equipment.
JUSTIFICATION:
A preventive maintenance program would prolong the life of the facilities. The
ground storage needs to be painted every 10 to 12 years to ensure its integrity
and usefulness.
Estimated Project Costs $372,000 '
36
�
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Water Plant Number Two Replacement Public Works
COUNGL GOAL• #2 Improve Infrastructure
Planning Document: None
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2013
SUBTYPE: Water Distribution Improvements PROJECT NUMBER: UW0017
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The replacement of Plant #2 wiil include the replacement of control room,
chemical room, conversion of pumps and the probable replacement of the
ground storage tank as necessary. Replacement of ail valves and piping as
necessary. The existing cyclone fence will be replaced with an 8 foot cedar
woodfence.
JUSTIPICATION:
This well site is in need of a new control room. The existing controls are located
outside and are showing the effects of that environment. The tank is 41 years
old and made from galvanized steel with a capacity of oniy 210,000 gailons and
is in need of total replacement. The vertical turbine pumps will be replaced with
horizontal units to provide more efficient operation.
I
Estimated Project Costs $879,000
i
37
III
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Water Plant Number Five Repiacement Pubiic Works
COUNCIL GOAL: #2 Improve Infrastructure
Planning Document: None
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2012
SUBTYPE: Water Distribution Improvements PROJECT NUMBER: UW0018
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This rehabilitation will include the replacement of the control room, chemical
room, pumps, ground storage tank, and the elevated storage tank. Additionally,
the project scope wiil include the replacing of all valves and piping as necessary.
The existing cycione fence wiil be replaced with 8 feet cedar wood. The existing
ground storage tank is made of steel with a capacity of 210,000 gallons. The
ground storage tank wili be replaced with a 500,000-gallon capacity unit. The
control room is in need of modification to eliminate water damage due to rainfall
intrusion.
JUSTIFICATION:
This site contains a one million gailon elevated storage tank. The existing
ground storage tank leaks from the bottom plates and requires extensive repairs.
The ground storage tank is 32 years old and is in need of replacement. The
existing control room facility is extremely small and floods easily. The existing
controls are aging to the point of needing total replacement. Correcting this will
require modification of this buiiding and the surrounding area. The vertical
turbine pumps are also in need of replacement with horizontal units to improve
operation efficiency.
FUNDING
Funding has been allocated for this project from 2009 Revenue Bonds.
�
Estimated Project Costs $3,518,292 I
I
38 �
PROJECT NAME SPONSOR DEPARTMENT
Water Plant Number Seven Repiacement Pubiic Works
COUNCIL GOAL #2 Improve Infrastructure
Planning Document: None
TYPE: Utility YEAR PLANNED: 2013
SUBTYPE: Water Distribution Improvements PROJECT NUMBER: UW0026
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project wili inciude the replacement of the control room; chemicai room,
pumps, and ground storage tank. Replace all vaives and piping as necessary.
The existing cyclone fence wiil be replaced with 8 feet cedar wood. The existing
tank is made of galvanized steel with a capacity of 210,000 galions and should
be replaced with a 500,000 gallon unit.:
JUSTIFICATION:
This well site is in need of a new control room. The existing room is too smail for
safety when performing electrical repair work and no longer meets NEC Codes.
The existing switchgear is at the end of its usable life. The room also fioods
when there is any rainfali. A new control room/chemical room will eliminate this
situation. The repiacement of the existing vertical turbine pumps with horizontal
units would provide a more e�cient operation. The ground storage tank should
be replaced as necessary with haif million gallon ground storage as dictated by
the last ground storage tank inspection. At this time the replacement of all
needed piping and accessories should be done. The existing automatic transfer
switch at the site was hit by lightening and partially destroyed. A new switch
would enable this site to automaticaily transfer power when needed.
Reconditioning the existing generator set, including increasing the diesel tank
capacity, would make this emergency power system more reliable. •
I
Estimated Project Costs $1,625,300 '
I
39 �
�I
I
Generel Government Projects-Beyond Five Year CIP �
Table 6
�"�``��'-�r —
Brittany Bay Blvd-Phase 1(East of FM 528) $ 6,203,1�
Brittany Bay Blvd-Phase 2(West of FM 528) $ 8,260,259
Fire Dept.Training Field Upgrades $ 784,000
FM518Drainagelmprovements-Phase2 $ 2,747,0�
Lake Priendswood $ 611,514
Park Improvements(Imperial Estates,Old City Park,New Land,etc.) $ 1,300,000
Parks Maintenance Building-Both Phases $ 1,000,0�
PublicSafetyBUildingPhase2 $ 2,982,W0
Public Works Building Renovation $ 1,362,000
Records Retention $ 465,000
Sanloaquin Pkwy Reconstruction $ 565,000
Shadowbend Drainage Improvements-Phase 2 $ 416,000
Sunmeadow Drainage Improvements-Phase 2 $ 3,140,000
Water&Sewee ProJects-Beyond Five Year CIP �
Table 7
AutomatedMeterReadingSystem $ 3,000,0�
Beamer Road Sanitary Sewer-Future Phases $ 3,049,0�
BeamerROadWaterline-FUturePhases $ 1,483,000
BlackhawkWastewaterTreatmentPlantExpansion $ 8,395,�
ElDOrado-LUndyLaneSanitarySewer $ 2,837,000
FM528-FalconRidgetoWindsongSanitarySewer $ 706,000
FM528-LundyLanetoTowerEstatesSanitarySewer $ 1,109,�0
SanJoaquin Estates Waterline Replacement $ 1,423,000
SCADASystemUpgrade $ 200,000
South Friendswood Service Area Water Loop $ 715,000
Surface Water Plant 1 Rehab $ 299,000
Water Distribution Replacement and Upgrades $ 5,000,0�
WaterPlant3Rehab $ 154,W0
WaterPlant4Rehab $ 154,000
WindsongSanitarySewer $ 2,152,000
I
I
40 ,
I